forecasting
agent
← back to scans

Colombia wage growth minus inflation above 4.00 pp in 2027?

kalshiEconomics·2026-10-05·view on kalshi ↗
16%
Agent
19%
Market Price
-3.2%
Edge
63%
Confidence
123,152
Volume
3.0c
Spread
133
Days to resolution
1
Markets in event
final rationale
Mean of 5 draws (0.12, 0.12, 0.19, 0.19, 0.17). (0) Not resolved. The 2027 minimum wage is not set; tripartite talks began Oct 2 and must agree by Dec 15, or the government decrees by Dec 30. DANE's December 2026 CPI comes out in early January 2027. (a) About four months remain, with the decisive window in late November to December 2026. (b) Status quo: the new De la Espriella government's Finance Minister Gómez has said repeatedly that the hike must be moderate and anchored to DANE inflation plus productivity ('no podemos aumentar cuatro o cinco veces por encima de la inflación'). Analysts mostly expect 7–10% (Cárdenas 8%, Corficolombiana 7–8%, Credicorp 9–10%) against a consensus December CPI of about 6.7–6.9%, which implies a gap of roughly 1–3pp. (c) NO: a negotiated or decreed hike of about 8–9% against about 6.8% CPI gives a gap near 2pp. A higher-than-expected CPI (El Niño, indexation from the 2026 hike) would narrow it further. (d) YES: unions win a double-digit settlement of 11% or more, which the government accepts to avoid conflict. Alternatively, December CPI surprises lower (about 6.3%) while the wage lands at 10.5% or more. Either outcome would break this government's stated stance. The pre-Petro norm was roughly 2–3pp, and 4pp+ gaps occurred only under Petro's populist policy, which has now ended. The Kalshi price of about 17–19% (bid 16%) looks somewhat rich given the government's consistent messaging, so I shade it down to about 12% while keeping tail risk for political bargaining and a CPI undershoot.
price vs. prediction
market price agent forecast at t+0
14 follow-ups
1. Planner Opus 5.5 · picks the research tools
Tools chosen: kalshi_direct kalshi_related resolution_source fred article_search
Planner reasoning
This is a Kalshi question about the 2027 Colombian minimum wage increase minus December 2026 CPI, so kalshi_direct is the price anchor, and the other strikes in KXCOWAGE help map the implied distribution. FRED can supply Colombia CPI history for the inflation trajectory, and the resolution source is DANE's CPI page plus the minimum wage decree. One targeted news search covers the current inflation print and early statements on the wage negotiation.
2. Research parallel tool calls + 4 web research loops (Sonnet 5) · read raw by the forecasters
at a glance
RESEARCH DIGEST (built in code: tool summaries and each report's bottom line; the forecasters read the full tool outputs and reports) Tools - kalshi_direct: ## This Market's Kalshi Data **Above 4.00 pp** (KXCOWAGE-2027-T400) - Current price (probability): 19.00% (live; bid 16% / ask 19%) - Last daily close (2026-10-04): 15.00% - 7-day price change: +1.00% - 30-day price change: +16.00% - Average daily volume: 8796 contracts - Price range: 3.00% - 22.00% - Data points: 14 days - resolution_source: already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=False; last_updated=unknown (page references 'agosto 2026' indices as most recent highlighted links, but no explicit publication date is shown). The fetched page is DANE's general IPC (CPI) landing page with navigation links and methodology information; it does not show any specific CPI figure for December 2026 or the 2027 minimum wage decree, both of whi - kalshi_related: 2 related markets / summaries. series KXCOWAGE: 0 markets (skipped 1 no-signal) | keyword 'Colombia inflation': ok | keyword 'Colombia minimum wage': ok - fred: Fetched 1 FRED series (lookback=730d) (via search 'Colombia consumer price index inflation'). - article_search: Fetched 13 unique articles across 2 queries (lookback=45d). 'Colombia salario mínimo 2027 incremento propuesta Petro': 8 articles | 'DANE IPC septiembre 2026 inflación anual Colombia': 8 articles Research loops, bottom lines - current state: As of early October 2026, Colombia's 2027 minimum-wage negotiation has only just begun (first session Oct 2, next Oct 13, formal haggling in Nov-Dec, decree deadline Dec 30) with analyst/government scenarios clustering at 5%-10% (consensus near 7-8%), while December 2026 CPI is being forecast by BanRep's own survey at roughly 6.8-6.9% — implying a base-case wage-inflation gap of only 0-3pp, well under the 4.00pp bar, unless the new government surprises with another oversized decree-driven hike a - base rate: Over the last five wage-setting cycles only 2025 (≈4.3pp) and the outlier 2026 (≈17pp+) cleared the 4.00pp threshold by the ministry's own "real increase" measure, while 2022-2024 fell short (≈2.8-4.5pp); this gives a moderate, not overwhelming, historical base rate for a >4pp outcome, and the extreme 2026 decree may not recur in 2027 given a change of government and warnings that the 2026 wage shock itself could lift Dec-2026 CPI, narrowing the gap. - yes case: The single most credible path to YES is a double-digit 2027 wage settlement (10%+) combining the inflation+productivity floor (~7-8%) with a political/union premium — a dynamic economists like Velandia and union data from CUT are already flagging — landing against a December-2026 CPI that consensus still pegs near 6.7-6.9%; a ~10-11% wage hike against ~6.7% CPI would clear the 4.00pp bar, even without a repeat of 2026's extreme 23.7% decree. - no case: Every current proposal, projection and official statement (Credicorp's 8-10% scenario, Cárdenas's "8% absent politicking," and repeated Finance Ministry commitments to an inflation/productivity-anchored, non-populist formula against ~7% expected December-2026 CPI) clusters the implied 2027 wage-minus-CPI gap in the 1-3pp range, comfortably under the 4.00pp bar, and the new government's explicit, repeated rejection of outsized decrees makes a Petro-style outlier increase unlikely before the quest
tools
toolstatustimeitemssummary
kalshi_direct OK 0.2s 1 ## This Market's Kalshi Data **Above 4.00 pp** (KXCOWAGE-2027-T400) - Current price (probability): 19.00% (live; bid 16% / ask 19%) - Last daily close (2026-10-04): 15.00% - 7-day price change: +1.00% - 30-day price change: +16.00% - Average daily volume: 8796 contracts - Price range: 3.00% - 22.00
kalshi_related OK 2.7s 2 2 related markets / summaries. series KXCOWAGE: 0 markets (skipped 1 no-signal) | keyword 'Colombia inflation': ok | keyword 'Colombia minimum wage': ok
resolution_source OK 4.7s 1 already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=False; last_updated=unknown (page references 'agosto 2026' indices as most recent highlighted links, but no explicit publication date is shown). The fetched page is DANE's general IPC (CPI) landing page with navigation links and methodology information; it
fred OK 1.3s 1 Fetched 1 FRED series (lookback=730d) (via search 'Colombia consumer price index inflation').
article_search OK 46.6s 13 Fetched 13 unique articles across 2 queries (lookback=45d). 'Colombia salario mínimo 2027 incremento propuesta Petro': 8 articles | 'DANE IPC septiembre 2026 inflación anual Colombia': 8 articles
research loops · 4/4 ok · 12 searches · 6 page reads
dimensionstatustimesearchespage readsreport
current state OK 41s 5 3 5028 chars
base rate SNIPPETS 41s 2 0 6056 chars · no page read; snippets only
yes case OK 38s 3 1 4830 chars
no case OK 26s 2 2 4672 chars
report: current state
- [2026-10-05] Formal minimum-wage talks for 2027 had not produced any percentage yet; Finance Minister Miguel Gómez urged restraint, saying "no podemos aumentar cuatro o cinco veces por encima de la inflación," while Corficolombiana's César Pabón projected year-end inflation near 7% plus one point for productivity, i.e., an ~8% wage scenario. The negotiation of the minimum wage increase for 2027 has not formally started, but the judicial precedent of the 2026 hike of more than 23% already conditions the scenario, with discussion to include inflation, productivity and the Produto Interno Bruto; the new government is expected to take a more austere stance. Scenarios discussed run 5%, 7%, 8% and 10% (source: infobae, 2026-10-05, infobae.com). - [2026-10-02] The tripartite Comisión Permanente de Concertación held its first session on the 2027 minimum wage under the new government; the first extraordinary session of the Comisión Permanente de Concertación de Políticas Salariales y Laborales was held on October 2, presided by Labor Minister Natalia López Fuentes, with government, business and union representatives, starting the negotiation process (pulzo.com, 2026-10-02). - [2026-10-05] Participants have until October 9, 2026 to submit comments on labor regulations under review, and the Comisión will meet again on October 13 to review proposals received and continue dialogue (ntn24.com, 2026-10-05). - [2026-10-05] The specific discussion on the minimum wage percentage usually concentrates between late November and early December, and Law 278 of 1996 requires the Comisión to reach agreement by December 15 , with a final government-decree deadline of December 30, 2026 if no consensus is reached (bloomberglinea.com, 2026-10-05). - [2026-09-03] A detailed scenario table puts possible 2027 wage hikes at 5%-8%, with Corficolombiana's "floor" near 7% matching projected year-end inflation, and 8% if one productivity point is added; this contrasts with 2026's 23% decree-driven increase under Petro (poli.edu.co, 2026-09-03). - [2026-09-07] DANE's latest official CPI print (August 2026): in August 2026 the monthly CPI variation was 0.39%, year-to-date variation 5.35%, and annual variation 6.24%, i.e., 1.14 percentage points higher than the 5.10% recorded a year earlier (dane.gov.co). - [2026-09-17] BanRep's Encuesta Mensual de Expectativas showed a December 2026 inflation projection that is the highest since late 2023, with September's CPI expected to rise from 6.25% in August to 6.33% , and December 2026 overall expected to round "6.8 %" per the article text (yahoo/Valora Analitik, 2026-09-17). - [2026-09-17] The same BanRep survey shows analysts now expect 2026 to close at 6.81% inflation, up from 6.60% projected in the August survey (larepublica.co, 2026-09-17/updated). - [2026-10-07, scheduled] DANE is due to publish the official September 2026 CPI figure; the official data was expected on October 7 , which will be the last full monthly print before the December 2026 figure that the contract references (yahoo/Valora Analitik, 2026-09-17). - [2025-12-30/2026-02-20] Historical precedent: for 2026, Petro decreed a 23.7% minimum wage hike versus roughly 5.1% trailing inflation (a ~18.6pp gap), after failed tripartite talks; Petro signed a new decree maintaining the 23.7% increase for 2026 after the Consejo de Estado's provisional suspension, reaffirming the wage increase for 2.4 million workers — but this episode pertains to 2026, not 2027, and a change of government (Abelardo de la Espriella took office August 2026) makes a repeat of such an oversized unilateral hike less likely for 2027 given the new Finance Minister's stated preference for technical, inflation/productivity-anchored criteria. - [2026-10-05] Infobae's own wage-scenario modeling assumes ~7% inflation and explicitly computes an 8% wage scenario (inflation+1pp productivity) as the "central" case, implying a wage-minus-inflation gap near 1-2pp if December 2026 CPI lands near the 6.8-6.9% BanRep consensus — far below the 4.00pp threshold (infobae.com, 2026-10-05). BOTTOM LINE: As of early October 2026, Colombia's 2027 minimum-wage negotiation has only just begun (first session Oct 2, next Oct 13, formal haggling in Nov-Dec, decree deadline Dec 30) with analyst/government scenarios clustering at 5%-10% (consensus near 7-8%), while December 2026 CPI is being forecast by BanRep's own survey at roughly 6.8-6.9% — implying a base-case wage-inflation gap of only 0-3pp, well under the 4.00pp bar, unless the new government surprises with another oversized decree-driven hike as Petro did in 2025/26. NOT FOUND: The official/final 2027 minimum wage percentage (not set until Nov-Dec 2026/decree by Dec 30, 2026); the official DANE December 2026 CPI figure (due early January 2027, after trading closes Feb 15, 2027 but before the wage-growth figure needed for resolution is likely known); and the official September 2026 CPI print (scheduled Oct 7, 2026, just after this report's cutoff).
report: base rate
- [2026-10-05] Historical gap between Colombia's minimum-wage increase (set for year Y) and the DANE CPI reading for December of year Y‑1 (the figure used as the basis for negotiation) has varied widely under the Petro administration: 2022 wage +10.07% vs Dec-2021 CPI 5.62% (gap ≈4.45pp); 2023 wage +16% vs Dec-2022 CPI 13.12% (gap ≈2.88pp); 2024 wage +12.07% vs Dec-2023 CPI (gap ≈2.8pp); 2025 wage +9.5% vs Dec-2024 CPI 5.20%, explicitly reported as "a 9.50% increase over the 2024 minimum wage. This represents a real increase of 4.36% in addition to the IPC" . https://leglobal.law/countries/colombia/looking-ahead-2025-colombia/ - [2026-10-05] For 2026, the government bypassed the usual negotiation formula entirely: "the measure aims to reduce inequality and move Colombia toward a 'living minimum wage'... business associations, financial analysts and opposition lawmakers said the scale of the increase — far above inflation and productivity trends" implying a gap vastly exceeding 4pp (wage +23% vs. inflation expected near 5%, i.e. ~17-18pp gap), described as "a technically grounded adjustment would have been close to 6.2%. The gap between that benchmark and the decreed hike exceeds 17 percentage points, the largest deviation on record" . https://thecitypaperbogota.com/news/colombias-23-7-minimum-wage-hike-stirs-inflation-and-informality-fears/ - [2026-10-05] A Colombian Labor Ministry official framed the whole Petro-era pattern as deliberately exceeding inflation: "Under President Gustavo Petro's administration, we have increased the minimum wage by a cumulative 37.6 percent, and year after year this has meant a difference between inflation and wage increases... in 2022 there was a real increase of nearly three percent, the same as in 2023, and noted that in 2024 it reached 4.5 percent" . https://www.plenglish.com/news/2025/12/01/negotiations-for-the-minimum-wage-in-2026-will-begin-in-colombia/ - [2026-10-05] Out of the five most recent wage-setting cycles (2022-2026), at least two (2025, 2026) produced a real gap above 4pp by the ministry's own accounting, and 2026 was an extreme outlier (~17-24pp depending on method) — giving a base rate of roughly 40-60% of recent years clearing the 4pp bar, skewed upward by the trend toward larger, politically-driven increases. - [2026-10-05] Base-case econometric projections (not policy-specific) see continued, more moderate nominal wage growth going forward: Trading Economics projects the Colombian minimum wage to be "expected to reach 1750000.00 COP/Month by the end of 2026... projected to trend around 1900000.00 COP/Month in 2027" , implying roughly an 8-9% nominal increase for 2027 versus 2026, a much smaller jump than the 23% decreed for 2026. - [2026-10-05] Analysts cited in coverage of the 2026 decree warned the oversized hike risks "reignite inflation, complicating the central bank's easing cycle... Central bank economists have forecast 2026 inflation at 3.6%, down from 5.1% expected in 2025, but several analysts said those projections may now need revising" — meaning Dec-2026 CPI (the denominator for this market) is itself uncertain and could be pushed up by the 23% wage shock, which would mechanically narrow the 2027 wage-minus-CPI gap versus a no-shock baseline. - [2026-10-05] The 2026 round was explicitly decreed rather than negotiated, reflecting a documented structural pattern: "the minimum wage rose by 12%, followed by a 9.54% increase in 2025, which set the wage at COP 1,423,500 per month. That 2025 increase was introduced by presidential decree after negotiations... failed to reach an agreement" , i.e., Colombia has a recent history (2024, 2025, 2026) of unilateral decrees rather than tripartite consensus, each capable of producing outsized real gaps when the executive prioritizes purchasing power over the CPI/productivity formula. - [2026-10-05] A government-cited "living minimum wage" framework explicitly aims to close a large gap over multiple years rather than in one shot: "Deflactando con inflación estimada para 2026 (4,54%), el valor aproximado sería $1.826.190, frente a lo cual se describe una brecha porcentual aproximada de 28,3%... no se busca cerrar totalmente la brecha en una sola vigencia y justifica un incremento inicial del 23% desde 2026, complementable con ajustes posteriores" — suggesting the policy architecture (if carried into 2027 by the next government) could continue producing above-CPI increases, though the "ajustes posteriores" language implies future hikes may be smaller than the 2026 one. - [2026-10-05] Political context: Petro's presidential term runs 2022-2026, so the 2027 minimum-wage decision will be made by Colombia's next administration (inaugurated August 2026), which could revert to a more conventional, formula-based (inflation + productivity) negotiation rather than the "living wage" approach that produced the outsized 2026 gap — a key reason the historical base rate under Petro (heavily skewed toward Yes in 2025-2026) may not carry over unchanged into 2027. BOTTOM LINE: Over the last five wage-setting cycles only 2025 (≈4.3pp) and the outlier 2026 (≈17pp+) cleared the 4.00pp threshold by the ministry's own "real increase" measure, while 2022-2024 fell short (≈2.8-4.5pp); this gives a moderate, not overwhelming, historical base rate for a >4pp outcome, and the extreme 2026 decree may not recur in 2027 given a change of government and warnings that the 2026 wage shock itself could lift Dec-2026 CPI, narrowing the gap. NOT FOUND: An official, consolidated DANE/Banco de la República dataset giving year-by-year "minimum wage growth minus December CPI" figures in one place (figures above were reconstructed from multiple news/analyst sources); any formal forecast specifically for the 2027 minimum-wage decree (negotiations typically begin only in Oct-Dec of the prior year, so no 2027 figure exists yet); and no betting-market or survey-based historical track record specific to this exact metric beyond the Trading Economics econometric wage projection.
report: yes case
YES means: Colombia's 2027 minimum-wage increase (as decreed/agreed for January 2027) ends up at least 4.01 percentage points above DANE's December-2026 annual CPI print. - [2026-10-04] Credicorp Capital's chief economist Daniel Velandia now frames the "employer-side" working scenario as a **9%-10%** nominal wage increase for 2027, explicitly higher than the pure inflation-plus-productivity technical calculation of ~8%, because the increment would have a floor close to 7%, a percentage that would respond to the expected behavior of inflation during 2026 is only the starting point, not the final number — he adds a historical "political premium" on top (portafolio.co, 2026-10-04). - [2026-10-04] Velandia noted that in the years before the Petro government the average increase stood 2.5 to 3 points above inflation -style premium, i.e., Colombia has a structural pattern of settling above the technical floor, which is the mechanism that could push 2027 past the 4pp bar even without another "salario vital" shock (portafolio.co, 2026-10-04). - [2026-10-04] Labor's opening position is far more aggressive than any technical formula: CUT president Fabio Arias says according to Arias, that study initially established a 50% difference between the vital minimum wage and the wage imposed in Colombia , and that the 2026 decree only closed that gap to 18 points, leaving the 2027 increase must consider the existing gap relative to the vital minimum wage, taking as reference a study by the International Labour Organization — a 32-point residual gap CUT wants addressed in 2027 (portafolio.co, 2026-10-04). - [2026-10-04] If negotiators split the difference between the CUT's "vital wage" framework and the employer/technical range, settlements well above 10% are not implausible; Velandia's own framing is that 9-10% is "a reference... but not to assume from now an 8% increase," i.e., he sees more upside risk than downside to the double-digit scenarios (portafolio.co, 2026-10-04). - [2026-09-26] El Niño is simultaneously creating upside political cover for a larger wage hike and downside pressure on the CPI print used in the denominator: BBVA Research's Alejandro Reyes said if we have an El Niño phenomenon that pushes inflation up at year-end when the minimum wage is being negotiated, it can also affect the value assigned to that income's growth — food-price shocks have historically been used by unions as leverage for bigger nominal hikes, not just a 1:1 CPI pass-through (bloomberglinea.com, 2026-09-26). - [2026-09-23] Even as Banco de la República and Bancolombia converge on December-2026 CPI near 6.7%-6.8%, Bancolombia separately flags 2027 as a high-inflation-volatility year: Bancolombia adjusted its inflation forecast for the close of 2026 from 6.4% to 6.7% due to labor costs, regulated tariffs and indexation — showing forecasters are already revising the denominator upward on the *labor-cost* channel itself, meaning any wage settlement surprise could further lift the CPI print used, but a sufficiently front-loaded nominal wage hike (10%+) would still outrun even an upward-revised ~6.8-7% CPI, clearing 4pp (abceconomia.co/Bancolombia, 2026-09-23). - [2026-10-04] The CUT itself is internally divided and under new leadership pressure (a breakaway faction event flagged the same week), which historically in Colombia has produced *more* aggressive public demands from rival union leaders competing for members' support — a dynamic that tends to push opening union asks, and sometimes final settlements, higher rather than toward moderation (portafolio.co, 2026-10-04 sidebar reference to CUT division). - [2026-10-04] Procedurally, the Comisión's hard deadlines (agreement by Dec 15, decree by Dec 29/30) concentrate real bargaining into a short, high-pressure window in which both sides historically compromise upward from the technical floor rather than settle exactly at it, as Velandia's 9-10% "employer" estimate against an 8% "technical" floor itself illustrates (portafolio.co, 2026-10-04). BOTTOM LINE: The single most credible path to YES is a double-digit 2027 wage settlement (10%+) combining the inflation+productivity floor (~7-8%) with a political/union premium — a dynamic economists like Velandia and union data from CUT are already flagging — landing against a December-2026 CPI that consensus still pegs near 6.7-6.9%; a ~10-11% wage hike against ~6.7% CPI would clear the 4.00pp bar, even without a repeat of 2026's extreme 23.7% decree. NOT FOUND: Any formal 9%+ or 10%+ proposal tabled by the government, business, or CUT side as of October 5, 2026 (all such numbers are analyst projections, not negotiating positions); the September-2026 official CPI print (due Oct 7, after this report's cutoff) that will update the base for the final months of bargaining.
report: no case
YES means: Colombia's 2027 minimum-wage percentage increase, minus DANE's December-2026 annual CPI print, comes out strictly above 4.00 percentage points. - [2026-10-04] Credicorp Capital's chief economist Daniel Velandia put the "deber ser" technical calculation (inflation near 7% + productivity 1-1.5pp) at about 8%, explicitly below his own conservative "political premium" scenario of 9-10%, implying a gap versus ~7% December CPI of only roughly 1-3pp, not above 4pp (portafolio.co, 2026-10-04). - [2026-09-10] Former Finance Minister Mauricio Cárdenas was quoted saying he attributed that decision to a populist policy of Gustavo Petro's government , and separately estimated the "most likely" 2027 increase at 8% "in the absence of politicking," a figure barely above the ~7% CPI consensus and far short of the 4pp bar (infobae.com, 2026-09-10). - [2026-09-10] Finance Minister Miguel Gómez Martínez explicitly tied the government's approach to official DANE data and productivity, stating the government "también señaló que el ajuste debe sustentarse en las cifras oficiales de inflación publicadas por el Dane," and calling the 2026 23.7% hike "absolutamente innecesario" — a direct institutional signal against any repeat of an outsized, decree-driven gap (infobae.com, 2026-09-10). - [2026-10-05] Gómez reiterated restraint days ago, saying the wage "no podemos aumentar cuatro o cinco veces por encima de la inflación," explicitly naming the 4x-5x-inflation multiple as unacceptable — rhetoric aimed squarely at preventing a gap anywhere near 4pp, let alone higher (infobae.com, 2026-10-05). - [2026-10-04] Vice President José Manuel Restrepo's framing — protecting purchasing power "sin golpear la economía nacional y las empresas" — signals the executive branch prefers a moderate, inflation-anchored number rather than another "living wage" shock (es-us.noticias.yahoo.com, cited 2026-10-04 coverage). - [2026-10-04] The CUT's own public demand (via president Fabio Arias) frames 2027 around closing a "32-point" living-wage gap over multiple future years rather than in one decree, implying unions themselves are not pushing for an all-at-once jump this cycle that would blow past 4pp (portafolio.co, 2026-10-04). - [2026-10-04] Business-side analysts (Velandia) still flag El Niño risk that could push December-2026 CPI above 7%, which — if realized — would mechanically shrink any wage-minus-CPI gap further, reinforcing the NO case (portafolio.co, 2026-10-04). - [2026-10-05] Multiple outlets (diariodelhuila.com, esquirecolombia.com) independently report that as of Oct 2-5, 2026 "no existe una propuesta oficial con un porcentaje determinado," and that President De la Espriella's stated orientation is an increase "que no se aleje demasiado de la inflación," i.e., status-quo inertia favors a formula-based, not populist, outcome. - [2026-10-04] Procedurally, Law 278's framework gives the Comisión until December 15, 2026 to agree, with a hard government-decree deadline of December 30, 2026 if talks fail (portafolio.co, 2026-10-04) — meaning even a decreed (non-negotiated) outcome, as in 2026, will still be bounded by a government that has already publicly disavowed decreeing far above inflation. - [2026-07-03] As early as July 2026 — before taking office — Gómez had already "anticipó que la próxima discusión para definir el aumento de 2027... [tendrá] incrementos más moderados que los aplicados en el último año," establishing months of consistent messaging against a repeat oversized hike (infobae.com, 2026-07-03). - [2026-10-04] Historically, Velandia noted that in the years before Petro's presidency the wage increase averaged only "2,5 y 3 puntos por encima" of inflation — the pre-2022 norm that the new, more conventional government explicitly wants to return to, which would fall under the 4pp threshold (portafolio.co, 2026-10-04). BOTTOM LINE: Every current proposal, projection and official statement (Credicorp's 8-10% scenario, Cárdenas's "8% absent politicking," and repeated Finance Ministry commitments to an inflation/productivity-anchored, non-populist formula against ~7% expected December-2026 CPI) clusters the implied 2027 wage-minus-CPI gap in the 1-3pp range, comfortably under the 4.00pp bar, and the new government's explicit, repeated rejection of outsized decrees makes a Petro-style outlier increase unlikely before the question's effective deadline. NOT FOUND: Any official 2027 wage percentage or decree (not due until mid-to-late December 2026/Dec 30 deadline); the official September or December 2026 DANE CPI prints; any union or government proposal that explicitly targets a gap above 4pp for 2027.
3. Forecasters 5 draws · Opus 5.5 + GPT-6 Astra + GPT-5.6 Sol · plain mean
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
60% conf
Yes 12%
No 88%
(0) Not resolved. The 2027 minimum wage is not set; tripartite talks began Oct 2 and must agree by Dec 15, or the government decrees by Dec 30. DANE's December 2026 CPI comes out in early January 2027. (a) About four months remain, with the decisive window in late November to December 2026. (b) Status quo: the new De la Espriella government's Finance Minister Gómez has said repeatedly that the hike must be moderate and anchored to DANE inflation plus productivity ('no podemos aumentar cuatro o cinco veces por encima de la inflación'). Analysts mostly expect 7–10% (Cárdenas 8%, Corficolombiana 7–8%, Credicorp 9–10%) against a consensus December CPI of about 6.7–6.9%, which implies a gap of roughly 1–3pp. (c) NO: a negotiated or decreed hike of about 8–9% against about 6.8% CPI gives a gap near 2pp. A higher-than-expected CPI (El Niño, indexation from the 2026 hike) would narrow it further. (d) YES: unions win a double-digit settlement of 11% or more, which the government accepts to avoid conflict. Alternatively, December CPI surprises lower (about 6.3%) while the wage lands at 10.5% or more. Either outcome would break this government's stated stance. The pre-Petro norm was roughly 2–3pp, and 4pp+ gaps occurred only under Petro's populist policy, which has now ended. The Kalshi price of about 17–19% (bid 16%) looks somewhat rich given the government's consistent messaging, so I shade it down to about 12% while keeping tail risk for political bargaining and a CPI undershoot.
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
60% conf
Yes 12%
No 88%
(0) Not resolved yet. The DANE resolution page shows nothing beyond August 2026 CPI (6.24% y/y), and no 2027 wage figure exists. Resolution needs the 2027 minimum-wage decree (agreement due Dec 15, decree deadline Dec 30, 2026) and DANE's December 2026 CPI (early January 2027). (a) Roughly 3 months remain until the inputs are known, and trading closes Feb 15, 2027. (b) Status quo: BanRep's survey consensus puts December 2026 CPI near 6.8%. Analyst and government scenarios cluster at 7–10%, with Cárdenas at 8% and Credicorp at 8% technical and 9–10% with a political premium. That implies a gap of about 1–3pp, so clearing 4pp needs a hike near 10.9% or more. (c) NO: the De la Espriella government follows through on Finance Minister Gómez's repeated calls for a moderate, DANE-anchored increase, settling around 8–9% against ~6.8% CPI. Pre-Petro norms of 2–3pp above inflation would also fall short. (d) YES: union pressure (CUT's 'living wage' gap), a political premium in a December crunch, or an El Niño food shock used as leverage push the hike to 11%+, possibly helped by a softer-than-expected December CPI. The Petro-era base rate (2025 at ~4.3pp, 2026 at ~18pp) argues for this, but that regime has ended. The Kalshi anchor is 19% (bid 16%), which looks somewhat rich given the new government's explicit rejection of outsized increases and the near-unanimous 7–10% scenario range. I shade it to about 12%, keeping tail risk for negotiation upside and CPI surprises.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
62% conf
Yes 19%
No 81%
Neither resolution input is documented: the fetched DANE portal lacks December 2026 annual CPI, and no final 2027 wage decree is supplied, so neither outcome is established. About 133 days remain until February 15, 2027; the reported wage-decree deadline is December 30 and December CPI should appear in early January, leaving several weeks of publication buffer. I anchor at Kalshi's 19% Yes quote (16% bid/19% ask) and retain it because the research establishes no clearly unpriced reason to depart. Status-quo continuation of the government's reported restraint favors No: Infobae's October 5 central wage scenario is 8%, while the September 17 inflation survey cited by La República projects 6.81%, producing a spread of only 1.19 percentage points. Even Portafolio's October 4 political-premium scenario of 9–10% remains No at that inflation level; contrary to parts of the YES report, wage growth must exceed 10.81% if CPI is 6.81%, and exactly four percentage points does not qualify. Yes could result from union pressure producing an 11% raise against 6.8% CPI, yielding 4.2 percentage points, with previous oversized decrees establishing the possibility of political surprises. Historical threshold crossings support this tail, but the reported administration change and arithmetic inconsistencies in the reconstructed base rates limit their predictive value. Settlement requires the actual official figures rather than forecasts, annual-average FRED inflation, or compounded real-wage growth; publication risk appears modest given the buffer, but missing final inputs and imperfect secondary reporting preclude high conviction.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
62% conf
Yes 19%
No 81%
The condition is not already met or impossible: the supplied DANE portal contains no December 2026 CPI figure, and the 2027 wage increase remains unset. Approximately 133 days remain until February 15, 2027; the wage decree is expected by December 30 and December CPI in early January, before—not after—the trading close. I retain Kalshi's 19% YES anchor (16% bid/19% ask), because the research establishes no sufficiently reliable, unpriced information warranting a departure. If current policy guidance holds, NO is the status-quo outcome: Portafolio's October 4 wage scenarios of roughly 8–10% against the September BanRep survey's 6.81% year-end inflation forecast imply gaps of 1.19–3.19 pp, with an 8% settlement providing a concrete NO scenario. A YES scenario is an 11% settlement against 6.81% CPI, producing 4.19 pp, potentially driven by union living-wage demands and a political bargaining premium despite the new government's reported restraint. At that inflation rate, wage growth must strictly exceed 10.81%, so the YES report overstates what a 10% hike achieves, while the NO report incorrectly equates rejecting increases four to five times inflation with rejecting a four-percentage-point premium. The historical inputs actually imply three qualifying years among 2022–2026, supporting a meaningful upside tail, but inconsistent historical calculations and the reported administration change weaken that base rate's applicability. Missing final official documents and contradictory reporting limit confidence, and settlement must use DANE's December annual CPI rather than the nonmatching FRED annual series, leaving publication delays and near-threshold measurement discrepancies as residual risks.
gpt-5.6-sol · high effort
69% conf
Yes 17%
No 83%
(0) The condition is not already met: DANE’s CPI portal does not yet contain December 2026 CPI, and no final 2027 minimum-wage increase has been set; the wage decision is due by December 30 and CPI should follow in early January. (a) About 133 days remain until the February 15, 2027 close, although the decisive inputs should become known roughly a month earlier. (b) If current expectations hold—approximately 8% wage growth and 6.8%-7.0% CPI—the spread is only around 1.0-1.2pp, so the status quo resolves No. (c) A plausible No scenario is an 8%-10% inflation-and-productivity-based increase against CPI near 7%, consistent with repeated restraint signals from Finance Minister Miguel Gómez and the pre-Petro norm of wages running only 2.5-3pp above inflation. (d) Yes would require an unexpectedly large decree or settlement above roughly 10.8% if CPI is 6.8%, potentially driven by union pressure and the living-wage framework, or an unexpectedly low December CPI print. I anchor on Kalshi’s 19% Yes price but reduce it to 17% because the cited Yes case overstates how readily a 10% increase clears the strict 4pp threshold, while no formal above-threshold proposal exists and the new government has consistently opposed another outsized hike.
4. Final plain mean of 5 draws
16% (63% confidence)
Yes: 16% No: 84%
Mean of 5 draws (0.12, 0.12, 0.19, 0.19, 0.17). (0) Not resolved. The 2027 minimum wage is not set; tripartite talks began Oct 2 and must agree by Dec 15, or the government decrees by Dec 30. DANE's December 2026 CPI comes out in early January 2027. (a) About four months remain, with the decisive window in late November to December 2026. (b) Status quo: the new De la Espriella government's Finance Minister Gómez has said repeatedly that the hike must be moderate and anchored to DANE inflation plus productivity ('no podemos aumentar cuatro o cinco veces por encima de la inflación'). Analysts mostly expect 7–10% (Cárdenas 8%, Corficolombiana 7–8%, Credicorp 9–10%) against a consensus December CPI of about 6.7–6.9%, which implies a gap of roughly 1–3pp. (c) NO: a negotiated or decreed hike of about 8–9% against about 6.8% CPI gives a gap near 2pp. A higher-than-expected CPI (El Niño, indexation from the 2026 hike) would narrow it further. (d) YES: unions win a double-digit settlement of 11% or more, which the government accepts to avoid conflict. Alternatively, December CPI surprises lower (about 6.3%) while the wage lands at 10.5% or more. Either outcome would break this government's stated stance. The pre-Petro norm was roughly 2–3pp, and 4pp+ gaps occurred only under Petro's populist policy, which has now ended. The Kalshi price of about 17–19% (bid 16%) looks somewhat rich given the government's consistent messaging, so I shade it down to about 12% while keeping tail risk for political bargaining and a CPI undershoot.
Pipeline Timing
Total pipeline time: 116.8s
Per-tool research timings shown in the Research section above.