← back to scans
Will 1 Fed rate hike happen in 2026?
21%
Agent
22%
Market Price
-1.1%
Edge
74%
Confidence
365,342
Volume
1.0c
Spread
83
Days to resolution
6
Markets in event
final rationale
Mean of 5 draws (0.21, 0.22, 0.21, 0.21, 0.21). (0) Resolution check: this is the exact-count bucket for one hike. The Fed's 9/16 press release and FRED (target upper bound 4.00%, effective rate 3.88%) confirm exactly one 25bp hike so far in 2026, the first since 2023. So YES is live but not locked in. It needs no further hike at the Oct 27–28 or Dec 8–9 meetings and no emergency move. Any additional hike resolves this NO immediately.
(a) About 12 weeks remain, covering two scheduled FOMC meetings plus the window for an emergency action through Dec 31.
(b) Status quo: if the Fed holds from today, the market resolves YES. However, the Fed's own September projections had 16 of 18 participants expecting at least one more hike, and the Oct 7 minutes said most officials see another hike as likely appropriate by year-end.
(c) NO path: inflation stays hot (PCE ~3.8%, core ~3.4%), AI and energy demand persist, and the Fed hikes in December (Kalshi ~73–76%) or less likely in October (~16–18%).
(d) YES path: data softens enough to justify a skip at both meetings. Unemployment ticked up to 4.2% in September, officials say they 'can wait', and an October move near the midterms looks unlikely.
Anchors: this market trades at 21.5%. Its complement, 'Another Fed rate hike in 2026', sits at 79.5% on Polymarket and 80% on Kalshi, so the crowds agree. The research surfaces no unpriced information, so I stay at the market price.
price vs. prediction
market price
agent forecast at t+0
10 follow-ups
re-scan context
This market has been scanned before. Previous predictions:
| date | predicted | market price | confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 20% | 20% | 69% |
| 2026-09-21 | 15% | 14% | 69% |
1. Planner Opus 5.5 · picks the research tools
Tools chosen:
polymarket_direct
resolution_source
fred
kalshi_related
polymarket_related
Planner reasoning
Fed hike-count question as of Oct 2026, with only the Oct/Nov and Dec FOMC meetings left. Polymarket's own price is the anchor. FRED rate and inflation series show whether any hike has already happened this year and what macro pressure exists. Kalshi's Fed decision markets give an independent crowd to cross-check, and the Fed's open market page settles the count of hikes so far.
2. Research parallel tool calls + 4 web research loops (Sonnet 5) · read raw by the forecasters
at a glance
RESEARCH DIGEST (built in code: tool summaries and each report's bottom line; the forecasters read the full tool outputs and reports)
Tools
- polymarket_direct: ## This Market's Polymarket Data **Will 1 Fed rate hike happen in 2026?** - Current price (probability): 21.50% (live; bid 21% / ask 22%) - 7-day price change: -6.00% - 30-day price change: -22.00% - Total volume: $365,342 (USD notional) - Price range: 8.50% - 49.50% - Data points: 90 days
- resolution_source: already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=True; last_updated=September 16, 2026 (page's own 'Last Update' notice). The fetched openmarket.htm text shows a historical table of federal funds rate changes, but the visible portion only covers 2003–2005 (e.g., Dec 14, 2004: +25bp to 2.25%; Jun 25, 2003: -25bp to 1.00%); the 2026 entries are not present in the visible text (a large chunk of ~10,539 cha
- fred: Fetched 5 FRED series (lookback=365d).
- kalshi_related: 1 related markets / summaries. series KXFEDDECISION: 0 markets (skipped 55 no-signal) | series KXFED: 0 markets (skipped 100 no-signal) | series KXRATEHIKE: 0 markets (skipped 4 no-signal) | keyword 'fed rate hike 2026': ok
- polymarket_related: Polymarket search over 3 keyword(s), kept 15 matches. keyword 'fed decision october': 5 markets | keyword 'fed decision december': 5 markets | keyword 'fed rate hike 2026': 5 markets
Research loops, bottom lines
- current state: One 25-bps hike has already been delivered in 2026 (Sept 16, to 3.75%–4.00%), satisfying a "will at least 1 hike happen" framing outright; however, if the contract requires exactly one hike for the year, the outcome now hinges on the Oct 28 and Dec 9 meetings, where officials have signaled another hike is likely by year-end even though near-term futures/Kalshi pricing puts only ~16–25% odds on a hike specifically at the October meeting.
- base rate: The relevant "base rate" for this question is moot: a confirmed, officially-documented 25bp hike already occurred on 2026-09-16, satisfying a "1 hike in 2026" threshold outright per primary Fed sources, and FOMC dot-plot/market pricing as of September pointed toward an even higher probability of a second hike by December, not a reversal.
- yes case: For a literal "at least 1 hike in 2026" framing, YES is already locked in by the confirmed September 16, 2026 FOMC hike to 3.75%-4.00%, a fact that cannot be undone by any subsequent hold or cut; moreover, Fed minutes, official speeches, and futures pricing as of early October continue to point toward a second hike in December, which would only reinforce (not threaten) this outcome.
- no case: For a contract requiring exactly one 2026 hike, the strongest NO case is that market-implied odds (Kalshi/Polymarket, Oct 9 readings) put a second hike at roughly 73-80% likely by Dec 9, meaning the dominant scenario is NOW two hikes in 2026, not one — the only way to YES is a clean skip at both the Oct 28 and Dec 9 meetings, priced at only ~20-27%.
tools
| tool | status | time | items | summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| polymarket_direct | OK | 0.3s | 1 | ## This Market's Polymarket Data **Will 1 Fed rate hike happen in 2026?** - Current price (probability): 21.50% (live; bid 21% / ask 22%) - 7-day price change: -6.00% - 30-day price change: -22.00% - Total volume: $365,342 (USD notional) - Price range: 8.50% - 49.50% - Data points: 90 days |
| resolution_source | OK | 14.6s | 1 | already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=True; last_updated=September 16, 2026 (page's own 'Last Update' notice). The fetched openmarket.htm text shows a historical table of federal funds rate changes, but the visible portion only covers 2003–2005 (e.g., Dec 14, 2004: +25bp to 2.25%; Jun 25, 2003: |
| fred | OK | 1.8s | 5 | Fetched 5 FRED series (lookback=365d). |
| kalshi_related | OK | 0.9s | 1 | 1 related markets / summaries. series KXFEDDECISION: 0 markets (skipped 55 no-signal) | series KXFED: 0 markets (skipped 100 no-signal) | series KXRATEHIKE: 0 markets (skipped 4 no-signal) | keyword 'fed rate hike 2026': ok |
| polymarket_related | OK | 0.5s | 15 | Polymarket search over 3 keyword(s), kept 15 matches. keyword 'fed decision october': 5 markets | keyword 'fed decision december': 5 markets | keyword 'fed rate hike 2026': 5 markets |
research loops
·
4/4 ok ·
10 searches ·
6 page reads
| dimension | status | time | searches | page reads | report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current state | OK | 43s | 3 | 1 | 3599 chars |
| base rate | OK | 37s | 3 | 1 | 4598 chars |
| yes case | OK | 35s | 2 | 2 | 4513 chars |
| no case | OK | 42s | 2 | 2 | 4440 chars |
report: current state
- [2026-09-16] The FOMC raised the federal funds target range by 25 bps to 3.75%–4.00%, its first rate hike since 2023, in a unanimous 12-0 vote — this is the one hike that has occurred so far in 2026.
As part of its policy decision, the Federal Open Market Committee voted to direct the Open Market Desk at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to execute transactions in accordance with a target range of 3-3/4 to 4 percent.
- [2026-09-16]
16 of 18 SEP participants expected at least one additional 25bp hike by year end, with the median year-end policy rate at approximately 4.1%, corresponding to a 4.00%-4.25% target range.
- [2026-09-16]
The Fed's updated 2026 projections showed GDP revised up to 2.3%, unemployment revised down to 4.1%, and PCE inflation revised up to 3.7%.
- [2026-10-07] FOMC minutes from the September meeting were released, confirming broad hawkish consensus.
All 19 Federal Reserve officials backed the September rate hike to 3.75%-4.00%, and most officials also expected another hike by year end.
- [2026-10-07/08] Despite the hawkish minutes, near-term hike odds for the next meeting fell:
Fed leaders have since said they can wait, and traders price just a 20% to 25% chance of an October hike.
- [2026-10-07]
Fed staff estimated PCE inflation at 3.8% year-over-year in August, with core PCE at 3.4%, while the unemployment rate fell to 4.1% in July and August.
- [2026-10-07] H.15 data confirm the effective federal funds rate has settled at 3.88% (midpoint of the 3.75–4.00% range) since the September move, with no change through October 6. (https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/)
- [2026-10-08] Kalshi's "Fed decision in October" contract shows an 83% chance the Fed holds rates at the Oct 27–28 meeting versus a 16% chance of a 25 bps hike. (https://kalshi.com/markets/kxfeddecision/fed-meeting/kxfeddecision-26oct)
- [2026-10-08] Futures-market pricing (streetstats) shows
the current effective federal funds rate at 3.88%, with futures markets pricing the rate to rise to about 4.1% by January 2027, indicating expectations of further tightening.
- [2026-10-27/28] Next scheduled FOMC meeting (Oct 27–28, 2026) will include a rate decision at 2:00 PM ET on Oct 28; no Summary of Economic Projections is scheduled for this meeting. (https://fedratecalc.com/fomc-meeting-schedule/)
- [2026-12-08/09] Final scheduled FOMC meeting of the year is Dec 8–9, 2026, which includes a new Summary of Economic Projections ("SEP") and is explicitly covered by this contract's resolution rules. (https://fedratecalc.com/fomc-meeting-schedule/)
- [2026-10-07] Minutes noted drivers of hawkishness:
most participants judged that another hike would probably be appropriate by the end of the year, citing upside inflation risks, a resilient economy, and the possibility that strong AI investment could add to demand pressures.
BOTTOM LINE: One 25-bps hike has already been delivered in 2026 (Sept 16, to 3.75%–4.00%), satisfying a "will at least 1 hike happen" framing outright; however, if the contract requires exactly one hike for the year, the outcome now hinges on the Oct 28 and Dec 9 meetings, where officials have signaled another hike is likely by year-end even though near-term futures/Kalshi pricing puts only ~16–25% odds on a hike specifically at the October meeting.
NOT FOUND: No confirmation yet of the Fed's decision at the Oct 27–28, 2026 meeting (it has not yet occurred as of this report); no official Dec 2026 dot plot or pre-meeting guidance beyond the September SEP; no evidence of any emergency inter-meeting rate action in 2026.
report: base rate
- [2026-09-16] The Federal Reserve's official press release confirms the FOMC raised the target range by 25 basis points to 3.75%–4.00% on September 16, 2026, its first rate increase since 2023, voted 12–0 — https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20260916a.htm
- [2026-09-16] Secondary reporting corroborates the official action:
the Federal Reserve concluded its sixth meeting of the year by raising the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to a target range of 3.75%-4%, the first time the benchmark rate has been increased since 2023.
— https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2026/09/16/feds-interest-rate-decision-september-16-2026
- [2026-09-16] This means at least one 25bp hike has already occurred in calendar year 2026, well before today's date (2026-10-09) and well before the December 31, 2026 deadline — https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20260916a.htm
- [2026-09-16] Updated Summary of Economic Projections shows a hawkish committee:
the median participant now expects the fed funds rate to hike an additional 25bps ending 2026 at 4.1%, and sixteen of eighteen participants expect one additional rate hike this year, while four participants project two additional hikes.
— https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/adv/insights/portfolio-insights/fixed-income/fixed-income-perspectives/fomc-statement-september-2026/
- [2026-09-16] Analyst commentary reinforces this:
a large majority of the FOMC indicated that they expected another rate hike before the end of 2026.
JPMorgan's strategist stated a further 25bp hike by year-end was
"already priced into markets."
— https://www.chase.com/personal/investments/learning-and-insights/article/federal-reserve-raises-rates-officials-signal-one-more-hike-in-2026
- [Historical base rate] In the broader reference class of "Fed rate hikes within a given calendar year," outcomes depend entirely on the macro/inflation regime: hikes were common in 2004–2006, 2015–2018, and 2022–2023 tightening cycles, but zero hikes occurred in most years from 2008–2015 and 2019–2021 (cutting/hold regimes). This underscores that base rates are regime-dependent rather than a fixed annual frequency, and the 2026 regime (post-cut, re-hiking due to persistent inflation) is itself an unusual and recent shift — no single authoritative "average" applies.
- [2026 regime shift] Forbes' historical tracker notes the abruptness of the reversal:
it's been almost a year since the Fed changed rates, with this September hike marking the first rate hike in three years; last September, former Fed Chair Jerome Powell began a series of rate cuts, and in 2025 there were three consecutive 25-basis-point rate cuts (September, October, December).
— https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/fed-funds-rate-history-1/
- [2026-09-16] Remaining 2026 FOMC meetings are confirmed as October 27–28 and December 8–9, giving two more opportunities for a second hike, though only one additional hike (not two) is needed for this "1 hike" threshold to already be satisfied — https://fedratecalc.com/fomc-meeting-schedule/
- [Forecast track record note] Pre-meeting market pricing was a reasonably good predictor in this cycle:
markets had priced in a better than 90% chance that the FOMC would
hike in September, and the hike occurred as priced, suggesting market-implied odds (e.g., CME FedWatch-style pricing) have had decent short-horizon accuracy this year. — https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/16/fed-rate-decision-september-2026.html
- [2026-07-29] Prior to September, dissent was already building toward hiking: minutes show
three members, Beth M. Hammack, Neel Kashkari, and Lorie K. Logan, voted against the July hold, preferring to raise the target range by 1/4 percentage point.
This signals the hiking bias had outside-view momentum building for months before it materialized. — https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcminutes20260729.htm
BOTTOM LINE: The relevant "base rate" for this question is moot: a confirmed, officially-documented 25bp hike already occurred on 2026-09-16, satisfying a "1 hike in 2026" threshold outright per primary Fed sources, and FOMC dot-plot/market pricing as of September pointed toward an even higher probability of a second hike by December, not a reversal.
NOT FOUND: No long-run quantitative historical base-rate study (e.g., "% of years since 1990 with at least one FOMC hike") was located in search results; also no explicit current CME FedWatch probability for October/December 2026 meetings was found in the sources retrieved.
report: yes case
YES means: at least one 25-basis-point Fed rate hike occurs at some point during calendar year 2026 (a threshold already satisfied once it happens, and which cannot be reversed even if subsequent meetings hold or cut).
- [2026-09-16] The FOMC's official action already delivered the qualifying event for this threshold: a confirmed 25bp hike to 3.75%-4.00%, meaning the "at least 1 hike in 2026" condition is mechanically satisfied regardless of what happens at the two remaining 2026 meetings (Oct 27-28 and Dec 8-9), per the Fed's own October calendar confirming no further ambiguity about meeting dates — https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/2026-october.htm
- [2026-10-07] FOMC minutes released this week show the hawkish case remains intact even after the hike: officials stated that "most participants assessed that another increase in the target range for the federal funds rate would likely be appropriate by year end," reinforcing that the September move was not a one-off outlier but part of a continuing tightening bias — https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/06/stock-market-today-live-updates.html
- [2026-10-01] Fed Vice Chair Philip Jefferson and NY Fed President John Williams have shifted market expectations away from an October move specifically, but notably Williams himself said "one further upward adjustment" in the policy rate may be appropriate late this year — confirming officials still expect a second hike, just timed for December rather than October — https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/fed-may-time-next-interest-173209828.html
- [2026-10-01] Reuters reports that "global brokerages now largely expect the Fed to hike rates only once more this year, in December rather than in October," which — combined with the already-realized September hike — would in fact produce two hikes in 2026, comfortably clearing the "at least 1" bar for this contract — https://www.kitco.com/news/off-the-wire/2026-10-01/fed-officials-wash-away-market-bets-october-rate-increase
- [2026-10-07] Futures-market pricing cited by Yahoo Finance shows "only a 17% chance of a rate hike this month, but a roughly 70% chance in December," indicating markets see a second 2026 hike as the modal outcome even though October itself is unlikely — https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/article/the-fed-was-unanimous-about-raising-rates-in-september-economic-signals-have-since-changed-184839972.html
- [2026-10-07] US News reporting adds a political-calendar mechanism for why December, not October, is the likely second-hike venue: "the October meeting comes close to the November midterms and the Fed may decide not to act so close to an election. That leaves December as the more likely option" — https://usnews.com/news/economy/articles/2026-10-07/fed-telegraphs-another-interest-rate-hike-this-year
- [2026-09-29] Forbes contributor reporting from late September described fixed-income markets as "firmly pricing in back-to-back Federal Reserve rate hikes for October and December 2026," with Fed Governors Michael Barr and Lisa Cook cited as reinforcing the hawkish stance on inflation from AI-driven demand, oil prices, and geopolitical risk — a more aggressive scenario than current October pricing, but illustrative of the hawkish momentum underlying this cycle — https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonmoore/2026/09/29/what-to-expect-from-interest-rates-for-the-rest-of-2026/
- [2026-10-07] Minutes language cited by CNBC shows the inflation rationale persisting: officials noted "a higher policy rate would help prevent sector-specific price increases stemming from energy market disruptions and AI-related demand from broadening out," underscoring that the structural case for hiking (not just the completed September hike) remains active heading into Q4 — https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/06/stock-market-today-live-updates.html
BOTTOM LINE: For a literal "at least 1 hike in 2026" framing, YES is already locked in by the confirmed September 16, 2026 FOMC hike to 3.75%-4.00%, a fact that cannot be undone by any subsequent hold or cut; moreover, Fed minutes, official speeches, and futures pricing as of early October continue to point toward a second hike in December, which would only reinforce (not threaten) this outcome.
NOT FOUND: No evidence of any rate cut or reversal of the September hike; no primary-source indication that the Fed considers the September action invalid or reversible; no confirmation yet of the October 28 or December 9 2026 decisions since they have not occurred.
report: no case
YES means: exactly one 25-bps Fed hike occurs in calendar-year 2026 — i.e., the September 16 move is not followed by any additional 25-bp (or larger) increase at the October 27–28 or December 8–9 meetings, and no emergency inter-meeting hike occurs before Dec 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
- [2026-10-09] Kalshi's and Polymarket's dedicated "Another hike before 2027?" aggregate price stands at 80% Yes (Kalshi 80.5¢, Polymarket 79.5¢), meaning markets assign only roughly a 1-in-5 chance that 2026 ends with just the single September hike — https://defirate.com/odds/fed-decision/
- [2026-10-09] On a meeting-by-meeting basis, Kalshi prices the Dec 9 decision at 76% hike vs 25% hold, up 2 points in the prior 24 hours, directly implying the "exactly one hike" outcome is a minority scenario — https://defirate.com/odds/fed-decision/
- [2026-10-09] Kalshi's standalone December contract (separate page) shows "Hike 25bps" at 73% (up 2 points) and "Fed maintains rate" at only 26% (down 1 point), with "Hike >25bps" priced at 3% — confirming a hold in December is the clear minority case, not the base case, as of this reading — https://kalshi.com/markets/kxfeddecision/fed-meeting/kxfeddecision-26dec
- [2026-10-09] Even the lower-probability October meeting carries a non-trivial 16-18% hike chance (Kalshi 17¢, Polymarket 15.5¢); if the Fed hikes in October, this contract would resolve NO immediately (per the rules' "impossible" early-resolution clause) well before December even needs to be decided — https://defirate.com/odds/fed-decision/
- [2026-10-07] Independent tracker data (admiralmarkets) shows futures-implied odds of "at least one hike by Dec 9" at about 81% as of Oct 5, consistent with the Kalshi/Polymarket readings and reinforcing that markets see the December meeting, not a pause, as the likely site of a second 2026 move — https://admiralmarkets.com/analytics/traders-blog/fomc-minutes-october-2026
- [2026-10-09] A third-party tracker (rateprobability.com) shows the market-implied path pricing roughly 2.3 additional 25bp increments by the Dec 9 meeting relative to today's effective rate, a more aggressive tightening path than a single additional hike would imply — https://rateprobability.com/fed
- [2026-09-16 cited in colleague reports, extended] The September SEP already showed 16 of 18 participants expecting at least one more hike by year end and 4 of 18 expecting two more hikes; combined with the hawkish Oct 7 minutes, officials' own dots point toward a second hike as their base case, not a pause — https://defirate.com (corroborating Schwab's 2026-09-16 reporting)
- [2026-10-07] CNBC reporting independently notes markets "expect the central bank to stay on hold" specifically for the imminent October decision, which is consistent with the NO case resting on timing (hike expected in December, not October) rather than on no hike occurring at all in 2026 — https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/07/inflation-fears-on-the-rise-as-one-year-outlook-in-fed-survey-hits-highest-since-may-2023.html
- [2026-10-09 mechanism] Because one hike has already occurred, the contract's own rules ("resolve early to No if more hikes have already occurred than the strike") mean that any hike at either remaining 2026 meeting (Oct 28 or Dec 9) is sufficient and necessary to flip this market to NO — there is no scenario requiring both meetings to hike; a single additional move anywhere before Dec 31 closes it out NO.
- [2026-10-09] The only path to YES is a full skip at both remaining meetings (and no emergency action), which current pricing implies has roughly a 20-27% probability based on the complement of the "another hike" aggregates (100% − 80% ≈ 20%, or 100% − 73-76% ≈ 24-27% using the December-only figures) — https://defirate.com/odds/fed-decision/, https://kalshi.com/markets/kxfeddecision/fed-meeting/kxfeddecision-26dec
BOTTOM LINE: For a contract requiring exactly one 2026 hike, the strongest NO case is that market-implied odds (Kalshi/Polymarket, Oct 9 readings) put a second hike at roughly 73-80% likely by Dec 9, meaning the dominant scenario is NOW two hikes in 2026, not one — the only way to YES is a clean skip at both the Oct 28 and Dec 9 meetings, priced at only ~20-27%.
NOT FOUND: No evidence yet of the Fed's actual Oct 28 decision (hasn't happened); no official December Fed dot plot (SEP not released until the Dec 8-9 meeting itself); no confirmation of any emergency inter-meeting action.
3. Forecasters 5 draws · Opus 5.5 + GPT-6 Astra + GPT-5.6 Sol · plain mean
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
67% conf
| Yes | 21% |
| No | 79% |
(0) Resolution check: this is the exact-count bucket for one hike. The Fed's 9/16 press release and FRED (target upper bound 4.00%, effective rate 3.88%) confirm exactly one 25bp hike so far in 2026, the first since 2023. So YES is live but not locked in. It needs no further hike at the Oct 27–28 or Dec 8–9 meetings and no emergency move. Any additional hike resolves this NO immediately.
(a) About 12 weeks remain, covering two scheduled FOMC meetings plus the window for an emergency action through Dec 31.
(b) Status quo: if the Fed holds from today, the market resolves YES. However, the Fed's own September projections had 16 of 18 participants expecting at least one more hike, and the Oct 7 minutes said most officials see another hike as likely appropriate by year-end.
(c) NO path: inflation stays hot (PCE ~3.8%, core ~3.4%), AI and energy demand persist, and the Fed hikes in December (Kalshi ~73–76%) or less likely in October (~16–18%).
(d) YES path: data softens enough to justify a skip at both meetings. Unemployment ticked up to 4.2% in September, officials say they 'can wait', and an October move near the midterms looks unlikely.
Anchors: this market trades at 21.5%. Its complement, 'Another Fed rate hike in 2026', sits at 79.5% on Polymarket and 80% on Kalshi, so the crowds agree. The research surfaces no unpriced information, so I stay at the market price.
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
68% conf
| Yes | 22% |
| No | 78% |
(0) Not yet resolved. The Fed's Sept 16, 2026 press release confirms one 25bp hike to 3.75–4.00%, and FRED DFEDTARU still shows 4.00% through Oct 8. This is an exact-count bucket, so YES needs the year to end with exactly that one hike; any further hike resolves NO immediately under the early-resolution clause. (a) About 12 weeks remain, covering the Oct 27–28 and Dec 8–9 FOMC meetings plus any emergency action before Dec 31. (b) If nothing changes and the Fed holds at both meetings, this resolves YES; that is the market's minority scenario. (c) NO path: the September SEP had 16 of 18 participants expecting another hike, the Oct 7 minutes said most saw another increase as likely appropriate by year-end, and Williams has talked of 'one further upward adjustment.' A December hike, priced at about 73–76% on Kalshi, or an October surprise (about 16–17%) would flip this to NO. (d) YES path: unemployment drifting up (4.2% in September) and softer inflation prints lead the Fed to skip both meetings, as officials have already shown willingness to wait. The anchor is Polymarket at 21.5%, which matches the complements of Polymarket's 'Another hike in 2026' (79.5%) and Kalshi's 'before 2027' (80%) markets. The research surfaces no unpriced information, so I stay near the market at 22%.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
74% conf
| Yes | 22% |
| No | 78% |
This contract requires exactly one hike-equivalent, not at least one: reports cite the official September 16 FOMC statement documenting a 25-bp increase, but no second hike is documented, so neither outcome is settled. The resolution-source extraction omitted the relevant 2026 history; corroborating reporting and FRED's October 8 target upper bound of 4% support the reported status quo, while incomplete annual-count verification warrants residual uncertainty rather than near-certainty. Approximately 83 days remain until the rules' December 31, 11:59 PM ET deadline, encompassing the October 27–28 and December 8–9 meetings plus possible emergency actions. If there are no further increases, YES wins; subsequent cuts would not erase the September hike. The NO scenario is another increase at either meeting or between meetings, supported by the September SEP and October 7 minutes indicating that most officials expected additional tightening before year-end. The YES scenario is sufficiently softer inflation or employment data persuading officials to postpone further tightening into 2027, with September unemployment edging up to 4.2% and October hold expectations offering some support. I retain the source market's 21.5% YES anchor because the research establishes no reliable, specifically unpriced information warranting a departure. Kalshi's approximately 80% probability of a hike before 2027 and Polymarket's 79.5% 'another hike' price corroborate this assessment only as related-market context, while the research's claims that YES is already guaranteed incorrectly apply an at-least-one interpretation.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
77% conf
| Yes | 22% |
| No | 78% |
This contract requires exactly one hike, not at least one: the September 16 official FOMC release cited in the research documents the first 25bp increase of 2026, so neither final Yes nor early No is established. About 83 days remain until December 31 at 11:59 PM ET, including the October 28 and December 9 scheduled decisions and any emergency actions. If nothing changes, Yes wins; its plausible scenario is cooling inflation or weaker employment persuading officials to make no further increases through year-end. The principal No scenario is another December hike, supported by the September projections and October 7 minutes indicating that most officials expected further tightening; any additional qualifying increase, including 1–24bp, defeats exactly one regardless of subsequent cuts. Recent guidance favoring an October hold delays tightening rather than clearly abandoning it. I retain the source market's live 21.5% Yes anchor because the research supplies no convincing, unpriced information warranting a departure. Related markets pricing another hike near 80% support this assessment as context, not as same-contract anchors. The truncated resolution-source extract leaves residual count-verification risk within these probabilities: the separately cited official release and corroborating reporting support one hike, while FRED's unchanged 4.00% upper bound through October 8 corroborates only the current level, limiting confidence in the full-year reconstruction.
gpt-5.6-sol · high effort
82% conf
| Yes | 21% |
| No | 79% |
(0) The outcome is not yet resolved: the Fed’s official September 16 release documents one 25-bp hike, but this contract asks whether exactly one occurs, so another hike before year-end would make Yes impossible. (a) About 83 days remain until December 31, including scheduled decisions on October 28 and December 9 plus the possibility of an emergency action. (b) If nothing changes, 2026 ends with exactly the single September hike and the market resolves Yes. (c) No results if the Fed raises rates at either remaining meeting; September projections had 16 of 18 participants expecting at least one further hike, and early-October markets put another 2026 hike near 80%. (d) Yes results if the Fed holds at both meetings and makes no emergency hike, plausibly because officials have recently emphasized patience and the unemployment rate is 4.2%. I anchor closely to Polymarket’s 21.5% Yes price, with the related Polymarket and Kalshi “another hike” contracts near 79.5%-80% independently implying roughly 20%-20.5% for no further hike; the small difference reflects contract timing and emergency-action risk.
4. Final plain mean of 5 draws
21%
(74% confidence)
Yes: 21%
No: 79%
Mean of 5 draws (0.21, 0.22, 0.21, 0.21, 0.21). (0) Resolution check: this is the exact-count bucket for one hike. The Fed's 9/16 press release and FRED (target upper bound 4.00%, effective rate 3.88%) confirm exactly one 25bp hike so far in 2026, the first since 2023. So YES is live but not locked in. It needs no further hike at the Oct 27–28 or Dec 8–9 meetings and no emergency move. Any additional hike resolves this NO immediately.
(a) About 12 weeks remain, covering two scheduled FOMC meetings plus the window for an emergency action through Dec 31.
(b) Status quo: if the Fed holds from today, the market resolves YES. However, the Fed's own September projections had 16 of 18 participants expecting at least one more hike, and the Oct 7 minutes said most officials see another hike as likely appropriate by year-end.
(c) NO path: inflation stays hot (PCE ~3.8%, core ~3.4%), AI and energy demand persist, and the Fed hikes in December (Kalshi ~73–76%) or less likely in October (~16–18%).
(d) YES path: data softens enough to justify a skip at both meetings. Unemployment ticked up to 4.2% in September, officials say they 'can wait', and an October move near the midterms looks unlikely.
Anchors: this market trades at 21.5%. Its complement, 'Another Fed rate hike in 2026', sits at 79.5% on Polymarket and 80% on Kalshi, so the crowds agree. The research surfaces no unpriced information, so I stay at the market price.
Pipeline Timing
Total pipeline time: 117.5s
Per-tool research timings shown in the Research section above.