← back to scans
Will the highest score achieved by a Moonshot Kimi model on Humanity’s Last Exam in 2026 be 50% or higher?
28%
Agent
38%
Market Price
-10.2%
Edge
44%
Confidence
33,357
Volume
3.0c
Spread
81
Days to resolution
5
Markets in event
final rationale
Mean of 4 draws (0.28, 0.32, 0.30, 0.23). (0) Not met: the resolution source agi.safe.ai lists no Kimi model in its static table; the linked Scale leaderboard shows Kimi K2.5 at 24.4%, and mirrors of the Sept 2026 HLE-Diamond refresh show Kimi K3 at 22.2%. Every officially tallied Kimi figure is 22-24%. (a) About 11.5 weeks remain until Dec 31, 2026. (b) Status quo resolves No. (c) No path: no Kimi K4 ships (Polymarket prices a year-end release at ~9.5%), the official board keeps scoring Kimi no-tools at ~22-24%, and vendor with-tools claims (K2.6 54.0, K3 56.0) never appear on agi.safe.ai; Moonshot's self-reported HLE numbers have been inflated before (K2 claimed ~50%, tested 29.4%). (d) Yes path: the resolver treats a tools-enabled or vendor score as a 'clear equivalent metric', or agi.safe.ai adds a with-tools Kimi K3 row (56% vendor, 46.9% Artificial Analysis). The market's 38.5% (up 13.5 points this week) and the 45% sibling at ~79% imply traders expect a lenient reading that counts with-tools or vendor numbers. That is real resolution risk, but the named source plainly supports No, so I shade below the market while keeping substantial weight on an ambiguous or lenient resolution.
price vs. prediction
market price
agent forecast at t+0
7 follow-ups
re-scan context
This market has been scanned before. Previous predictions:
| date | predicted | market price | confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-19 | 32% | 36% | 53% |
| 2026-09-01 | 37% | 45% | 50% |
1. Planner Opus 5.5 · picks the research tools
Tools chosen:
polymarket_direct
resolution_source
polymarket_related
kalshi_related
article_search
Planner reasoning
The Polymarket price is the anchor, and the agi.safe.ai leaderboard decides resolution, so I need its current top Kimi score. Related Polymarket markets on HLE scores from other labs give cross-market signal. One targeted article search checks whether any newer Kimi release has an announced HLE number that the leaderboard has not yet listed.
2. Research parallel tool calls + 4 web research loops (Sonnet 5) · read raw by the forecasters
at a glance
RESEARCH DIGEST (built in code: tool summaries and each report's bottom line; the forecasters read the full tool outputs and reports)
Tools
- polymarket_direct: ## This Market's Polymarket Data **Will the highest score achieved by a Moonshot Kimi model on Humanity’s Last Exam in 2026 be 50% or higher?** - Current price (probability): 38.50% (live; bid 37% / ask 40%) - 7-day price change: +13.50% - 30-day price change: -6.50% - Total volume: $33,357 (USD notional) - Price range: 24.50% - 60.50% - Data points: 81 days
- resolution_source: already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=False; last_updated=September 17, 2026 (per Scale Labs leaderboard update note). The official HLE partner leaderboard (Scale AI Labs, linked from agi.safe.ai) currently shows the Moonshot model 'kimi-k2.5' scoring 24.37% (±1.81) accuracy on the standard (no-tool) HLE evaluation, which is the 'HLE Accuracy' metric used for ranking. The main agi.safe.ai fro
- polymarket_related: Polymarket search over 2 keyword(s), kept 16 matches. keyword "Humanity's Last Exam": 8 markets | keyword 'Kimi': 8 markets
- kalshi_related: 1 related markets / summaries. keyword "Humanity's Last Exam": ok | keyword 'Kimi': no matches
- article_search: Fetched 11 unique articles across 2 queries (lookback=90d). "Kimi K3 Humanity's Last Exam score": 8 articles | 'Moonshot Kimi new model HLE accuracy': 8 articles
Research loops, bottom lines
- current state: On the actual resolution source (the official Scale/CAIS HLE leaderboard), the only listed Kimi model currently sits at 24.4% — nowhere near 50% — even though Moonshot's own marketing blogs for K2.5/K2.6/K3 claim tool-assisted scores of 50-56%; those vendor numbers have not been verified or posted to the official leaderboard, and independent re-tests of past Kimi claims have landed far below Moonshot's self-reported figures, making an official ≥50% Kimi HLE score by year-end look currently unsup
- base rate: The base-rate evidence strongly favors "No": across the entire ~21-month history of HLE, no Moonshot Kimi model has ever posted a verified/official ≥50% score (self-reported Kimi K2 and K2-Thinking claims near or just above 50% were either independently debunked or relied on non-standard "heavy mode" aggregation), and as of October 2026 the official-leaderboard-style scores for the latest Kimi models (K2.5, K3) sit in the 22-44% range, well behind frontier leaders already at 50-65%.
- yes case: The strongest YES path is that Moonshot's own and several third-party (Artificial Analysis/OpenRouter, Vellum) trackers already show Kimi models at 54-60% HLE under tool-augmented or specialized configurations, with a clear generation-over-generation upward trend (K2.5→K2.6→K2.7→K3) and a continuing release cadence — if either the official leaderboard adopts/accepts a tools-enabled score or Moonshot ships one more model before year-end matching its own recent with-tools trajectory, a ≥50% offici
- no case: Every independently or officially tallied figure for any Kimi model — across three separate leaderboard refreshes (original HLE, HLE-Rolling, and the newly launched HLE-Diamond) spanning July through October 2026 — sits at 22–24%, roughly half the 50% strike, while the only path to 50%+ (a materially stronger unreleased flagship such as "K4") remains unannounced and rated unlikely by independent forecasters; absent a verified leaderboard submission crediting Moonshot's self-reported 50-56% tool-
tools
| tool | status | time | items | summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| polymarket_direct | OK | 0.5s | 1 | ## This Market's Polymarket Data **Will the highest score achieved by a Moonshot Kimi model on Humanity’s Last Exam in 2026 be 50% or higher?** - Current price (probability): 38.50% (live; bid 37% / ask 40%) - 7-day price change: +13.50% - 30-day price change: -6.50% - Total volume: $33,357 (USD no |
| resolution_source | OK | 38.3s | 1 | already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=False; last_updated=September 17, 2026 (per Scale Labs leaderboard update note). The official HLE partner leaderboard (Scale AI Labs, linked from agi.safe.ai) currently shows the Moonshot model 'kimi-k2.5' scoring 24.37% (±1.81) accuracy on the standard (no |
| polymarket_related | OK | 0.5s | 16 | Polymarket search over 2 keyword(s), kept 16 matches. keyword "Humanity's Last Exam": 8 markets | keyword 'Kimi': 8 markets |
| kalshi_related | OK | 0.6s | 1 | 1 related markets / summaries. keyword "Humanity's Last Exam": ok | keyword 'Kimi': no matches |
| article_search | OK | 0.6s | 11 | Fetched 11 unique articles across 2 queries (lookback=90d). "Kimi K3 Humanity's Last Exam score": 8 articles | 'Moonshot Kimi new model HLE accuracy': 8 articles |
research loops
·
4/4 ok ·
15 searches ·
4 page reads
| dimension | status | time | searches | page reads | report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current state | OK | 40s | 3 | 2 | 3916 chars |
| base rate | OK | 48s | 3 | 1 | 4800 chars |
| yes case | OK | 58s | 5 | 1 | 5190 chars |
| no case | SNIPPETS | 34s | 4 | 0 | 4561 chars · no page read; snippets only |
report: current state
- [2026-10-07] The official Scale AI "Humanity's Last Exam" leaderboard (the market's resolution source, mirrored at labs.scale.com/leaderboard/humanitys_last_exam) shows only one Moonshot entry, "Kimi K2.5," at 24.4% accuracy — far below 50% — while the leaderboard's current leader is GPT-6 Astra at 54.8%. https://benchlm.ai/benchmarks/scale-humanitys-last-exam
- [2026-10-07] On that same official snapshot the top rows are GPT-6 Astra (54.8%), Fable 5.1 xhigh (46.5%) and gemini-3.1-pro-preview thinking-high (46.4%); no Kimi model is close to the top. https://benchlm.ai/benchmarks/scale-humanitys-last-exam
- [2026-09-17] The Center for AI Safety/Scale's official HLE page confirms the benchmark was refreshed via "HLE-Rolling," a continually updated fork with harder questions replacing easier ones, which tends to push scores down rather than up for any given model. https://scale.com/leaderboard/humanitys_last_exam
- [2026-09-22] The official agi.safe.ai site's most recent "Latest News" item (as of today) is the release of "HLE-Diamond" on 09/22/2026, indicating the benchmark itself is still evolving, which could affect how/whether new Kimi scores are posted before year-end. https://agi.safe.ai/
- [2026-07-27] Moonshot's newest flagship, Kimi K3 (2.8T parameters), reports on its own model card an HLE-Full score of 43.5% without tools and 56.0% with tools — but this is a vendor-reported figure, not yet reflected on the official Scale/HLE leaderboard. https://devoriales.com/kimi-k3-open-weights-what-moonshot-actually-shipped
- [2026-07-16] Moonshot's K3 model card (self-reported) lists HLE-Full at "43.5 / 56.0" (no-tools/with-tools), trailing rival vendor-reported scores such as Claude Fable 5 (53.3/63.0) and GPT-5.6 Sol (44.5/58.0). https://huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-K3
- [2026-04-xx] Earlier in 2026, Moonshot's Kimi K2.6 vendor blog claimed "Humanity's Last Exam with tools at 54.0" — a self-reported, tools-enabled figure that, like other Moonshot vendor claims, has not appeared on the official Scale leaderboard. https://dev.to/dishant0406/kimi-k26-dropped-the-internet-went-crazy-then-reality-hit-4dgf
- [2026-02-xx] A documented pattern exists of large gaps between Moonshot's self-reported HLE numbers and independently/officially measured ones: Kimi K2's vendor-claimed ~50% HLE score was independently found to be only about 29.4% under standard, non-optimized conditions. https://www.mindstudio.ai/blog/humanities-last-exam-benchmark-score-inflation-explained
- [2026-11-09 (reported)] An earlier generation reasoning model, Kimi K2 Thinking, was noted by outside trackers as sitting at about 23.9% on HLE text-only (no tools) around that date, well under the 44.9%/51% "heavy" tool-assisted figures Moonshot itself publicized. https://thezvi.substack.com/p/kimi-k2-thinking
- [2026-10-11] As of today, no Kimi model (K2, K2 Thinking, K2.5, K2.6, or K3) appears on the official Scale/HLE leaderboard with a score at or above 50%; the only listed Kimi row (K2.5) sits at 24.4%. https://benchlm.ai/benchmarks/scale-humanitys-last-exam
BOTTOM LINE: On the actual resolution source (the official Scale/CAIS HLE leaderboard), the only listed Kimi model currently sits at 24.4% — nowhere near 50% — even though Moonshot's own marketing blogs for K2.5/K2.6/K3 claim tool-assisted scores of 50-56%; those vendor numbers have not been verified or posted to the official leaderboard, and independent re-tests of past Kimi claims have landed far below Moonshot's self-reported figures, making an official ≥50% Kimi HLE score by year-end look currently unsupported by the primary data source.
NOT FOUND: No evidence that Moonshot has formally submitted Kimi K2.6 or Kimi K3 results to the official Scale/CAIS HLE leaderboard (only "Kimi K2.5" appears as of the October 7, 2026 snapshot); no official leaderboard entry corroborating any Moonshot vendor-blog claim of ≥50% HLE accuracy.
report: base rate
- [2026-10-11] The question's own resolution source (agi.safe.ai / Scale's official HLE leaderboard) requires sign-in and isn't publicly browsable directly; third-party mirrors of that same "Scale score" snapshot are the best available proxy. https://agi.safe.ai/dashboard
- [2026-09-30] A mirror of the Scale Labs official HLE leaderboard puts Moonshot's newest and largest model, Kimi K3, at only
"GPT-6 Astra OpenAI 60.6%... 10 Kimi K3 Moonshot AI · Closed 22.2%"
— far below the 50% strike and well behind the leading proprietary models. https://benchlm.ai/benchmarks/scale-hle-diamond
- [2026-09-23] An earlier Scale snapshot (one month prior) shows Kimi K2.5 at only
"Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI 24.4%"
, confirming Moonshot models have persistently scored in the low-to-mid 20s on the Scale/official-style leaderboard even as other labs' models climbed well past 50%. https://benchlm.ai/benchmarks/scale-humanitys-last-exam
- [2025-09-05 release / later inflation exposed] For Kimi K2 (2025), Moonshot's own benchmark card
listed a score of roughly 50% on the Humanities Last Exam
, but
independent testing found 29.4%
— a documented ~21-point gap between Moonshot's self-reported HLE numbers and independently verified results, which is the key base-rate precedent for discounting Moonshot's self-reported figures. https://www.mindstudio.ai/blog/humanities-last-exam-benchmark-score-inflation-explained
- [2025-11-06] Kimi K2 Thinking's own release materials claimed
"K2 Thinking achieves 44.9% on HLE with tools... establishing new records in multi‑domain expert‑level reasoning performance"
, and only under a non-standard, heavily compute-amplified "heavy mode" (multiple parallel samples) did Moonshot report
"HLE Heavy Mode: 51.0%"
— a configuration unlikely to match how the official leaderboard scores single-run accuracy. https://moonshotai.github.io/Kimi-K2/thinking.html ; https://docs.api.nvidia.com/nim/reference/moonshotai-kimi-k2-thinking
- [2026-10-09] Independent aggregator Artificial Analysis-based trackers (a different methodology than Scale's) place Kimi K3 somewhat higher but still below the strike:
"Kimi K3: 43.5%... behind Fable 5 and Opus 4.8"
on HLE without tools, versus 56.0% with tools per the same source, illustrating how much "HLE score" varies by tool-use configuration and tracker — none of which is confirmed to be the configuration the Polymarket resolution source (official agi.safe.ai leaderboard) will display. https://emergent.sh/learn/kimi-k3-benchmark
- [2026-10-08] Across several leaderboard aggregators (llm-stats, modelgrep, benchlm) the top overall HLE scores in October 2026 are held by Anthropic (Claude Fable 5.1, ~59-65%) and OpenAI (GPT-6 Astra, ~54-61%), not by any Moonshot Kimi model, with Kimi K3 typically ranked around 10th-12th place among tracked models at scores in the 22-43% range depending on source. https://benchlm.ai/benchmarks/hle ; https://llm-stats.com/benchmarks/humanity's-last-exam
- [Historical pattern] Since HLE's public release in January 2025, the overall leaderboard has shown rapid upward drift — top scores rose from roughly 20-25% in early 2025 to 37.5% (Gemini 3 Pro, Feb 2026) to past 50-60% by September-October 2026 for leading closed models (GPT-6 Astra, Claude Fable/Opus 5.x) — but Moonshot's Kimi line has lagged this frontier curve on independently-tracked numbers the entire time. https://letsdatascience.com/blog/humanitys-last-exam-the-test-thats-humbling-the-worlds-smartest-ai
- [No market-specific odds found] No betting market or forecaster-specific history for "Kimi crossing 50% on HLE" could be located beyond a resolved Manifold market on a related but distinct question ("K2 Thinking gets top score on HLE, independent eval") which
"Resolved NO"
, reinforcing that independent/official evaluations have consistently rated Kimi models below the top of the field. https://manifold.markets/Bayesian/k2thinking-gets-top-score-on-hle-ac
BOTTOM LINE: The base-rate evidence strongly favors "No": across the entire ~21-month history of HLE, no Moonshot Kimi model has ever posted a verified/official ≥50% score (self-reported Kimi K2 and K2-Thinking claims near or just above 50% were either independently debunked or relied on non-standard "heavy mode" aggregation), and as of October 2026 the official-leaderboard-style scores for the latest Kimi models (K2.5, K3) sit in the 22-44% range, well behind frontier leaders already at 50-65%.
NOT FOUND: Could not directly view the live official agi.safe.ai/Scale leaderboard (it requires sign-in), so had to rely on third-party mirrors; could not find any explicit prediction-market or forecaster probability estimate specifically for "Kimi model ≥50% on HLE in 2026" outside of the Polymarket contract itself (excluded per instructions).
report: yes case
YES means: the official Humanity's Last Exam leaderboard (agi.safe.ai / Scale, or an accepted official-results substitute) shows some Moonshot Kimi model's "HLE Accuracy" figure at ≥50% at any point before December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
- [2026-07-16] Moonshot's own Kimi K3 model card
reports HLE-Full at 43.5 without tools and 56.0 with tool augmentation
, and a third-party mirror (unsloth) separately lists a Hugging Face "cais/hle" evaluation-results badge of 56 for K3, i.e. a non-Moonshot-hosted page still crediting the model with a 56% figure. https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Kimi-K3
- [2026-04-xx] Moonshot's Kimi K2.6 model card shows a clear, steadily rising tool-assisted HLE trend across Moonshot's own last three flagships:
HLE-Full (w/ tools): Kimi K2.6 54.0, versus Kimi K2.5 50.2
, both already above the 50% strike on the vendor's own tool-enabled configuration. https://huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.6
- [2026-04-xx] On that same K2.6 card, Moonshot's tool-augmented score also already exceeded contemporaneous frontier closed models:
GPT-5.4 (xhigh) 52.1, Claude Opus 4.6 (max effort) 53.0, Gemini 3.1 Pro (thinking high) 51.4
, all clustered in the low-50s alongside Kimi, showing 50%+ with-tools HLE scores are now a routine frontier-model outcome, not a Kimi-specific anomaly. https://huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.6
- [2026-06-12] Moonshot's Kimi K2.7 Code release, a specialized coding-focused model, still posted a vendor-reported HLE-with-tools score of 54.0, explicitly
"HLE with tools (leads GPT-5.4 and Opus 4.6) 54.0"
, indicating Moonshot's tool-augmented HLE performance did not regress even in a model optimized for coding rather than reasoning. https://www.okou.ai/en/models/kimi-k2-7-code
- [2026-10-09] An independent third-party aggregator (Vellum) lists Kimi K3 as the open-source "Best Overall" model on Humanity's Last Exam with a score of 56%, an aggregator-reported figure distinct from Moonshot's own blog. https://www.vellum.ai/open-llm-leaderboard
- [2026-08-xx] A head-to-head comparison piece using Artificial Analysis-style data put Kimi K3's HLE-with-tools score even higher than Moonshot's own card, at
"HLE w/ Tools (Hard Tasks with Tool Access): GLM-5.3 at 62.5%, Kimi K3 at 59.8%" — a 4.5% edge
for GLM-5.3, meaning an independent-style tracker already shows Kimi K3 near 60% on a tool-enabled HLE configuration. https://medium.com/data-science-in-your-pocket/glm-5-3-vs-kimi-k3-a0e8694aa47d
- [2026-07-23] Artificial Analysis's own tracked (non-vendor) number for Kimi K3 (Max), as mirrored by OpenRouter, puts HLE at 46.9%, already closing most of the historical gap between Moonshot's self-reported and independently measured no-tools scores (compare the ~21-point K2 gap documented earlier), making a further small jump to ≥50% on a no-tools configuration plausible with one more model generation. https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k3
- [2026-10-11] Moonshot's release cadence has been rapid and continuous through 2026 —
K2.5 (January 2026), K2.6 (April 2026), K2.7 Code (June 2026)
— followed by K3 in July, implying at least one more flagship or point release is plausible before the December 31, 2026 deadline, giving Moonshot additional opportunities to post a higher score.
- [2026-10-11] The resolution criteria explicitly allow for "a clear equivalent metric if the data's presentation or terminology is restructured," which gives room for a tool-augmented or harness-specific Kimi score (already 54-60% per multiple vendor and tracker sources) to count if the official leaderboard's displayed "HLE Accuracy" column adopts or is read as a tools-enabled configuration, as several leading closed models' rank-1 scores (e.g., the current 54.8% leader) may themselves reflect a tool-assisted harness rather than a strict no-tools run.
- [2026-09-22] The benchmark itself is in flux with the "HLE-Diamond" refresh; new/harder question sets historically produce a period where only the very top models clear 50%, but Moonshot has shown it can match frontier labs' tool-augmented numbers within the same release cycle (K2.6/K2.7 matching or beating GPT-5.4/Opus 4.6's low-50s tool scores), so a Kimi model landing in the mid-50s on a refreshed official board is not without precedent.
BOTTOM LINE: The strongest YES path is that Moonshot's own and several third-party (Artificial Analysis/OpenRouter, Vellum) trackers already show Kimi models at 54-60% HLE under tool-augmented or specialized configurations, with a clear generation-over-generation upward trend (K2.5→K2.6→K2.7→K3) and a continuing release cadence — if either the official leaderboard adopts/accepts a tools-enabled score or Moonshot ships one more model before year-end matching its own recent with-tools trajectory, a ≥50% official Kimi score is plausible by December 31, 2026.
NOT FOUND: No confirmation that the official Scale/agi.safe.ai leaderboard itself displays or will display a tool-augmented Kimi score (its current listed Kimi K2.5 entry, 24.4%, is a no-tools figure); no evidence of a specific additional Kimi flagship (e.g., "K3.5" or "K4") confirmed for release before December 31, 2026, beyond unverified leak-stage rumors.
report: no case
YES means: the official Humanity's Last Exam leaderboard at agi.safe.ai (or its confirmed successor source) shows some Moonshot Kimi model reaching an HLE accuracy of 50% or higher on or before December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
- [2026-10-06] The authoritative Scale/CAIS leaderboard, mirrored via Klu's benchmark tracker, lists "Kimi K3 … Score: 22.2 overall" on Scale's Diamond split, the newest and largest Moonshot flagship, still less than half the 50% strike. https://klu.ai/benchmarks/humanitys-last-exam
- [2026-09-30] A separate Scale snapshot confirms the same figure in ranked context: Kimi K3 sits at "22.2%" in 10th place among just 12 published rows, trailing even Grok 4.7's 23.4% and far behind leader GPT-6 Astra's 60.6%. https://benchlm.ai/benchmarks/scale-hle-diamond
- [2026-10-04] The HLE-Diamond refresh (released Sept 22, 2026) explicitly lists "kimi-k3 22.2%" under its no-tools comparison table, showing the newer, harder Diamond variant did not lift Moonshot's score at all versus the original HLE. https://postcutoff.com/e/2026-09-22-hle-diamond/
- [2026-10-10] A completely independent aggregator (benchlm's model-ledger page) still shows Kimi K3's only "source-displayable" HLE entry is the self-reported 56% figure sourced explicitly to "Provider exact — Moonshot AI: Kimi K3 launch blog," not to any independently verified or official-leaderboard row — the gap between vendor claim and official score persists structurally. https://benchlm.ai/models/kimi-k3
- [2026-09-07] Independent tracker Artificial Analysis, checked six weeks after K3's July 16 launch, placed Kimi K3's overall Intelligence Index well behind rivals (44, versus GLM-5.3's 45), with a separately noted raw HLE figure "around 11%" for a comparable open model class, underscoring how far third-party scoring runs lag Moonshot's own marketing numbers. https://www.morphllm.com/kimi-k3
- [2026-08-14] As of mid-August 2026, no Kimi K4 (or any larger, unreleased Moonshot flagship that might plausibly jump the HLE score) had been announced: "Moonshot AI has made no announcement of a model named Kimi K4," with kimi-k3 still the newest model in Moonshot's own API docs. https://kimik4ai.com/models/kimi-k4/
- [2026-09-29] The sole public rumor of a next-generation Moonshot model (per a 29 July 2026 Information report) is limited to GPU-procurement chatter, with explicitly "zero real specifications" — no parameter count, benchmark, or release date — meaning there is no credible pipeline event in Q4 2026 that would materially raise Kimi's official score before the Dec 31 deadline. https://aitoolsreview.co.uk/insights/kimi-k4-release-date
- [78 days ago, i.e. ~2026-07-25] A Manifold Markets contract on "Kimi K4 released in 2026?" was trading at only 13% chance, directly reflecting forecaster skepticism that any new, more-capable Moonshot flagship (the only plausible route to a 50%+ official HLE score) will ship before year-end. https://manifold.markets/Gen/kimi-k4-released-in-2026
- [2026-10-10] On the broader, non-Scale llm-stats.com aggregator (104 evaluated models, last updated October 2026), Kimi K3 ranks only 12th among tracked models with no tools score anywhere near the leaders, consistent across every independently-operated leaderboard checked. https://llm-stats.com/benchmarks/humanity's-last-exam
- [2026-10-06] Even the most favorable third-party breakdown (Klu) reiterates there is "no single HLE leaderboard in 2026" and that Scale's full-set board — the market's literal resolution source — is the one on which Kimi sits at 22.2%, not the self-reported 56% figure that circulates in vendor and press coverage. https://klu.ai/benchmarks/humanitys-last-exam
BOTTOM LINE: Every independently or officially tallied figure for any Kimi model — across three separate leaderboard refreshes (original HLE, HLE-Rolling, and the newly launched HLE-Diamond) spanning July through October 2026 — sits at 22–24%, roughly half the 50% strike, while the only path to 50%+ (a materially stronger unreleased flagship such as "K4") remains unannounced and rated unlikely by independent forecasters; absent a verified leaderboard submission crediting Moonshot's self-reported 50-56% tool-assisted figures, the resolution source gives no support for a YES outcome.
NOT FOUND: No evidence of Moonshot formally submitting K2.6/K3 vendor-reported tool-assisted scores (50-56%) for independent verification on the official agi.safe.ai/Scale leaderboard; no confirmed Kimi K4 (or any Moonshot model beyond K3) release or benchmark as of this report's date.
3. Forecasters 4 draws · Opus 5.5 + GPT · plain mean
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
45% conf
| Yes | 28% |
| No | 72% |
(0) Not met: the resolution source agi.safe.ai lists no Kimi model in its static table; the linked Scale leaderboard shows Kimi K2.5 at 24.4%, and mirrors of the Sept 2026 HLE-Diamond refresh show Kimi K3 at 22.2%. Every officially tallied Kimi figure is 22-24%. (a) About 11.5 weeks remain until Dec 31, 2026. (b) Status quo resolves No. (c) No path: no Kimi K4 ships (Polymarket prices a year-end release at ~9.5%), the official board keeps scoring Kimi no-tools at ~22-24%, and vendor with-tools claims (K2.6 54.0, K3 56.0) never appear on agi.safe.ai; Moonshot's self-reported HLE numbers have been inflated before (K2 claimed ~50%, tested 29.4%). (d) Yes path: the resolver treats a tools-enabled or vendor score as a 'clear equivalent metric', or agi.safe.ai adds a with-tools Kimi K3 row (56% vendor, 46.9% Artificial Analysis). The market's 38.5% (up 13.5 points this week) and the 45% sibling at ~79% imply traders expect a lenient reading that counts with-tools or vendor numbers. That is real resolution risk, but the named source plainly supports No, so I shade below the market while keeping substantial weight on an ambiguous or lenient resolution.
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
38% conf
| Yes | 32% |
| No | 68% |
(0) Not met. No source shows a Kimi model at 50% or higher on the official HLE leaderboard. The Scale/CAIS partner board lists Kimi K2.5 at 24.4% and Kimi K3 at 22.2% on HLE-Diamond. The agi.safe.ai front-page table lists no Kimi model at all. YES would need either a new, stronger Kimi model posted to the official board, or the source crediting a tools-enabled score: Moonshot claims 54–56% with tools, and Artificial Analysis measures K3 Max at 46.9% without tools.
(a) About 11.5 weeks remain until the Dec 31, 2026 deadline.
(b) If nothing changes, the official figures stay in the low-to-mid 20s and the market resolves NO.
(c) NO scenario: the board keeps scoring Kimi on harder no-tools sets (HLE-Rolling and Diamond push scores down). Kimi K4 does not ship; the related Polymarket market prices that at about 9.5% by year-end, and no specs or dates have leaked.
(d) YES scenario: Moonshot ships a K3.x or K4 update, or gets a tools-enabled or self-reported 56% score accepted as a 'clear equivalent' on the source page.
The market anchor is 38.5% and rose 13.5 points this week. The sibling 45% market trades at about 79%, which suggests traders expect something other than the 22–24% official rows to count. That information gap is not explained by my research, so I fade the market only modestly rather than pricing near the strong-NO reading of the official data.
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
42% conf
| Yes | 30% |
| No | 70% |
(0) Not met: the official HLE leaderboard data (Scale partner board linked from agi.safe.ai) lists Kimi K2.5 at 24.4%, and the HLE-Diamond split lists Kimi K3 at 22.2%; the agi.safe.ai front-page table shows no Kimi model. (a) About 2.7 months remain, to Dec 31, 2026. (b) Status quo is No: all official and independent no-tools Kimi figures are 22-47%, and only Moonshot's self-reported with-tools numbers (K2.5 50.2, K2.6 54.0, K3 56.0) exceed 50%. (c) No: the official board keeps Kimi in the 20s, no K4 ships (related market about 9.5%), and the resolver uses the strict 'HLE Accuracy' column. (d) Yes: the resolver accepts a tools-enabled or vendor-reported 'equivalent' metric, or the board adds tool-enabled entries including Kimi K3 at about 56%. The sibling markets (45% at 79%, 55% at 11%) imply traders expect a value between 45% and 55%, probably anticipating a non-official-board figure, and the 7-day +13.5 move may reflect information I lack. So I shade below the 38.5% anchor but keep weight on resolution ambiguity.
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
50% conf
| Yes | 23% |
| No | 77% |
(0) Not met: the agi.safe.ai front-page table lists no Kimi model, and the official Scale/CAIS partner leaderboard shows Kimi K2.5 at 24.4% and Kimi K3 at 22.2% on HLE-Diamond, far below 50%. (a) About 11.5 weeks remain until Dec 31, 2026. (b) Status quo resolves No, with the best official Kimi score around 22-24%. (c) No: no K4 or stronger model ships (Manifold about 13%, Polymarket K4-by-Dec-31 about 9.5%), and the official board keeps showing only no-tools scores in the 20s. (d) Yes: the resolver accepts Moonshot's with-tools figures (K3 56.0%, K2.6 54.0%) as official results published elsewhere or as a clear equivalent metric, or a new Kimi release posts at least 50% officially. The 38.5% price, the related 45% market near 79%, and this week's +13.5% move suggest traders expect a lenient reading, which is the main risk. Still, the named source is far below the strike, and Moonshot's past HLE claims have been inflated (K2: about 50% claimed vs 29.4% measured), so I price below market while keeping weight on resolution ambiguity.
4. Final plain mean of 4 draws
28%
(44% confidence)
Yes: 28%
No: 72%
Mean of 4 draws (0.28, 0.32, 0.30, 0.23). (0) Not met: the resolution source agi.safe.ai lists no Kimi model in its static table; the linked Scale leaderboard shows Kimi K2.5 at 24.4%, and mirrors of the Sept 2026 HLE-Diamond refresh show Kimi K3 at 22.2%. Every officially tallied Kimi figure is 22-24%. (a) About 11.5 weeks remain until Dec 31, 2026. (b) Status quo resolves No. (c) No path: no Kimi K4 ships (Polymarket prices a year-end release at ~9.5%), the official board keeps scoring Kimi no-tools at ~22-24%, and vendor with-tools claims (K2.6 54.0, K3 56.0) never appear on agi.safe.ai; Moonshot's self-reported HLE numbers have been inflated before (K2 claimed ~50%, tested 29.4%). (d) Yes path: the resolver treats a tools-enabled or vendor score as a 'clear equivalent metric', or agi.safe.ai adds a with-tools Kimi K3 row (56% vendor, 46.9% Artificial Analysis). The market's 38.5% (up 13.5 points this week) and the 45% sibling at ~79% imply traders expect a lenient reading that counts with-tools or vendor numbers. That is real resolution risk, but the named source plainly supports No, so I shade below the market while keeping substantial weight on an ambiguous or lenient resolution.
Pipeline Timing
Total pipeline time: 125.9s
Per-tool research timings shown in the Research section above.