← back to scans
Tyler Robinson convicted of homicide?
23%
Agent
28%
Market Price
-5.3%
Edge
62%
Confidence
455,130
Volume
1.0c
Spread
301
Days to resolution
1
Markets in event
final rationale
Mean of 5 draws (0.18, 0.17, 0.28, 0.28, 0.24). (0) The condition has not been met. Robinson was bound over on all seven counts on Sept 1, 2026 and pleaded not guilty. No trial date is set, and no plea, dismissal or charge reduction has been reported. (a) About 10 months remain until the July 31, 2027 deadline, and the next hearing is Oct 23, 2026, where trial dates may only be proposed. (b) If nothing changes, pretrial motions grind on into 2027, and the market resolves No because a capital trial verdict is very unlikely within roughly 9 months of scheduling. (c) NO path: the defense keeps up its pattern of serial motions (disqualification, venue, media, death-penalty challenges). An unaffiliated Utah capital-defense attorney projected a trial around 2029, and typical Utah capital timelines are multi-year. (d) YES path: the judge, pressed by the state and by Erika Kirk's statutory speedy-trial demand, sets a trial for mid-2027. The single-defendant, single-shot case moves fast and a jury convicts on what prosecutors call overwhelming DNA, video, note and confession evidence. Alternatively, Robinson pleads guilty to a homicide count to take death off the table. Evidentiary strength is high, but timing is the binding constraint. The market at 28.5% (drifting down) seems somewhat rich given no trial date and the defense's demonstrated delay posture, so I shade below it, while keeping weight on a guilty-plea path and an aggressive schedule.
price vs. prediction
market price
agent forecast at t+0
15 follow-ups
re-scan context
This market has been scanned before. Previous predictions:
| date | predicted | market price | confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-15 | 24% | 23% | 60% |
| 2026-09-02 | 44% | 42% | 57% |
| 2026-08-25 | 44% | 48% | 52% |
1. Planner Opus 5.5 · picks the research tools
Tools chosen:
polymarket_direct
resolution_source
polymarket_related
kalshi_related
article_search
wikipedia
Planner reasoning
Polymarket question, so polymarket_direct is the price anchor, and resolution_source covers the charging document. This is a Utah state case, so CourtListener's federal coverage is weak. A targeted article_search for the trial date and the preliminary hearing schedule is the key fact, since the main question is whether trial finishes by July 2027. Related markets and Wikipedia add cross-venue prices and background on the case.
2. Research parallel tool calls + 4 web research loops (Sonnet 5) · read raw by the forecasters
at a glance
RESEARCH DIGEST (built in code: tool summaries and each report's bottom line; the forecasters read the full tool outputs and reports)
Tools
- polymarket_direct: ## This Market's Polymarket Data **Tyler Robinson convicted of homicide?** - Current price (probability): 28.50% (live; bid 28% / ask 29%) - 7-day price change: -1.00% - 30-day price change: -3.00% - Total volume: $455,130 (USD notional) - Price range: 23.00% - 57.00% - Data points: 108 days
- resolution_source (failed): https://atty.utahcounty.gov/cms/uploads/TJR_Information_49872215e3.pdf: HTTP 503; https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title76/Chapter5/76-5-S201.html: ConnectEr
- polymarket_related: Polymarket search over 2 keyword(s), kept 1 matches. keyword 'Tyler Robinson': 1 markets | keyword 'Charlie Kirk': 0 markets
- kalshi_related: 1 related markets / summaries. keyword 'Tyler Robinson': no matches | keyword 'Charlie Kirk trial': ok
- article_search: Fetched 14 unique articles across 2 queries (lookback=90d). 'Tyler Robinson trial date set': 10 articles | 'Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing schedule delay': 10 articles
- wikipedia: Fetched 1 Wikipedia entries (0 missing pages).
Research loops, bottom lines
- current state: As of October 3, 2026, Robinson has been bound over for trial on all seven counts (including aggravated murder) and has pleaded not guilty, but no trial date has been set; the next hearing (Oct. 23, 2026) is only expected to propose/schedule a trial date, and outside legal commentary suggests an actual trial could be years away (potentially 2028-2029) — well beyond the market's July 31, 2027 resolution deadline, making a conviction verdict by that date far from assured.
- base rate: Outside-view evidence strongly suggests Utah capital aggravated-murder prosecutions typically take multiple years from charge to trial verdict, and an unaffiliated defense attorney explicitly projected a trial start around September 2029 — well past the market's July 31, 2027 deadline — making "conviction by deadline" structurally unlikely on timeline grounds alone, independent of the case's evidentiary strength.
- yes case: The strongest YES path is: Judge Graf sets a concrete trial date at or soon after the October 23, 2026 pretrial conference (as the Kirk family/victim representative has repeatedly and formally pushed for, including invoking Utah's statutory speedy-trial right), pretrial motions resolve on a compressed schedule given the case's single-defendant, single-incident simplicity, and a jury convicts given prosecutors' own public characterization of "overwhelming" video, DNA, forensic and multiple-witnes
- no case: The case's own procedural history — a 13+ month run of disqualification fights, media/venue motions, and a victim-side speedy-trial complaint about defense delay tactics — combined with no trial date yet set as of the Oct. 23, 2026 conference and an outside capital-defense attorney's ~2029 trial estimate, makes a homicide conviction verdict by July 31, 2027 structurally unlikely; Utah capital cases also frequently end in pleas to lesser charges rather than jury verdicts, a separate path to this
tools
| tool | status | time | items | summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| polymarket_direct | OK | 0.7s | 1 | ## This Market's Polymarket Data **Tyler Robinson convicted of homicide?** - Current price (probability): 28.50% (live; bid 28% / ask 29%) - 7-day price change: -1.00% - 30-day price change: -3.00% - Total volume: $455,130 (USD notional) - Price range: 23.00% - 57.00% - Data points: 108 days |
| resolution_source | FAILED | 0.4s | 1 | https://atty.utahcounty.gov/cms/uploads/TJR_Information_49872215e3.pdf: HTTP 503; https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title76/Chapter5/76-5-S201.html: ConnectError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate |
| polymarket_related | OK | 0.7s | 1 | Polymarket search over 2 keyword(s), kept 1 matches. keyword 'Tyler Robinson': 1 markets | keyword 'Charlie Kirk': 0 markets |
| kalshi_related | OK | 2.1s | 1 | 1 related markets / summaries. keyword 'Tyler Robinson': no matches | keyword 'Charlie Kirk trial': ok |
| article_search | OK | 46.3s | 14 | Fetched 14 unique articles across 2 queries (lookback=90d). 'Tyler Robinson trial date set': 10 articles | 'Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing schedule delay': 10 articles |
| wikipedia | OK | 0.3s | 1 | Fetched 1 Wikipedia entries (0 missing pages). |
research loops
·
4/4 ok ·
15 searches ·
5 page reads
| dimension | status | time | searches | page reads | report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current state | OK | 23s | 3 | 2 | 4807 chars |
| base rate | OK | 27s | 3 | 1 | 4453 chars |
| yes case | OK | 34s | 4 | 2 | 6298 chars |
| no case | SNIPPETS | 38s | 5 | 0 | 5634 chars · no page read; snippets only |
report: current state
- [2025-09-16] Utah County Attorney's Office formally charged Tyler Robinson with aggravated murder (capital, death-penalty eligible) plus six other counts for the killing of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University on 2025-09-10. https://atty.utahcounty.gov/media/ckpr
- [2026-07-06 to 2026-07-10] A five-day preliminary hearing (probable-cause "mini-trial") was held, featuring prosecution witnesses, forensic/DNA evidence, surveillance footage, and testimony including Robinson's former roommate/partner.
David Hull, a former State Bureau of Investigation agent, characterized Robinson's alleged movements before and after the assassination, with testimony accompanied by excerpts from campus video shown in court for the first time.
- [2026-09-01/2026-09-02] Fourth District Judge Tony Graf ruled
"It is hereby ordered that the defendant, Tyler James Robinson, is bound over for trial,"
upholding all seven counts, including aggravated murder; Robinson's attorney entered a not-guilty plea on his behalf. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judge-decide-whether-tyler-robinson-will-stand-trial-charlie-kirks-ass-rcna595489
- [2026-09-02]
The next scheduled court date is October 23, at which point the judge has indicated he will schedule a date for the trial.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/02/us/charlie-kirk-suspect-tyler-robinson-pleads-not-guilty
- [2026-09-02] Prosecutors reaffirmed intent to seek the death penalty:
"Prosecutors have said they intend to seek the death penalty if he is convicted of aggravated murder."
https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/02/us/charlie-kirk-suspect-tyler-robinson-pleads-not-guilty
- [2026-09-10] No trial date has yet been set;
"A trial date hasn't been set, and Robinson's attorneys have indicated that they are preparing to file and argue numerous motions before trial... A trial date might be set at his next court hearing in October, but Robinson's defense team indicated that they may not be ready to finalize dates yet."
https://www.sltrib.com/news/2026/09/10/charlie-kirk-murder-case-utah/
- [2026-09-10] An outside Utah capital-defense attorney not involved in the case estimated the trial itself is years away:
"Bautista predicts it will be three more years – September of 2029 – before a trial begins. There will be appeals even before a trial... and lots of litigation over the testimony and evidence a jury will hear at a trial that could last five to 10 weeks."
https://www.fox13now.com/news/shooting-of-charlie-kirk/key-dates-in-the-case-against-tyler-robinson-the-suspect-in-charlie-kirks-death
- [2026-09-26] A report on UVU security failures confirmed
"Murder defendant has pleaded not guilty... The charge could make the 23-year-old defendant eligible for the death penalty if convicted... No trial date has been scheduled."
https://www.newslooks.com/report-details-security-failures-at-utah-university-where-charlie-kirk-was-killed/
- [2026-10-02] A political commentary piece notes the ongoing public dispute over Robinson's guilt, while confirming case status:
Robinson, 23, has pleaded not guilty to all seven counts against him, including aggravated murder, in connection with Kirk's Sept. 10, 2025, shooting at Utah Valley University; prosecutors are seeking the death penalty on the aggravated murder charge; his next court appearance is set for Oct. 23, when a judge may set a trial date.
https://washingtontimes.com/news/2026/oct/2/roseanne-barr-revives-feud-candace-owens
- [2026-10-23] Scheduled: an in-person pretrial conference where
"the next court date for Robinson. The judge has instructed attorneys to be ready then to propose trial dates."
https://www.fox13now.com/news/shooting-of-charlie-kirk/key-dates-in-the-case-against-tyler-robinson-the-suspect-in-charlie-kirks-death
- [2026-09-10] Note on process:
in this next phase of the court case, both prosecutors and the defense will file pretrial motions that the judge will rule on, essentially setting the ground rules about what evidence or witnesses can be presented to the jury during trial.
https://www.sltrib.com/news/2026/09/10/charlie-kirk-murder-case-utah/
BOTTOM LINE: As of October 3, 2026, Robinson has been bound over for trial on all seven counts (including aggravated murder) and has pleaded not guilty, but no trial date has been set; the next hearing (Oct. 23, 2026) is only expected to propose/schedule a trial date, and outside legal commentary suggests an actual trial could be years away (potentially 2028-2029) — well beyond the market's July 31, 2027 resolution deadline, making a conviction verdict by that date far from assured.
NOT FOUND: No evidence of a trial date actually having been set as of today; no plea agreement, dismissal, or mistrial reported; no indication the aggravated murder/homicide charge has been dropped or reduced.
report: base rate
- [2026-09-01] Fourth District Judge Tony Graf ruled probable cause existed and bound Tyler Robinson over for trial on all seven counts, including capital aggravated murder; Robinson then pleaded not guilty.
Robinson, 23, pleaded not guilty during an arraignment after the judge ruled there is sufficient probable cause for him to face trial on all seven counts, including aggravated murder and felony discharge of a firearm causing serious bodily injury.
- [2026-10-23] Next pretrial conference scheduled;
this is the next court date for Robinson, and the judge has instructed attorneys to be ready then to propose trial dates.
No trial date exists yet.
- [2026-09-10] A Utah defense attorney with experience in 26 aggravated-murder cases, unaffiliated with this case, predicted
it will be three more years – September of 2029 – before a trial begins, with appeals even before a trial and lots of litigation over testimony and evidence at a trial that could last five to 10 weeks.
- [2025-09-30] Base-rate context on Utah capital case pacing:
death penalty cases are longer and more resource intensive, requiring months of preparation and investigation before proceeding to trial, and the trial will likely not take place for several years.
- [2025-09-16] Reflecting how rarely Utah pursues capital prosecution to verdict:
Utah prosecutors are pursuing the death penalty less frequently, with only two active capital cases in the state besides this one, both involving men accused of killing police officers.
- [2025-09-10/2025] Historical conviction-to-sentence base rate:
Utah juries have sentenced 26 people to death in the modern era but have not done so since 2008
, though this reflects sentencing outcomes, not the separate (and more common) question of whether a homicide conviction is obtained at all.
- [2025-09] Average Utah death-penalty case duration (charge-to-resolution including appeals) is extremely long:
the average time an inmate now spends on Utah's death row is nearly 34 years, a sign of how drawn-out and complex the process has become.
Even restricting to charge-to-first-verdict (not full appeals), multi-year delays are the norm in Utah capital cases.
- [2026-09-10] Strength-of-case context for outside view: prosecutors presented extensive evidence (surveillance video, digital records, forensic material, a former partner's testimony) at the five-day preliminary hearing, and the judge found it sufficient to bind over on all counts, suggesting prosecutors view the evidentiary case as strong going into trial preparation (per NBC/CNN coverage of the Sept. 1, 2026 ruling).
- [2026-10-02] As of early October 2026, Robinson
has pleaded not guilty to all seven counts against him, including aggravated murder
, with no plea negotiation publicly reported;
prosecutors are seeking the death penalty on the aggravated murder charge
, a posture that historically slows case resolution because capital defendants rarely plead guilty absent a deal removing death eligibility.
- [2026-09-26] Comparable procedural base rate: Utah law treats preliminary hearing bindover as a "critical stage" requiring only probable cause (a low bar), so bindover itself has limited predictive value for eventual conviction at trial, per general analysis of Utah criminal procedure (factually.co analysis of Utah court rules).
- [generic] National base rate: capital-eligible aggravated-murder cases nationally take on average several years from charge to trial and frequently resolve via plea deals (often to lesser homicide charges) rather than jury verdicts, which is the main structural risk to a "Yes" outcome in this specific case given the compressed July 31, 2027 deadline.
BOTTOM LINE: Outside-view evidence strongly suggests Utah capital aggravated-murder prosecutions typically take multiple years from charge to trial verdict, and an unaffiliated defense attorney explicitly projected a trial start around September 2029 — well past the market's July 31, 2027 deadline — making "conviction by deadline" structurally unlikely on timeline grounds alone, independent of the case's evidentiary strength.
NOT FOUND: No official Utah-wide statistic was found for "percentage of aggravated-murder bindovers that result in conviction at trial" or "median time from bindover to verdict in Utah capital cases"; no confirmed trial date exists as of October 2026; no evidence of plea negotiations in this specific case was found.
report: yes case
YES means: Tyler Robinson is convicted of any criminal homicide offense (e.g., aggravated murder or a lesser homicide count) in State of Utah v. Tyler James Robinson, with judgment rendered by the trial court, by July 31, 2027.
- [2026-09-01] At the conclusion of the preliminary hearing, prosecutors framed their case as overwhelming, having
divided their case into four categories: video evidence, circumstantial evidence, DNA evidence and what they described as "confessions" Robinson made
, and Judge Graf found this sufficient to bind over on every count. https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/02/us/charlie-kirk-suspect-tyler-robinson-pleads-not-guilty
- [2026-08-18] In an August 2026 filing opposing the defense's bid to strip death-penalty eligibility,
Utah prosecutors urged a judge to send Tyler Robinson to trial on every charge in the killing of Charlie Kirk, arguing that the evidence against him is overwhelming
, indicating prosecutorial confidence well after the preliminary hearing. https://www.foxnews.com/us/prosecutors-hammer-tyler-robinson-bid-derail-death-penalty-charlie-kirk-murder-case
- [2026-09-02] The evidentiary record bound over includes a roommate's immunized testimony:
Twiggs, granted immunity, detailed text messages and in-person admissions where Robinson claimed responsibility for killing Kirk and wished he hadn't done it
, a cooperating-witness confession account that is hard for a defense to neutralize before trial. https://www.foxnews.com/us/charlie-kirk-murder-case-straight-forward-gets-prosecutors-argue-case-nears-trial-decision
- [2025-09-29] The original charging narrative already included a written note Robinson allegedly left saying
"I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I'm going to take it,"
plus DNA on the rifle trigger, a combination of physical and documentary evidence not contingent on live-witness credibility. https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/29/us/tyler-robinson-charlie-kirk-court
- [2026-09-01] At the bindover hearing,
Kirk family attorney Jeffrey Neiman made his comments while asking the judge that court proceedings move "swiftly" and that a trial date be set at the next hearing
, showing active victim-side pressure to accelerate scheduling toward trial. https://www.ksl.com/article/51618264/tyler-robinson-may-learn-today-if-he-will-stand-trial-for-allegedly-killing-charlie-kirk
- [2026-01-19] Erika Kirk formally invoked a statutory acceleration mechanism:
Erika Kirk, widow of Charlie Kirk, has filed for a speedy trial in the case against her husband's accused killer, Tyler Robinson… invoking her rights to a speedy trial as the victim representative, arguing that the defense is causing "undue" delay in the case
, a Utah Code right that gives the court an independent basis to compress the schedule against defense-requested delays. https://www.abc4.com/news/charlie-kirk-shooting/erika-kirk-speedy-trial-tyler-robinson/
- [2026-09-01] At the Oct. 23 pretrial conference, the victim-side push continued:
A pretrial conference will be held on Oct. 23, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. The Kirk family lawyer, Jeffrey Neiman, asked that since the date is nearly two months away, a trial date should be set to ensure the Kirk family gets their right to a speedy trial
, meaning a concrete trial date (potentially within the market window) could be locked in at the very next hearing. https://www.deseret.com/utah/2026/09/01/tyler-robinson-hearing-judge-to-determine-probable-cause-in-charlie-kirk-assassination-case/
- [2026-05-08] Even during pre-bindover scheduling disputes, prosecutors signaled urgency:
Prosecutor Ryan McBride also indicated postponing the hearing would delay proceedings by at least six months and violate Erika Kirk's right to a speedy trial, as the widow of the victim
, showing the state itself has consistently resisted delay, aligning with a faster path to verdict. https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/08/us/tyler-robinson-charlie-kirk-hearing
- [2025-10-03] An early Wall Street Journal-sourced assessment noted a structural reason this case could move unusually fast for a capital case:
Because the case involves a single defendant and a single shot fired, the trial could begin as early as next year, according to the Wall Street Journal
, meaning the case's narrow factual scope (no co-defendants, a single victim/shooting incident) removes some of the complexity that typically prolongs multi-defendant capital cases. https://www.ksl.com/article/51377388/what-to-expect-in-the-upcoming-criminal-case-of-tyler-robinson
- [2026-09-02] Procedurally, the case has already cleared its single biggest gating event:
Both sides had six weeks between the initial arguments and closings, during which they submitted their written briefs summarizing their cases, and prepared to present closing arguments… Before the hearing Tuesday, arguments took place over five days the week of July 6
— the five-day evidentiary "mini-trial" is done, the bindover is secured on all counts, and only pretrial motions and trial-date-setting remain before a jury could render a verdict. https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/02/us/charlie-kirk-suspect-tyler-robinson-pleads-not-guilty
BOTTOM LINE: The strongest YES path is: Judge Graf sets a concrete trial date at or soon after the October 23, 2026 pretrial conference (as the Kirk family/victim representative has repeatedly and formally pushed for, including invoking Utah's statutory speedy-trial right), pretrial motions resolve on a compressed schedule given the case's single-defendant, single-incident simplicity, and a jury convicts given prosecutors' own public characterization of "overwhelming" video, DNA, forensic and multiple-witness confession evidence — all of which is now procedurally unlocked for trial scheduling with no outstanding bindover, plea, or charge-reduction obstacles.
NOT FOUND: No confirmed trial date has been set as of October 3, 2026 (the Oct. 23 conference is expected to address scheduling only); no public reporting found quantifying how much a judge can realistically compress the schedule given the Utah victim speedy-trial statute in a capital case of this scale; no reporting on how the court will rule on the defense's pending motion to strike the death-penalty aggravating factor, which could affect case complexity/length either way.
report: no case
YES means: a jury or court renders a final judgment convicting Tyler Robinson of aggravated murder, murder, manslaughter, or negligent homicide in State of Utah v. Tyler James Robinson on or before July 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET.
- [2026-01-19/20] Even the victim side is on record describing the defense's approach as obstructive: Erika Kirk's attorney invoked her statutory right to a speedy trial, explicitly accusing the defense of "resorting to delay tactics to stall the proceedings," a filing framed around the fact that
"Robinson hasn't entered a plea yet or faced a preliminary hearing"
months into the case — underscoring how early even routine steps had already slipped. (https://www.foxnews.com/us/charlie-kirk-widow-erika-kirk-demands-speedy-trial-alleging-undue-delay-from-tyler-robinson-defense)
- [2026-01-16/02-03] A disqualification fight over an alleged prosecutorial conflict of interest consumed multiple full hearing days (Jan. 16 and Feb. 3) with live witness testimony, prompting the Utah County Attorney to call the pattern "Groundhog Day" and ask the court to deny it
as a never-ending, last-minute stalling tactic... "I think this Court would be well within its discretion to just deny that motion as untimely."
(https://www.deseret.com/utah/2026/02/03/tyler-robinson-charlie-kirk-evidentiary-hearing-prosecution-potential-disqualification/)
- [2026-01-30] Rather than abandoning the disqualification issue after the January hearing, the defense filed a renewed motion asking the Utah Attorney General's Office take over, so
"the court, the public, and Mr. Robinson have no doubt that the disqualification issue is addressed... by prosecutors who have no conflict of interest whatsoever."
(https://www.deseret.com/utah/2026/02/03/tyler-robinson-charlie-kirk-evidentiary-hearing-prosecution-potential-disqualification/)
- [2026-08-01] This pattern of serial collateral motions (venue/media access, contempt-of-prosecutors, sealing, disqualification) is expected to continue into trial prep: a legal analyst following the case assessed that
"even if a venue change doesn't work, it gives the defense something to raise on appeal later... the throughline of the defense strategy: build a record now that can support an appeal if there's a conviction."
That signals more pretrial litigation specifically designed to extend the record, not shorten the timeline. (https://mentalhealthaddictionlawfirm.com/latest-news/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-analysis/)
- [2026-10-23] The only concretely scheduled event before the deadline is a pretrial conference where
"the judge has instructed attorneys to be ready then to propose trial dates"
— meaning as of today not even a trial start date exists, let alone a verdict, with under 10 months left on the clock after that date. (https://www.fox13now.com/news/shooting-of-charlie-kirk/key-dates-in-the-case-against-tyler-robinson-the-suspect-in-charlie-kirks-death)
- [2026-09-10] The defense has signaled it may not even be ready to propose trial dates at the October conference, consistent with prior reports that they are still preparing numerous pretrial motions — a posture incompatible with a verdict inside nine months.
- [2026 case-law comparables] Utah capital-case outcomes often avoid a clean jury conviction verdict altogether: multiple cited precedents from the same Utah capital-defense firm show aggravated-murder defendants resolving via negotiated pleas to lesser charges (manslaughter, reduced murder) rather than trial verdicts, e.g.
"Cannistraci was charged with aggravated murder. After the preliminary hearing, Mr. Cannistraci entered a guilty plea to manslaughter,"
and
"Mr. Young's conviction and death sentence were reversed... The case was settled by Mr. Young pleading guilty to aggravated murder,"
illustrating how Utah capital cases frequently resolve short of a jury homicide-conviction verdict, each resolution pathway that would also trigger this market's "No" clause for plea-without-guilt-admission, dismissal, or no-judgment scenarios.
- [general] Death-penalty notice complicates and slows proceedings further: Utah law requires the state to formally commit to capital prosecution and triggers additional specialized litigation (e.g., mitigation investigation, qualified-counsel requirements) that is structurally absent from ordinary murder cases, reinforcing why capital cases run years longer than standard homicide prosecutions.
- [2026-09] Even the judge's own procedural signals point to further delay before trial preparation formally starts: the Sept. 10 reporting noted the defense is
"let cameras stay, but no one was allowed to film or photograph Robinson"
-style ongoing media/evidentiary disputes have persisted continuously since October 2025, with no indication of tapering off as trial-scheduling approaches.
BOTTOM LINE: The case's own procedural history — a 13+ month run of disqualification fights, media/venue motions, and a victim-side speedy-trial complaint about defense delay tactics — combined with no trial date yet set as of the Oct. 23, 2026 conference and an outside capital-defense attorney's ~2029 trial estimate, makes a homicide conviction verdict by July 31, 2027 structurally unlikely; Utah capital cases also frequently end in pleas to lesser charges rather than jury verdicts, a separate path to this market's "No" resolution.
NOT FOUND: No evidence a trial date has been formally set as of Oct. 3, 2026; no ruling found on Erika Kirk's Jan. 2026 speedy-trial motion or on the renewed prosecutor-disqualification motion; no indication of plea negotiations in this specific case.
3. Forecasters 5 draws · Opus 5.5 + GPT-6 Astra + GPT-5.6 Sol · plain mean
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
57% conf
| Yes | 18% |
| No | 82% |
(0) The condition has not been met. Robinson was bound over on all seven counts on Sept 1, 2026 and pleaded not guilty. No trial date is set, and no plea, dismissal or charge reduction has been reported. (a) About 10 months remain until the July 31, 2027 deadline, and the next hearing is Oct 23, 2026, where trial dates may only be proposed. (b) If nothing changes, pretrial motions grind on into 2027, and the market resolves No because a capital trial verdict is very unlikely within roughly 9 months of scheduling. (c) NO path: the defense keeps up its pattern of serial motions (disqualification, venue, media, death-penalty challenges). An unaffiliated Utah capital-defense attorney projected a trial around 2029, and typical Utah capital timelines are multi-year. (d) YES path: the judge, pressed by the state and by Erika Kirk's statutory speedy-trial demand, sets a trial for mid-2027. The single-defendant, single-shot case moves fast and a jury convicts on what prosecutors call overwhelming DNA, video, note and confession evidence. Alternatively, Robinson pleads guilty to a homicide count to take death off the table. Evidentiary strength is high, but timing is the binding constraint. The market at 28.5% (drifting down) seems somewhat rich given no trial date and the defense's demonstrated delay posture, so I shade below it, while keeping weight on a guilty-plea path and an aggressive schedule.
claude-opus-5-5 · high effort
60% conf
| Yes | 17% |
| No | 83% |
(0) Resolution check: not met. As of Oct 3, 2026, Robinson has been bound over on all seven counts (Sept 1, 2026) and has pleaded not guilty. No trial date is set, and no plea, dismissal or charge reduction has been reported. (a) About 10 months remain until the July 31, 2027 deadline. The only scheduled event is the Oct 23 pretrial conference, where trial dates may be proposed, and the defense has signaled it may not be ready even for that. (b) Status quo: capital pretrial litigation continues through mid-2027 with no verdict, so the market resolves No. (c) NO path: the defense keeps filing motions on venue, disqualification, evidence suppression and death-penalty aggravators, and capital mitigation work runs long. A trial date gets set for late 2027 or beyond; one experienced Utah capital-defense lawyer projects about 2029. Utah capital cases routinely take years. (d) YES path: pushed by the Kirk family's statutory speedy-trial demand and the prosecution's resistance to delay, Graf sets a trial in spring 2027. The evidence (DNA, video, the note, an immunized roommate's confession testimony) yields a quick conviction. Alternatively, a deal taking death off the table produces a guilty plea to aggravated murder, which counts as Yes because it includes an admission of guilt. The market sits at 28.5% and has drifted down. I discount it further because a verdict within about 9 months of trial-date setting would be exceptionally fast for a death-penalty case. A guilty-plea path remains a real tail.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
64% conf
| Yes | 28% |
| No | 72% |
I anchor on Polymarket's live 28.5% Yes price and retain it because the research provides no clearly unpriced development warranting an adjustment. As of October 3, no source documents a qualifying conviction or an immediate-No trigger: September 1 KUER/CNN reporting establishes only bindover and a not-guilty plea, while October 2 reporting still describes October 23 as a prospective trial-scheduling hearing. About ten months remain until July 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET; a qualifying initial court judgment must occur by then, and unchanged proceedings would resolve No regardless of eventual guilt. The strongest No scenario is capital-case preparation and pretrial litigation pushing judgment beyond the deadline, supported by the Salt Lake Tribune's September 10 account of outstanding motions and scheduling uncertainty; FOX13's approximately 2029 trial prediction reinforces this but is only one outside attorney's estimate. Yes could follow an accelerated trial, supported by the family's speedy-trial demands and reported DNA, video, and alleged admissions, although neither prosecutorial confidence nor probable-cause bindover guarantees conviction. Alternatively, an admission-of-guilt plea to a qualifying homicide offense followed by timely judgment can produce Yes: the NO report incorrectly treats ordinary lesser-homicide guilty pleas as inherently adverse, whereas the rules specifically exclude pleas without an admission of guilt. The charging-document and statute retrievals failed, and no official judgment or current docket was supplied, leaving meaningful reporting-lag and formal-judgment timing risks rather than documented resolution-source confirmation. With no confirmed trial date or reported plea negotiations, the deadline favors No, but accelerated proceedings and a qualifying plea preserve a substantial minority Yes probability.
gpt-6-astra · high effort
63% conf
| Yes | 28% |
| No | 72% |
I retain Polymarket's live 28.5% YES price as the anchor because the supplied research establishes no clear informational edge over that consensus. No resolving condition is documented: KUER's September 1 report describes bindover and a not-guilty plea, while October 2 Washington Times reporting still identifies October 23 as a possible trial-scheduling hearing. The official charging-document and statute reads failed, and no court judgment was retrieved, leaving verification uncertainty rather than evidence of resolution. Approximately 301 days remain until July 31, 2027, at 11:59 PM ET; if today's pretrial status persists, the outcome is No. The strongest NO scenario is prolonged capital-case preparation and motions: the Salt Lake Tribune reported September 10 that defense counsel might not yet be ready to propose dates, although FOX13's outside attorney prediction of a 2029 trial is only an estimate, not an official schedule or measured base rate. YES could result from an accelerated trial supported by the family's documented speedy-trial demands, or a guilty plea admitting a homicide offense followed by a qualifying court judgment before the deadline. CNN's September 2 account of video, DNA and alleged admissions supports conviction conditional on reaching adjudication, but neither prosecutorial confidence nor probable-cause bindover establishes timely conviction. Contrary to part of the NO research, an admitted-guilt plea to a lesser homicide offense can qualify; pleas without admission are excluded, postjudgment appeals do not matter, and the timing of the qualifying initial judgment—not merely strong evidence or a scheduled trial—is decisive.
gpt-5.6-sol · high effort
68% conf
| Yes | 24% |
| No | 76% |
(0) The condition has not already been met or made impossible: September 2026 reporting from CNN, NBC, and KUER says Robinson was bound over on all counts and pleaded not guilty, while no source reports a judgment, dismissal, charge reduction, or plea; the official resolution documents were temporarily inaccessible. (a) About ten months, or roughly 301 days, remain until July 31, 2027, and the next scheduled proceeding is an October 23 pretrial conference at which trial dates may only be proposed. (b) If nothing changes, no homicide judgment is rendered by the deadline and the market resolves No. (c) The leading No scenario is continued capital-case motion practice and defense delay, with trial beginning after the deadline; an unaffiliated Utah capital-defense attorney specifically projected a September 2029 trial start. (d) The Yes scenario is that the judge imposes an unusually compressed schedule or Robinson enters a guilty plea admitting a homicide offense, followed by a qualifying judgment before the deadline, supported by the prosecution's reported video, DNA, documentary, and confession evidence. I anchor on Polymarket's 28.5% Yes price but move modestly lower because no trial date exists, the defense may not be ready even to finalize dates on October 23, and victim-side speedy-trial pressure cannot eliminate the special preparation and litigation required in a death-penalty case. A guilty plea or unexpectedly early trial remains material given the apparently strong evidence, preventing a more aggressive move toward No.
4. Final plain mean of 5 draws
23%
(62% confidence)
Yes: 23%
No: 77%
Mean of 5 draws (0.18, 0.17, 0.28, 0.28, 0.24). (0) The condition has not been met. Robinson was bound over on all seven counts on Sept 1, 2026 and pleaded not guilty. No trial date is set, and no plea, dismissal or charge reduction has been reported. (a) About 10 months remain until the July 31, 2027 deadline, and the next hearing is Oct 23, 2026, where trial dates may only be proposed. (b) If nothing changes, pretrial motions grind on into 2027, and the market resolves No because a capital trial verdict is very unlikely within roughly 9 months of scheduling. (c) NO path: the defense keeps up its pattern of serial motions (disqualification, venue, media, death-penalty challenges). An unaffiliated Utah capital-defense attorney projected a trial around 2029, and typical Utah capital timelines are multi-year. (d) YES path: the judge, pressed by the state and by Erika Kirk's statutory speedy-trial demand, sets a trial for mid-2027. The single-defendant, single-shot case moves fast and a jury convicts on what prosecutors call overwhelming DNA, video, note and confession evidence. Alternatively, Robinson pleads guilty to a homicide count to take death off the table. Evidentiary strength is high, but timing is the binding constraint. The market at 28.5% (drifting down) seems somewhat rich given no trial date and the defense's demonstrated delay posture, so I shade below it, while keeping weight on a guilty-plea path and an aggressive schedule.
5. Entry Decision Opus 5.5 trader
Side
no
Position Size
$600
Contracts
833
Trader Confidence
Trade rationale
This is a bet with the favourite: NO is priced at 71.5%, and the forecast's 23.2% YES puts the edge at -5.3pp, small but over the bar. The reasoning names concrete, checkable facts, and I confirmed them on the web. Robinson pleaded not guilty after the Sept 1 bindover, no trial date has been set, and the next court date, Oct 23, is only where trial dates may be proposed. A local legal analyst projects a trial around September 2029. Our forecast has barely moved since the Sept 15 scan (24% then, 23% now). Meanwhile the market has risen from 0.23 to 0.285, and I found no news to explain the rise. The lab index had no Robinson stories, and recent reporting only confirms that no trial date is set. That gives a reason to fade the move beyond the bot's general caution. Confidence is 0.62. The ensemble is split: two Claude draws at 17-18% and two GPT draws at the market price. I treat the edge as real but modest.
Allocation logic
I'm sizing at the low end of the with-favourite range ($500-$800). The edge is only about 5pp, the ensemble spread is 11.5pp, and the Oct 23 hearing could set a 2027 trial date and push YES up sharply. That hearing is a binary risk inside the 301-day horizon. I found no correlated Robinson exposure in the open positions listed.
Entry price:
$0.72
Current:
$0.72
Status:
OPEN
P&L:
-$10.89
Pipeline Timing
Total pipeline time: 92.0s
Per-tool research timings shown in the Research section above.