← back to scans
Will the S&P 500 be between 8000 and 8199.99 on Dec 31, 2026 at 4pm EST? — 8,000 to 8,199.99
15%
Agent
17%
Market Price
-2.2%
Edge
59%
Confidence
512,698
Volume
1.0c
Spread
103
Days to resolution
27
Markets in event
final rationale
Mean of 5 draws (0.14, 0.14, 0.14, 0.16, 0.16). Spot is ~7,640 (FRED, Sept 17), so the 8,000–8,199.99 band requires a +4.7% to +7.3% move in ~3.4 months with VIX near 15–18. A lognormal with σ=15–20% and modest drift puts roughly 9–12% on this 200-point band, which sits about 0.4–0.8 standard deviations above the current center of mass. Kalshi prices YES at 17% (flat for 30 days, 90-day range 10–19%), and strategist targets clustering at 8,000–8,150 provide mild support for a slightly-above-model estimate, but bucket markets on Kalshi tend to carry a premium and no neighboring-bucket data confirms the distribution sums cleanly. I shade modestly below the Kalshi anchor toward the model estimate, landing at 14%.
price vs. prediction
market price
agent forecast at t+0
29 follow-ups
1. Planner Fable 5.1 · Fermi decomposition + tool plan
Tools chosen:
kalshi_direct
kalshi_related
polymarket_related
fred
earnings_data
article_search
claude_news
code_execution
Sub-questions (Fermi decomposition)
- What is the current S&P 500 index level, and what percentage move (up or down) is required to land in the 8000-8199.99 band by Dec 31, 2026?
- What is the current VIX / implied volatility for horizons out to Dec 2026, and what annualized volatility should be used to model the year-end distribution?
- What probability does a lognormal (or option-implied) distribution centered on the current level with a modest drift assign to the 8000-8199.99 bucket given the time remaining?
- How are the neighboring Kalshi KXINXY-26DEC31 buckets priced, does the implied distribution sum near 100%, and where is the market's modal year-end level?
- What are Wall Street strategists' 2026 year-end S&P 500 targets (median and range), and how do they compare to 8000-8200?
- Are there major macro catalysts (Fed rate path, recession risk, earnings growth, tariffs/policy shocks) that skew the year-end distribution meaningfully up or down from a random-walk assumption?
- Does Polymarket or other venues have a year-end 2026 S&P 500 market, and does its implied distribution agree with Kalshi's?
Planner reasoning
This is a range bet on the S&P 500 year-end 2026 level, so the probability is driven almost entirely by the current index level, remaining time to expiry, and implied volatility — a lognormal/option-implied distribution gives the base estimate, which should be cross-checked against Kalshi's sibling buckets (which sum to ~100% and reveal the crowd's full distribution) and any Polymarket year-end S&P markets. News on strategist year-end targets, Fed policy, and macro shocks adjusts the center and width of the distribution.
2. Research Parallel tool calls
| tool | status | time | items | summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| kalshi_direct | OK | 0.2s | 1 | ## This Market's Kalshi Data **8,000 to 8,199.99** (KXINXY-26DEC31H1600-B8100) - Current price (probability): 17.00% - 7-day price change: -1.00% - 30-day price change: +0.00% - Average daily volume: 3351 contracts - Price range: 10.00% - 19.00% - Data points: 90 days |
| kalshi_related | OK | 2.7s | 2 | 2 related markets / summaries. series KXINXY: 0 markets (skipped 59 no-signal) | keyword 'S&P 500 Dec 31 2026': ok | keyword 'S&P 500 year end': ok |
| polymarket_related | OK | 4.2s | 24 | Polymarket search over 3 keyword(s), kept 24 matches. keyword 'S&P 500 2026': 8 markets | keyword 'S&P 500 end of year': 8 markets | keyword 'SPX 8000': 8 markets |
| fred | OK | 1.5s | 5 | Fetched 5 FRED series (lookback=365d). |
| earnings_data | OK | 0.3s | 2 | Fetched FMP data for 2 ticker(s). |
| article_search | OK | 36.5s | 19 | Fetched 19 unique articles across 3 queries (lookback=45d). 'S&P 500 2026 year-end target strategists': 10 articles | 'S&P 500 outlook 2026 Wall Street forecast': 10 articles | 'stock market rally record high S&P 500': 10 articles |
| claude_news | OK | 32.1s | 21 | Here are key findings for forecasting S&P 500 level on Dec 31, 2026: **Current index level (mid-Sept 2026):** - The S&P 500 rose to 7,651 points on September 18, 2026, gaining 0.17% from the previous session. Over the past month, the index has declined 0.75%, though it remains 14.80% higher than |
| code_execution | OK | 34.5s | 0 | **Key Findings — Lognormal Model for S&P 500 close on Dec 31, 2026** - **Setup:** Sandbox system date = 2026‑09‑19, giving **T ≈ 0.282 years** (~3.4 months) to expiry (2026‑12‑31). Placeholder spot **S0 = 6,700** (no live data feed available — sensitivity shown below for S0 = 6,600/6,700/6,800). - |
3. Evidence Brief Sonnet 5 · 6349 chars
# Event
Will the S&P 500 close between 8,000.00 and 8,199.99 on Dec 31, 2026 at 4pm EST?
# Outcomes to forecast
- Yes (close lands in 8,000–8,199.99 band)
- No (close outside band)
# Kalshi market anchor
**YES = 17.00%** (KXINXY-26DEC31H1600-B8100). 7-day change: -1.00%; 30-day change: 0.00% (flat). Range over 90 days: 10%–19%. Avg daily volume: 3,351 contracts — reasonably liquid, moderately stable pricing, no recent repricing shock. [kalshi_direct]
# Resolution source
Not run (no dedicated resolution_source tool result provided). Anchor is FRED SP500 series and Kalshi price itself.
# Sub-question answers
1. **Current level / required move**: SP500 = 7,637.76 on 2026-09-17 (FRED), corroborated by claude_news at ~7,651 (9/18) and 7,718.6 intraday cited by CNBC (9/8). To reach 8,000 requires ~+4.7%; to reach 8,200 requires ~+7.3% by Dec 31, 2026 (~3.4 months away). Note: the code_execution tool used a stale/incorrect placeholder spot of 6,700, producing an understated (0.5–3%) probability — this should be disregarded in favor of the FRED-confirmed ~7,640 spot.
2. **VIX/implied vol**: VIX ~14.8–17.8 in Sept 2026 (FRED, streetstats), well below 52-week high of 35.3 (52-wk range 13.4–35.3). Reasonable annualized vol assumption: 15–20%.
3. **Lognormal probability**: Using corrected S0≈7,640, T=0.28yr, σ=15–20%, drift 0–5%: reworked estimate puts the 8,000–8,199.99 bucket probability at roughly **8–15%**, materially higher than the flawed code_execution output (which used wrong spot) but broadly consistent with Kalshi's 17% price.
4. **Neighboring Kalshi buckets**: No usable KXINXY neighbor-bucket data returned (kalshi_related search found 0 series matches, only unrelated CPI/population markets). Cannot confirm whether the full Kalshi distribution sums to ~100% or locate the modal bucket independently.
5. **Wall Street 2026 targets**: CNBC Market Strategist Survey median = 8,000. Cluster of targets sits inside or at the edge of this exact band: JPMorgan 8,000 (Aug), Goldman 8,000 (May), Deutsche Bank 8,000, UBS 8,100, CFRA 8,050, RBC 8,150 (highest in survey). Bulls: Evercore ISI 9,000 (base case 7,750), HSBC (raised, level not specified), Yardeni-style "worldwide bull" call for 8,400. Bears: BofA 7,100 (base), later flagged "buyable washout" below 6,600; JPMorgan's earlier 2026 target was reset lower (7,500) amid oil/geopolitical shocks before the August re-raise to 8,000. Dispersion is extreme (~1,500-pt spread).
6. **Macro catalysts**: Hot August payrolls (162k vs 53k expected) revived rate-hike fears, reversing earlier cut expectations — a headwind. Fed funds ~3.63–3.88% (already cut from higher levels). 10Y yield elevated at ~4.9–5.0%, curve modestly positive (0.25–0.4). Middle East oil-supply uncertainty cited as tail risk by JPMorgan/Goldman. Valuation stretched: forward P/E 19.3, trailing 22.7. AI-driven earnings beats (JPMorgan/Barclays raised 2026 EPS to $365) are the dominant bullish driver.
7. **Polymarket 2026 year-end SPX markets**: Exist and diverge somewhat from Kalshi. "Hit $8,000 HIGH in Dec" = 49%; "Hit $8,200 HIGH in Dec" = 29.5%; "Hit $9,000 HIGH" = 10.6%; "Hit $7,400 LOW" = 66%; "Hit $7,000 LOW" = 27.5%. These are touch/high-low probabilities (not close-in-band), so not directly comparable, but they confirm markets see meaningful two-sided uncertainty with more downside-touch risk priced than upside.
# Key facts (high-confidence, factual)
1. [FRED] SP500 = 7,637.76 (2026-09-17), up from a Jul 29 low of 7,316 and a Aug 13 high of 7,799 (claude_news/streetstats).
2. [FRED] VIX ≈ 14.8–17.8 in mid-Sept 2026, near 52-wk lows.
3. [FRED] Fed funds rate 3.63–3.88%; 10Y yield ~4.9–5.0%; yield curve mildly positive.
4. [CNBC] Median 2026 year-end S&P target across strategists = 8,000; several firms (JPMorgan, Goldman, UBS, CFRA, RBC) cluster targets between 8,000–8,150.
5. [Kalshi] Current YES price for 8,000–8,199.99 bucket = 17%, essentially flat over 30 days.
# Cross-market signals
- Kalshi related: No usable KXINXY neighbor-bucket data retrieved (search returned no relevant series matches).
- Polymarket: Separate "hit-high/low" market structure; implies ~49% chance of touching 8,000 sometime and ~29.5% of touching 8,200 during the window — consistent with meaningful upside path probability, though not a direct close-in-band estimate.
- Sportsbook implied: N/A (not applicable to this event type).
# Analyst opinions and speculation
- Bulls (Evercore 9,000, Yardeni/Pasquariello seasonal rally into year-end, Goldman/JPM/Deutsche/UBS/CFRA/RBC at 8,000–8,150) broadly see the 8,000–8,200 zone as the modal/consensus 2026 year-end landing area.
- Bears (BofA 7,100, JPMorgan's earlier bearish reset to 7,500, "buyable washout" calls below 6,600) see material downside risk from rate-hike fears and oil shocks.
- Strategist dispersion (~1,500 pts) signals genuine two-sided uncertainty, not a settled consensus.
# Directional lean per outcome
- **Yes**: Supported by strategist median clustering exactly at/near 8,000–8,150; low VIX; strong AI-driven EPS revisions; only ~4.7–7.3% further gain needed from current ~7,640 level over 3.4 months (plausible given the +3% summer rally already realized).
- **No**: Supported by lognormal math showing 8,000–8,200 is past the likely modal outcome (spot is below band, band is above the current center of mass); renewed rate-hike risk from hot payrolls; elevated valuations (fwd P/E 19.3); oil/geopolitical tail risk; Polymarket "touch" prices imply real downside path risk too (66% chance of touching 7,400 at some point).
# Gaps / unknowns
- No live/confirmed exact current spot beyond Sept 17–19 data (12+ weeks of unknown price action remain until Dec 31).
- No Kalshi neighboring-bucket prices obtained — can't verify the full band distribution or locate Kalshi's own implied mode.
- code_execution model output is unreliable (wrong spot input) and should not be trusted at face value.
- FMP earnings/quote data failed (403 errors) — no additional real-time quote confirmation.
# Calibration anchors
- Kalshi current YES price (anchor): **17%**
- Corrected lognormal estimate (σ=15–20%, drift 0–5%, S0≈7,640): **~8–15%**
- Strategist-cluster-based intuition (median target = 8,000, right at band's low edge): supports a probability at or modestly above naive lognormal estimates, in the mid-to-high teens.
4. Forecasters 5 draws · Fable 5.1 + GPT-5.6 Sol
claude-fable-5-1
52% conf
| Yes | 14% |
| No | 86% |
Spot is ~7,640 (FRED, Sept 17), so the 8,000–8,199.99 band requires a +4.7% to +7.3% move in ~3.4 months with VIX near 15–18. A lognormal with σ=15–20% and modest drift puts roughly 9–12% on this 200-point band, which sits about 0.4–0.8 standard deviations above the current center of mass. Kalshi prices YES at 17% (flat for 30 days, 90-day range 10–19%), and strategist targets clustering at 8,000–8,150 provide mild support for a slightly-above-model estimate, but bucket markets on Kalshi tend to carry a premium and no neighboring-bucket data confirms the distribution sums cleanly. I shade modestly below the Kalshi anchor toward the model estimate, landing at 14%.
claude-fable-5-1
52% conf
| Yes | 14% |
| No | 86% |
Spot is ~7,640 (FRED, Sept 17), so the band requires a +4.7% to +7.3% gain over ~3.4 months. A lognormal model with σ=15–20% and modest drift puts the 8,000–8,199.99 bucket at roughly 9–10%, since the band lies above the distribution's center of mass and is only 200 points wide. Kalshi prices YES at 17% (flat for 30 days), likely reflecting strategist targets clustering at 8,000–8,150 and bullish AI-earnings momentum; Polymarket's 49% 'touch 8,000' price is consistent with meaningful but not dominant upside paths. Balancing the market anchor against the model, I shade slightly below Kalshi to ~14%, noting rate-hike fears, stretched valuations, and oil tail risks as downside pressures.
claude-fable-5-1
52% conf
| Yes | 14% |
| No | 86% |
Spot is ~7,640 (FRED, Sept 17), so the band requires a +4.7% to +7.3% gain over ~3.4 months; a lognormal model with VIX-consistent 15–18% vol and modest drift puts the 8,000–8,200 close probability at roughly 9–12%. Kalshi prices YES at 17%, flat over 30 days, but single-bucket Kalshi index markets often sum above 100%, so the anchor likely carries a modest premium. The strategist median target of 8,000 and the clustering of JPM/Goldman/UBS/CFRA/RBC in 8,000–8,150 argue for a probability at the upper end of the model range, while renewed rate-hike fears, stretched valuations, and oil tail risk cut the other way. I land slightly below the Kalshi price at 14%.
gpt-5.6-sol
68% conf
| Yes | 16% |
| No | 84% |
Kalshi’s reasonably liquid market anchors Yes at 17%, with little recent repricing. The index must gain about 4.7%–7.3% from 7,637.76 to finish in the specified band, while 15%–20% annualized volatility makes the narrow 200-point landing zone intrinsically unlikely; corrected lognormal estimates put it at 8%–15%. The strategist median of 8,000 and several targets between 8,000 and 8,150 support the upper end of that range, but elevated yields, stretched valuations, and geopolitical risks add downside uncertainty. I therefore stay close to the market while shading Yes slightly lower to 16%.
gpt-5.6-sol
72% conf
| Yes | 16% |
| No | 84% |
Kalshi’s reasonably liquid 17% YES price is the primary anchor, and its stability suggests no unpriced recent shock. From the confirmed 7,637.76 level, the band requires a plausible 4.7%–7.3% gain, while 15%–20% annualized volatility and corrected lognormal estimates imply roughly an 8%–15% chance of landing in this narrow range. Strategist targets cluster unusually strongly around 8,000–8,150, supporting the upper end of the model range, but elevated yields, stretched valuations, geopolitical risks, and substantial downside-touch pricing argue against exceeding the market anchor. I therefore assign YES 16%, just below Kalshi’s consensus.
6. Final plain mean of 5 draws
15%
(59% confidence)
Yes: 15%
No: 85%
Mean of 5 draws (0.14, 0.14, 0.14, 0.16, 0.16). Spot is ~7,640 (FRED, Sept 17), so the 8,000–8,199.99 band requires a +4.7% to +7.3% move in ~3.4 months with VIX near 15–18. A lognormal with σ=15–20% and modest drift puts roughly 9–12% on this 200-point band, which sits about 0.4–0.8 standard deviations above the current center of mass. Kalshi prices YES at 17% (flat for 30 days, 90-day range 10–19%), and strategist targets clustering at 8,000–8,150 provide mild support for a slightly-above-model estimate, but bucket markets on Kalshi tend to carry a premium and no neighboring-bucket data confirms the distribution sums cleanly. I shade modestly below the Kalshi anchor toward the model estimate, landing at 14%.
Pipeline Timing
Total pipeline time: 126.4s
Per-tool research timings shown in the Research section above.