forecasting
agent
← back to scans

Will Rafael López Aliaga win the 2026 Lima mayoral election?

kalshiElections·2026-10-05·view on kalshi ↗
89%
Agent
93%
Market Price
-4.2%
Edge
66%
Confidence
24,665
Volume
40.0c
Spread
364
Days to resolution
11
Markets in event
final rationale
Mean of 5 draws (0.88, 0.88, 0.89, 0.90, 0.89). (0) Not yet resolved. The election was held on 4 Oct 2026. EFE/Infobae and Ojo call López Aliaga's Renovación Popular list the winner: the Datum exit poll had it at 32.1% vs 25.1% for Allison, and the early official count (13.4% counted) showed 29.4% vs 26.9%. There is no certified ONPE tally yet, and the JNE has not ruled on his mayoral credential. (a) Trading runs until Oct 2027, so there is ample time for the count, the JEE Lima Centro proclamation, appeals and a JNE Pleno ruling. Accelerated resolution by media consensus is possible sooner. (b) Status quo: his list leads and the JNE majority has ruled for him three times (Aug 28 by 3-1, Burneo's Sept statement, Resolución 3707-2026). Expert consensus is that the credential flows almost automatically from proclamation, which points to Yes. (c) NO scenario: the early-count margin keeps narrowing (exit poll +7 shrank to +2.5) and Allison overtakes him. Alternatively, the JNE Pleno, pressured by 14 of 15 parties and the 130-mayor precedent, denies him the credential under Art. 194 or gives it to the second councillor, and Kalshi treats that as not winning. (d) YES scenario: the final ONPE count confirms his plurality, the JEE proclaims the list, and the JNE issues his credential in line with its earlier rulings, or media consensus calls him the winner. I anchor on the Kalshi price of about 93% (bid/ask 58/98, a wide spread). I shade down slightly for the unfinished, narrowing count and the unresolved credential and resolution-wording ambiguity.
price vs. prediction
market price agent forecast at t+0
13 follow-ups
1. Planner Opus 5.5 · picks the research tools
Tools chosen: kalshi_direct resolution_source wikipedia gdelt_news kalshi_related polymarket_related
Planner reasoning
The question is about the Lima mayoral election, but López Aliaga was Lima's mayor until 2025 and resigned to run for president in 2026, so it's unclear whether he is even a candidate. Kalshi's own price is the anchor. Wikipedia and GDELT can confirm the candidate list and any results or calls from ONPE around the Oct 4 date, and the resolution source should check ONPE's results page.
2. Research parallel tool calls + 4 web research loops (Sonnet 5) · read raw by the forecasters
at a glance
RESEARCH DIGEST (built in code: tool summaries and each report's bottom line; the forecasters read the full tool outputs and reports) Tools - kalshi_direct: ## This Market's Kalshi Data **Rafael López Aliaga** (KXLIMAMAYOR-26OCT04-RALI) - Current price (probability): 93.00% (live; bid 58% / ask 98%) - Last daily close (2026-10-05): 94.00% - 7-day price change: +4.00% - 30-day price change: +32.00% - Average daily volume: 597 contracts - Price range: 8.00% - 95.00% - Data points: 41 days - resolution_source (failed): https://resultados.onpe.gob.pe/PRI2025: HTTP 403 - wikipedia: Fetched 3 Wikipedia entries (1 missing pages). - gdelt_news: GDELT: 20 articles across 2 queries (lookback=14d). 'elecciones municipales Lima 2026 resultados alcalde': 10 hits | 'López Aliaga alcaldía Lima 2026': 10 hits - kalshi_related: 0 related markets / summaries. series KXLIMAMAYOR: 0 markets (skipped 11 no-signal) - polymarket_related: Polymarket search over 2 keyword(s), kept 10 matches. keyword 'Lima mayor': 5 markets | keyword 'López Aliaga': 5 markets Research loops, bottom lines - current state: On election night (Oct 4) López Aliaga/Popular Renewal appears to have won the most votes for Lima's mayoralty, but he ran as first councillor rather than mayoral candidate, and the JNE has not yet decided — and has given no timeline — on whether to award him the mayor's credential given the constitutional ban on immediate reelection; this unresolved "disguised reelection" dispute, likely to be contested via proclamation and appeals, is the key remaining obstacle before the question can resolve. - base rate: The base-rate picture strongly favors Yes: López Aliaga was the clear polling frontrunner for months (consistently 21–32% in a fragmented field of 24+ lists), won his only prior Lima mayoral bid in 2022, and wire-service calls already describe him as the election's winner on 2026-10-04 with exit polls and early official counts both showing him ahead by several points. The main residual uncertainty is not electoral but legal/administrative — whether the JNE formally certifies him given the "disgu - yes case: The strongest case for YES rests on (1) López Aliaga's list having clearly won the most votes per exit polls and early official counts, and (2) a consistent, repeated JNE jurisprudential pattern over the campaign — three separate rulings (Aug 28, Sept 5-6, Sept 22) by a 3-1 majority — finding no "disguised reelection" bar to a former mayor running and succeeding as first councillor, combined with expert consensus that the credential is a near-automatic formality flowing from proclamation under e - no case: Even though Popular Renewal's list appears to have won the most votes, the literal resolution mechanism — the JNE plenary granting López Aliaga personally the mayoral credential — remains undecided, unscheduled, opposed by 14 of 15 parties, subject to multi-stage appeal, and contested by a credible alternative-successor theory (Alonzo); any of these could produce a NO resolution despite an apparent vote-count "win."
tools
toolstatustimeitemssummary
kalshi_direct OK 0.2s 1 ## This Market's Kalshi Data **Rafael López Aliaga** (KXLIMAMAYOR-26OCT04-RALI) - Current price (probability): 93.00% (live; bid 58% / ask 98%) - Last daily close (2026-10-05): 94.00% - 7-day price change: +4.00% - 30-day price change: +32.00% - Average daily volume: 597 contracts - Price range: 8.
resolution_source FAILED 0.5s 1 https://resultados.onpe.gob.pe/PRI2025: HTTP 403
wikipedia OK 0.5s 3 Fetched 3 Wikipedia entries (1 missing pages).
gdelt_news OK 53.5s 20 GDELT: 20 articles across 2 queries (lookback=14d). 'elecciones municipales Lima 2026 resultados alcalde': 10 hits | 'López Aliaga alcaldía Lima 2026': 10 hits
kalshi_related OK 0.4s 0 0 related markets / summaries. series KXLIMAMAYOR: 0 markets (skipped 11 no-signal)
polymarket_related OK 0.7s 10 Polymarket search over 2 keyword(s), kept 10 matches. keyword 'Lima mayor': 5 markets | keyword 'López Aliaga': 5 markets
research loops · 4/4 ok · 10 searches · 8 page reads
dimensionstatustimesearchespage readsreport
current state OK 28s 3 2 3974 chars
base rate OK 32s 3 2 5178 chars
yes case OK 35s 2 2 6280 chars
no case OK 40s 2 2 5695 chars
report: current state
- [2026-10-04] Lima held its 2026 municipal election; the elections took place on October 4, 2026 to elect the Metropolitan Mayor and Metropolitan Council of Lima for the 2027-2030 period , with 21 lists competing for the mayoralty. - [2026-10-04] Rafael López Aliaga did not run directly for mayor: he appeared as first councillor (primer regidor) of the Popular Renewal list, after the original mayoral candidate, Luis Rubio, resigned for personal reasons . - [2026-10-04] An exit poll by Datum for América Televisión gave López Aliaga 32.1% of valid votes, followed by Francis Allison (Avanza País) with 25.1% and Carlos Bruce (Somos Perú) with 15.9% . - [2026-10-04] With partial official counting underway, at 13.4% of the official count, the margin between López Aliaga (29.4%) and Allison (26.9%) was narrower than the poll, at 2.5 points . - [2026-10-05] Multiple outlets (Infobae/EFE) declared López Aliaga the election-night winner, but noted the race has been controversial from the start over his bid for a new consecutive term, which the Constitution prohibits; he already won the 2022 election for 2023-2027, resigned in 2025 to run for president, was elected senator, and then resigned that seat to try to return to the mayoralty . - [2026-10-05] The core unresolved legal question: the JNE's full board must decide whether to grant López Aliaga the mayoral credential if official results confirm the exit poll, because since Rubio resigned, López Aliaga as first councillor would be the one to assume the mayor's post, and he was already elected mayor for 2023-2026, which the Constitution bars from immediate reelection . - [2026-10-05] JNE president Roberto Burneo has not set a date for this ruling: what remains to be resolved is whether, if Popular Renewal wins, the electoral body will hand him the mayoral credential; Burneo said the decision corresponds to the full board with no date yet defined . - [2026-10-05] Procedurally, the Jurado Electoral Especial (JEE) de Lima Centro must first proclaim the municipal results, a decision that can be appealed to the JNE's full board . - [2026-10-04/05] Rival candidates have taken opposing stances: Allison said the JNE must award the credential to whoever wins the election, calling it "grave" for democracy if it didn't after allowing him to run , while Urresti called it "unconstitutional" for the JNE to grant credentials to López Aliaga . - [2026-10-05] A Popular Renewal legislator expressed confidence the credential will be granted: Aldo Bravo said Burneo "will do what is right" and will hand López Aliaga the mayoral credential, arguing a refusal would have no legal basis . - [2026-10-02] Carlos Bruce had escalated the dispute internationally before the vote, taking his objections to the OEA election observation mission, while legal expert José Tello argued the JNE could not legally deny López Aliaga the credential since municipal succession law allows the replacement directly and no electoral rule can restrict it by analogy . - [2026-10-04] López Aliaga has pre-emptively threatened legal consequences if denied: he stated "Si el JNE va en contra de la ley, hay un delito que se llama prevaricato" (if the JNE goes against the law, there is a crime called malfeasance). BOTTOM LINE: On election night (Oct 4) López Aliaga/Popular Renewal appears to have won the most votes for Lima's mayoralty, but he ran as first councillor rather than mayoral candidate, and the JNE has not yet decided — and has given no timeline — on whether to award him the mayor's credential given the constitutional ban on immediate reelection; this unresolved "disguised reelection" dispute, likely to be contested via proclamation and appeals, is the key remaining obstacle before the question can resolve. NOT FOUND: Official ONPE final vote tally/certified results; any JNE Pleno ruling or JEE Lima Centro proclamation on the mayoral credential as of Oct 5; a confirmed date for that ruling.
report: base rate
- [2022-10-02] Base rate for this exact actor: López Aliaga won the 2022 Lima mayoral election with 26.34% of the vote , establishing him as the incumbent-type favorite heading into 2026 — he has won the one prior Lima mayoral race he contested. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Lima_municipal_election - [2025-10-13] Reggiardo took office as Mayor of Lima on 13 October 2025 upon the resignation of his predecessor Rafael López Aliaga , who left to run for president, showing the reference class here includes a resign-to-run-for-president pattern common among strong incumbents in Peru. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renzo_Reggiardo - [2026-08-05] Pre-election Ipsos poll (n=502): An Ipsos poll conducted 5–6 August 2026 (n=502) showed Rafael López Aliaga leading voting intention at 21%, followed by Carlos Bruce (Somos Perú) at 13%, Francis Allison (Avanza País) at 9%, and Daniel Urresti (Podemos Perú) at 7%, with 21% undecided. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Lima_municipal_election - [2026-09-24] Late-campaign Ipsos/Perú21 simulation put him well ahead: 30.0% valid-vote share versus 15.6% for Bruce and 15.1% for Allison, per the Wikipedia polling table sourced to Ipsos/Perú21 (24–25 Sep 2026, n=780). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Lima_municipal_election - [2026-09-15] A separate Datum/El Comercio poll (15–17 Sep 2026, n=600) also showed him leading, at 28.4% valid votes versus 18.2% for Allison, consistent across pollsters/houses. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Lima_municipal_election - [2026-10-04] Election day: a Datum exit poll for América Televisión, with a margin of error of 3-4%, gave López Aliaga 32.1% of valid votes, followed by Francis Allison (Avanza País) and Carlos Bruce (Somos Perú), with 25.1% and 15.9%, respectively . https://www.infobae.com/america/agencias/2026/10/05/lopez-aliaga-gana-comicios-para-alcaldia-de-lima-bajo-polemica-de-reeleccion-encubierta/ - [2026-10-04] With partial official counting underway, the margin narrowed but he still led: with 13.4% of official tally scrutinized, López Aliaga had 29.4% against Allison's 26.9% (2.5-point gap), per the same Infobae report. https://www.infobae.com/america/agencias/2026/10/05/lopez-aliaga-gana-comicios-para-alcaldia-de-lima-bajo-polemica-de-reeleccion-encubierta/ - [2026-10-04] EFE's wire framed the outcome as a confirmed win: the far-right Rafael López Aliaga again won Sunday's election for the Lima mayoralty, meeting forecasts that made him the favorite , though it noted this victory "no le garantiza de momento ejercer el cargo" due to the pending legal dispute. https://www.infobae.com/america/agencias/2026/10/05/lopez-aliaga-gana-comicios-para-alcaldia-de-lima-bajo-polemica-de-reeleccion-encubierta/ - [2026-10-04] Track record of forecasts: pollsters correctly predicted the frontrunner status for months; López Aliaga fulfilled the forecasts that placed him as the clear favorite to win the municipal elections again , suggesting Lima polling in this cycle had good directional accuracy, though the final margin (exit poll ~32% vs initial official count ~29%) shows typical few-point exit-poll overstatement. https://www.abc.com.py/internacionales/2026/10/04/el-ultraderechista-lopez-aliaga-vuelve-a-ganar-elecciones-a-alcalde-de-lima-segun-sondeo/ - [2026-10-04] Legal/institutional caveat affecting whether a "win" converts into holding office: the JNE continued without defining its position on disguised re-election; the former mayor did not run directly for re-election but appears as first councillor of Popular Renewal , a maneuver shared by roughly 130 mayors nationwide seeking "disguised re-election," as their rivals denounce . https://larepublica.pe/politica/2026/10/04/lima-decidira-entre-26-listas-a-su-proximo-alcalde-jne-continuo-sin-definir-posicion-sobre-reeleccion-encubierta-erm-2026-hnews-146307 - [2026-10-02] López Aliaga's own confidence reflects prior JNE precedent in his favor: his claim is backed by JNE rulings issued over the last 12 years, and the JNE had already confirmed his candidacy after dismissing an appeal seeking his exclusion for alleged "disguised re-election" . https://www.infobae.com/peru/2026/10/02/rafael-lopez-aliaga-afirma-que-podria-presentarse-en-las-elecciones-2030-para-un-tercer-periodo-como-alcalde/ BOTTOM LINE: The base-rate picture strongly favors Yes: López Aliaga was the clear polling frontrunner for months (consistently 21–32% in a fragmented field of 24+ lists), won his only prior Lima mayoral bid in 2022, and wire-service calls already describe him as the election's winner on 2026-10-04 with exit polls and early official counts both showing him ahead by several points. The main residual uncertainty is not electoral but legal/administrative — whether the JNE formally certifies him given the "disguised re-election" dispute — but historical JNE precedent over the past 12 years has favored allowing such successions, and he has already won the vote count. NOT FOUND: Final certified official vote tally/percentage for López Aliaga's list (only partial counts as of the available sources); a definitive JNE ruling on whether he will receive the mayoral credential.
report: yes case
YES means: Rafael López Aliaga wins the 2026 Lima mayoral election and this is reflected in the market's resolution (i.e., he both wins the vote and is confirmed/seated as mayor of Lima under the resolution criteria). - [2026-09-05/06] JNE president Roberto Burneo publicly stated there is no "disguised reelection" mechanism in Peru and that the Pleno's answer was affirmative regarding electoral participation, because there is no express restriction on incumbent mayors running as councillors , establishing a favorable institutional baseline before the vote even occurred. https://www.infobae.com/peru/2026/09/06/jne-descarta-reeleccion-encubierta-y-aclara-que-alcaldes-en-ejercicio-pueden-postular-como-regidores/ - [2026-08-28] In a materially identical precedent case, three of four JNE magistrates ruled that "the mere possibility that [the candidate] could be proclaimed mayor does not prove a current infraction nor turn his councillor candidacy into a disguised bid for the office he currently holds" , with only magistrate Gunther Gonzáles dissenting — showing a 3-1 majority precedent favoring succession. https://www.infobae.com/peru/2026/08/28/oficial-jne-no-frena-reeleccion-encubierta-y-acepta-que-un-alcalde-postule-como-primer-regidor/ - [2026-09-22] The JNE's Resolución N.° 3707-2026-JNE formally rejected an appeal to exclude López Aliaga, with Burneo noting the constitutional ban applies specifically to immediate reelection to the mayor's office itself, not to a councillor candidacy. https://diariocorreo.pe/politica/jne-ratifica-que-un-exalcalde-puede-postular-como-primer-regidor-noticia/ - [2026-09-15] Electoral law expert José Tello argued unequivocally that the JNE could not deny López Aliaga the credentials, since the Ley Orgánica de Municipalidades enables that replacement directly and no electoral rule can restrict it by analogy , and that the mechanism activates automatically once the election concludes, results are proclaimed, and the councillor credential is issued . https://www.infobae.com/peru/2026/09/15/podria-rafael-lopez-aliaga-recibir-la-credencial-de-alcalde-de-lima-esto-dice-experto/ - [2026-09-13] Legal experts consulted by El Comercio "coincidieron en que, como consecuencia de la proclamación de resultados... el JNE debería otorgar la respectiva credencial de alcalde al primer regidor," and one specialist added that an existing precedent establishes that the mayor's role is recognized at the proclamation act itself, making the credential "una formalidad derivada de la proclamación" rather than a separate discretionary act. https://elcomercio.pe/politica/rafael-lopez-aliaga-es-legal-o-no-entregarle-las-credenciales-de-alcalde-a-primeros-regidores-tras-eventual-victoria-jne-noticia/ - [2026-10-04] El Comercio-affiliate reporting on the procedural chain notes that in November 2022 the JEE de Lima Centro issued López Aliaga's mayoral credentials directly once ONPE's official tally confirmed him winner — establishing a working logistical precedent (JEE proclamation → ONPE count → credential) that previously ran smoothly for this same individual. (same source as above) - [2026-10-04] Rival candidate Francis Allison, who finished second, publicly stated the JNE "sí debe dar las credenciales a todos los que han postulado," i.e., even a losing major candidate is pressuring the JNE to honor the vote outcome rather than block it — reducing the chance of an adversarial blocking coalition. https://diariocorreo.pe/politica/francis-allison-sobre-lopez-aliaga-el-jne-si-debe-dar-las-credenciales-a-todos-los-que-han-postulado-noticia/ - [2026-10-05] Popular Renewal legislators are signaling they will treat any denial as an attack: Aldo Bravo expects Burneo "hará lo que corresponde" and will hand over the credential, while deputy Roxana Rocha has threatened constitutional/criminal complaints against Burneo if he does not — indicating the winning party sees the path to confirmation as near-automatic and will fight hard to force it. https://www.infobae.com/peru/2026/10/05/roberto-burneo-va-a-hacer-lo-que-corresponde-diputado-de-rp-confia-en-que-lopez-aliaga-sera-proclamado-alcalde/ - [2026-10-04] Multiple outlets (Ojo, Infobae) already describe López Aliaga's list as having won, framing the outstanding JNE credential question as a near-formality rather than a live contest over who actually got the most votes: "el líder de Renovación Popular, Rafael López Aliaga, ganó ayer las elecciones municipales en la capital y asumiría en enero próximo el cargo de burgomaestre capitalino" . https://ojo.pe/politica/renovacion-popular-gana-elecciones-en-lima-y-falta-definir-si-rafael-lopez-aliaga-sera-alcalde-web-ojo-print-noticia/ - [2026-10-04] Procedurally, under Article 23 of the Ley de Elecciones Municipales, the president of the corresponding Jurado Electoral Especial proclaims as mayor the citizen occupying first place on the list that obtains the highest vote total , and a constitutional law expert noted past JEEs have, in some analogous cases, proclaimed the first councillor directly as mayor when the list arrived without a mayoral candidate. https://elcomercio.pe/politica/rafael-lopez-aliaga-que-entidad-tiene-en-sus-manos-definir-la-entrega-de-credenciales-apuesplan-noticia/ BOTTOM LINE: The strongest case for YES rests on (1) López Aliaga's list having clearly won the most votes per exit polls and early official counts, and (2) a consistent, repeated JNE jurisprudential pattern over the campaign — three separate rulings (Aug 28, Sept 5-6, Sept 22) by a 3-1 majority — finding no "disguised reelection" bar to a former mayor running and succeeding as first councillor, combined with expert consensus that the credential is a near-automatic formality flowing from proclamation under existing municipal succession law, plus a prior (2022) smooth JEE-to-credential precedent for this same person and public pressure/threats from his party and even a rival (Allison) pushing the JNE to simply honor the vote. NOT FOUND: Any actual JNE Pleno ruling or JEE Lima Centro proclamation act specifically awarding (or denying) López Aliaga the mayoral credential as of Oct 5, 2026; a scheduled date for that Pleno session; final certified ONPE tally for the Lima mayoral race.
report: no case
YES means: Rafael López Aliaga is confirmed/certified as the winner of the 2026 Lima mayoral race — i.e., he actually receives the mayoral credential and takes office for 2027-2030. The NO case below argues this real-world outcome may fail to materialize even though his list won the most votes. - [2026-10-05] The core legal fact the NO case rests on: Rafael López Aliaga did not run for mayor on the ballot at all — he appears only as first councillor — and the JNE itself frames the open question as whether to "proclamar al candidato de Renovación Popular para un nuevo mandato en Lima Metropolitana a pesar de haber sido elegido para el periodo anterior," explicitly invoking the Art. 194 immediate-reelection ban. https://www.infobae.com/peru/2026/10/05/jne-decidira-si-entrega-credencial-de-alcalde-a-rafael-lopez-aliaga/ - [2026-10-05] Peru's electoral body has so far only ruled on candidacy eligibility, not on the credential itself: Burneo stated the JNE plenary only decided "que la postulación de un alcalde como primer regidor no estaba prohibida," while explicitly saying "el otro punto (entrega de credencial) no era controvertido" at the time — leaving the decisive question unresolved and unscheduled. https://www.infobae.com/peru/2026/10/05/jne-decidira-si-entrega-credencial-de-alcalde-a-rafael-lopez-aliaga/ - [2026-09-08] Institutional opposition to a López Aliaga credential is broad, not fringe: 14 of 15 political parties (a 14-1 vote, with only Renovación Popular dissenting) formally demanded the JNE plenary issue "un pronunciamiento vinculante y definitivo" within three business days on whether 2022-elected mayors running as first councillors can receive the mayoral credential — a demand the JNE did not meet before the election. https://www.infobae.com/peru/2026/09/08/partidos-exigen-al-jne-fijar-postura-sobre-intento-de-rafael-lopez-aliaga-de-reelegirse-pese-a-prohibicion/ - [2026-10-05] A concrete alternative outcome exists that would make the question resolve NO even with a Popular Renewal win: rival candidate Urresti argues succession law dictates the credential should go to Jeanette Alonzo, the second councillor, not López Aliaga, since "le correspondería en este caso a la señora Janeth, que va como segunda regidora." https://www.infobae.com/peru/2026/10/02/daniel-urresti-sigue-los-pasos-de-carlos-bruce-y-lleva-ante-la-oea-dudas-sobre-una-reeleccion-encubierta-de-rafael-lopez-aliaga/ - [2026-10-05] Renovación Popular legislators are already threatening criminal/constitutional complaints against JNE president Burneo if he denies the credential, and López Aliaga has pre-emptively invoked "prevaricato" — both signal the party itself expects a real chance of denial, not a formality. https://www.infobae.com/peru/2026/10/05/roberto-burneo-va-a-hacer-lo-que-corresponde-diputado-de-rp-confia-en-que-lopez-aliaga-sera-proclamado-alcalde/ - [2026-10-05] The procedural path to a final answer is multi-staged and slow: the JEE Lima Centro must first proclaim the municipal results, a decision "puede ser apelada ante el Pleno del JNE" — meaning any credential fight can be litigated through at least two more formal stages before resolution, with no deadline fixed. https://www.infobae.com/peru/2026/10/05/roberto-burneo-va-a-hacer-lo-que-corresponde-diputado-de-rp-confia-en-que-lopez-aliaga-sera-proclamado-alcalde/ - [2026-10-04] Media framing itself is hedged, not a consensus "call": Ojo Público's headline describes him as merely "a un paso de consumar la reelección pese a impedimento" (one step from completing reelection despite a legal impediment), explicitly stating "todavía es incierto si López Aliaga recibirá la credencial de alcalde" — undercutting any claim that a media consensus already exists for accelerated resolution. https://ojo-publico.com/politica/lopez-aliaga-un-paso-consumar-la-reeleccion-pese-impedimento - [2026-10-04] The dispute is explicitly nationwide, not uniquely resolvable in López Aliaga's favor: roughly 130 mayors elsewhere in Peru face the identical "disguised re-election" maneuver, meaning the JNE's eventual ruling is a high-stakes precedent-setting decision the board may delay or decide conservatively (i.e., against successions) to avoid opening the door nationally. https://larepublica.pe/politica/2026/10/04/lima-decidira-entre-26-listas-a-su-proximo-alcalde-jne-continuo-sin-definir-posicion-sobre-reeleccion-encubierta-erm-2026-hnews-146307 - [2026-10-05] López Aliaga's track record shows he has twice already surrendered elected mandates mid-term (resigning the mayoralty in 2025 to run for president, then resigning his Senate seat in July 2026, per the credential-dispute article's timeline) — a pattern of institutional volatility around him that adds residual risk even if a credential is initially granted. https://www.infobae.com/peru/2026/10/05/rafael-lopez-aliaga-lidera-el-boca-de-urna-en-lima-y-podria-ser-reelecto-alcalde-pese-a-la-polemica-de-una-reelecion-encubierta/ BOTTOM LINE: Even though Popular Renewal's list appears to have won the most votes, the literal resolution mechanism — the JNE plenary granting López Aliaga personally the mayoral credential — remains undecided, unscheduled, opposed by 14 of 15 parties, subject to multi-stage appeal, and contested by a credible alternative-successor theory (Alonzo); any of these could produce a NO resolution despite an apparent vote-count "win." NOT FOUND: A set hearing date or deadline for the JNE Pleno's credential ruling; any indication of how the Kalshi contract's "wins the election" language would be adjudicated if the JNE denies López Aliaga the credential but seats another Popular Renewal councillor as mayor.
3. Forecasters 5 draws · Opus 5.5 + GPT-6 Astra + GPT-5.6 Sol · plain mean
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
68% conf
Yes 88%
No 12%
(0) Not yet resolved. The election was held on 4 Oct 2026. EFE/Infobae and Ojo call López Aliaga's Renovación Popular list the winner: the Datum exit poll had it at 32.1% vs 25.1% for Allison, and the early official count (13.4% counted) showed 29.4% vs 26.9%. There is no certified ONPE tally yet, and the JNE has not ruled on his mayoral credential. (a) Trading runs until Oct 2027, so there is ample time for the count, the JEE Lima Centro proclamation, appeals and a JNE Pleno ruling. Accelerated resolution by media consensus is possible sooner. (b) Status quo: his list leads and the JNE majority has ruled for him three times (Aug 28 by 3-1, Burneo's Sept statement, Resolución 3707-2026). Expert consensus is that the credential flows almost automatically from proclamation, which points to Yes. (c) NO scenario: the early-count margin keeps narrowing (exit poll +7 shrank to +2.5) and Allison overtakes him. Alternatively, the JNE Pleno, pressured by 14 of 15 parties and the 130-mayor precedent, denies him the credential under Art. 194 or gives it to the second councillor, and Kalshi treats that as not winning. (d) YES scenario: the final ONPE count confirms his plurality, the JEE proclaims the list, and the JNE issues his credential in line with its earlier rulings, or media consensus calls him the winner. I anchor on the Kalshi price of about 93% (bid/ask 58/98, a wide spread). I shade down slightly for the unfinished, narrowing count and the unresolved credential and resolution-wording ambiguity.
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
72% conf
Yes 88%
No 12%
(0) Resolution is not yet met. The October 4, 2026 election has happened, and EFE/Infobae/Ojo report López Aliaga's Renovación Popular list won. The Datum exit poll had it at 32.1% vs Allison's 25.1%. But ONPE results are only partial: 29.4% vs 26.9% at 13.4% counted, a narrower margin than the exit poll showed. The JNE has also not ruled on awarding him the mayoral credential, since he ran as first councillor and the constitution bars immediate reelection. (a) Trading runs until October 2027, but the count should finish within weeks. The proclamation and credential decision, with possible appeals, should follow within one to two months, ahead of the January 2027 swearing-in. (b) Status quo: his list leads, media have called the race, and three JNE rulings (August 28, September 5-6, and Resolution 3707-2026 on September 22) found no 'disguised reelection' bar. Expert consensus is that the credential flows almost automatically from proclamation. (c) NO: the remaining count tightens and Allison overtakes the 2.5-point lead. Or the JNE plenary, pressed by 14 of 15 parties and facing about 130 similar cases nationally, denies him the credential or hands it to second councillor Alonzo, and Kalshi treats that as not winning. (d) YES: the full count confirms the lead and JEE Lima Centro proclaims the list. The JNE follows its 3-1 precedent, he gets the credential, and media consensus calls him the winner. I anchor on Kalshi's 93% (last close 94%), but the bid/ask is very wide at 58/98. I shade down a few points for the narrowing partial count, the unscheduled credential ruling, and ambiguity over how 'wins' would be adjudicated if the credential were denied.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
58% conf
Yes 89%
No 11%
I anchor on Kalshi's 93% Yes price, but reduce it to 89% because the October 5 Infobae report quotes JNE president Burneo distinguishing permission to run from the still-undecided mayoral credential, a risk the last price may underweight given its wide 58%–98% bid–ask spread. Resolution is not conclusively documented: EFE/Infobae describes López Aliaga as the winner, but the ONPE read failed with HTTP 403, no final proclamation was found, and the full accelerated-resolution criteria are unavailable. Voting occurred October 4, and approximately 364 days remain until the October 4, 2027 trading deadline, leaving ample time for counting and legal adjudication. If nothing changes, he remains the apparent vote winner, favoring Yes, but his personal recognition as the winning mayor remains unresolved. Datum's 32.1%–25.1% exit-poll lead and the reported 29.4%–26.9% lead with 13.4% counted support electoral victory, although neither establishes a final result and syndicated EFE coverage is not independent corroboration. A No scenario is a count reversal or an electoral ruling recognizing another councillor as mayor because López Aliaga faces the immediate-reelection prohibition, unless qualifying media calls have already triggered settlement. A Yes scenario is an accepted media consensus or official proclamation recognizing his victory, with September's eligibility rulings and expert succession arguments supporting—but not guaranteeing—that outcome. I do not impose the research reports' additional requirement that he actually take office, which is absent from the supplied contract; the remaining 11% principally reflects counting, legal-recognition, and settlement-interpretation risks.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
65% conf
Yes 90%
No 10%
I anchor on Kalshi's 93% Yes, although its 58%–98% bid/ask spread limits the quote's precision. As of October 5, resolution is not conclusively documented: the ONPE read failed with HTTP 403, no final proclamation was found, and EFE/Infobae victory reports do not establish that the unspecified accelerated-resolution requirements have been satisfied. Voting occurred October 4; with no separate deadline supplied, approximately 364 days remain until the October 4, 2027 trading close. The status quo favors Yes electorally—Datum's exit poll showed 32.1% versus Allison's 25.1%, while the reported official count showed 29.4% versus 26.9% at only 13.4% counted—but leaves final recognition unresolved. A No scenario is a count reversal or, before qualifying accelerated settlement, a JNE decision denying López Aliaga recognition as mayor under the immediate-reelection prohibition and recognizing another councillor instead. A Yes scenario is that his list retains its lead and the JEE/JNE recognizes his succession from first councillor, supported by favorable legal opinions and prior candidacy rulings, or qualifying media consensus enables earlier settlement. My modest reduction to 90% reflects Burneo's October 5 clarification that permission to run did not decide entitlement to mayoral credentials, a specific distinction understated by the research's characterization of candidacy rulings as succession precedents. The supplied contract requires winning, not actually taking office, so I reject the reports' stricter seating requirement while explicitly retaining uncertainty about official candidate classification and the unavailable full resolution rules.
gpt-5.6-sol · high effort
67% conf
Yes 89%
No 11%
(0) The resolving condition is not conclusively documented: EFE and Infobae called López Aliaga the election-night winner, but the available official count was only 13.4% complete, the ONPE resolution source returned HTTP 403, and neither a final tally nor a JEE/JNE credential decision was found. (a) Voting occurred on October 4, 2026, but there are roughly 364 days until the October 4, 2027 trading deadline, leaving ample time for proclamation and appeals. (b) If nothing changes, López Aliaga remains the apparent vote winner but personally unconfirmed as mayor, creating a potential No under the credential-based interpretation. (c) No results if Allison overtakes his 2.5-point partial-count lead or, more plausibly, the JNE applies the constitutional immediate-reelection ban and seats second councillor Jeanette Alonzo instead. (d) Yes results if the final count confirms Popular Renewal's lead and the JEE/JNE awards López Aliaga the mayoral credential under Article 23 and the JNE's recent 3-1 precedent permitting this succession route. I price Yes below Kalshi's 93% anchor because the wide 58%-98% spread signals weak price precision and the market still lacks both a final official tally and a ruling on the decisive legal issue, although consistent polling, media calls, and favorable JNE precedent keep Yes strongly favored.
4. Final plain mean of 5 draws
89% (66% confidence)
Yes: 89% No: 11%
Mean of 5 draws (0.88, 0.88, 0.89, 0.90, 0.89). (0) Not yet resolved. The election was held on 4 Oct 2026. EFE/Infobae and Ojo call López Aliaga's Renovación Popular list the winner: the Datum exit poll had it at 32.1% vs 25.1% for Allison, and the early official count (13.4% counted) showed 29.4% vs 26.9%. There is no certified ONPE tally yet, and the JNE has not ruled on his mayoral credential. (a) Trading runs until Oct 2027, so there is ample time for the count, the JEE Lima Centro proclamation, appeals and a JNE Pleno ruling. Accelerated resolution by media consensus is possible sooner. (b) Status quo: his list leads and the JNE majority has ruled for him three times (Aug 28 by 3-1, Burneo's Sept statement, Resolución 3707-2026). Expert consensus is that the credential flows almost automatically from proclamation, which points to Yes. (c) NO scenario: the early-count margin keeps narrowing (exit poll +7 shrank to +2.5) and Allison overtakes him. Alternatively, the JNE Pleno, pressured by 14 of 15 parties and the 130-mayor precedent, denies him the credential under Art. 194 or gives it to the second councillor, and Kalshi treats that as not winning. (d) YES scenario: the final ONPE count confirms his plurality, the JEE proclaims the list, and the JNE issues his credential in line with its earlier rulings, or media consensus calls him the winner. I anchor on the Kalshi price of about 93% (bid/ask 58/98, a wide spread). I shade down slightly for the unfinished, narrowing count and the unresolved credential and resolution-wording ambiguity.
Pipeline Timing
Total pipeline time: 116.4s
Per-tool research timings shown in the Research section above.