← Back to scans

Will any member of the Cabinet (defined as: the Vice President, Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Defense, Attorney General, Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of Commerce, Secretary of Labor, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Secretary of Transportation, Secretary of Energy, Secretary of Education, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of Homeland Security, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, Director of National Intelligence, Trade Representative, Administrator of the Small Business Administration, White House Chief of Staff) be impeached before Jul 1, 2026? — Before July 2026

KXIMPEACHCABINET-26JUL01 · Politics · 2026-05-15
2%
Agent
1%
Market Price
+0.3%
Edge
90%
Confidence
Volume: 83,577
Spread: 0.3c
Days to resolution: 47
Markets in event: 4
Final Rationale
My independent estimate of 2.2% rested on the binding constraint that a GOP-controlled House will not impeach a Trump cabinet member in the ~47 days remaining, despite articles being introduced against Hegseth (April 2026) and Noem (January 2026) by Democrats as explicit midterm messaging with no committee action. I partially accept the Devil's Advocate's challenge that the conjunction of a privileged resolution + ~4 GOP defections + floor scheduling in 47 days likely yields <2%, adjusting down to 1.5%. The market at 1.2% is essentially aligned with my view, and the small remaining gap reflects residual tail risk from the live articles already filed — a non-trivial but very unlikely activation pathway that I weight slightly higher than the market.
Price vs. prediction
How the market moved after the agent's call. Solid blue line is the actual market price; dashed line is the agent's static forecast at $t{=}0$.
$n = 58$ follow-ups
Re-scan Context
This market has been scanned before. Previous predictions:
DatePredictedMarket PriceConfidence
2026-04-12 2% 6% 90%
1. Planner Opus · Fermi decomposition + tool plan
Tools chosen: kalshi_data article_search web_search wikipedia_lookup congress_bills
Sub-questions (Fermi decomposition)
  1. Is there currently an active impeachment inquiry or resolution against any cabinet member in the House of Representatives? (w=0.50)
  2. Has the House historically impeached a cabinet member within the last 150 years (making it a plausible precedent)? (w=0.20)
  3. Given Republican control of the House, will partisan dynamics allow a cabinet impeachment to succeed before July 1, 2026? (w=0.30)
Planner reasoning
This question asks whether a cabinet-level official will be impeached (by House vote) within 47 days. Key considerations: 1. **Historical base rate**: Cabinet impeachments are extraordinarily rare. Only one cabinet member (Secretary of War William Belknap in 1876) has ever been impeached. This gives a near-zero base rate. 2. **Current political dynamics**: With Republicans controlling both the House and the Presidency (Trump's second term), there is almost no partisan incentive for the majority to impeach their own cabinet members. Democratic minorities cannot force impeachment votes. 3. **Temporal analysis**: For YES to occur before July 1, 2026 (47 days away), the House would need to: (a) have an active impeachment inquiry already underway or rapidly introduce articles, (b) pass through committee, and (c) hold a full floor vote — all within ~6-7 weeks. Even if articles were introduced today, moving from introduction to full House vote in 47 days is procedurally challenging. 4. **What to look for**: Any introduced impeachment articles (H.Res.) against named cabinet officials in the 119th Congress. If no articles are currently pending, the probability is extremely low given the time constraint. 5. **Reference class**: In 2023, the House impeached DHS Secretary Mayorkas — a rare modern precedent showing cabinet impeachment is possible in the modern era. However, that was the minority party (Republicans) targeting a Democratic administration's official. The current setup reverses the partisan alignment, making this even less likely.
2. Research Parallel tool calls · legacy v2
ToolStatusTimeItemsSummary
kalshi_data OK 1.8s -
article_search OK 0.8s -
web_search OK 49.8s -
wikipedia_lookup OK 1.2s -
congress_bills OK 0.7s -
3. Evidence Synthesis Sonnet · 13 items · legacy v2
#StrengthCredibilityDirectionSourceClaimPriced In
1 STRONG 88 ↑ UP article_search House Democrats formally introduced six articles of impeachment against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on April 15, 2026, led by Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.), citing unauthorized war against Iran, war crimes, and mishandling of classified information. Yes
2 STRONG 85 ↓ DOWN article_search The April 15 impeachment articles against Hegseth 'almost certainly won't go anywhere in the House this year, since Republicans have a narrow majority,' per reporting at the time of introduction. Yes
3 MODERATE 72 ↓ DOWN web_search Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) had previously introduced impeachment articles against Hegseth but did not force a vote; the Ansari resolution is a continuation of minority-party pressure tactics. Yes
4 MODERATE 75 NEUTRAL web_search Democrats also introduced impeachment articles against former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem in January 2026 following an ICE shooting, but Noem has since been fired and replaced, making those articles moot. Yes
5 WEAK 40 ↓ DOWN congress_bills The congress_bills search returned no impeachment resolutions (H.Res.) specifically for cabinet members in the dataset provided, suggesting no active committee-level impeachment proceedings have advanced. No
6 STRONG 95 NEUTRAL wikipedia_lookup William Belknap (Secretary of War) was impeached by the House on March 2, 1876, making him the only cabinet secretary ever impeached in U.S. history — a 150-year-old precedent showing it is constitutionally possible but historically unique. Yes
7 MODERATE 80 ↑ UP article_search The House impeached DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas in February 2024 (119th Congress precedent referenced in Article 7), demonstrating that modern cabinet impeachments by the minority-turned-majority are possible, though that required months of procedural maneuvering. Yes
8 STRONG 90 ↓ DOWN article_search Republicans hold a narrow House majority (described as 'one vote to lose'), meaning Democrats — who introduced the Hegseth articles — are in the minority and cannot force a floor vote without GOP cooperation. Yes
9 STRONG 82 ↓ DOWN article_search There is no reporting of any Republican House member supporting or signaling intent to support impeachment of Hegseth or any other Trump cabinet member, eliminating any realistic path to the majority needed. Yes
10 STRONG 85 ↓ DOWN article_search Democrats explicitly acknowledge their impeachment push is a messaging effort aimed at the 2026 midterms, not a near-term legislative strategy, with sponsors suggesting renewal only 'if the party takes control of the chamber.' Yes
11 STRONG 78 ↓ DOWN kalshi_data Kalshi market for cabinet impeachment before July 2026 is priced at 1.20%, down 5.50% over 30 days and 0.90% over 7 days, with moderate trading volume (625 contracts/day average). Yes
12 MODERATE 70 ↓ DOWN article_search Article 7 notes Republicans struggled to maintain discipline even for their own majority priorities — illustrating that even if some Republicans defected to support impeachment, the procedural and political bar remains extremely high. Yes
13 MODERATE 72 ↓ DOWN article_search Democrats are 'treading cautiously' on broader impeachment strategies due to political risk calculations, further reducing urgency to force a doomed cabinet impeachment vote. Yes
Information Gaps
  • No data on whether any Republican House member has privately expressed support for impeaching Hegseth or any other cabinet official — a critical precondition for a floor vote to succeed.
  • No information on whether House Democratic leadership (Hakeem Jeffries et al.) have endorsed the Hegseth impeachment resolution or plan to force a privileged resolution vote on the floor.
  • No clarity on current House floor schedule for May-June 2026 that might create or block procedural opportunities for a privileged impeachment resolution.
  • No data on the specific text or H.Res. number for the Ansari impeachment resolution in the congressional record, which would help confirm its formal status.
  • No evidence of committee referral or any committee hearing on the Hegseth impeachment articles post-introduction.
Key Uncertainties
  • Whether House Democrats attempt to force a floor vote via a privileged resolution (as was done with Mayorkas), which would bypass committee and force a vote within 2 legislative days — the one procedural path that could theoretically succeed even with minority status (though it would still fail without GOP votes).
  • Whether any unexpected scandal or revelation about a cabinet member causes even a small number of Republicans to break ranks and support impeachment, which would be necessary for passage.
  • Whether the Iran conflict escalates further and creates a political environment where moderate Republicans feel pressure to act against Hegseth specifically.
  • Whether any cabinet member resigns or is fired before July 1, 2026, rendering the question moot for that individual.
Market Context
Price: 0.012 · 7d: -0.009 · 30d: -0.055
Volume: MODERATE · Depth: UNKNOWN
Reliability: MEDIUM — moderate volume (625 contracts/day), but price range has been wide (1.2%-12%), suggesting prior uncertainty that has now collapsed. Strong downward trend indicates market has priced in the near-impossibility of the event before July 1, 2026.
4. Independent Forecaster Opus · No market price · legacy v2 Did NOT see market price
Independent estimate: 2% (91% confidence)
base rate
2%
90% conf
evidence driven
2%
92% conf
contrarian
2%
92% conf
Spread
0pp
Low disagreement
sq1: Is there currently an active impeachment inquiry or resolution against any cabinet member?
95%
Articles were formally introduced against Hegseth on April 15, 2026 by Rep. Ansari, and earlier by Rep. Thanedar. Articles also introduced against Noem in January 2026. 'Active resolution' clearly exists; however these are minority-party resolutions with no committee action. Estimate 95%.
sq2: Has House historically impeached a cabinet member in last 150 years?
99%
Belknap (1876) and Mayorkas (2024) both occurred. Factually yes.
sq3: Will partisan dynamics allow cabinet impeachment to succeed before July 1, 2026?
2%
Republicans hold the House majority with no signal any Republican supports impeaching a Trump cabinet member. Democrats explicitly frame this as a 2026 midterm messaging effort, not a near-term strategy. Even a privileged resolution would fail without GOP votes. Base rate of majority-party impeaching own cabinet: essentially zero in US history. ~2%.
Show full reasoning trace
base rate: Cabinet impeachments by a House controlled by the President's own party: 0 in US history. Only 2 cabinet impeachments ever (Belknap 1876, Mayorkas 2024), both by opposition-controlled Houses. Base rate for this specific scenario in any 47-day window: <1%.
evidence updates: Existence of introduced articles against Hegseth (and previously Noem) pushes UP slightly (~+1%) by showing the mechanism is engaged. However, explicit acknowledgment by sponsors that this is messaging for midterms, narrow GOP majority with no defectors signaled, and no committee action all push back DOWN. Net: stays near base rate of ~2%.
combination method: Despite weighted_average instruction, sq1 and sq2 are necessary preconditions already met; sq3 is the binding sufficient condition. The realistic probability ≈ sq3 estimate.
final: With a Republican House majority unwilling to impeach Trump's cabinet, Democratic articles being explicit midterm messaging, no committee action, and only ~6 weeks remaining, the probability is approximately 2%.
ensemble: {'ensemble_count': 3, 'perspectives': {'base_rate': {'p_yes': 0.02, 'confidence': 0.9}, 'evidence_driven': {'p_yes': 0.02, 'confidence': 0.92}, 'contrarian': {'p_yes': 0.025, 'confidence': 0.92}}, 'spread': 0.005, 'individual_p_yes': {'base_rate': 0.02, 'evidence_driven': 0.02, 'contrarian': 0.025}}
5. Devil's Advocate Sonnet · legacy v2 Market price revealed
Challenges
  1. The forecast at 2.2% is already very close to the market at 1.2%, and the reasoning is sound: GOP-controlled House will not impeach a Trump cabinet member, Democratic articles are explicit messaging, no committee action, only 47 days remain. The minor 1pp divergence is well within reasonable bounds.
  2. Minor consideration: sq3 at 2% may slightly overweight the probability given that for impeachment to succeed in 47 days would require (a) a privileged resolution forcing a floor vote, (b) ~4+ Republican defections, and (c) successful scheduling — the joint probability is arguably <1%, closer to market price. However, this is not a major reasoning flaw.
  3. The combination method correctly notes that sq1 and sq2 are preconditions already met, so the binding constraint is sq3. This is mathematically appropriate.
Suggested adjustment: -1pp
Very minor downward adjustment possible because the conjunction of requirements (privileged resolution + GOP defections + floor scheduling in 47 days) likely yields <1% rather than 2%. But the forecast is already well-reasoned and the divergence from market is small enough that no major adjustment is warranted.
Market comparison: Forecaster: 2.2%, Market: 1.2%. The 1pp divergence is small and the forecaster's reasoning is sound. Market trend (-5.5% over 30d) confirms structural near-impossibility. The forecast is essentially aligned with market consensus, with the forecaster slightly more cautious — a defensible position given residual tail risk.
6. Aggregator Opus · final calibrated forecast
2% (90% confidence)
My independent estimate of 2.2% rested on the binding constraint that a GOP-controlled House will not impeach a Trump cabinet member in the ~47 days remaining, despite articles being introduced against Hegseth (April 2026) and Noem (January 2026) by Democrats as explicit midterm messaging with no committee action. I partially accept the Devil's Advocate's challenge that the conjunction of a privileged resolution + ~4 GOP defections + floor scheduling in 47 days likely yields <2%, adjusting down to 1.5%. The market at 1.2% is essentially aligned with my view, and the small remaining gap reflects residual tail risk from the live articles already filed — a non-trivial but very unlikely activation pathway that I weight slightly higher than the market.