Scan: Who will be Trump's next Attorney General?

← Back to scans

Who will be Trump's next Attorney General? — Todd Blanche

KXNEXTAG-29-TBLA · Politics · 2026-05-14

53%

Agent

54%

Market Price

-1.0%

Edge

45%

Confidence

Volume: 1,334,488

Spread: 1.0c

Days to resolution: 982

Markets in event: 22

Final Rationale

Blanche is already acting AG with uniquely strong Trump ties as his former personal defense attorney, making him the clear front-runner to be the first new confirmed AG after Bondi's April 2026 firing. I PARTIALLY ACCEPT Challenge 1 on resolution ambiguity — if acting status counts, the probability is much higher, so a weighted interpretation justifies moving up; I ACCEPT Challenge 2's point about asymmetric use of market signals (the 30-day +30 trend reflects his elevation and shouldn't be ignored); I REJECT Challenge 4 since 'first new AG' locks resolution at confirmation. Given the high-liquidity market at 54% with deep orderbook depth and these accepted critiques, I converge toward the market while retaining modest discount for genuine Zeldin-alternative risk and the Bondi-style firing precedent showing Trump's willingness to churn through AGs.

Price vs. prediction

How the market moved after the agent's call. Solid blue line is the actual market price; dashed line is the agent's static forecast at $t{=}0$.

$n = 58$ follow-ups

Re-scan Context

This market has been scanned before. Previous predictions:

Date	Predicted	Market Price	Confidence
2026-05-07	66%	66%	50%
2026-04-05	22%	17%	52%

1. Planner Opus · Fermi decomposition + tool plan

Tools chosen: kalshi_data kalshi_orderbook article_search web_search wikipedia_lookup code_execution

Sub-questions (Fermi decomposition)

Will Pam Bondi leave or be removed as Attorney General before Jan 20, 2029? (w=0.35)
If there is a new Attorney General before Jan 20, 2029, will Todd Blanche be nominated and confirmed as the replacement? (w=0.40)
Is Todd Blanche currently in a position (e.g., Deputy AG or senior DOJ role) that makes him the most likely successor to the AG role? (w=0.25)

Planner reasoning

This question asks whether Todd Blanche will be the *first new* person to serve as AG in Trump's second term before Jan 20, 2029. Currently (May 2026), Pam Bondi is AG. For YES to resolve: (1) Bondi must leave/be removed, AND (2) Blanche must be the one confirmed/appointed as the next AG — not some other person. Key causal mechanisms: - Trump's history: In his first term, he fired Sessions and Barr resigned, showing high AG turnover. This raises P(AG departure) in second term. - Todd Blanche's position: Blanche was Trump's personal defense attorney in his criminal cases and was reportedly considered for Deputy AG. If he's in a senior DOJ role, he's a logical successor. - The question is specifically about Blanche being FIRST new AG — if someone else (e.g., an interim) serves first, it fails even if Blanche later becomes AG. - Timeline: ~33 months remain. There's meaningful probability of AG turnover (perhaps 30-45% given Trump's history), but Blanche must specifically be the next person, competing with other candidates. Reference class: In Trump's first term, 2 AGs served (Sessions, Barr) plus an acting AG (Whitaker). The 'next AG' market likely has multiple candidates (Kash Patel, others). Blanche's probability depends on his current role and Trump's relationship with him. Temporal analysis: For YES by Jan 2029, Bondi would likely need to depart in 2026-2028, giving time for Senate confirmation. The longer Bondi stays, the narrower the window. If Blanche is already Deputy AG, he'd be positioned as a natural successor.

2. Research Parallel tool calls · legacy v2

Tool	Status	Time	Items
kalshi_data	OK	2.1s	-
kalshi_orderbook	OK	0.1s	-
article_search	OK	0.7s	-
web_search	OK	49.9s	-
wikipedia_lookup	OK	1.8s	-
code_execution	OK	0.0s	-

3. Evidence Synthesis Sonnet · 17 items · legacy v2

#	Strength	Credibility	Direction	Source	Claim	Priced In
1	STRONG	98	↑ UP	article_search + web_search	Pam Bondi was fired as Attorney General on April 2, 2026, after a 14-month tenure — so sq1 is already resolved YES. Bondi has departed.	Yes
2	STRONG	92	↑ UP	wikipedia_lookup	Wikipedia confirms Pam Bondi served as the 87th U.S. Attorney General 'from 2025 to 2026,' confirming her departure is a concluded fact.	Yes
3	STRONG	90	↑ UP	article_search	Trump fired Bondi over frustration with her handling of the Epstein files and her failure to prosecute his political enemies, ending a turbulent 14-month tenure.	Yes
4	STRONG	88	↑ UP	article_search	Todd Blanche publicly stated on April 7, 2026 that he is open to serving as AG permanently if Trump asks, signaling his interest and availability.	Yes
5	STRONG	95	↑ UP	article_search + web_search	Trump named Blanche acting AG immediately after firing Bondi, making him the de facto top law enforcement official and the front-runner for the permanent nomination.	Yes
6	MODERATE	72	↓ DOWN	article_search	Trump was reportedly considering Lee Zeldin (EPA Administrator) as a potential permanent replacement for Bondi, suggesting Blanche is not the only candidate for the permanent role.	Yes
7	STRONG	90	↑ UP	web_search	Under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, Blanche can serve as acting AG for up to 210 days, meaning a permanent nominee must be in place by approximately November 2026.	Yes
8	MODERATE	70	↓ DOWN	article_search	Analysis pieces note that Blanche faces the same pressures that undid Bondi — Trump's desire to prosecute political enemies — suggesting Blanche's permanent appointment is not guaranteed and he may also be fired before confirmation.	Yes
9	MODERATE	75	↑ UP	kalshi_data	The KXNEXTAG-29-TBLA market prices Blanche at 54% probability as next AG, with a large 30-day gain of +30 points but a recent 7-day decline of -9 points.	Yes
10	MODERATE	65	↓ DOWN	kalshi_data	The related 'How many AGs will Trump have? — 2' market is priced at 41%, implying ~59% probability of 3+ AGs, which would mean Blanche could be a placeholder before yet another AG is named.	Yes
11	MODERATE	78	NEUTRAL	kalshi_data	The Blanche market has HIGH liquidity (depth 35,069 contracts, avg daily volume 31,771), suggesting strong market conviction and price reliability.	Yes
12	STRONG	97	↑ UP	wikipedia_lookup + web_search	Todd Blanche has been serving as acting U.S. Attorney General since April 2, 2026, and previously served as Deputy AG since January 2025 — he is literally occupying the AG role right now.	Yes
13	STRONG	92	↑ UP	article_search	Blanche has deeper personal history with Trump than any prior AG — he was Trump's lead defense attorney in multiple criminal cases, including the hush-money trial — giving him unique trust capital.	Yes
14	STRONG	85	↑ UP	article_search	Blanche managed DOJ day-to-day operations even before becoming acting AG, and was the public face of DOJ when Bondi was sidelined — demonstrating operational competence in the role.	Yes
15	MODERATE	72	↓ DOWN	web_search	Blanche has controversies including near-testimony over the Abrego Garcia deportation case and CPAC comments about ICE at polling places, which could create political/legal vulnerabilities that make permanent confirmation more complicated.	No
16	MODERATE	82	↑ UP	article_search	Blanche announced he is moving into the AG's fifth-floor office and made staffing changes — structural signals that he is consolidating control and positioning for a permanent role.	Yes
17	STRONG	85	NEUTRAL	article_search	The question specifies Blanche must be 'first new person' to be AG — since he is currently acting AG (not Senate-confirmed as AG), whether his acting role counts as resolution is a key interpretive uncertainty.	No

Information Gaps

No data on whether Trump has formally nominated or indicated intention to nominate Blanche for the permanent AG role (vs. keeping him acting or choosing Lee Zeldin or another candidate).
No information on Senate Republican vote counts or likely confirmation hearing timeline for Blanche.
Unclear how the Kalshi question resolves — whether 'acting AG' counts as being AG for resolution purposes, or only Senate-confirmed AG. This is a critical definitional gap.
No data on other potential permanent AG candidates besides Zeldin who may be under consideration.
No information on Trump's current satisfaction level with Blanche's performance as acting AG (whether the 'deliver on prosecutions' pressure is being met).
No data on whether the 210-day FVRA clock has started and what happens if Trump does not nominate before ~November 2026.
Unknown whether Blanche faces any Senate confirmation risks (e.g., bipartisan opposition, controversial statements).

Key Uncertainties

Whether 'acting AG' satisfies the market resolution criteria for 'first new person to be Attorney General' — this could mean the market has already effectively resolved YES if acting status counts, OR it requires Senate confirmation.
Trump's decision on permanent nomination: will he nominate Blanche or someone else (e.g., Lee Zeldin) before the FVRA 210-day limit (~November 2026)?
Blanche's ability to satisfy Trump's demand for prosecution of political enemies — failure here, as with Bondi, could lead to his removal before permanent confirmation.
The recent 7-day price decline of -9 points on Kalshi may signal new information (possible alternative candidate emerging) not captured in the article search.
Whether there will be a third AG (Trump having 3+ total), which would mean Blanche is only a bridge figure and NOT the 'next' confirmed AG.

Market Context

Price: 0.54 · 7d: -0.09 · 30d: +0.30
Volume: HIGH · Depth: HIGH — 35,069 contracts depth
Reliability: HIGH — very high volume (31,771 avg daily contracts), large depth; price likely reflects informed market participants with current knowledge. The +30 point 30-day surge reflects Blanche's elevation to acting AG in April 2026. The recent -9 point 7-day drop may signal emerging uncertainty about permanent confirmation or alternative candidates.

4. Independent Forecaster Opus · No market price · legacy v2 Did NOT see market price

Independent estimate: 49% (42% confidence)

base rate

47%

40% conf

evidence driven

60%

45% conf

contrarian

40%

40% conf

Spread

20pp

High disagreement

sq1: Will Pam Bondi leave or be removed as Attorney General before Jan 20, 2029?

99%

Bondi was already fired on April 2, 2026. This is a resolved historical fact confirmed by multiple sources including Wikipedia. Probability is essentially 1.0.

sq2: If there is a new AG, will Todd Blanche be nominated and confirmed as the replacement?

45%

Base rate for acting AG being confirmed as permanent AG in modern era is mixed — Whitaker was NOT confirmed (Barr was), but Blanche has stronger Trump personal ties. Strong UP: Blanche is acting AG, has expressed willingness, has unique trust capital with Trump as former personal attorney, is consolidating control (moving offices, staffing changes). Pushes to ~60%. DOWN factors: (1) Lee Zeldin reportedly under consideration as alternative — pushes down ~10%; (2) Same prosecution pressures that ended Bondi could end Blanche — pushes down ~5%; (3) The previous forecast noted a 7-day price decline of -9 points suggesting possible negative news; (4) Critically, the market likely requires Senate confirmation (not just acting status) — if Trump fails to nominate or nominates someone else, this fails. FVRA 210-day clock ending ~Nov 2026 forces decision soon. Net estimate: ~45%.

sq3: Is Todd Blanche currently in a position that makes him the most likely successor?

90%

Blanche IS currently the acting AG, making him by definition the most likely successor. Strong personal ties to Trump as former defense attorney, has been managing DOJ operations. Minor concerns about controversies (Abrego Garcia, CPAC comments) don't change his front-runner status. ~90%.

Show full reasoning trace

base rate: Among acting AGs in recent history, transition to confirmed AG is roughly 40-50% (Whitaker→Barr was a no, Mukasey was nominated directly). For a personally trusted Trump ally already in the role with FVRA pressure forcing a decision, base rate skews somewhat higher.

evidence updates: Blanche being acting AG (+15-20% over generic candidate), strong Trump personal ties (+10%), Zeldin as alternative (-10%), risk of being fired like Bondi (-5%), Senate confirmation risk (-3%), recent market decline signal (-3%).

combination method: Conditional probability: P(Bondi leaves) × P(Blanche is the confirmed successor | Bondi leaves). Since Bondi has already left, this reduces to P(Blanche is confirmed next AG).

final: Blanche is the clear front-runner as acting AG with strong Trump ties, but faces real competition (Zeldin), the same political pressures that doomed Bondi, and a Senate confirmation hurdle. The market's interpretation of 'first new person to be AG' likely requires Senate confirmation given prior market behavior referenced in previous forecasts. Final estimate: 47%.

ensemble: {'ensemble_count': 3, 'perspectives': {'base_rate': {'p_yes': 0.47, 'confidence': 0.4}, 'evidence_driven': {'p_yes': 0.6, 'confidence': 0.45}, 'contrarian': {'p_yes': 0.4, 'confidence': 0.4}}, 'spread': 0.2, 'individual_p_yes': {'base_rate': 0.47, 'evidence_driven': 0.6, 'contrarian': 0.4}}

5. Devil's Advocate Sonnet · legacy v2 Market price revealed

Missing Info Reasoning Flaw

Challenges

The forecaster assumes the market 'likely requires Senate confirmation' without strong evidence. This is a critical definitional gap explicitly flagged in information gaps. If acting AG status counts for resolution, Blanche is ALREADY the AG and probability should be much higher (~75-85%). The forecaster picks the stricter interpretation without justification, which materially lowers the estimate.
The sq2 reasoning double-counts negative factors: the -9 point 7-day market decline is cited as evidence to push down ~3%, but this is using the market signal to adjust a forecast that's supposed to be independent. Worse, the 30-day trend is +30 points, which the forecaster ignores while citing the smaller 7-day decline.
The Whitaker→Barr base rate comparison is weak. Whitaker was a stopgap with limited Trump relationship; Blanche is described as having uniquely deep Trump ties. The base rate should weight toward cases where acting AG was a trusted insider, not generic acting AGs.
With 982 days until resolution, there's substantial time for Blanche to be fired/replaced even IF nominated and confirmed. But the question is about 'next' AG (first new person), so once confirmed, later firings don't matter. The forecaster doesn't clearly address this — the long timeline cuts both ways depending on resolution criteria.
Confidence of 0.417 seems reasonable given the resolution ambiguity, but the spread between ensemble perspectives (0.20) suggests the forecaster should consider widening uncertainty further given the critical definitional gap about what counts as 'AG'.

Suggested adjustment: +3pp

Minor upward adjustment warranted because (1) the forecaster picks the stricter 'Senate-confirmed' resolution interpretation without justification when this is flagged as a critical unknown — a 50/50 weighting between interpretations would raise the estimate, and (2) the forecaster cites the 7-day decline as a negative signal while ignoring the much larger 30-day positive trend, an asymmetric use of market data. Not adjusting to match market — adjusting for genuine reasoning issues in handling the resolution ambiguity.

Market comparison: Forecaster: 49%, Market: 54%. The 5-point divergence is small and within reasonable range given genuine uncertainty about resolution criteria (acting vs confirmed AG). Market reliability is HIGH with deep liquidity, but the forecaster's specific concerns (Zeldin alternative, Bondi-style firing risk) are legitimate and not necessarily priced in. Divergence is modest and largely justified.

6. Aggregator Opus · final calibrated forecast

53% (45% confidence)