← back to scans
Will the upper bound of the federal funds rate be above 4.50% following the Fed's Dec 9, 2026 meeting?
6%
Agent
8%
Market Price
-2.2%
Edge
77%
Confidence
141,132
Volume
2.0c
Spread
65
Days to resolution
11
Markets in event
final rationale
Mean of 5 draws (0.03, 0.03, 0.08, 0.08, 0.07). (0) Not met: FRED DFEDTARU and the Sept 16 statement show the upper bound at 4.00% (range 3.75-4.00%); 'above 4.50%' requires at least 4.75%, i.e. 75bp more. (a) About 9.5 weeks remain, with only the Oct 28 and Dec 9 meetings left. (b) Status quo is 4.00%; the modal priced outcome is one 25bp December hike to 4.25% (CME tracker ~67%, dot plot median 4.1%, JPMorgan call). (c) NO: October is a hold (78-84% priced after the 29k payrolls print and Williams/Jefferson's no-urgency remarks), then December brings one 25bp hike or none; even back-to-back 25bp hikes only reach 4.50%, which still resolves NO. (d) YES: a sharp CPI reacceleration plus oil/war shocks would push the Fed to 75bp over two meetings, but no official advocates this, Logan frames 50bp+ as gradual, and CME put a cumulative 75bp by December at only 0.3% right after September. Kalshi's 8% (bid 6/ask 8) looks like longshot bias against futures-implied odds, so I shade well below it, keeping some tail for inflation shocks and misreading the threshold.
price vs. prediction
market price
agent forecast at t+0
14 follow-ups
1. Planner Opus 5.5 · picks the research tools
Tools chosen:
kalshi_direct
resolution_source
fred
kalshi_related
polymarket_related
Planner reasoning
This is a Fed rate threshold question, so the Kalshi price is the anchor and the resolution source is the Fed's open market page. FRED rate and inflation data establish the current target upper bound and the macro path. Related Kalshi markets for other FOMC meetings and Polymarket Fed markets let us check the implied rate path from a second crowd.
2. Research parallel tool calls + 4 web research loops (Sonnet 5) · read raw by the forecasters
at a glance
RESEARCH DIGEST (built in code: tool summaries and each report's bottom line; the forecasters read the full tool outputs and reports)
Tools
- kalshi_direct: ## This Market's Kalshi Data **Above 4.50%** (KXFED-26DEC-T4.50) - Current price (probability): 8.00% (live; bid 6% / ask 8%) - 7-day price change: -1.00% - 30-day price change: +2.00% - Average daily volume: 4837 contracts - Price range: 1.00% - 13.00% - Data points: 29 days
- resolution_source: already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=True; last_updated=September 16, 2026. The table shows the most recent federal funds rate change was on December 13 (year implied 2025), a 25 basis point increase bringing the level to 4.25%. This reflects the rate as of that date, which is the level (not the upper bound of the target range) before the Dec 9, 2026 meeting in question.
- fred: Fetched 6 FRED series (lookback=365d).
- kalshi_related: 0 related markets / summaries. series KXFED: 0 markets (skipped 100 no-signal) | series KXFEDDECISION: 0 markets (skipped 55 no-signal) | series KXRATECUTCOUNT: 0 markets (skipped 21 no-signal)
- polymarket_related: Polymarket search over 3 keyword(s), kept 15 matches. keyword 'Fed December 2026': 5 markets | keyword 'fed rate 2026': 5 markets | keyword 'FOMC': 5 markets
Research loops, bottom lines
- current state: As of 2026-10-04 the target range sits at 3.75%-4.00% (upper bound 4.00%) after September's hike, and market pricing plus the Fed's own September dot plot point to at most one more 25bp move by December 9, 2026 (most likely outcome: upper bound at 4.25%, with October 28 highly likely to be a hold). This is well short of the 4.50% threshold, so current data strongly implies the "upper bound above 4.50%" condition is unlikely to be met absent a surprise 50bp+ hike or back-to-back hikes not current
- base rate: Both the Fed's own September 2026 dot plot (median 4.10%, implying one more 25bp hike to 4.00–4.25%) and CME FedWatch-based market pricing (modal December outcome 4.00–4.25%, ~65-67% probability) point to the upper bound landing at 4.25% after the Dec 9, 2026 meeting, not above 4.50% — reaching >4.50% would require two additional hikes beyond what is currently priced or projected, a historically aggressive and currently unanticipated pace.
- yes case: The path to YES requires an unusually aggressive outcome — either a single 50bp+ hike or two hikes summing to more than 50bp — which is not the current base case, but it is not zero: a vocal hawkish contingent (Warsh, Barr, Cook), a dot plot with four members already at 50bp of further 2026 tightening, rising PCE/PCE-core projections, and an upcoming September CPI print forecast to reaccelerate to 3.7% all provide a plausible, data-dependent mechanism by which the Fed could deliver enough combin
- no case: Every current primary-source data point — FOMC voters' own words (Williams, Jefferson, Goolsbee, even hawkish Logan), JPMorgan's and Evercore's base cases, and the weak September payrolls print — converges on a single additional 25bp hike by December 9, 2026 (upper bound 4.25%), with no voting member or credible forecaster currently calling for the back-to-back or 50bp move needed to push the upper bound above 4.50% by that date.
tools
| tool | status | time | items | summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| kalshi_direct | OK | 0.2s | 1 | ## This Market's Kalshi Data **Above 4.50%** (KXFED-26DEC-T4.50) - Current price (probability): 8.00% (live; bid 6% / ask 8%) - 7-day price change: -1.00% - 30-day price change: +2.00% - Average daily volume: 4837 contracts - Price range: 1.00% - 13.00% - Data points: 29 days |
| resolution_source | OK | 3.2s | 1 | already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=True; last_updated=September 16, 2026. The table shows the most recent federal funds rate change was on December 13 (year implied 2025), a 25 basis point increase bringing the level to 4.25%. This reflects the rate as of that date, which is the level (not t |
| fred | OK | 1.7s | 6 | Fetched 6 FRED series (lookback=365d). |
| kalshi_related | OK | 0.2s | 0 | 0 related markets / summaries. series KXFED: 0 markets (skipped 100 no-signal) | series KXFEDDECISION: 0 markets (skipped 55 no-signal) | series KXRATECUTCOUNT: 0 markets (skipped 21 no-signal) |
| polymarket_related | OK | 0.6s | 15 | Polymarket search over 3 keyword(s), kept 15 matches. keyword 'Fed December 2026': 5 markets | keyword 'fed rate 2026': 5 markets | keyword 'FOMC': 5 markets |
research loops
·
4/4 ok ·
17 searches ·
6 page reads
| dimension | status | time | searches | page reads | report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current state | OK | 28s | 4 | 2 | 3568 chars |
| base rate | OK | 32s | 4 | 1 | 5501 chars |
| yes case | OK | 62s | 5 | 1 | 5726 chars |
| no case | OK | 37s | 4 | 2 | 6031 chars |
report: current state
- [2026-09-16] The FOMC voted 12-0 to raise the federal funds target range by 25bp to 3.75%–4.00%, its first hike since 2023, lifting the current upper bound to 4.00% effective 2026-09-17.
The Federal Open Market Committee voted 12–0 to raise the federal funds target range by a quarter point to 3.75%–4.00%, announced at 2:00 PM US Eastern Time on 16 September 2026.
- [2026-09-16] The accompanying Summary of Economic Projections showed the median dot for year-end 2026 at 4.1% (implying one more 25bp move), with
sixteen of eighteen participants expect one additional rate hike this year, while four participants project two additional hikes
;
the most hawkish participant sees the policy rate at 4.375% in 2026 and 2027
(source: jpmorgan.com FOMC Statement Sept 2026).
- [2026-09-16] The implementation note accompanying the decision set the interest on reserve balances rate at 3.90% and the primary credit rate at 4.00%, both effective 2026-09-17 (cambridgecurrencies.com, citing the Fed's implementation note).
- [2026-10-04] The Federal Reserve's official FOMC calendar confirms the two remaining 2026 meetings are October 27-28 (no SEP) and December 8-9 (with SEP/dot plot), per federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm.
- [2026-10-03] Prediction-market pricing (Kalshi/Polymarket, averaged) puts only an 18-20% chance of a 25bp hike at the October 28, 2026 meeting, with a hold favored at roughly 83%.
- [2026-10-03] The same markets price a hike at the December 9, 2026 meeting at roughly 72-73%, which would be the "at least one more hike this year" the SEP projected; combined, an any-2026-hike contract is priced near 73% (defirate.com, Kalshi/Polymarket average, observed Oct 3, 12:23 PM ET).
- [2026-09-10] Just before the September decision, CME FedWatch-style futures pricing showed the market moving from near coin-flip to roughly
62.4% probability of a quarter-point hike
for that meeting, illustrating the market's tendency to price single 25bp moves rather than larger jumps.
- [2026-08-31] Ahead of September, Barclays' published view was
two more rate hikes this year, in September and December, totaling 50 basis points
— i.e., ending 2026 at 4.00-4.25% (upper bound 4.25%), still below the 4.50% threshold.
- [2026-10-03] No source found pricing a 50bp or larger hike at any remaining 2026 meeting, or multiple hikes at a single meeting; all tracked scenarios (CME, Kalshi, Polymarket, Barclays) point to at most one additional 25bp move between now and December 9, which would bring the upper bound to 4.25%, not above 4.50%.
- [2026-10-03] Current effective federal funds rate reported at 3.880% (EFFR), consistent with the 3.75-4.00% target range still in force (rateprobability.com, observed data).
NOT FOUND: Any market pricing or Fed communication (dot plot, statement, speech) suggesting more than one additional 25bp hike is likely before or at the December 9, 2026 meeting; no confirmed October 28, 2026 decision yet (meeting has not occurred as of today).
BOTTOM LINE: As of 2026-10-04 the target range sits at 3.75%-4.00% (upper bound 4.00%) after September's hike, and market pricing plus the Fed's own September dot plot point to at most one more 25bp move by December 9, 2026 (most likely outcome: upper bound at 4.25%, with October 28 highly likely to be a hold). This is well short of the 4.50% threshold, so current data strongly implies the "upper bound above 4.50%" condition is unlikely to be met absent a surprise 50bp+ hike or back-to-back hikes not currently priced by any tracked source.
report: base rate
- [2026-10-04] The federal funds target range currently stands at 3.75%–4.00% (upper bound 4.00%), set after the September 16, 2026 FOMC meeting, which delivered the Fed's first rate hike since 2023. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DFEDTARU
- [2026-09-16]
The Federal Open Market Committee approved raising the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/4 percentage point to 3-3/4 to 4 percent
, a unanimous 12-0 decision under new Chair Kevin Warsh, ending a multi-year pause/cut cycle. https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20260916a.htm
- [2026-09-16] The accompanying Summary of Economic Projections (SEP/"dot plot") put
the median federal funds rate projection at 4.10% for year-end 2026 (up from 3.80% in June) and signaled a higher trajectory of 4.10% through 2027
, which maps to one further 25bp hike this year (to a 4.00%–4.25% range), not two. https://www.raisin.com/en-us/news/fed-decision-dot-plot-breakdown-september-2026/
- [2026-09-16] A separate read of the same SEP data notes
the Fed dot plot projected a target range of the fed funds rate to be 4.00% to 4.25% at yearend 2026 and 2027... the September Fed dot plot implies one-half point of total 2026 fed funds rate increases
, i.e., the committee's own baseline does not foresee the upper bound exceeding 4.50% in 2026. https://www.bondsavvy.com/fixed-income-investments-blog/fed-dot-plot
- [2026-09-16] Fed staff dot dispersion showed some hawkish outliers:
the dots in 2027 are interesting, as there were four outliers projecting rate cuts in 2027 while the other 14 FOMC participants projected the target range to be either 4.00% to 4.25% or 4.25% to 4.50%
— meaning even among hawks, few see the range reaching above 4.50% even by end-2027. https://www.bondsavvy.com/fixed-income-investments-blog/fed-dot-plot
- [2026-10-02] CME FedWatch-based reporting post-September-jobs-report shows October hike odds collapsing:
a 77.9% probability of no change on October 28, compared with only 35.8% a week earlier. A hike is priced at 22.1%
. https://actionforex.com/action-insight/market-overview/weekly-report/656341-dollar-and-yields-hold-firm-as-soft-nfp-changes-fed-timing-inflation-still-decides-the-destination
- [2026-10-02] For the December meeting itself, the same tracker reports
4.00–4.25% is the modal outcome at 67.3%, implying one further 25bp hike from the current 3.75–4.00% range
— i.e. markets' modal outcome lands at an upper bound of 4.25%, well below the 4.50% threshold. https://actionforex.com/action-insight/market-overview/weekly-report/656341-dollar-and-yields-hold-firm-as-soft-nfp-changes-fed-timing-inflation-still-decides-the-destination
- [2026-10-03] Other trackers converge on similar December pricing: one outlet notes
following the release of the nonfarm payrolls data, the interest-rate market's pricing for a Fed rate hike in October cooled sharply... the odds of no rate change rose to 83.9%, while the odds of a December hike increased to 66.1%
, again pointing to a single 25bp step by December rather than two. https://news.futunn.com/en/post/1000551632/weekly-outlook-will-the-fomc-minutes-reveal-the-fed-s
- [2026-10-03] A forward-looking FedWatch snapshot noted that by April 2027, the largest probability bucket shifts to a higher bracket:
by April 2027, the largest individual probability bucket has moved to 4.50–4.75% at 35.3%, narrowly ahead of 4.25–4.50%
— showing markets expect the >4.50% threshold to be crossed only well after the December 2026 meeting, if at all. https://actionforex.com/action-insight/market-overview/weekly-report/656341-dollar-and-yields-hold-firm-as-soft-nfp-changes-fed-timing-inflation-still-decides-the-destination
- [2026-10-03] One secondary source went further, claiming
futures still price a December hike at nearly 100%, and that markets expect three more increases through June 2027, taking the target range to 4.50%-4.75%. That is above the highest official projection of 4.375%
, an outlier bullish read not corroborated by the primary CME data reviewed above, which puts December's modal outcome at 4.00–4.25%. https://ecommerceparadise.com/jobs-miss-fed-october-hike-odds
- [2026-10-04] Base-rate context: the Fed moved in quarter-point increments at every hike/cut since the 2023 cycle ended, and the historical pattern since July 2023 (3 cuts in 2025, pause through mid-2026, one hike in September 2026) shows the FOMC rarely moves by more than 25bp per meeting or delivers back-to-back hikes without a pause, absent acute inflation/crisis shocks — reinforcing that two more 25bp hikes by Dec 9 (needed to clear 4.50%) would be an unusually aggressive pace. https://www.nerdwallet.com/banking/news/what-is-the-fed-rate
NOT FOUND: An official Kalshi-independent "upper bound >4.50% by Dec 2026" betting market or Polymarket odds; also no SEP data point assigning explicit probability mass above the 4.25–4.50% bracket for year-end 2026 among FOMC participants' individual dots (central tendency reporting was unavailable in full).
BOTTOM LINE: Both the Fed's own September 2026 dot plot (median 4.10%, implying one more 25bp hike to 4.00–4.25%) and CME FedWatch-based market pricing (modal December outcome 4.00–4.25%, ~65-67% probability) point to the upper bound landing at 4.25% after the Dec 9, 2026 meeting, not above 4.50% — reaching >4.50% would require two additional hikes beyond what is currently priced or projected, a historically aggressive and currently unanticipated pace.
report: yes case
YES means: the Fed's official target range upper bound, as published on federalreserve.gov, is strictly greater than 4.50% immediately after the December 9, 2026 FOMC decision — i.e., a cumulative tightening of more than 50bp from today's 4.00% upper bound within the two remaining 2026 meetings (Oct 28 and Dec 9), achieved via back-to-back 25bp hikes plus a 50bp move, a single 50bp-plus hike, or two 50bp hikes.
- [2026-09-16] Fed Chair Kevin Warsh delivered a hawkish surprise at his post-meeting press conference that exceeded the dot plot itself: reporting noted he "delivered a decidedly hawkish message that opened the door to additional rate hikes," creating a gap between the SEP and his rhetoric. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fed-rate-hike-warsh-trump-inflation/
- [2026-09-16] Immediately after that press conference, CME FedWatch-tracked odds of two or more hikes this year jumped to 37% (from 27% that morning), and odds of at least one more hike rose to 87% (from 77%), showing the market was already pricing meaningful probability of a 50bp-or-more path right after the hike. https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/fomc-meeting
- [2026-09-16] Within the SEP, 4 of 18 FOMC participants explicitly projected 50bp of further 2026 tightening (implying a 4.375% midpoint, i.e., an upper bound near 4.50%), compared with 12 projecting just one more 25bp move. https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/article/fed-officials-forecasts-project-one-more-rate-hike-to-come-in-2026-183856618.html
- [2026-09-16] Just after the September decision, CME FedWatch (via a contemporaneous tracker) assigned a 28.9% probability to a cumulative 50bp increase by December and a non-zero 0.3% probability to a cumulative 75bp increase by December — the latter being the minimum path that would push the upper bound to 4.75%, strictly above 4.50%. https://www.chaincatcher.com/en/article/2290356
- [2026-09-23] Fed Governor Michael Barr publicly argued policymakers "have more work to do" even after the September hike, and a hot S&P Global flash PMI reading showed input-price inflation at its highest in nearly four years, briefly pushing October hike odds to 73% — evidence that senior officials beyond Warsh are pressing for continued tightening. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/23/market-sees-next-fed-hike-in-october-following-barr-comments-hot-inflation.html
- [2026-09-29] Forbes reported fixed-income markets had begun "firmly pricing in back-to-back Federal Reserve rate hikes for October and December 2026," with Governors Barr and Lisa Cook both reinforcing a hawkish stance citing AI-driven and oil-driven inflation risks — a scenario that, if either hike came in at 50bp rather than 25bp, would carry the upper bound above 4.50%. https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonmoore/2026/09/29/what-to-expect-from-interest-rates-for-the-rest-of-2026/
- [2026-09-29] A Richmond Fed research note confirmed the median SEP projection for 2026 headline PCE inflation was revised up to 3.7% y/y (from 3.6% in June) and core PCE to 3.4% (from 3.3%), underscoring that inflation forecasts are still rising, not falling, heading into Q4. https://www.richmondfed.org/research/national_economy/macro_minute/2026/sep_by_sep_how_fed_walks_inflation_back_to_2_percent
- [2026-10-02] TradingEconomics' forecast panel projects September CPI (due Oct 14, before the December meeting) to jump to 3.7% y/y from 3.4% in August — a reacceleration that, if realized or exceeded, is exactly the kind of inflation surprise that could force the Fed toward a larger move. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/inflation-cpi
- [2026-10-02] The Cleveland Fed's nowcast separately pegs September core PCE at 3.02% y/y and core CPI m/m at 0.20%, still well above the 2% target, giving Warsh's "underlying trends have not meaningfully improved" framing continued data support into Q4. https://www.clevelandfed.org/indicators-and-data/inflation-nowcasting
- [2026-10-02] Even after the weak September payrolls report cooled October-hike odds, analysts noted the labor-force arithmetic (Fed Board/Dallas Fed research) leaves "no reason to drop the December hike," meaning a December move remains highly likely as a floor scenario, on top of which an upside inflation or labor surprise could still trigger a jumbo (50bp) move. https://www.fxstreet.com/analysis/the-october-fed-hike-just-died-heres-what-the-29k-jobs-report-really-means-for-rates-202610021806
- [2026-10-03] J.P. Morgan Global Research's updated call still forecasts "another quarter-point raise in December" on top of September's hike, which the firm frames as part of persistent above-3% core PCE inflation — illustrating that even mainstream sell-side desks see the Fed's tightening bias as intact and data-dependent upside risk live. https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/global-research/economy/fed-rate-cuts
BOTTOM LINE: The path to YES requires an unusually aggressive outcome — either a single 50bp+ hike or two hikes summing to more than 50bp — which is not the current base case, but it is not zero: a vocal hawkish contingent (Warsh, Barr, Cook), a dot plot with four members already at 50bp of further 2026 tightening, rising PCE/PCE-core projections, and an upcoming September CPI print forecast to reaccelerate to 3.7% all provide a plausible, data-dependent mechanism by which the Fed could deliver enough combined tightening by Dec 9 to push the upper bound above 4.50%.
NOT FOUND: Any Fed official or primary-source document explicitly advocating a single 50bp hike at either the October or December 2026 meeting; no FOMC member dot above 4.375% in the September SEP; no updated (October/November) dot plot since the September 16 SEP was not refreshed before the question's resolution.
report: no case
YES means: the upper bound of the federal funds target range, as published on the Federal Reserve's official website, is above 4.50% following the Fed's December 9, 2026 meeting — i.e., the committee delivers enough hikes (two or more 25bp moves beyond September's 3.75-4.00% range, or one or more 50bp moves) to push the ceiling past 4.50% by that date. This report argues the NO case: that the upper bound will most likely remain at or below 4.50%.
- [2026-10-01] Even the most hawkish FOMC voter publicly speaking, Dallas Fed's Logan, frames further tightening as a multi-meeting project rather than a single-meeting jump:
"I currently estimate the target range needs to rise an additional 50 basis points or more to appropriately balance the outlook and risks for our dual mandate goals,"
and she called the September move only
"an important first step" in tightening policy
— language describing a gradual path, not an imminent jump past 4.50%. https://1027wbow.com/2026/10/01/feds-logan-calls-for-50-bps-or-more-in-rate-hikes/
- [2026-10-01] Even Logan's own "50bp or more" framing is explicitly hedged as gradual and conditional, not front-loaded: she added
"Higher term premiums can slow the economy, reducing the need to tighten monetary policy." The bond selloff this year has push
ed yields up, which by her own logic could reduce the hikes still needed — undercutting the case for an aggressive move big enough to clear 4.50% by December.
- [2026-09-29/10-01] Two sitting voters with more dovish-leaning caution — NY Fed's Williams and Vice Chair Jefferson — explicitly ruled out a second consecutive hike at the next (October) meeting, with Williams stating
"there is no need for urgency" on changing the current setting of monetary policy... "One further upward adjustment" in the policy rate may be appropriate late this year
— i.e., the FOMC's own communicated base case is one more 25bp move total, not two.
- [2026-10-01] Analysts reading Jefferson's and Williams's remarks together concluded the Fed is deliberately slowing the pace: Evercore said Jefferson
"has confirmed the message from NY Fed President Williams: the Fed does not expect to deliver a back-to-back rate hike at its coming October meeting,"
reinforcing that even reaching 4.25% by December (let alone above 4.50%) depends on just a single additional step.
- [2026-10-02] A primary wire account (Reuters) of the week's data and Fed commentary confirms the modal scenario is one hike in December, not two: JPMorgan's Feroli wrote that
policymakers signalled they will likely deliver at least one more increase by year's end if the Iran war and other shocks that have pushed up inflation persist
— "at least one," consistent with 4.25%, not a doubled-up move to 4.50%+.
- [2026-10-02] The same Reuters report shows the labor-market backdrop argues against urgency for aggressive tightening: September payrolls rose by just
just 29,000 jobs last month... less than the 90,000 economists had expected and August payroll gains were revised downward
, a soft print that reduces the case for the Fed to leapfrog straight to two hikes by December.
- [2026-10-02] Per the same account, markets had already cut hike odds sharply after this data and the Williams/Jefferson comments, with Reuters noting
Fed Vice Chair Philip Jefferson and New York Fed President John Williams said they would rather see more data before considering further action, prompting traders to slash bets on a hike at the Fed's October meeting
— a dovish repricing that works against the larger, faster tightening path required for >4.50%.
- [2026-10-02] Chicago Fed's Goolsbee, also a 2026 voter, signaled openness but not commitment to aggressive action, saying only
"There is plenty of room for anything to be on the table"
when asked about hiking versus pausing — rhetorical flexibility, not a call for a jumbo or double hike.
- [2026-08-28] Status-quo/inertia case: even Chair Warsh's most hawkish public remarks to date (Jackson Hole) stopped short of endorsing an accelerated or outsized tightening path, saying only that
"while this summer's [inflation] readings were better than expected, they do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved. We must be confident that underlying inflation is moving to our objective, clearly and at sufficient speed. Otherwise, we have work to do."
This is consistent with the Fed's demonstrated pattern since 2023 of moving in single 25bp steps with gaps between them, not consecutive or 50bp moves.
- [2026-10-02] Mechanism/technicality: the question's resolution window is tied strictly to the December 9 statement (or one week after), meaning any post-meeting dot-plot signal about 2027 hikes is irrelevant — only the actual target range set at that single meeting counts, and the modal Fed/market view for that one meeting is a single 25bp step from 4.00% to 4.25%, per JPMorgan's explicit base case of "another hike at the December FOMC meeting" (singular). https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/business/economics/2026/10/02/fed-may-skip-october-but-pull-us-rate-hike-trigger-in-december/
NOT FOUND: Any FOMC voter, speech, or primary Fed document calling for a 50bp single-meeting hike or for two separate hikes to be delivered at or before the December 9, 2026 meeting specifically (Logan's "50bp or more" is explicitly a multi-meeting, undated target, not a December deadline); no confirmed government-shutdown-driven data blackout affecting the Oct-Dec 2026 meetings was found (the shutdown sources found were from the 2025 episode, not 2026).
BOTTOM LINE: Every current primary-source data point — FOMC voters' own words (Williams, Jefferson, Goolsbee, even hawkish Logan), JPMorgan's and Evercore's base cases, and the weak September payrolls print — converges on a single additional 25bp hike by December 9, 2026 (upper bound 4.25%), with no voting member or credible forecaster currently calling for the back-to-back or 50bp move needed to push the upper bound above 4.50% by that date.
3. Forecasters 5 draws · Opus 5.5 + GPT-6 Astra + GPT-5.6 Sol · plain mean
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
80% conf
| Yes | 3% |
| No | 97% |
(0) Not met: FRED DFEDTARU and the Sept 16 statement show the upper bound at 4.00% (range 3.75-4.00%); 'above 4.50%' requires at least 4.75%, i.e. 75bp more. (a) About 9.5 weeks remain, with only the Oct 28 and Dec 9 meetings left. (b) Status quo is 4.00%; the modal priced outcome is one 25bp December hike to 4.25% (CME tracker ~67%, dot plot median 4.1%, JPMorgan call). (c) NO: October is a hold (78-84% priced after the 29k payrolls print and Williams/Jefferson's no-urgency remarks), then December brings one 25bp hike or none; even back-to-back 25bp hikes only reach 4.50%, which still resolves NO. (d) YES: a sharp CPI reacceleration plus oil/war shocks would push the Fed to 75bp over two meetings, but no official advocates this, Logan frames 50bp+ as gradual, and CME put a cumulative 75bp by December at only 0.3% right after September. Kalshi's 8% (bid 6/ask 8) looks like longshot bias against futures-implied odds, so I shade well below it, keeping some tail for inflation shocks and misreading the threshold.
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
82% conf
| Yes | 3% |
| No | 97% |
(0) The condition is not met: the upper bound is 4.00% per FRED as of 2026-10-04, so clearing 4.50% needs at least 75bp of hikes across the October 28 and December 9 meetings or an emergency move. (a) About 9.5 weeks remain, with two scheduled meetings. (b) The status quo is 4.00% or 4.25% after one 25bp hike, which matches the September dot-plot median of 4.1% and CME's modal December range of 4.00–4.25% (~67%); both resolve No. (c) No: October hold (priced ~78–84% after weak payrolls and Williams/Jefferson remarks), then one December hike to 4.25%; even two 25bp hikes only reach exactly 4.50%, still No. (d) Yes: an inflation shock (CPI re-accelerating to 3.7%+) leads hawks to force a 50bp+25bp path or back-to-back 50bp moves, but no dot exceeded 4.375% for 2026, no official has called for a 50bp move, and CME put only ~0.3% on 75bp just after September. Kalshi at 8% (bid 6%) looks rich for a 75bp requirement, so I go to about 3%, keeping tail mass for a shock or emergency action.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
72% conf
| Yes | 8% |
| No | 92% |
The event is unresolved and still possible: the official-site fetch contains no December decision and an ambiguous historical 4.25% entry, whereas FRED DFEDTARU through October 4 and the cited September 16 Fed statement corroborate a current upper bound of 4.00%. There are 66 days until December 9, with two scheduled meetings remaining; expiration follows the statement at the first 2:05 PM ET or occurs one week after the meeting. If policy remains unchanged, No wins, and even two additional 25-basis-point hikes would produce exactly 4.50%, insufficient under the strict greater-than rule. A plausible No scenario is an October hold followed by a December quarter-point hike, supported by Reuters' October 2 report of only 29,000 additional payroll jobs, Williams/Jefferson caution, and the September SEP median implying a 4.25% upper bound. A Yes scenario requires an inflation shock that accelerates tightening to at least 75 basis points in conventional increments, such as a 50-basis-point October hike followed by 25 in December; hawkish September commentary and elevated inflation forecasts support this tail without establishing it as likely. Several research passages incorrectly imply that 50 basis points would suffice, and the reported SEP participant counts are inconsistent, so I discount those arguments rather than treating every report as independent confirmation. I retain Kalshi's live 8% Yes anchor because the research establishes no reliable unpriced advantage; the related Polymarket contracts concern different outcomes and provide context only. The ambiguous official-page extraction leaves source-verification risk, helping justify retaining that tail rather than pricing No near certainty: settlement depends specifically on the Fed's published post-meeting target upper bound, not the effective rate, historical level, or projected dots.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
72% conf
| Yes | 8% |
| No | 92% |
The condition is neither already met nor impossible: the resolution-source fetch contains no December decision, while the supplied September 16 Fed statement and October 4 FRED DFEDTARU reading support a current upper bound of 4.00%. There are 66 days until the December 9 decision, with October 28 and December 9 the remaining scheduled meetings; expiration follows the statement at the specified 2:05 PM ET time, with a one-week fallback. If nothing changes, No wins, and even two additional 25-basis-point hikes would produce exactly 4.50%, still No—Yes requires at least 75 basis points of net tightening under standard quarter-point increments. I retain Kalshi's 8% Yes anchor, quoted at 6% bid/8% ask, because the research supplies no sufficiently reliable, demonstrably unpriced information warranting a departure; related Polymarket hike contracts are context, not equivalent-event prices. The central No scenario is an October hold followed by a December quarter-point hike to 4.25%, supported by the September SEP median and October 2 reporting of just 29,000 additional payroll jobs and cautious Williams/Jefferson commentary. Those recent developments outweigh September reports anticipating back-to-back hikes, which would not alone satisfy this contract anyway. A plausible Yes scenario is an unexpectedly severe inflation or energy-price shock prompting a 50-basis-point October hike and another 25 basis points in December, although the research identifies no official advocating that timetable. Settlement depends on the Fed's published target-range upper bound—not the effective rate, projected dots, or Treasury yields—and the ambiguous historical-table extraction plus inconsistent arithmetic and dot counts in the reports argue for preserving the 8% uncertainty tail rather than pricing No near certainty.
gpt-5.6-sol · high effort
78% conf
| Yes | 7% |
| No | 93% |
(0) The event is not resolved: the Fed resolution page has no December 9 decision, while FRED shows the current upper bound at 4.00%; YES still requires at least 75 basis points of cumulative tightening by the December statement because exactly 4.50% would remain NO. (a) About 66 days remain, including the scheduled October 27-28 and December 8-9 meetings. (b) If nothing changes, the upper bound stays at 4.00% and the market resolves NO. (c) The most likely NO scenario is an October hold followed by a 25bp December hike, producing a 4.25% upper bound; even two ordinary 25bp hikes would produce only 4.50% and still resolve NO. (d) A YES scenario requires an exceptional path such as a 25bp October hike followed by a 50bp December hike, driven by sharply worsening inflation, or equivalent intermeeting tightening. Kalshi's 8% YES price is the primary anchor, but October markets favor a hold at roughly 83%, the September SEP median implies only one further 25bp hike, and no official or major forecaster advocates the necessary 75bp path. I therefore shade slightly below the market to 7%, while retaining a meaningful tail for inflation surprises given hawkish Fed rhetoric, elevated inflation, and the 4.78% two-year Treasury yield.
4. Final plain mean of 5 draws
6%
(77% confidence)
Yes: 6%
No: 94%
Mean of 5 draws (0.03, 0.03, 0.08, 0.08, 0.07). (0) Not met: FRED DFEDTARU and the Sept 16 statement show the upper bound at 4.00% (range 3.75-4.00%); 'above 4.50%' requires at least 4.75%, i.e. 75bp more. (a) About 9.5 weeks remain, with only the Oct 28 and Dec 9 meetings left. (b) Status quo is 4.00%; the modal priced outcome is one 25bp December hike to 4.25% (CME tracker ~67%, dot plot median 4.1%, JPMorgan call). (c) NO: October is a hold (78-84% priced after the 29k payrolls print and Williams/Jefferson's no-urgency remarks), then December brings one 25bp hike or none; even back-to-back 25bp hikes only reach 4.50%, which still resolves NO. (d) YES: a sharp CPI reacceleration plus oil/war shocks would push the Fed to 75bp over two meetings, but no official advocates this, Logan frames 50bp+ as gradual, and CME put a cumulative 75bp by December at only 0.3% right after September. Kalshi's 8% (bid 6/ask 8) looks like longshot bias against futures-implied odds, so I shade well below it, keeping some tail for inflation shocks and misreading the threshold.
Pipeline Timing
Total pipeline time: 130.3s
Per-tool research timings shown in the Research section above.