← back to scans
Will Washington’s annual-average employment in Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing for 2026 be above 83,000 jobs?
87%
Agent
87%
Market Price
+0.0%
Edge
74%
Confidence
49,274
Volume
1.0c
Spread
205
Days to resolution
13
Markets in event
final rationale
Mean of 5 draws (0.86, 0.85, 0.87, 0.87, 0.90). (0) Not resolved yet. The official 2026 annual average will only be published after the early-2027 benchmark revision, and the rules use that published figure.
(a) About seven months remain until the April 30, 2027 close. September through December data plus the benchmark are still to come.
(b) Status quo: the current-vintage FRED NSA series runs 81.0, 81.6, 82.1, 82.7, 83.3, 84.7, 86.0 and 85.7 for Jan–Aug 2026, which averages about 83.4k. The remaining four months need only average above roughly 82.2k for the year to clear 83.0. If they hold near 85.7–86k, the annual average comes out around 84.2k, a cushion of about 1.2k. Boeing's rate-47 737 transition, the new fourth line, ESD's report of aerospace up 5,800 year on year in August, and the SPEEA contract ratified Oct 1 (averting a strike) all support holding that level.
(c) NO path: the annual benchmark revision cuts 2026 levels by more than about 1.2–1.5k. This is plausible: the 2025 months were revised by about 3k in the last benchmark, and the OFM vintages show multi-thousand swings in single months. A sharp Q4 seasonal dip or Boeing disruption could compound it.
(d) YES path: employment stays in the mid-80s through year-end and the benchmark is neutral or upward, giving an average of about 84k.
The market's 87% looks about right. The main unpriced uncertainty is benchmark revision risk, so I land slightly below at 0.86.
price vs. prediction
market price
agent forecast at t+0
11 follow-ups
1. Planner Opus 5.5 · picks the research tools
Tools chosen:
kalshi_direct
kalshi_related
fred
resolution_source
earnings_data
Planner reasoning
The question resolves on the BLS state employment series for Washington aerospace (NAICS 3364). FRED likely carries this series (SMU53000003133640001), so it gives the 2026 monthly values to date and lets us estimate the annual average against 83,000. The Kalshi price is the anchor, and the sibling strikes in the same series show the market's implied distribution. Boeing's Washington employment news, including the 2024 strike aftermath and any layoffs, also matters.
2. Research parallel tool calls + 4 web research loops (Sonnet 5) · read raw by the forecasters
at a glance
RESEARCH DIGEST (built in code: tool summaries and each report's bottom line; the forecasters read the full tool outputs and reports)
Tools
- kalshi_direct: ## This Market's Kalshi Data **Above 83,000 jobs** (KXWAAEROEMP-27APR30-T83000) - Current price (probability): 87.00% (live; bid 86% / ask 87%) - 7-day price change: +6.00% - 30-day price change: +3.00% - Average daily volume: 2464 contracts - Price range: 80.00% - 88.00% - Data points: 20 days
- resolution_source: already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=True; last_updated=Sep 18, 2026. FRED monthly data (not seasonally adjusted) for Washington Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing shows Apr 2026: 82.7, May 2026: 83.3, Jun 2026: 84.7, Jul 2026: 86.0, Aug 2026: 85.7 (thousands of persons). No annual-average figure for 2026 has been published yet, as the year is incomplete.
- kalshi_related: 1 related markets / summaries. series KXWAAEROEMP: 0 markets (skipped 13 no-signal) | keyword 'Washington aerospace employment': ok
- fred: Fetched 5 FRED series (lookback=1000d) (via search 'All Employees Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing Washington').
- earnings_data: Fetched FMP data for 1 ticker(s).
Research loops, bottom lines
- current state: The most recent published BLS data (through July 2026, not seasonally adjusted) shows Washington aerospace manufacturing employment rising steadily each month since March 2026 (82.1→86.0 thousand), driven by Boeing's 737 rate increase to 47/month and a broader industry hiring surge; if this upward trajectory continues or holds through year-end, the annual average for 2026 would plausibly clear 83,000, but confirmation requires the still-unpublished August–December 2026 data and the final BLS ann
- base rate: Historically, Washington's NAICS 3364 annual-average employment has crossed 83,000 in past up-cycles (2007-09, 2011-19) and fallen well short in down-cycles (1999-2005, 2020-2025); the 83,000 line is a realistic mid-cycle marker, not an extreme. The current cycle, driven by Boeing's 737 rate increases, has already pushed monthly (NSA) employment from the mid-70s in 2025 to 82.1-86.0k in March-July 2026, a trajectory that—if sustained or further increased in H2—makes a full-year 2026 average abov
- yes case: Two independent, more-recent data points — the WA ESD's own August 2026 payroll report (aerospace manufacturing up 5,800 y/y, manufacturing overall still rising) and Boeing's confirmed 42→47/month 737 rate transition plus a new fourth production line starting in July 2026 — corroborate and extend the FRED series' March–July climb (82.1k→86.0k), and September 2026 industry production data show the 737 line still running at an elevated, stable pace into Q4. If the monthly NSA series merely holds n
- no case: Washington's own state labor-market reports (OFM/ESD, seasonally adjusted) show aerospace employment running below 83,000 through at least Feb-Mar 2026 and reveal a pattern of significant downward revisions to recent months plus a recurring December seasonal dip; combined with Boeing's own caution that Rate 47 is merely "stabilizing" rather than accelerating further, rising labor costs from new union contracts, and broader signs of WA/US economic cooling, there is a credible, evidence-based case
tools
| tool | status | time | items | summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| kalshi_direct | OK | 0.2s | 1 | ## This Market's Kalshi Data **Above 83,000 jobs** (KXWAAEROEMP-27APR30-T83000) - Current price (probability): 87.00% (live; bid 86% / ask 87%) - 7-day price change: +6.00% - 30-day price change: +3.00% - Average daily volume: 2464 contracts - Price range: 80.00% - 88.00% - Data points: 20 days |
| kalshi_related | OK | 0.9s | 1 | 1 related markets / summaries. series KXWAAEROEMP: 0 markets (skipped 13 no-signal) | keyword 'Washington aerospace employment': ok |
| fred | OK | 2.0s | 5 | Fetched 5 FRED series (lookback=1000d) (via search 'All Employees Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing Washington'). |
| resolution_source | OK | 4.5s | 1 | already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=True; last_updated=Sep 18, 2026. FRED monthly data (not seasonally adjusted) for Washington Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing shows Apr 2026: 82.7, May 2026: 83.3, Jun 2026: 84.7, Jul 2026: 86.0, Aug 2026: 85.7 (thousands of persons). No annual-aver |
| earnings_data | OK | 0.4s | 1 | Fetched FMP data for 1 ticker(s). |
research loops
·
4/4 ok ·
16 searches ·
9 page reads
| dimension | status | time | searches | page reads | report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current state | OK | 49s | 4 | 3 | 4060 chars |
| base rate | OK | 56s | 5 | 3 | 4267 chars |
| yes case | OK | 27s | 2 | 2 | 3863 chars |
| no case | OK | 118s | 5 | 1 | 7064 chars |
report: current state
- [2026-09-18] The FRED/BLS State and Metro Area Employment series for All Employees: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing in Washington (SMU53000003133640001, not seasonally adjusted) was last updated with data through July 2026, with monthly values of
Jul 2026: 86.0 Thousands of Persons, Not Seasonally Adjusted
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SMU53000003133640001
- [2026-08-21] The same series shows a clear upward monthly trend over the prior five months: Mar 2026: 82.1, Apr 2026: 82.7, May 2026: 83.3, Jun 2026: 84.7, Jul 2026: 86.0 (thousands of persons, NSA). https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SMU53000003133640001
- [2026-09-13] An industry workforce report citing BLS CES series CES3133640001 states
the fastest growth over the year to July 2026 was in Washington, up 7.2 percent on the 737 rate increase
, confirming a rising trajectory in WA aerospace employment. https://c3workforce.com/insights/aerospace-workforce-2026
- [2026-09-13] At the national level,
US aerospace product and parts manufacturing employed 594,500 people in July 2026, up 26,000 or 4.6 percent in a year, while total manufacturing grew 0.2 percent
, indicating the WA gains are part of a broader industry hiring surge tied to aircraft production rate increases. https://c3workforce.com/insights/aerospace-workforce-2026
- [2026-09-13] Demand drivers cited include Boeing's Q2 2026 results, where
Boeing reported second quarter 2026 revenue of $24.6 billion, up 8 percent, a record total backlog of $715 billion including more than 6,200 commercial airplanes, and said the 737 line began transitioning to 47 a month during the quarter
, directly relevant since the 737 is built in Renton, WA. https://c3workforce.com/insights/aerospace-workforce-2026
- [2026-09-18] The next scheduled BLS State and Metro Area Employment release (which will add August 2026 data) was dated September 18, 2026, per the FRED release calendar notation on the series page; subsequent months (Sept–Dec 2026) remain unpublished as of today. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SMU53000003133640001
- [2026-09-13] A watch-item flagged by industry analysts:
whether the August 2026 value for BLS series CES3133640001 extends the streak
, and continued 737/787 rate increases that could sustain the hiring trend into year-end. https://c3workforce.com/insights/aerospace-workforce-2026
- [2020 report, dated for context] Historical context: Washington's aerospace employment annual average was around
Aerospace employment: 82,700 in 2020 (annual average)
, showing the 83,000 threshold is near where WA aerospace employment stood five years ago, before a sharp pandemic-era decline and the current multi-year recovery. https://app.leg.wa.gov/committeeschedules/Home/Document/223739
- [2026-06-25] AIA's 2026 Facts and Figures report (June 25, 2026, covering 2025 data) is cited as a source for state-level aerospace and defense employment rankings, confirming Washington remains among the top states for aerospace manufacturing employment concentration. https://c3workforce.com/insights/aerospace-workforce-2026
NOT FOUND: Exact January and February 2026 monthly values for the WA series (needed to compute a precise year-to-date average); the official BLS QCEW/CES 2025 Washington NAICS 3364 annual-average figure (to establish the 2025 baseline precisely); any August–December 2026 monthly data (not yet published as of today); any direct BLS statement or market-specific commentary addressing the 83,000 annual-average threshold for 2026.
BOTTOM LINE: The most recent published BLS data (through July 2026, not seasonally adjusted) shows Washington aerospace manufacturing employment rising steadily each month since March 2026 (82.1→86.0 thousand), driven by Boeing's 737 rate increase to 47/month and a broader industry hiring surge; if this upward trajectory continues or holds through year-end, the annual average for 2026 would plausibly clear 83,000, but confirmation requires the still-unpublished August–December 2026 data and the final BLS annual-average release.
report: base rate
- [2026-08-21] BLS state CES data (not seasonally adjusted, series SMU53000003133640001) show Washington NAICS 3364 employment climbing through H1 2026:
Jul 2026: 86.0, Jun 2026: 84.7, May 2026: 83.3, Apr 2026: 82.7, Mar 2026: 82.1
(thousands of persons). Source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SMU53000003133640001
- [2026-01-28] Prior-vintage BLS data for the same series showed Washington still well below the 83k threshold in late 2025 (Sep 2025: 76.4k, Aug 2025: 76.3k, Jul 2025: 76.8k, Jun 2025: 75.9k, May 2025: 75.9k), confirming the current ramp is a sharp and recent acceleration rather than a stable plateau. Source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/SMU53000003133640001
- [2026-09-13] Industry tracker reporting on national BLS CES data states
five states, California, Washington, Texas, Florida and Kansas, hold 44 percent of aerospace and defense employment, and the fastest growth over the year to July 2026 was in Washington, up 7.2 percent on the 737 rate increase
, corroborating the state-level FRED trend from an independent compilation. Source: https://c3workforce.com/insights/aerospace-workforce-2026
- [1990-2025 history] Longer-run FRED history for this same Washington series shows the 83k level has been crossed repeatedly in past Boeing production cycles (e.g., ~83-86k in 2007-2009, ~83-97k in 2011-2016, ~82-89k in 2017-2019) and fallen well below it during downturns (e.g., high-50s to mid-60s in 1993-1995 and 1999-2004, high-60s to mid-70s in 2020-2025). This indicates 83k is a historically "mid-cycle" level, neither a record high nor unusually low. Source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/SMU53000003133640001
- [2021-11-01 report, WA state] A 2020 state workforce report noted
the core "Aerospace Manufacturing and Parts" (NAICS 3364) industry employed 83,904 people in 2018
, showing that 2018's annual level was almost exactly at today's 83,000 strike, i.e., historically borderline rather than extreme. Source: https://wtb.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/FINAL-Aerospace-Report.pdf
- [2026-09-13] National (not state) NAICS 3364 employment hit a multi-year high in 2026:
US aerospace product and parts manufacturing employed 594,500 people in July 2026, up 26,000 or 4.6 percent in a year
, confirming an industry-wide expansion cycle (driven by Boeing/Airbus rate increases and defense spending) that Washington, as the largest single-state hub, is participating in disproportionately. Source: https://c3workforce.com/insights/aerospace-workforce-2026
- [National context, 1987-2024] National BLS Industry Productivity annual data show the U.S. aerospace manufacturing workforce bottomed around 483-513k in 2020-2021 and recovered to
537.4 in 2023, 563.0 in 2024 (thousands)
, consistent with a broad recovery/expansion cycle now reaching Washington with a lag. Source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/IPUEN3364W200000000
- [No dedicated prediction-market or poll history found] No history of this specific Kalshi contract (or an equivalent prior-year version) could be located, so there is no direct market base rate; the "outside view" here rests on BLS historical series behavior and current-cycle trend data rather than on past forecaster accuracy.
BOTTOM LINE: Historically, Washington's NAICS 3364 annual-average employment has crossed 83,000 in past up-cycles (2007-09, 2011-19) and fallen well short in down-cycles (1999-2005, 2020-2025); the 83,000 line is a realistic mid-cycle marker, not an extreme. The current cycle, driven by Boeing's 737 rate increases, has already pushed monthly (NSA) employment from the mid-70s in 2025 to 82.1-86.0k in March-July 2026, a trajectory that—if sustained or further increased in H2—makes a full-year 2026 average above 83,000 plausible and consistent with the direction (not just the level) of comparable past recovery episodes.
NOT FOUND: Washington's actual January-February 2026 monthly values, Washington's August-onward 2026 monthly values, an official BLS QCEW/CES 2026 annual-average figure (not yet published, as annual averages are finalized only after the full year's data are in, typically early the following year), and any existing prediction-market or analyst point-forecast specifically for Washington's 2026 annual average in this series.
report: yes case
YES means: BLS publishes a Washington NAICS 3364 (Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing) 2026 annual-average employment figure above 83,000 jobs.
- [2026-09-16] Washington's Employment Security Department (ESD) state labor-market profile, updated September 2026, reports that
7,300 (2.7%) more manufacturing jobs, with manufacturing employment increasing over the past several months, and aerospace manufacturing up 5,800 over the year.
This is an independent state-agency confirmation (distinct from the FRED/BLS CES series already cited) that the aerospace hiring surge is broad and accelerating into August 2026, not a one-month blip.
- [2026-09-16] The same ESD release shows statewide manufacturing (goods-producing) employment at
279,100 in Aug. 2026, versus 279,000 in Jul. 2026 and 271,800 in Aug. 2025, a 2.7% year-over-year gain
, indicating the manufacturing/aerospace hiring trend held through the most recent month for which state-level data exists, supporting continuation of the upward trajectory noted in the FRED series through July.
- [2026-07-31] Boeing's Form 10-Q for Q2 2026 confirms that
during the first half of 2026, the 737 program began to transition from a production rate of 42 to 47 per month with FAA concurrence, and began low-rate production on a new 737 production line in July 2026
, a direct, verifiable mechanism for additional Renton-area hiring in H2 2026 beyond what was already captured in the July FRED data.
- [2026-10-05] Forecast International's September 2026 commercial-aircraft production tracker reports that
commercial aircraft manufacturing rebounded in September 2026, with total output rising to 146 units from 131 in August and surpassing July's previous recent high of 137 aircraft
, and that
the 737 MAX program continued to serve as a stable source of production in September
, suggesting Boeing's Washington-based 737 line kept running at an elevated, rate-increase-supported pace into Q4 2026 — the months still needed to lift the full-year average.
- [2025-12-17] An earlier Forecast International headline flagged by this same tracker series, titled "Boeing 737 MAX Production: Signs Emerge of a Potential 63-Per-Month Rate," points to a credible longer-run upside case: if Boeing pushes past 47/month toward higher rates as planned, Renton-area aerospace hiring could keep climbing through late 2026, further supporting an above-83,000 annual average. (Headline cited per search result; full article not fetched.)
- [2026-09-13] National industry data already cited by colleagues show Washington posting the fastest year-over-year aerospace employment growth of any state (7.2%) through July 2026; combined with the newly confirmed August ESD manufacturing data, this indicates the growth rate has not decelerated through the most recent available month.
BOTTOM LINE: Two independent, more-recent data points — the WA ESD's own August 2026 payroll report (aerospace manufacturing up 5,800 y/y, manufacturing overall still rising) and Boeing's confirmed 42→47/month 737 rate transition plus a new fourth production line starting in July 2026 — corroborate and extend the FRED series' March–July climb (82.1k→86.0k), and September 2026 industry production data show the 737 line still running at an elevated, stable pace into Q4. If the monthly NSA series merely holds near its July level (86.0k) rather than reverses sharply, the 2026 annual average would clear 83,000 comfortably, making sustained Boeing 737/787 rate increases through Q4 2026 the single most likely path to YES.
NOT FOUND: An official BLS or ESD monthly figure for Washington NAICS 3364 specifically beyond July 2026 (August–December 2026 not yet published in the FRED/CES state series); any explicit full-year 2026 forecast or point estimate for the WA aerospace annual average from BLS, ESD, or industry analysts.
report: no case
YES means: BLS's official annual-average employment figure for Washington NAICS 3364 (Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing) for calendar-year 2026 comes in above 83,000. The dimension below argues for NO (annual average ≤83,000).
- [2026-04] Washington's own Employment Security Department/OFM joint report shows seasonally-adjusted aerospace employment levels well under the 83,000 strike for the first two months of 2026:
Aerospace Employment (level) was 84,000, 81,100, 81,300, 81,800 for the Nov-25, Dec-25, Jan-26 and Feb-26 columns
— meaning Feb-26 (81,800) was still *below* the year-ago Feb-25 level of 84,000, a year-over-year decline, not the acceleration implied by later-vintage data. https://ofm.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/monthly_economic_report.pdf
- [2026-03] An earlier vintage of the same Dec-25 month showed a different, higher value:
Aerospace Employment (level) was 79,400, 80,800, 80,400, 81,900 for Sep-25 through Dec-25
, versus 81,100 for Dec-25 in the April report — a roughly 800-job downward revision to the same month in one release cycle, illustrating that the "strong recovery" readings cited elsewhere are subject to material benchmark revisions that have historically moved in both directions. https://ofm.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/monthly_economic_report.pdf
- [2026-05] A third vintage revised Dec-25 down again, to 80,400, and put Mar-26 at only 82,100:
Aerospace Employment (level) was 80,400, 81,000, 81,500, 82,100 for Dec-25 through Mar-26
, confirming a pattern of successive downward re-benchmarking of recent months rather than a clean monotonic climb. https://ofm.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/May_2026_economic_report.pdf
- [2026-07] Two months later, the same Mar-26 figure was revised down sharply again:
Aerospace Employment (level) was 79,400, 82,600, 83,100, 84,000 for Mar-26 through Jun-26
— Mar-26 dropped from 82,100 to 79,400 across vintages, a ~2,700-job swing for one month, underscoring that any single month's "high" preliminary reading (including Jul-26's NSA 86.0 cited elsewhere) carries real downside revision risk before the year is finalized. https://ofm.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/July_2026_economic_report.pdf
- [2026-08] The latest available vintage (through July 2026) gives seasonally-adjusted levels of
Aerospace Employment (level) was 79,500, 83,000, 84,000, 84,700 for Apr-26 through Jul-26
— these SA figures run roughly 1,000-1,300 below the NSA figures cited elsewhere for the same months, showing the "headline" NSA strength is partly a seasonal-adjustment artifact rather than pure underlying growth. https://ofm.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/August_2026_Economic_report.pdf
- [2025-04] A seasonal/December-dip pattern recurs across years: in the prior cycle,
Aerospace Employment (level) was 81,700, 79,600, 79,200, 78,300 for Nov-24 through Feb-25
, a sharp Nov-to-Dec drop of roughly 2,100 jobs — if a similar seasonal pullback recurs in Nov-Dec 2026, it would directly erode whatever cushion the mid-year rate-47 ramp builds into the annual average. https://ofm.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/public/dataresearch/economy/monthlyeconomicreport/April2025EconomicReport.pdf
- [2026-05-27] Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg cautioned that reaching the Rate 47 737 target is a stabilization process, not guaranteed continued acceleration:
"We've passed the capstone review for rate 47, so we are now in the process of running the line at the 47-a-month rate," Ortberg said. "It'll probably take us a few months of stabilization there."
A plateau at the newly reached rate — rather than further hiring to chase rate 52/63 — would cap the H2 employment gains needed to lift the full-year average comfortably past 83,000. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/27/boeing-ortberg-737-max-production.html
- [2026-04] Washington's broader economy shows cooling signals that could spill over into manufacturing hiring restraint: the state's own leading-indicator dashboard flagged
U.S. employment growth slowing with a sharp February 2026 nonfarm payroll decline of -133,000 and layoff announcements increasing 25% month-over-month in late March, alongside the Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti Business Conditions Index falling to -0.36, indicating lower economic conditions
, and Washington General Fund revenue coming in below forecast. https://ofm.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/monthly_economic_report.pdf
- [2026-04] Separately, large non-aerospace layoffs continue across Washington's economy (Amazon ~2,599, T-Mobile ~637, Oracle ~475 in subsequent months per the same OFM reports), indicating the state's labor market is not uniformly expanding; if any comparable cost-cutting pressure reaches Boeing's supplier base or white-collar aerospace roles, it could offset blue-collar 737-line hiring gains. https://ofm.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/monthly_economic_report.pdf
- [2026-10-01] Boeing's SPEEA engineering/technical unions only avoided a strike by ratifying a new contract on October 1, 2026 with "immediate 10% raises" — rising labor costs from this and the earlier IAM contract increase pressure on Boeing to control headcount growth even as production rates rise, a cost dynamic that cuts against assuming hiring will keep pace with output indefinitely through year-end. https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/10/01/boeing-contract-engineers-technical-workers.html
- [recent, undated] A 2025 annual-average baseline compiled from BLS QCEW data is implicitly below the 2026 strike, since every monthly reading cited by colleagues for 2025 (per FRED, in the mid-70s to 80s) sat under 83,000 for essentially the entire year; achieving an annual average above 83,000 for 2026 therefore requires not just matching July's 86.0 NSA peak but sustaining comparably high levels for most of the remaining five-to-seven months to offset the sub-83k first quarter — a materially higher bar than a single strong month suggests. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SMU53000003133640001 (cross-referenced with OFM data above)
BOTTOM LINE: Washington's own state labor-market reports (OFM/ESD, seasonally adjusted) show aerospace employment running below 83,000 through at least Feb-Mar 2026 and reveal a pattern of significant downward revisions to recent months plus a recurring December seasonal dip; combined with Boeing's own caution that Rate 47 is merely "stabilizing" rather than accelerating further, rising labor costs from new union contracts, and broader signs of WA/US economic cooling, there is a credible, evidence-based case that the full calendar-year 2026 average could land at or below 83,000 even though mid-2026 monthly readings have been strong.
NOT FOUND: The official BLS QCEW/CES 2025 Washington NAICS 3364 annual-average figure as a precise number; actual (not seasonally adjusted) January–February 2026 values for the specific FRED series SMU53000003133640001 used for resolution; any August–December 2026 data for that exact series; and any direct statement from BLS or Boeing addressing the 83,000 annual-average threshold itself.
3. Forecasters 5 draws · Opus 5.5 + GPT-6 Astra + GPT-5.6 Sol · plain mean
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
70% conf
| Yes | 86% |
| No | 14% |
(0) Not resolved yet. The official 2026 annual average will only be published after the early-2027 benchmark revision, and the rules use that published figure.
(a) About seven months remain until the April 30, 2027 close. September through December data plus the benchmark are still to come.
(b) Status quo: the current-vintage FRED NSA series runs 81.0, 81.6, 82.1, 82.7, 83.3, 84.7, 86.0 and 85.7 for Jan–Aug 2026, which averages about 83.4k. The remaining four months need only average above roughly 82.2k for the year to clear 83.0. If they hold near 85.7–86k, the annual average comes out around 84.2k, a cushion of about 1.2k. Boeing's rate-47 737 transition, the new fourth line, ESD's report of aerospace up 5,800 year on year in August, and the SPEEA contract ratified Oct 1 (averting a strike) all support holding that level.
(c) NO path: the annual benchmark revision cuts 2026 levels by more than about 1.2–1.5k. This is plausible: the 2025 months were revised by about 3k in the last benchmark, and the OFM vintages show multi-thousand swings in single months. A sharp Q4 seasonal dip or Boeing disruption could compound it.
(d) YES path: employment stays in the mid-80s through year-end and the benchmark is neutral or upward, giving an average of about 84k.
The market's 87% looks about right. The main unpriced uncertainty is benchmark revision risk, so I land slightly below at 0.86.
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
70% conf
| Yes | 85% |
| No | 15% |
(0) Not yet resolved. BLS publishes the official 2026 annual average only after the full year and the annual benchmark, around March 2027. (a) That leaves roughly three to six months, with September through December data and the benchmark revision still to come before the 2027-04-30 close. (b) Status quo: the current NSA series (FRED SMU53000003133640001) averages about 83.4k for January through August (81.0 to 85.7). If September through December hold near August's 85.7k, the annual average is about 84.2-84.3k, roughly 1.2k above the strike. Current-vintage data only fails if the last four months average below about 82.4k, a drop of over 3k that no evidence supports: the 737 rate-47 ramp, a new production line and ratified union contracts all point the other way. (c) NO path: the March 2027 benchmark against QCEW revises the whole year down by about 1.2k or more. Such revisions happen; the prior vintage moved Sep-2025 from 76.4k to 79.2k, and OFM's SA figures shifted by several thousand across vintages. Alternatively, a sharp Q4 production disruption or layoffs, possibly combined with a weaker-than-usual December. (d) YES path: employment holds in the mid-80s through Q4 under rate-47 production, and the benchmark revision is small or upward, giving an official average around 84k. The market at 87% prices mainly the benchmark risk. I shade slightly below it because a roughly 1.4% cushion is within the range of historical state-level 4-digit NAICS revisions.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
76% conf
| Yes | 87% |
| No | 13% |
Kalshi's live 87% Yes price (86% bid/87% ask) is my anchor, which I retain because the research does not establish a clearly unpriced, verified edge. The September 18 BLS/FRED resolution-source read contains no official 2026 annual average, so neither outcome is settled: Yes still requires BLS to publish a figure strictly above 83,000. From October 7, approximately 205 days remain until the April 30, 2027 close, with 85 days remaining in the measurement year. The raw, exact-series NSA observations supersede the research reports' incomplete July-only descriptions: January–August averages approximately 83,388 jobs, and holding August's 85,700 through December would imply roughly 84,158 for the year, making Yes the status-quo outcome. A YES scenario is sustained employment near current levels, supported by Boeing's reported July 31 Form 10-Q transition from 42 to 47 monthly 737s and Forecast International's October 5 account of stable September 737 production, followed by an official annual figure above the threshold. A NO scenario is a sharp employment reversal bringing September–December's average to approximately 82,225 or lower before rounding and revisions, or a downward benchmark adjustment of roughly 1,200 jobs to the otherwise flat-employment annual projection. The OFM reports flag revision risk, but their conflicting vintages and seasonally adjusted figures do not establish an equivalent downward revision to the exact NSA resolution series, while the supplied annual-series baseline of 80,500 for 2025 confirms that this year's gains matter. I retain 13% for No principally because the cushion is vulnerable to benchmark revisions and late-year contraction, and settlement depends on BLS's officially published annual average—not this monthly arithmetic—with an official 83,000 insufficient for Yes.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
76% conf
| Yes | 87% |
| No | 13% |
I retain Kalshi’s live 87% YES price as my anchor because the research supports the consensus without establishing a clear overlooked advantage. The September 18 BLS/FRED source read shows no official 2026 annual average, so the condition is not already met; approximately 85 days remain in 2026 and 205 days until the April 30, 2027 trading deadline, with the official annual publication still required. Prioritizing the raw NSA observations through August over research reports stopping at July, January–August employment averaged approximately 83,388 jobs. If employment remains at August’s 85,700 for September–December, diagnostic monthly arithmetic implies approximately 84,158 for the year—a status-quo YES, although only BLS’s officially published annual figure determines settlement. Without revisions, the remaining four months need average only approximately 82,225 to reach the threshold, making stable employment a credible YES scenario supported by Boeing’s Q2 filing describing the 42-to-47 monthly production transition and the October 5 production tracker. A NO scenario is a sufficiently sharp late-year employment contraction, or downward revisions before determination that erase the roughly 1,158-job annual cushion under the flat-employment scenario; exactly 83,000 also resolves NO. Publication, rounding, and benchmark risk therefore deserve meaningful probability, but the NO report’s seasonally adjusted figures and inconsistent vintage comparisons are not direct corrections to the specified NSA series, and revisions after determination do not count. Historical cyclicality, August’s slight monthly decline, and imperfect corroboration of industry claims justify retaining 13% for NO, while the October 1 SPEEA contract settlement reduces immediate strike-disruption risk.
gpt-5.6-sol · high effort
78% conf
| Yes | 90% |
| No | 10% |
(0) The condition is not already resolved: the BLS/FRED resolution source has monthly data through August 2026 but no official 2026 annual-average figure, which must still be published before settlement. (a) About 85 days remain in calendar 2026 and roughly 205 days remain until the April 30, 2027 market close. (b) January-August NSA employment totals 667.1 thousand job-months, averaging 83.39 thousand; if employment simply remains at August's 85.7 thousand through December, the full-year average would be about 84.16 thousand and resolve Yes. (c) A No outcome could result if September-December average no more than roughly 82.2 thousand, or if BLS benchmark revisions materially reduce the currently published months; OFM reports document revisions as large as approximately 2,700 jobs for an individual month. (d) Yes requires only that the recent Boeing-supported employment level avoid a sharp reversal, with Boeing's 737 rate increase and Washington ESD's reported aerospace gains supporting that scenario. I anchor on Kalshi's 87% Yes price and move modestly to 90% because the complete January-August figures show the remaining-month break-even level is substantially below August employment, while retaining meaningful revision and year-end downturn risk.
4. Final plain mean of 5 draws
87%
(74% confidence)
Yes: 87%
No: 13%
Mean of 5 draws (0.86, 0.85, 0.87, 0.87, 0.90). (0) Not resolved yet. The official 2026 annual average will only be published after the early-2027 benchmark revision, and the rules use that published figure.
(a) About seven months remain until the April 30, 2027 close. September through December data plus the benchmark are still to come.
(b) Status quo: the current-vintage FRED NSA series runs 81.0, 81.6, 82.1, 82.7, 83.3, 84.7, 86.0 and 85.7 for Jan–Aug 2026, which averages about 83.4k. The remaining four months need only average above roughly 82.2k for the year to clear 83.0. If they hold near 85.7–86k, the annual average comes out around 84.2k, a cushion of about 1.2k. Boeing's rate-47 737 transition, the new fourth line, ESD's report of aerospace up 5,800 year on year in August, and the SPEEA contract ratified Oct 1 (averting a strike) all support holding that level.
(c) NO path: the annual benchmark revision cuts 2026 levels by more than about 1.2–1.5k. This is plausible: the 2025 months were revised by about 3k in the last benchmark, and the OFM vintages show multi-thousand swings in single months. A sharp Q4 seasonal dip or Boeing disruption could compound it.
(d) YES path: employment stays in the mid-80s through year-end and the benchmark is neutral or upward, giving an average of about 84k.
The market's 87% looks about right. The main unpriced uncertainty is benchmark revision risk, so I land slightly below at 0.86.
Pipeline Timing
Total pipeline time: 212.4s
Per-tool research timings shown in the Research section above.