forecasting
agent
← back to scans

Will Tesla sell a Cybercab for 30k or less in 2026?

polymarketCompanies·2026-10-06·view on polymarket ↗
22%
Agent
26%
Market Price
-4.3%
Edge
57%
Confidence
59,557
Volume
3.0c
Spread
86
Days to resolution
1
Markets in event
final rationale
Mean of 5 draws (0.17, 0.17, 0.27, 0.27, 0.24). (0) Resolution check: no source shows a qualifying sale. Tesla's site lists no price or configurator. The Q3 delivery report (Oct 2) shows only Model 3/Y deliveries. Every Cybercab built so far, roughly 45 to 169 registered in Texas, sits in Tesla's own robotaxi fleet, which the rules explicitly exclude. (a) About 12 weeks remain until Dec 31, 2026. The Oct 21 earnings call is the main scheduled venue for a retail announcement. (b) Status quo is NO. There is no MSRP, no consumer order page, and the only purchase channel is a commercial/fleet interest form. Tesla walked back 2026 volume production in July. (c) NO scenario: the NHTSA Special Order on FMVSS compliance (no foot brake control) drags on with follow-up questions. Tesla keeps routing units to Austin and Houston fleets, and any retail launch slips into 2027, matching Tesla's history with the Model 3 at $35k and the Cybertruck's price and timing. (d) YES scenario: Musk and Moravy repeatedly promised a sub-$30k sale to a customer before 2027, and the MKBHD bet gives Musk a personal motive. Tesla prices a unit at $30k or less via the individual-purchase interest form and completes one symbolic December delivery to a member of the public. Whether such a sale counts under the 'general public, publicly available terms' test is also uncertain. The market sits at 26.5% after a +12.5% weekly jump, apparently driven by fleet scaling and showcase news rather than any retail-sale signal. Given the regulatory overhang, the absence of any pricing or order infrastructure, and Tesla's base rate on cheap-variant promises, I shade below the market. I keep meaningful weight on a stunt sale because only one transaction is needed.
price vs. prediction
market price agent forecast at t+0
12 follow-ups
re-scan context
This market has been scanned before. Previous predictions:
datepredictedmarket priceconfidence
2026-08-25 6% 8% 78%
1. Planner Opus 5.5 · picks the research tools
Tools chosen: polymarket_direct resolution_source polymarket_related kalshi_related earnings_data
Planner reasoning
The Polymarket price is the anchor, and the resolution source is Tesla's official information, so I'd check the Tesla Cybercab page. Related markets on both venues covering Cybercab production and sales give cross-market signals. TSLA earnings data, including the Q3 delivery report and the upcoming earnings call, may show the production and retail-sales status.
2. Research parallel tool calls + 4 web research loops (Sonnet 5) · read raw by the forecasters
at a glance
RESEARCH DIGEST (built in code: tool summaries and each report's bottom line; the forecasters read the full tool outputs and reports) Tools - polymarket_direct: ## This Market's Polymarket Data **Will Tesla sell a Cybercab for 30k or less in 2026?** - Current price (probability): 26.50% (live; bid 25% / ask 28%) - 7-day price change: +12.50% - 30-day price change: +11.00% - Total volume: $59,557 (USD notional) - Price range: 10.50% - 41.50% - Data points: 120 days - resolution_source: already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=True; last_updated=unknown. The fetched page is just Tesla's Robotaxi page navigation/branding elements with no pricing, sales, or delivery information about the Cybercab. - polymarket_related: Polymarket search over 2 keyword(s), kept 3 matches. keyword 'Cybercab': 1 markets | keyword 'Tesla robotaxi': 2 markets - kalshi_related: 0 related markets / summaries. keyword 'Cybercab': no matches | keyword 'Tesla robotaxi': no matches - earnings_data: Fetched FMP data for 1 ticker(s). Research loops, bottom lines - current state: As of October 6, 2026, Tesla has produced and deployed Cybercabs only into its own company-owned robotaxi fleet (Austin, with ~45 units registered as of late August and public paid rides since Sept 4); there is no published price, no configurator/order page, and no confirmed retail delivery date — Tesla itself walked back 2026 "volume production" guidance in July, and the Sept 3 private event and Asia "road show" explicitly excluded sales. Barring a surprise announcement at the Oct 21 Q3 earning - base rate: The reference class of Tesla's "cheap variant" promises (Model 3 Standard Range, Cybertruck base price) shows a strong historical pattern of multi-year delays, quiet discontinuation, or price creep well above the originally announced figure, and the Cybercab itself is ~2 years past its original unveiling with price/retail-availability still unconfirmed and now complicated by an active NHTSA safety-certification probe; the base rate for this kind of Tesla promise resolving YES within the original - yes case: The clearest path to YES rests on explicit, repeated, dated executive commitments (Musk Feb 18 and Moravy June 30) naming a sub-$30K individual sale within 2026, combined with an already-live "individual Cybercab" purchase-interest channel (Sept 3) and a fast-growing, regulator-tolerated production fleet (169 units by Oct 2) — giving Tesla both motive (the MKBHD bet, investor narrative) and physical means to arrange at least one qualifying retail sale before Dec 31, 2026, even absent a full cons - no case: With no published MSRP, no consumer configurator, an open NHTSA Special Order whose own analyst-sourced odds put "resolution by end of October" at only ~10% and a clean "documented compliance pathway" at just 20%, and every Cybercab built so far routed into Tesla's own fleet (Austin, now Houston) rather than individual retail hands, the structural, regulatory, and historical evidence (Tesla's repeated pattern of missing "cheap variant" deadlines) strongly favors NO by the December 31, 2026 deadl
tools
toolstatustimeitemssummary
polymarket_direct OK 0.3s 1 ## This Market's Polymarket Data **Will Tesla sell a Cybercab for 30k or less in 2026?** - Current price (probability): 26.50% (live; bid 25% / ask 28%) - 7-day price change: +12.50% - 30-day price change: +11.00% - Total volume: $59,557 (USD notional) - Price range: 10.50% - 41.50% - Data points:
resolution_source OK 3.4s 1 already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=True; last_updated=unknown. The fetched page is just Tesla's Robotaxi page navigation/branding elements with no pricing, sales, or delivery information about the Cybercab.
polymarket_related OK 0.6s 3 Polymarket search over 2 keyword(s), kept 3 matches. keyword 'Cybercab': 1 markets | keyword 'Tesla robotaxi': 2 markets
kalshi_related OK 2.6s 0 0 related markets / summaries. keyword 'Cybercab': no matches | keyword 'Tesla robotaxi': no matches
earnings_data OK 0.4s 1 Fetched FMP data for 1 ticker(s).
research loops · 4/4 ok · 17 searches · 6 page reads
dimensionstatustimesearchespage readsreport
current state OK 31s 4 2 5209 chars
base rate OK 34s 4 2 5155 chars
yes case OK 33s 6 1 4140 chars
no case OK 28s 3 1 5173 chars
report: current state
- [2026-02-17] First production Cybercab unit rolled off the line at Gigafactory Texas, confirming manufacturing had begun, though every unit since has gone to Tesla's own robotaxi fleet. In February 2026, Tesla announced the first Cybercab production vehicle had been produced at the Gigafactory Texas near Austin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Cybercab - [2026-02-20] Musk publicly reaffirmed on X that Musk confirmed that Tesla would sell a Cybercab to a customer for $30k or less before 2027 , but this remains a target, not a completed sale. https://www.autoevolution.com/news/tesla-cybercab-was-clearly-not-designed-for-private-customers-so-don-t-get-your-hopes-high-275331.html - [2026-07-22] Tesla's Q2 shareholder letter walked back the 2026 volume-production timeline: Tesla is no longer planning to reach "volume production" of three of its newest products — the Cybercab, the Tesla Semi, and its Megapack 3 commercial energy-storage solution — in 2026 . https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/22/tesla-spending-skyrockets-as-cybercab-semi-megapack-production-timeline-slips/ - [2026-08-31] Texas motor-carrier registration records showed only a small fleet in existence: As of August 2026, Texas motor vehicle records reported about 45 Cybercabs registered to Tesla's Robotaxi fleet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Cybercab - [2026-09-03] Tesla held a private, invite-only Cybercab showcase in Austin; no price, order page, or delivery date was announced, and it opened only a commercial/fleet "interest form," not a retail order book. - [2026-09-04] Public paid Cybercab rides began inside Tesla's own Austin robotaxi fleet (geofenced zone), not as retail vehicle sales. Paid rides launched in Austin around September 3, 2026, in a geofenced zone alongside autonomous Model Y vehicles. https://www.newsbreak.com/stick-shifting-334025021/4894386498334-a-tesla-cybercab-rider-did-the-math-on-musk-s-30k-year-claim - [2026-09-09] Tesla began an Asia "Cybercab road show" (Hong Kong, with Japan and China stops planned); Tesla started an Asia Cybercab road show in Hong Kong, and plans to show it simultaneously in Japan... and China... The road show does not involve sales, test drives or commercial robotaxi operations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Cybercab - [2026-09-22/25] Independent tracking confirms no retail path exists yet: No date exists. Musk said consumer sales this year in February 2026; on July 22 Tesla said it no longer expects volume production in 2026; and the September 3, 2026 event named no order date. Tesla's own fleet FAQ directs interested buyers only to a commercial/fleet interest form, not a consumer order page. - [2026-09-30] NHTSA gave Tesla a deadline to explain Cybercab safety-certification compliance: NHTSA Gives Tesla Until September 30 to Answer Cybercab Safety-Certification Questions. https://www.karmactive.com/tesla-q3-2026-deliveries-486532-waymo-competition/ - [2026-10-02] Tesla's Q3 2026 production/delivery report (486,532 deliveries) made no mention of any Cybercab retail sales or pricing; deliveries were driven entirely by Model 3/Y. In the third quarter, we produced over 464,000 vehicles, delivered over 486,000 vehicles... Model 3/Y · 457,387 · 478,237. https://ir.tesla.com/press-release/tesla-third-quarter-2026-production-deliveries-and-deployments - [2026-10-21] Tesla's Q3 2026 earnings call (scheduled) is the next major event where an update on Cybercab commercialization/pricing could emerge: Elon Musk and top executives... will conduct the 3rd-quarter earnings call on Wednesday, October 21, 2026... beginning at 4:30 PM Central Time. https://www.teslaoracle.com/2026/10/04/tesla-tsla-announces-the-date-and-time-for-the-q3-2026-earnings-call-live-webcast-with-elon-musk-and-his-team/ - [2026-09-08 (reported 27 days ago)] Benzinga noted that prediction markets had already priced in heavy doubt on this exact outcome, reflecting the lack of a retail sale path: Polymarket traders give Tesla just a 17% chance of selling a Cybercab to a retail customer for $30,000 or less by Dec. 31. The contract has attracted more than $55,000 in volume. https://www.benzinga.com/markets/prediction-markets/26/09/61673636/tesla-cybercab-waymo-cost BOTTOM LINE: As of October 6, 2026, Tesla has produced and deployed Cybercabs only into its own company-owned robotaxi fleet (Austin, with ~45 units registered as of late August and public paid rides since Sept 4); there is no published price, no configurator/order page, and no confirmed retail delivery date — Tesla itself walked back 2026 "volume production" guidance in July, and the Sept 3 private event and Asia "road show" explicitly excluded sales. Barring a surprise announcement at the Oct 21 Q3 earnings call, the current state shows no qualifying retail sale has occurred and none is scheduled before year-end. NOT FOUND: No evidence of any completed retail sale transaction, any published Cybercab price/configurator on tesla.com, or any announced consumer delivery date as of the most recent checks (Sept 22-28, 2026); no confirmation of what, if anything, Musk will say about Cybercab retail timing on the Oct 21, 2026 earnings call (not yet occurred).
report: base rate
- [2016-03 to 2019-02] Tesla first teased a $35,000 entry price at the electric sedan's unveiling in March 2016, but it just now opened up orders for the Model 3 Standard Range at the end of February 2019 — a ~3-year gap between promised low-price trim and actual deliveries. https://www.thedrive.com/news/27483/first-35000-tesla-model-3-finally-delivered-nearly-3-years-after-original-announcement - [2021-05] That cheap trim didn't last: the second iteration of the $35,000 Tesla Model 3 Standard Range, which is actually a downgraded Standard Range Plus, will go away after 2020 , illustrating Tesla's pattern of quietly discontinuing promised low-price variants. https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1130320_tesla-is-discontinuing-the-35-000-model-3-yes-again - [2018] An industry analyst's base-rate assessment: "Tesla has a history of overpromising and under-delivering when it comes to pricing, and the Model 3 is a prime example," said Ed Kim, president and chief analyst at AutoPacific . https://www.capitalone.com/cars/learn/finding-the-right-car/heres-what-happened-to-the-35000-tesla-model-3/2075 - [2024-10-10] The Cybercab reference class begins at unveiling: Musk unveiled a two-seat sedan called Cybercab, saying production may start in 2026 and that the vehicle could cost less than $30K , a target that is now ~2 years old with no retail sale yet confirmed. https://energynow.com/2024/10/elon-musk-unveils-30000-tesla-cybercab-with-2026-production-but-details-lacking/ - [2026-02-17/18] Production began but the $30K promise remained verbal, not transactional: Musk appeared to confirm a starting price of $30,000 for the fully autonomous vehicle in a response to Dillon Loomis , with customers including ride-hailing companies rather than retail individuals. https://www.autoblog.com/electric/tesla-builds-first-production-cybercab - [2026-09-03/04] Commercial launch occurred in Austin, but as a ride-hailing service, not a retail sale: Tesla began paid rides, and in September 2026, NHTSA opened an investigation into Tesla's self-certification that the Cybercab complies with applicable federal motor-vehicle safety standards, which were written for human-driven vehicles . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Cybercab - [2026-09-04] As of early September, no consumer configurator existed: Tesla is still targeting a Cybercab price of $30,000 or less, but the company has not published a final MSRP... The September 3 Austin launch moved Cybercab into limited public service, but it did not turn the $30,000 target into a guaranteed retail invoice . https://www.thepricer.org/how-much-will-the-tesla-cybercab-cost/ - [2026-09-04] The only purchase path opened is commercial/fleet, not ordinary retail: Tesla now says people interested in buying an individual Cybercab or a fleet of Cybercabs for commercial purposes can submit an interest form and wait for a representative to contact them — still short of the "qualifying retail customer" bar this question requires. https://www.thepricer.org/how-much-will-the-tesla-cybercab-cost/ - [2026-09-30 deadline] Regulatory overhang remains live: NHTSA's Special Order (Audit Query AQ26002) was opened on September 4, 2026 — one day after Tesla began offering paid Cybercab rides... Tesla response deadline: September 30, 2026 , with NHTSA having not issued a stop-sale or suspension order; the inquiry is investigative, not a shutdown directive , but it adds legal uncertainty to any consumer-sale rollout before year-end. - [2024-2026 pattern] Analogous "cheap EV" promises (Model 3 $25K/$35K, "$25,000 next-gen vehicle") have historically taken multiple years beyond initial target dates to materialize, or were later abandoned/upsold; Announced price 40k - actual price 60k... Announced for 2021 - available from 2023 for the Cybertruck is a recent parallel example of Tesla badly missing both price and timeline targets. https://www.goingelectric.de/forum/viewtopic.php?t=94909&amp=true&lang=en - [2026-09-27] Prediction-market pricing (not this specific contract) shows skepticism baked in by traders following the Goldman Sachs robotaxi-economics note, reflecting a broad outside-view discount on Musk's retail-price promises materializing on schedule. https://www.benzinga.com/markets/prediction-markets/26/09/61673636/tesla-cybercab-waymo-cost BOTTOM LINE: The reference class of Tesla's "cheap variant" promises (Model 3 Standard Range, Cybertruck base price) shows a strong historical pattern of multi-year delays, quiet discontinuation, or price creep well above the originally announced figure, and the Cybercab itself is ~2 years past its original unveiling with price/retail-availability still unconfirmed and now complicated by an active NHTSA safety-certification probe; the base rate for this kind of Tesla promise resolving YES within the original timeframe is low. NOT FOUND: No official Tesla press release or SEC filing announcing a finalized consumer MSRP, configurator, or completed retail sale of a Cybercab to an individual at or under $30,000; no confirmation of NHTSA audit resolution after the September 30, 2026 response deadline.
report: yes case
YES means: Tesla completes at least one bona fide retail sale of a Cybercab to a member of the general public at a base price of $30,000 or less, on or before December 31, 2026. - [2026-02-18] Musk confirmed that Tesla will be selling a Cybercab to regular consumers before 2027, and the vehicle will be priced for $30,000 or less, responding "Yes" to a direct question on X. - [2026-06-30] A Tesla executive ("Lars," i.e., VP of Vehicle Engineering Lars Moravy) stated at a company event that the Cybercab would be sold to a customer for under $30,000 within the next six months — a meaningfully more concrete commitment than anything officially published before , which would place a qualifying sale inside the window this market tracks. - [2026-09-03] Tesla opened its first-ever public purchasing channel for the Cybercab: "If you are interested in purchasing a fleet or an individual Cybercab vehicle for commercial purposes, fill out the form and a representative will contact you," explicitly including "an individual Cybercab," not only fleets. - [2026-09-25] Independent tracking confirms this individual-purchase option remains open and unresolved: nothing Tesla has published excludes individuals, and nothing confirms them — the September 3 interest form is for "a fleet or an individual Cybercab vehicle for commercial purposes." - [2026-10-02/05] Tesla's Austin Cybercab fleet is scaling rapidly — the company has almost quadrupled the number of its driverless, bronze two-seaters authorized for commercial service in Texas in one month, reaching 169 vehicles, nearly four times the number registered at launch — showing production capacity exists that could, in principle, support a diverted retail unit before year-end. - [2026-10-06] Tesla confirmed it will display its Cybercab robotaxi at the Paris Motor Show that kicks off on Oct. 12 , continuing a pattern of international showcases (after the Hong Kong "road show") that keeps the vehicle and its sub-$30K narrative in front of global press ahead of year-end. - [2026-09-30] No public report surfaced of NHTSA shutting down or suspending Cybercab operations after Tesla's Special-Order deadline; regulators had stated approximately 1,000 Cybercabs in the United States are covered, and no recall, suspension, or operating ban has been issued, leaving the regulatory path open for continued (and potentially expanded) deployment. - [2026-10-21 (scheduled)] Tesla's Q3 earnings call is the next company-controlled venue where Musk or Moravy could announce a concrete retail price/order date — consistent with Musk's pattern of making surprise on-call pricing confirmations (as he did at the Oct 2024 call that set the original $30K target). - Mechanism for YES: Tesla does not need a mass retail rollout — a single qualifying sale suffices. Given (a) an open "individual Cybercab" interest-form channel already live since Sept 3, (b) a specific executive-stated six-month window (ending ~Dec 30, 2026) from the June 30 Moravy comments, and (c) rapidly multiplying production/registration numbers, Tesla has both the stated intent and the physical units to execute one symbolic, year-end retail delivery to "win" Musk's public bet with MKBHD and satisfy the letter of the question, even without full volume production. BOTTOM LINE: The clearest path to YES rests on explicit, repeated, dated executive commitments (Musk Feb 18 and Moravy June 30) naming a sub-$30K individual sale within 2026, combined with an already-live "individual Cybercab" purchase-interest channel (Sept 3) and a fast-growing, regulator-tolerated production fleet (169 units by Oct 2) — giving Tesla both motive (the MKBHD bet, investor narrative) and physical means to arrange at least one qualifying retail sale before Dec 31, 2026, even absent a full consumer configurator. NOT FOUND: No evidence of an actual completed retail transaction, published MSRP/configurator, or specific order date as of October 6, 2026; no confirmation of what (if anything) NHTSA concluded after Tesla's September 30 Special Order response, and no readout yet from the October 21 Q3 earnings call.
report: no case
YES means: Tesla completes at least one bona fide retail sale of a Cybercab (or clearly-designated successor) to a member of the general public, at a base price of $30,000 or less, on or before December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. - [2026-09-03/04] Every Cybercab deployed to date — roughly 45 units in Austin, plus a wave shipped to a new Houston hub around Sept. 22 — remains inside Tesla's own company-owned robotaxi fleet, generating per-mile fare revenue rather than vehicle sales; Tesla shipped roughly 45 Cybercabs and a wave of Model Y Robotaxis to a new hub in Houston, signaling it wants a second robotaxi city running before year-end, as NHTSA's Special Order forces sworn answers on Cybercab safety compliance. - [2026-09-10] NHTSA escalated from an audit query to a legally enforceable Special Order, requiring a Tesla officer's sworn affidavit on 21 detailed questions, with NHTSA demanding answers to 21 safety questions by month-end, having ordered Tesla to answer how it self-certified Cybercab as compliant with federal safety standards. - [2026-09-10] The core legal obstacle is explicit: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 135 requires that "the service brakes shall be activated by means of a foot control," the Cybercab has no foot controls, and NHTSA wants sworn testimony on how Tesla self-certified compliance despite that gap. - [2026-09-18] A regulatory analyst's base-case timeline shows the dispute is nowhere near resolved by year-end: Grant expects NHTSA to return with follow-up questions within two to three weeks of the Sept. 30 filing, and called resolution by end of October "very unlikely." - [2026-09-18] Odds compiled from that analyst and a market tracker put only modest probability on a clean compliance pathway this year, with the table showing a "Documented compliance pathway secured" scenario at only 20%, versus 55–60% for "review continues, no service halt" — i.e., the most likely scenario is prolonged limbo, not a resolved path to retail sale. - [2026-09-18] If NHTSA ultimately rejects self-certification, Tesla would likely be forced onto a Part 555 exemption path analogous to Zoox's, which caps deployment at 2,500 non-conforming vehicles per year — a structural ceiling that would apply to any consumer-sold units too, not just fleet cars, and that is explicitly framed as a scaling constraint, not an enabler of retail sales. - [2026-09-22] Even optimistic framing of the regulatory status (no shutdown ordered) is paired with large potential penalties for non-compliance: Tesla has until September 30 to respond, and missing the deadline or answering falsely risks penalties reaching $139 million — a legal overhang that makes a parallel consumer retail launch during active federal scrutiny commercially and legally risky for Tesla before year-end. - [2026-09-30] Independent trackers covering this exact question note that no retail order path has opened at any point in the timeline, with the only "buy" option still a commercial/fleet interest form rather than a public configurator, consistent with the pattern that Tesla has prioritized robotaxi-fleet scaling (Austin, then Houston) over opening individual retail sales. - [2026-10-04] As of the most recent independent review, "You can't buy one" — Musk's "under $30,000, before 2027" promise stands, but there is no price, order page, or delivery date, and scale remains tiny at 45 Cybercabs registered in Texas versus roughly 3,000 at Waymo. - [2026-10-05] A fresh field report underscores operational immaturity rather than retail-readiness: state records showed 420 autonomous vehicles registered in Texas including 45 Cybercabs, while the Austin Fire Department warned that the Cybercab's touchscreen controls complicate emergency response when one must be moved — the kind of unresolved safety/operations friction that argues against Tesla simultaneously greenlighting individual retail sales. - Tesla's own Q3 2026 delivery report (Oct 2) listed deliveries only under Model 3/Y with zero Cybercab retail line item, and the Q3 earnings call (Oct 21) is the only scheduled corporate event before year-end where a retail-sale announcement could even be made — leaving roughly 10 weeks after that call for an actual completed transaction, configurator, and delivery to occur from a standing start. BOTTOM LINE: With no published MSRP, no consumer configurator, an open NHTSA Special Order whose own analyst-sourced odds put "resolution by end of October" at only ~10% and a clean "documented compliance pathway" at just 20%, and every Cybercab built so far routed into Tesla's own fleet (Austin, now Houston) rather than individual retail hands, the structural, regulatory, and historical evidence (Tesla's repeated pattern of missing "cheap variant" deadlines) strongly favors NO by the December 31, 2026 deadline. NOT FOUND: No evidence of Tesla's actual September 30 NHTSA response content or NHTSA's reaction to it; no announcement of a consumer configurator, MSRP, or order page as of October 6, 2026; no confirmation of what Tesla will say about Cybercab retail timing at the October 21, 2026 earnings call (not yet occurred).
3. Forecasters 5 draws · Opus 5.5 + GPT-6 Astra + GPT-5.6 Sol · plain mean
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
55% conf
Yes 17%
No 83%
(0) Resolution check: no source shows a qualifying sale. Tesla's site lists no price or configurator. The Q3 delivery report (Oct 2) shows only Model 3/Y deliveries. Every Cybercab built so far, roughly 45 to 169 registered in Texas, sits in Tesla's own robotaxi fleet, which the rules explicitly exclude. (a) About 12 weeks remain until Dec 31, 2026. The Oct 21 earnings call is the main scheduled venue for a retail announcement. (b) Status quo is NO. There is no MSRP, no consumer order page, and the only purchase channel is a commercial/fleet interest form. Tesla walked back 2026 volume production in July. (c) NO scenario: the NHTSA Special Order on FMVSS compliance (no foot brake control) drags on with follow-up questions. Tesla keeps routing units to Austin and Houston fleets, and any retail launch slips into 2027, matching Tesla's history with the Model 3 at $35k and the Cybertruck's price and timing. (d) YES scenario: Musk and Moravy repeatedly promised a sub-$30k sale to a customer before 2027, and the MKBHD bet gives Musk a personal motive. Tesla prices a unit at $30k or less via the individual-purchase interest form and completes one symbolic December delivery to a member of the public. Whether such a sale counts under the 'general public, publicly available terms' test is also uncertain. The market sits at 26.5% after a +12.5% weekly jump, apparently driven by fleet scaling and showcase news rather than any retail-sale signal. Given the regulatory overhang, the absence of any pricing or order infrastructure, and Tesla's base rate on cheap-variant promises, I shade below the market. I keep meaningful weight on a stunt sale because only one transaction is needed.
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
55% conf
Yes 17%
No 83%
(0) No source shows the condition met. Tesla's Q3 delivery report (Oct 2) lists no Cybercab sales, there is no MSRP or configurator, and the only purchase channel is a commercial/fleet interest form, not publicly listed retail terms. YES still needs Tesla to publish a price of $30k or less and complete a bona fide public sale by Dec 31. (a) About 12 weeks remain. The Oct 21 Q3 earnings call is the main scheduled venue for an announcement, leaving roughly 10 weeks to execute. (b) Status quo is NO: every unit (45 to 169 registered) goes into Tesla's own robotaxi fleet. Tesla walked back 2026 volume-production guidance in July, and the Sept 3 event and Asia road show explicitly excluded sales. (c) NO scenario: the NHTSA Special Order over FMVSS 135 (foot-control brakes) drags on through year-end, as analysts expect. Tesla keeps prioritizing fleet expansion to Houston, and Musk's sub-$30k promise slips, as the Model 3 $35k trim and the Cybertruck base price did. (d) YES scenario: to honor Musk's Feb 18 pledge, Moravy's June 30 'within six months' comment and the MKBHD bet, Tesla announces a $29,999 price on Oct 21. It then delivers a handful of units to individuals via the interest-form channel before Dec 31, and resolvers accept this as a retail sale. The market sits at 26.5% after a +12.5% weekly jump that the research doesn't explain beyond the Paris show and fleet growth. Given the regulatory overhang, the lack of any order path, and the strict qualifying-retail-customer language, I shade below the market, while keeping meaningful weight on Musk's motive to stage a symbolic sale.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
54% conf
Yes 26%
No 74%
I anchor on Polymarket’s live 26.5% Yes price and retain it because the research provides no clearly unpriced, sufficiently verified information warranting a departure. No supplied source documents a qualifying completed sale, and the event remains possible; however, the Tesla resolution-source scrape returned only navigation and its investor homepage was blocked, so those checks cannot establish nonoccurrence. About 86 days remain until December 31, 2026, at 11:59 PM ET, and an unchanged status quo—internal fleet operations and purchase-interest collection without a qualifying retail transaction—resolves No. A plausible No scenario is continued fleet prioritization amid the production delays reported by TechCrunch on July 22 and unresolved reported safety-certification questions, or an eventual retail price above $30,000. A plausible Yes scenario is Tesla fulfilling Musk’s February commitment by publicly offering a Cybercab at or below $30,000 and completing one genuine sale to an unaffiliated member of the public before the deadline. Only one sale is necessary, so delayed volume production is not decisive, and the reported regulatory inquiry does not establish a prohibition on sales. Commercial use by an individual is not automatically disqualifying, but promotional handovers, internal deployments and deposits are excluded; my Yes probability also discounts the risk that a late transaction lacks official Tesla evidence or credible-reporting consensus establishing its eligibility and price. Confidence is limited by stale or conflicting October fleet counts, uncited claims about executive commitments, and the absence of a verified post-September-30 regulatory update.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
54% conf
Yes 26%
No 74%
I retain Polymarket's 26.5% YES anchor (25% bid/28% ask), because the research does not establish a reliable, unpriced edge. No supplied source documents a qualifying sale, but the outcome remains possible: roughly 12 weeks remain until December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET for a completed retail transaction under publicly available terms at $30,000 or less. The status quo resolves No because reported Cybercab deployments and paid Austin rides involve Tesla's internal fleet rather than qualifying retail purchases. The NO scenario is continued fleet-only deployment or delayed/overpriced retail availability, supported by TechCrunch's July 22 account of postponed volume production and September reporting of no final MSRP or retail ordering terms. The YES scenario is Tesla fulfilling its February pricing commitment through one ordinary customer's completed purchase; an individual commercial buyer could qualify, and neither volume production nor a consumer configurator is required. I discount the unverified June executive promise and precise regulatory forecasts, while conflicting October fleet counts of 45 versus 169 and missing information about NHTSA's response prevent strong conclusions about readiness. Tesla's fetched Robotaxi page contains only navigation and its investor-relations fetch failed, so missing official confirmation is an evidence gap rather than proof of absence. Resolution-source lag and classification therefore remain material risks: a genuine late sale would need Tesla confirmation or credible-reporting consensus, while a promotional handoff, deposit, or internal deployment would not qualify.
gpt-5.6-sol · high effort
69% conf
Yes 24%
No 76%
(0) The resolving condition has not been documented: Tesla’s official Robotaxi page shows no retail pricing or sales, while the October 2 delivery report and recent independent reviews identify no completed retail transaction, configurator, or public purchase terms. (a) About 86 days remain until December 31, 2026, leaving limited time to announce terms, accept an order, and complete a qualifying delivery. (b) If nothing changes, the market resolves No because all documented Cybercabs remain in Tesla-controlled robotaxi service and the commercial interest form is not itself a bona fide retail sale. (c) No results if Tesla continues prioritizing fleet deployment while the NHTSA certification inquiry and absence of a consumer sales channel push retail availability into 2027. (d) Yes remains plausible because Musk and Lars Moravy explicitly promised a sub-$30,000 consumer sale during 2026, physical production exists, and Tesla needs only one qualifying sale—potentially following the October 21 earnings call—rather than a volume launch. I anchor on Polymarket’s 26.5% Yes price but move modestly lower because the public-terms requirement, unresolved regulatory questions, Tesla’s history of delayed low-price variants, and the complete absence of a retail pathway this late in the year outweigh the executive commitments.
4. Final plain mean of 5 draws
22% (57% confidence)
Yes: 22% No: 78%
Mean of 5 draws (0.17, 0.17, 0.27, 0.27, 0.24). (0) Resolution check: no source shows a qualifying sale. Tesla's site lists no price or configurator. The Q3 delivery report (Oct 2) shows only Model 3/Y deliveries. Every Cybercab built so far, roughly 45 to 169 registered in Texas, sits in Tesla's own robotaxi fleet, which the rules explicitly exclude. (a) About 12 weeks remain until Dec 31, 2026. The Oct 21 earnings call is the main scheduled venue for a retail announcement. (b) Status quo is NO. There is no MSRP, no consumer order page, and the only purchase channel is a commercial/fleet interest form. Tesla walked back 2026 volume production in July. (c) NO scenario: the NHTSA Special Order on FMVSS compliance (no foot brake control) drags on with follow-up questions. Tesla keeps routing units to Austin and Houston fleets, and any retail launch slips into 2027, matching Tesla's history with the Model 3 at $35k and the Cybertruck's price and timing. (d) YES scenario: Musk and Moravy repeatedly promised a sub-$30k sale to a customer before 2027, and the MKBHD bet gives Musk a personal motive. Tesla prices a unit at $30k or less via the individual-purchase interest form and completes one symbolic December delivery to a member of the public. Whether such a sale counts under the 'general public, publicly available terms' test is also uncertain. The market sits at 26.5% after a +12.5% weekly jump, apparently driven by fleet scaling and showcase news rather than any retail-sale signal. Given the regulatory overhang, the absence of any pricing or order infrastructure, and Tesla's base rate on cheap-variant promises, I shade below the market. I keep meaningful weight on a stunt sale because only one transaction is needed.
Pipeline Timing
Total pipeline time: 100.3s
Per-tool research timings shown in the Research section above.