← back to scans
Will the Republicans win the Montana Senate race in 2026?
92%
Agent
92%
Market Price
+0.7%
Edge
77%
Confidence
85,627
Volume
1.0c
Spread
29
Days to resolution
13
Markets in event
final rationale
Mean of 5 draws (0.93, 0.93, 0.92, 0.92, 0.93). (0) Not resolved: the election is Nov. 3, 2026, and per Ballotpedia and Wikipedia no results or calls exist yet. AP, Fox and NBC would still have to call the race for Alme, or certification would have to confirm it. (a) About four weeks remain until Election Day; the market closes Nov. 4. (b) Status quo strongly favors YES. Every post-primary poll shows Alme with a double-digit lead in the three/four-way field: American Pulse has him at 45-26-19, Quantus at 44-24-23, and the RCP average at Alme +14. Bankhead and Bodnar both refused to exit before the Aug. 10 deadline, and Montana law would replace a withdrawn Democratic nominee anyway. Cook, Inside Elections and Sabato all rate the race Solid or Safe R, and DDHQ gives Alme roughly 90%. (c) NO path: Bankhead informally urges her voters to back Bodnar, and a late collapse in her support plus Bodnar's fundraising edge and Alme's debate absences produce consolidation. Head-to-head polls (GQR Bodnar 50-44, Hart 47-45 Alme) show a consolidated anti-Alme vote could win, but nothing like that is visible in October polling. (d) YES path: the vote split persists, Trump-endorsed Alme carries an R+20 state with around 42-45%, and networks call it on election night. Anchoring on the Polymarket price of 91.5%, I nudge slightly up because the most recent October poll shows the split holding and no consolidation signals. A large-ish residual remains for a late shadow-consolidation tail and the polling errors typical of multi-candidate races.
price vs. prediction
market price
agent forecast at t+0
13 follow-ups
re-scan context
This market has been scanned before. Previous predictions:
| date | predicted | market price | confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-20 | 91% | 92% | 71% |
| 2026-08-31 | 91% | 92% | 75% |
| 2026-08-17 | 94% | 92% | 67% |
1. Planner Opus 5.5 · picks the research tools
Tools chosen:
polymarket_direct
resolution_source
kalshi_related
polymarket_related
wikipedia
Planner reasoning
This is a Polymarket election market, so polymarket_direct is the price anchor and resolution_source covers the AP/Fox/NBC calls. Kalshi's Montana Senate market gives an independent crowd to compare against. Wikipedia supplies the candidate field (Daines seat, any independent challenger) and past results as background.
2. Research parallel tool calls + 4 web research loops (Sonnet 5) · read raw by the forecasters
at a glance
RESEARCH DIGEST (built in code: tool summaries and each report's bottom line; the forecasters read the full tool outputs and reports)
Tools
- polymarket_direct: ## This Market's Polymarket Data **Will the Republicans win the Montana Senate race in 2026?** - Current price (probability): 91.50% (live; bid 91% / ask 92%) - 7-day price change: +0.00% - 30-day price change: +0.50% - Total volume: $85,627 (USD notional) - Price range: 77.00% - 93.00% - Data points: 91 days
- resolution_source: already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=False; last_updated=unknown. Race ratings show the 2026 Montana Senate race as Solid/Safe/Likely Republican (Cook Political Report: Solid Republican; Decision Desk: Likely Republican; Inside Elections: Solid Republican; Sabato's Crystal Ball: Safe Republican). The general election features Republican Kurt Alme, Democrat Alani Bankhead, independent Seth Bo
- kalshi_related: 2 related markets / summaries. keyword 'Montana Senate': ok | keyword 'Senate Montana 2026': ok
- polymarket_related: Polymarket search over 2 keyword(s), kept 10 matches. keyword 'Montana Senate': 5 markets | keyword 'Senate control 2026': 5 markets
- wikipedia: Fetched 1 Wikipedia entries (0 missing pages).
Research loops, bottom lines
- current state: With the Democratic and independent vote persistently split between Bankhead and Bodnar despite months of pressure to consolidate, every public poll since the June primary shows Republican Kurt Alme leading by double digits, and every major outlet rates the race Solid/Safe Republican — strongly supporting a Republican win in November.
- base rate: The reference class—Montana's shift to a Solid/Safe Republican state since roughly 2014-2020 (GOP holding both Senate seats, the state legislature, and voting R+20 for president in 2024)—combined with every major forecaster (Cook, Sabato, Inside Elections) rating this open-seat race Safe/Solid/Likely Republican throughout 2026, strongly implies a high prior for a Republican win; the one historical counter-example (Tester's 2018 win) required an unusually strong long-tenured incumbent, a conditio
- yes case: The single most likely path to YES is simple arithmetic plus institutional muscle: Bankhead and Bodnar remain legally and personally unwilling/unable to consolidate (confirmed as late as the Aug. 10 deadline and reaffirmed in September debates), Alme is backed by the NRSC, Trump, and Montana's full GOP leadership structure with seven-figure fundraising, and the national party is already spending to defend—not abandon—the seat, all pointing toward a straightforward Republican hold.
- no case: The NO case rests on a real, polling-documented mechanism — a head-to-head Bodnar lead or tie against Alme in nearly every poll that excludes Bankhead — combined with persistent late-race volatility (Alme's debate avoidances, active opposition research, NRSC-acknowledged ad concern, and Bodnar's fundraising edge), any of which could still trigger late Bankhead-voter migration to Bodnar or a tighter-than-expected final count; but this requires an unprecedented, deadline-proof consolidation that h
tools
| tool | status | time | items | summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| polymarket_direct | OK | 0.6s | 1 | ## This Market's Polymarket Data **Will the Republicans win the Montana Senate race in 2026?** - Current price (probability): 91.50% (live; bid 91% / ask 92%) - 7-day price change: +0.00% - 30-day price change: +0.50% - Total volume: $85,627 (USD notional) - Price range: 77.00% - 93.00% - Data poin |
| resolution_source | OK | 26.9s | 1 | already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=False; last_updated=unknown. Race ratings show the 2026 Montana Senate race as Solid/Safe/Likely Republican (Cook Political Report: Solid Republican; Decision Desk: Likely Republican; Inside Elections: Solid Republican; Sabato's Crystal Ball: Safe Republica |
| kalshi_related | OK | 6.5s | 2 | 2 related markets / summaries. keyword 'Montana Senate': ok | keyword 'Senate Montana 2026': ok |
| polymarket_related | OK | 0.3s | 10 | Polymarket search over 2 keyword(s), kept 10 matches. keyword 'Montana Senate': 5 markets | keyword 'Senate control 2026': 5 markets |
| wikipedia | OK | 0.2s | 1 | Fetched 1 Wikipedia entries (0 missing pages). |
research loops
·
4/4 ok ·
14 searches ·
9 page reads
| dimension | status | time | searches | page reads | report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current state | OK | 30s | 3 | 3 | 4438 chars |
| base rate | OK | 49s | 3 | 2 | 5154 chars |
| yes case | OK | 36s | 4 | 2 | 4958 chars |
| no case | OK | 38s | 4 | 2 | 5824 chars |
report: current state
- [2026-10-05] Latest poll (NonStop Local/American Pulse, surveyed Sept 19–24, released Oct 5):
a new NonStop Local/American Pulse Research and Polling poll in Montana finds Kurt Alme (R) leading Seth Bodnar (I) in the U.S. Senate race, 45% to 26%, with Alani Bankhead (D) at 19%
; the poll also found that
even if Bankhead were to drop out of the race, Bodnar would still not have enough votes to top Alme
.
- [2026-09-17] Quantus Insights poll:
a new Quantus Insights poll in Montana finds Kurt Alme (R) leading Seth Bodnar (I) in the U.S. Senate race, 44% to 24%, with Alani Bankhead (D) at 23%
.
- [2026-10-04/approx] RealClearPolitics polling average has
Alme +14.0, with Kurt Alme 41.0%, Seth Bodnar 27.0%, Alani Bankhead 19.5%
.
- [2026-08-10] Democratic nominee Alani Bankhead confirmed at a press conference ahead of the withdrawal deadline that
"I am in this race to win it, and I am staying in this race through Nov. 3,"
rejecting pressure from state and national Democrats to clear the field for independent Seth Bodnar;
her decision means that the anti-GOP vote will remain split with Bodnar, giving GOP nominee Kurt Alme a much easier path to victory
.
- [2026-08-10] Independent Seth Bodnar also publicly committed to staying in through Nov. 3, per a Billings press conference reported the same day, with Flathead Beacon noting
their locked horns on the question of leaving the race heavily increases the likelihood that Republican Kurt Alme will maintain his party's grip on Montana's open U.S. Senate seat this fall
.
- [2026-08-20/08-31] Major race-rating outlets have the contest solidly in the Republican column: Cook Political Report rated it Solid R (Aug. 20), Fox News Solid R (Aug. 18), Inside Elections Solid R (Aug. 6), Sabato's Crystal Ball Safe R (Aug. 26), and The Economist and Split Ticket both Safe R (Aug. 31), per Wikipedia's compiled ratings table.
- [2026-06-25] Inside Elections reported on a June 23–24 GrayHouse poll showing
Republican Kurt Alme leading the field with 41 percent, followed by Democrat Alani Bankhead with 25 percent and independent Seth Bodnar with 17 percent
, and shifted its rating
from Likely Republican to Solid Republican
that week, noting
the presence of any Democrat on the ballot likely siphons off too many anti-Alme votes for Bodnar to pull ahead
.
- [2026-06-02] Primary results: Republican U.S. Attorney Kurt Alme won the GOP nomination after incumbent Steve Daines withdrew at the filing deadline and endorsed him; Alme won with 76.1% of the primary vote. On the Democratic side, Air Force veteran Alani Bankhead won the nomination with 43.6% over Reilly Neill (33.0%) and Michael Black Wolf (13.1%), per Wikipedia's election page.
- [2026-10-01/10-11] A series of candidate forums/debates are scheduled before Election Day, including events on Oct. 1, Oct. 7, Oct. 11, and Oct. 19; Republican nominee Kurt Alme has reportedly declined or not responded to invitations to several of these forums, per a campaign-tracking page.
- [2026-09-07 to 09-15] An aggregator (Poliwave) polling average through mid-September had
Likely Republican. Kurt Alme (R) leads by 10.5 points in our forecast. The polling average has Alme 43.2, Bodnar 28.5, Bankhead 19.8 across 8 recent polls
.
- [2026-03-04] Seth Bodnar, former University of Montana president, launched an independent campaign with the backing of former Democratic Sen. Jon Tester, after resigning from the university; he qualified for the ballot with signatures far exceeding the threshold, per Wikipedia.
- [2026-10-06] No poll since the primary has shown either Bankhead or Bodnar leading or within single digits of Alme in the three-way field; all public polling from June through early October shows Alme with a double-digit lead over his nearest challenger.
BOTTOM LINE: With the Democratic and independent vote persistently split between Bankhead and Bodnar despite months of pressure to consolidate, every public poll since the June primary shows Republican Kurt Alme leading by double digits, and every major outlet rates the race Solid/Safe Republican — strongly supporting a Republican win in November.
NOT FOUND: No evidence of either Bankhead or Bodnar withdrawing after the Aug. 10 deadline (ballots are already set); no polling or reporting from after Oct. 5, 2026 was available; could not confirm whether Kurt Alme ultimately participated in the Oct. 7, Oct. 11, or Oct. 19 debates/forums.
report: base rate
- [2026-10-05] A new NonStop Local/American Pulse Research poll found
a Kurt Alme (R) leading Seth Bodnar (I) in the U.S. Senate race, 45% to 26%, with Alani Bankhead (D) at 19%
(https://politicalwire.com/2026/10/05/alme-way-ahead-in-three-way-montana-senate-race/).
- [2026-10-02] Montana public radio's Campaign Beat reported
Kurt Alme with a healthy double-digit lead in the Senate race, and independent Seth Bodnar a distant second, and Democrat Alani Bankhead in third place, noting "all these national forecasters see this race as a safe or likely Republican hold"
(https://www.mtpr.org/podcast/campaign-beat/2026-10-02/campaign-beat-new-polling-new-ads-new-challenges).
- [~2026-09] Aggregator poliwave.com rated the race
Kurt Alme (R) leading by 10.5 points in its forecast, rating the race "Likely Republican," with a polling average of Alme 43.2, Bodnar 28.5, Bankhead 19.8 across 8 recent polls
, and noted the equivalent 2020 Daines margin was R+10.0 (https://www.poliwave.com/us/mt/sen-fed).
- [2026-02 to 2026-02-10] Ballotpedia's tracked race ratings consistently showed
U.S. Senate, Montana: Cook Political Report: Solid Republican, DDHQ and The Hill: Pending, Inside Elections: Likely Republican, Sabato's Crystal Ball: Likely
[Republican] and by June/October these had hardened further to Solid/Safe Republican across outlets (https://ballotpedia.org/United_States_Senate_election_in_Montana,_2026).
- [2026-06-30] Inside Elections reported that despite Daines's late withdrawal injecting uncertainty,
a new poll showed Republicans remain favored to hold onto the open seat, despite a worsening national political environment for the GOP and a well-funded independent candidate in the race
(https://insideelections.com/montana-senate-new-poll-confirms-gop-edge/).
- [Historical base rate] Montana has voted Republican in Senate races in nearly every cycle since 2014;
Tim Sheehy (R) won Montana's Senate seat in 2024 by 13 points over Jon Tester, flipping the last competitive Democratic seat in a state that is now R+20+, with the realignment now structurally complete
(https://uspollingdata.com/states/montana/senate-race/).
- [Historical base rate] Ballotpedia's trifecta tracker shows
Republicans won control of the Montana State Senate in 2008, holding a 32-18 majority as of 2024
, reflecting a broader multi-decade GOP realignment in the state (https://ballotpedia.org/Montana_State_Senate).
- [Historical base rate] Montana's presidential voting history shows
21 Republican wins versus 10 Democratic wins in presidential elections from 1900-2024
, and
following 2024, the state was rated Solid Republican, having voted for Trump in 2016, 2020, and 2024
(https://ballotpedia.org/United_States_Senate_election_in_Montana,_2026).
- [2026 candidate field] The current race is for the open seat vacated by Steve Daines:
in the Republican primary, Daines announced he would seek re-election, but withdrew minutes before the filing deadline and endorsed Alme, who filed to run the same day, and as the only major Republican candidate, Alme was nominated with 76.2% of the vote
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_Senate_election_in_Montana).
- [Prior comparable election] The last time Montana's "other" Senate seat (Daines's) was contested, in 2020,
incumbent Steve Daines (R) defeated Steve Bullock (D) in the November 3, 2020, general election, having first been elected in 2014 with 58% of the vote
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_Montana,_2020).
- [Last Democratic Senate win in Montana] The most recent Democratic statewide Senate win was
in 2018, when Jon Tester (D) won his Senate election in Montana 50% to 47%
against Matt Rosendale — a much closer race than the current environment suggests, but Tester (an 18-year incumbent with strong personal brand) subsequently lost in 2024.
- [Independent factor] A notable complication versus pure historical base rate is the presence of a well-funded independent, Seth Bodnar; Inside Elections noted that unlike Nebraska's Dan Osborn or Utah's Evan McMullin,
the presence of any Democrat on the ballot likely siphons off too many anti-Alme votes for Bodnar to pull ahead
(https://insideelections.com/montana-senate-new-poll-confirms-gop-edge/).
BOTTOM LINE: The reference class—Montana's shift to a Solid/Safe Republican state since roughly 2014-2020 (GOP holding both Senate seats, the state legislature, and voting R+20 for president in 2024)—combined with every major forecaster (Cook, Sabato, Inside Elections) rating this open-seat race Safe/Solid/Likely Republican throughout 2026, strongly implies a high prior for a Republican win; the one historical counter-example (Tester's 2018 win) required an unusually strong long-tenured incumbent, a condition absent here.
NOT FOUND: An official, up-to-date Ballotpedia race-rating snapshot from October 2026 (the fetched Ballotpedia page content included some stale/cached primary-stage details); a comprehensive count of all historical open-seat Montana Senate races and their partisan outcomes (only illustrative examples were found, not an exhaustive tally).
report: yes case
YES means: Republican nominee Kurt Alme wins Montana's 2026 U.S. Senate election, as called by AP, Fox News, and NBC (or certified if they split).
- [2026-10-06] FEC filings confirm Alme's committee had raised
Total receipts · $1,984,860.91, Total contributions · $1,660,620.28
through June 30, 2026, with ending cash on hand of $1,450,718.79, giving the GOP nominee a financial base before the fall ad blitz (fec.gov/data/candidate/S6MT00295/).
- [2026-09-23] A Montana Free Press/Glasgow Courier review found
Alme is Montana's biggest recipient of donations from leadership PACs and political party committees, which aggregate dollars from Washington, D.C.-based political networks, with leadership PACs controlled by Steve Daines, Tim Sheehy and Ryan Zinke heavily represented across Montana's Republican campaigns
(glasgowcourier.com).
- [2026-09-11] The same Montana Free Press reporting specified
the largest single party committee donor in Montana's U.S. Senate race is the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which has donated $62,000 to Alme
, showing direct national-party investment behind him (montanafreepress.org).
- [2026-09-27(approx)] The NRSC itself intervened to protect Alme, sending a cease-and-desist letter after
Independent PAC, a group tied to Joe Manchin's Independent Leadership Council backing Bodnar, spent about $1.8 million in Montana's Senate race, more than half of which went to an advertisement now targeted by the NRSC
— demonstrating the national GOP apparatus is actively defending the seat rather than treating it as unwinnable (bozemandailychronicle.com).
- [2026-09-22] At a Missoula debate between the two anti-Alme candidates, local reporting captured persistent infighting: Bodnar accused Alme of being
"nothing more than a rubber stamp for Donald Trump"
while continuing to compete directly with Bankhead for the same voters rather than consolidating against him (dailymontanan.com).
- [2026-08-05] Even after direct mediated talks, KTVH reported
amid speculation that having them both in the Senate race could split the vote, Democratic candidate Alani Bankhead and independent candidate Seth Bodnar have met, but there's been no agreement for one of them to withdraw
, and a Democratic Party spokesperson called the talks "inconclusive," confirming no mechanism exists to unify the anti-Alme vote (ktvh.com).
- [2026-08-05] That same report notes a legal complication blocking any late Bankhead exit from helping Bodnar: Montana's Secretary of State's office stated
state law requires a party to pick a new candidate if their nominee withdraws
, meaning even a hypothetical Bankhead withdrawal would likely just install a new Democratic name rather than clear the field for Bodnar.
- [2026-09] Alme's rivals are financially overmatched relative to the combined GOP infrastructure: Bankhead's own voter guide shows her campaign reports
$0 in corporate PAC money, runs on small-dollar donations
, while earlier reporting pegged her total raised at under $60,000, leaving her unable to compete on paid media even as a spoiler.
- [2026-10-06 (campaign messaging)] Alme's campaign is actively counter-punching against outside attacks, with a deputy campaign manager calling the anti-Alme TV ad spending
"a liberal out-of-state super PAC created by a former Democrat Senator is pouring dark money into Montana to lie about Kurt Alme's record,"
indicating the campaign is resourced and organized enough to respond rapidly to opposition attacks rather than being caught flat-footed.
- [2026-03-05] Trump's "Complete and Total Endorsement" of Alme, issued the day Daines withdrew, remains unrescinded and is still featured on Alme's own campaign site, reinforcing base mobilization in a state Trump carried by 20 points in 2024.
- [2026-10 (ongoing)] Montana's open-seat Senate contest sits inside a broader national GOP institutional effort (NRSC legal threats, Daines/Sheehy/Zinke leadership-PAC money, Trump's endorsement) that treats this seat as a top-tier hold-the-majority priority, suggesting any late polling tightening would trigger further national-party resource deployment rather than abandonment.
BOTTOM LINE: The single most likely path to YES is simple arithmetic plus institutional muscle: Bankhead and Bodnar remain legally and personally unwilling/unable to consolidate (confirmed as late as the Aug. 10 deadline and reaffirmed in September debates), Alme is backed by the NRSC, Trump, and Montana's full GOP leadership structure with seven-figure fundraising, and the national party is already spending to defend—not abandon—the seat, all pointing toward a straightforward Republican hold.
NOT FOUND: Alme's FEC fundraising totals for Q3 2026 (July–September) were not available via the fetched FEC page, which only shows data through June 30, 2026; comprehensive Bodnar FEC third-quarter totals; confirmation of whether Alme participated in or skipped the Oct. 7/11/19 forums.
report: no case
YES means: the Republican nominee (Kurt Alme) wins the 2026 Montana U.S. Senate race and is called the winner by AP, Fox News, and NBC (or certified). This dimension argues for NO — i.e., a non-Republican (Bodnar or Bankhead) winning, or circumstances preventing a clean Republican call by the deadline.
- [2026-07-28] An independent poll (GQR/Strength in Numbers, paid for by nonprofit Contours) found that in a head-to-head,
likely voters in Montana would vote for independent candidate for U.S. Senate Seth Bodnar (50%) over Republican Kurt Alme (44%) if a head-to-head election were held today
, and this pattern held across "every configuration where Bankhead isn't on the ballot" per the same report.
- [2026-07-30] A Wild Montana Action Fund/Global Strategy Group poll found that
when the race consolidates to a three-way, Bodnar surpasses Alme with 40% of the vote, followed by 38% for Alme and 9% for Austin
, and a Hart Research poll in the same window found
in the initial two-way trial heat between Bodnar and Alme, the race is essentially tied: 47% Alme, 45% Bodnar, within the margin of error
— showing the underlying anti-Alme coalition is large enough to beat him if consolidated, a mechanism that remains structurally available (through write-in campaigns, late candidate replacement, or late-breaking consolidation messaging) until Nov. 3.
- [2026-08-05] Flathead Beacon reported that pressure to consolidate the field continued past the formal Aug. 10 deadline, noting Democratic operatives saw
potential for several different scenarios, from a Bankhead dropout to her staying in the race but encouraging her supporters to back Bodnar instead, to both candidates simply staying in
— meaning an informal "shadow consolidation" (Bankhead publicly urging her voters to Bodnar without formally quitting) remains a live tail risk not foreclosed by the ballot being set.
- [2026-10-02/ongoing] Alme has skipped multiple high-profile debates: per the Daily Montanan's Sept. 22 report,
neither Alme nor Libertarian Kyle Austin participated in the debate Sunday, but Indivisible scheduled other Senate candidate forums
, and a debate tracker shows Alme still unconfirmed for the Oct. 11 City Club Missoula forum, with organizers "still awaiting his answer" as of early October — a risk factor if continued no-shows feed a "ducking debates" narrative that erodes his lead in the final month.
- [2026-10-04] The NRSC itself treated the race as contestable enough to intervene: Billings Gazette reported the NRSC sent a cease-and-desist letter to Montana TV stations over an anti-Alme ad from a pro-Bodnar PAC, with the paper noting the race
might be considered by pollsters and pundits to be a safe bet for Republican nominee Kurt Alme, but it's not such a foregone conclusion that a recent advertisement critical of the GOP candidate didn't concern the national party
.
- [2026-07-ongoing] Alme faces negative opposition research that could still move late undecided voters: reporting (Yahoo/HuffPost, ~97 days old) detailed that
as U.S. attorney, Kurt Alme cut a plea deal allowing a tribal police officer to serve less than a year in prison after sexually abusing a 6-year-old
, and a separate 2018 civil case tied Alme's prior role at a youth ranch to a jury verdict awarding damages over an abuse allegation, both of which remain active attack-ad material in the campaign's final weeks.
- [2026-10-06/ongoing] Despite deep financial disadvantage structurally facing independents, Bodnar has consistently out-fundraised Alme every reporting period: the Daily Montanan's July 16 filing recap showed Bodnar
continues to outpace all federal candidates in fundraising, including raising roughly twice as much from individual contributions than Republican Kurt Alme
, which is
the third filing period where Bodnar has outraised all federal candidates in Montana
— giving him the resources to run a late advertising surge that could narrow Alme's lead before Nov. 4.
- [2026-09-10/approx] Decision Desk HQ's model, while favoring Alme, still assigns meaningful uncertainty: it gives
Alme...about a 9 in 10 shot at winning in November
, implying roughly a 1-in-10 modeled probability of a non-Republican win remains live under current data.
- [Resolution-mechanics risk] The market's own criteria require AP, Fox News, and NBC to jointly call the race for the same candidate, or fall back to official certification; in a three/four-way split field with no incumbent and an unusually contested independent challenge, any unexpectedly close count on election night (plausible given the head-to-head Bodnar-Alme polls cited above) could delay a clean "call," pushing resolution toward slower certification processes and raising the chance of a contested or recounted outcome before Jan. certification, which is a technical path to a NO (non-call) scenario within the contract's window if margins tighten late.
BOTTOM LINE: The NO case rests on a real, polling-documented mechanism — a head-to-head Bodnar lead or tie against Alme in nearly every poll that excludes Bankhead — combined with persistent late-race volatility (Alme's debate avoidances, active opposition research, NRSC-acknowledged ad concern, and Bodnar's fundraising edge), any of which could still trigger late Bankhead-voter migration to Bodnar or a tighter-than-expected final count; but this requires an unprecedented, deadline-proof consolidation that has not materialized in seven months of an unmoved Bankhead candidacy.
NOT FOUND: No evidence that Bankhead has withdrawn, suspended her campaign, or endorsed Bodnar after the Aug. 10 deadline; no post-Oct. 5 polling or debate-attendance confirmation for Alme at the Oct. 7/11/19 forums; no reporting of any formal recount mechanism trigger specific to this race's historical margins.
3. Forecasters 5 draws · Opus 5.5 + GPT-6 Astra + GPT-5.6 Sol · plain mean
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
74% conf
| Yes | 92% |
| No | 8% |
(0) Not resolved: the election is Nov. 3, 2026, and per Ballotpedia and Wikipedia no results or calls exist yet. AP, Fox and NBC would still have to call the race for Alme, or certification would have to confirm it. (a) About four weeks remain until Election Day; the market closes Nov. 4. (b) Status quo strongly favors YES. Every post-primary poll shows Alme with a double-digit lead in the three/four-way field: American Pulse has him at 45-26-19, Quantus at 44-24-23, and the RCP average at Alme +14. Bankhead and Bodnar both refused to exit before the Aug. 10 deadline, and Montana law would replace a withdrawn Democratic nominee anyway. Cook, Inside Elections and Sabato all rate the race Solid or Safe R, and DDHQ gives Alme roughly 90%. (c) NO path: Bankhead informally urges her voters to back Bodnar, and a late collapse in her support plus Bodnar's fundraising edge and Alme's debate absences produce consolidation. Head-to-head polls (GQR Bodnar 50-44, Hart 47-45 Alme) show a consolidated anti-Alme vote could win, but nothing like that is visible in October polling. (d) YES path: the vote split persists, Trump-endorsed Alme carries an R+20 state with around 42-45%, and networks call it on election night. Anchoring on the Polymarket price of 91.5%, I nudge slightly up because the most recent October poll shows the split holding and no consolidation signals. A large-ish residual remains for a late shadow-consolidation tail and the polling errors typical of multi-candidate races.
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
80% conf
| Yes | 92% |
| No | 8% |
(0) The race has not been decided. Ballotpedia and Wikipedia show the election is on Nov. 3, 2026, with no results or calls yet. (a) About four weeks remain until the election, and resolution needs AP, Fox and NBC to call the race (or official certification). (b) If nothing changes, Republican Kurt Alme wins. Every public three-way poll since June has him ahead by double digits: RCP average +14, the Oct. 5 American Pulse poll 45-26-19, Quantus 44-24-23. All major raters call it Solid/Safe R, and the DDHQ model gives him roughly 90%. (c) For NO, Bankhead's voters would have to migrate en masse to Bodnar late, perhaps through an informal endorsement by Bankhead. Head-to-head polls show Bodnar tied with or ahead of Alme, so this would need consolidation that seven months of pressure has not produced. Late opposition research or Alme skipping debates could add to it. (d) For YES, the anti-Alme vote stays split between Bodnar and Bankhead, both of whom stayed on the ballot past the Aug. 10 deadline. Alme then wins comfortably with Trump/NRSC backing in an R+20 state, despite a D-leaning national environment. I anchor on Polymarket's 91.5% and nudge slightly up, since there is no post-primary evidence of tightening. I keep about 7-8% on late consolidation and polling error in an unusual three-way race.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
76% conf
| Yes | 92% |
| No | 8% |
The resolving condition is not yet met: no supplied source reports an election result, and the resolution-source tool fetched secondary background rather than actual AP, Fox News, and NBC calls. There are 28 days until the November 3 election and about 29 days until trading closes; unanimous calls or official certification must follow, with the certification fallback making reporting delays a settlement-timing risk rather than an independent route to NO. I retain Polymarket's live 91.5% YES anchor because the research supports that consensus without establishing a clear informational edge; the related Senate-control markets are not equivalent contracts. If today's electoral alignment persists, Alme wins: the September 19–24 NonStop Local/American Pulse poll, released October 5, shows him leading 45–26–19, consistent with September Quantus polling at 44–24–23 and broadly Safe/Solid Republican ratings. The straightforward YES scenario is continued opposition fragmentation—Bankhead and Bodnar both committed in August to staying through election day—allowing Alme to win a plurality and receive the required calls or certification. A plausible NO scenario is substantial tactical migration from Bankhead to Bodnar, combined with adverse Alme developments or correlated polling error; July hypothetical head-to-head polls and Bodnar's fundraising demonstrate potential, but do not establish competitiveness with the actual ballot configuration. I preserve 8.5% for these upset paths rather than approach certainty, recognizing that several research claims are secondary or stale and that neither reliable final-month polling nor comprehensive current fundraising comparisons are available.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
76% conf
| Yes | 92% |
| No | 8% |
No supplied source documents an election winner: the purported resolution-source read fetched Ballotpedia and Wikipedia background, not matching AP, Fox News, and NBC calls or official certification. There are 28 days until the November 3 election and roughly 29 days until the November 4 trading close, although the rules allow settlement to await calls or certification afterward. I retain Polymarket's live 91.5% YES anchor, between its 91% bid and 92% ask, because the research supplies no demonstrably unpriced information warranting a departure. If today's alignment persists, the status quo is a Republican plurality victory: the October 5 NonStop Local/American Pulse release, surveyed September 19–24, put Kurt Alme ahead 45–26–19, consistent with September's Quantus poll at 44–24–23. The straightforward YES scenario is that Bankhead and Bodnar continue splitting opposition voters, as their commitments to remain candidates suggest, while Montana's Republican lean and broadly Solid/Safe Republican ratings support Alme. The strongest NO scenario is substantial tactical migration from Bankhead to Bodnar alongside Republican defections following effective attacks; July hypothetical polls without Bankhead demonstrate a possible coalition, but they are older and do not describe the actual ballot. Bodnar winning would resolve NO regardless of his affiliations, whereas delayed or conflicting election-night calls would not themselves produce NO because official certification is the fallback. The remaining 8.5% covers consolidation, correlated polling error, and late campaign shocks; confidence is limited by reliance on secondary polling summaries, incomplete current financial data, and the absence of a direct read from the named resolution outlets.
gpt-5.6-sol · high effort
79% conf
| Yes | 93% |
| No | 7% |
(0) The condition is not already met: no results or AP, Fox News, and NBC calls exist because the election is scheduled for November 3; a Republican must win and receive matching calls, or prevail in official certification. (a) About 28 days remain until Election Day and 29 days until the November 4 trading close, although settlement may await certification or any runoff. (b) If nothing material changes, Republican Kurt Alme wins: the October 5 poll has him leading 45%-26%-19%, the RCP average shows Alme +14, and all cited major forecasters rate the race Solid, Safe, or Likely Republican. (c) A NO scenario requires anti-Republican voters to consolidate tactically behind Seth Bodnar, aided by his fundraising, attacks on Alme, and head-to-head polling that previously showed Bodnar competitive or ahead. A delayed unanimous media call alone would not produce NO because the rules fall back to official certification. (d) The principal YES scenario is the current one persisting, with Bankhead and Bodnar splitting the opposition while Alme benefits from Montana's Republican baseline and national GOP support. I anchor on Polymarket's 91.5% YES price and move modestly upward because every post-primary public poll reportedly gives Alme a double-digit lead and the ballot/consolidation obstacle is now difficult to reverse, while retaining 7% for late tactical migration, scandal, or polling error.
4. Final plain mean of 5 draws
92%
(77% confidence)
Yes: 92%
No: 8%
Mean of 5 draws (0.93, 0.93, 0.92, 0.92, 0.93). (0) Not resolved: the election is Nov. 3, 2026, and per Ballotpedia and Wikipedia no results or calls exist yet. AP, Fox and NBC would still have to call the race for Alme, or certification would have to confirm it. (a) About four weeks remain until Election Day; the market closes Nov. 4. (b) Status quo strongly favors YES. Every post-primary poll shows Alme with a double-digit lead in the three/four-way field: American Pulse has him at 45-26-19, Quantus at 44-24-23, and the RCP average at Alme +14. Bankhead and Bodnar both refused to exit before the Aug. 10 deadline, and Montana law would replace a withdrawn Democratic nominee anyway. Cook, Inside Elections and Sabato all rate the race Solid or Safe R, and DDHQ gives Alme roughly 90%. (c) NO path: Bankhead informally urges her voters to back Bodnar, and a late collapse in her support plus Bodnar's fundraising edge and Alme's debate absences produce consolidation. Head-to-head polls (GQR Bodnar 50-44, Hart 47-45 Alme) show a consolidated anti-Alme vote could win, but nothing like that is visible in October polling. (d) YES path: the vote split persists, Trump-endorsed Alme carries an R+20 state with around 42-45%, and networks call it on election night. Anchoring on the Polymarket price of 91.5%, I nudge slightly up because the most recent October poll shows the split holding and no consolidation signals. A large-ish residual remains for a late shadow-consolidation tail and the polling errors typical of multi-candidate races.
Pipeline Timing
Total pipeline time: 123.4s
Per-tool research timings shown in the Research section above.