forecasting
agent
← back to scans

Will the maximum WTI front month settle price reach $115.01 by Dec 31, 2026? — $115.01 or above

kalshiFinancials·2026-09-19·view on kalshi ↗
43%
Agent
41%
Market Price
+1.5%
Edge
54%
Confidence
1,683,564
Volume
1.1c
Spread
103
Days to resolution
10
Markets in event
final rationale
Mean of 5 draws (0.44, 0.44, 0.41, 0.43, 0.42). Kalshi prices YES at 41.4%, and the brief confirms the condition is not verified as met (highest confirmed settles ~$111.54 in April and $102.48 on Sep 10), though one tracker's $117.63 52-week high leaves a small chance it already resolved. With spot ~$101-107 in mid-September, roughly 3.5 months remaining, and realized vol of 30-45% in an active Iran/Hormuz war regime, a driftless barrier-touch model gives roughly 45-55% for touching $115 (settle-only slightly lower), consistent with or a bit above the market. Offsetting factors are the recent pullback as Saudi reroutes exports, analyst base cases ($70-105) well below the strike, and oil's tendency to mean-revert from geopolitical spikes. I land marginally above the Kalshi anchor at 44%.
price vs. prediction
market price agent forecast at t+0
29 follow-ups
1. Planner Fable 5.1 · Fermi decomposition + tool plan
Tools chosen: kalshi_direct kalshi_related polymarket_related resolution_source fred article_search claude_news code_execution
Sub-questions (Fermi decomposition)
  1. What is the current WTI front-month settlement price and what percentage rally is required to reach $115.01?
  2. Has any WTI front-month settle price already exceeded $115 since the market's issuance date (i.e., is the condition already met)?
  3. What is the current implied volatility of WTI crude options and what barrier-touch probability does it imply for $115 by Dec 31, 2026?
  4. What is the historical base rate of WTI rising by the required percentage within the remaining time window (e.g., since 1990 front-month data)?
  5. Are there active or escalating geopolitical supply disruptions (Iran/Strait of Hormuz, Russia sanctions, Venezuela, OPEC+ policy) that could produce a 2022-style spike above $115?
  6. What do OPEC+ production decisions, US shale output, SPR levels, and demand forecasts (EIA/IEA) imply for the 2026 supply-demand balance?
  7. What do other Kalshi WTI strike markets (e.g., $100, $105, $110, $120) and Polymarket oil markets imply about the market-implied distribution of the max price?
Planner reasoning
This is a barrier-touch question on WTI front-month settlement prices through end of 2026. The key drivers are the current spot level relative to $115, realized/implied volatility, remaining time to expiry, and tail geopolitical supply risks (Iran/Hormuz, Russia, OPEC+). We anchor on the Kalshi price, check whether the barrier has already been hit, pull the WTI price history from FRED, scan news for supply shocks, and use code execution to compute a barrier-hit probability from a lognormal/jump model.
2. Research Parallel tool calls
toolstatustimeitemssummary
kalshi_direct OK 0.2s 1 ## This Market's Kalshi Data **$115.01 or above** (KXWTIMAX-26DEC31-T115) - Current price (probability): 41.40% - 7-day price change: -2.90% - 30-day price change: +4.50% - Average daily volume: 10231 contracts - Price range: 22.70% - 57.30% - Data points: 90 days
kalshi_related OK 4.4s 0 0 related markets / summaries. series KXWTIMAX: 0 markets (skipped 50 no-signal) | series KXWTIMIN: 0 markets (skipped 32 no-signal) | series KXWTI: 0 markets (skipped 100 no-signal) | keyword 'WTI': no matches | keyword 'crude oil': no matches | keyword 'oil price': no matches
polymarket_related OK 0.9s 15 Polymarket search over 4 keyword(s), kept 15 matches. keyword 'oil price': 0 markets | keyword 'WTI': 5 markets | keyword 'crude oil 2026': 5 markets | keyword 'Strait of Hormuz': 5 markets
resolution_source OK 5.1s 1 already_resolved=unclear; matches_criteria=False; last_updated=unknown (EIA page shown only displays historical 1983-1985 data; ICE page shows no date, footer says '© 2026 Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.'). The ICE product page returned only generic navigation/menu text with no actual WTI settle pri
fred OK 2.1s 5 Fetched 5 FRED series (lookback=365d) (via search 'WTI crude oil price').
article_search OK 0.9s 32 Fetched 32 unique articles across 4 queries (lookback=30d). 'WTI crude oil price forecast 2026': 10 articles | 'oil supply disruption Iran Strait of Hormuz': 10 articles | 'OPEC+ production decision oil market': 10 articles | 'crude oil implied volatility OVX': 10 articles
claude_news OK 32.0s 18 Key findings from research (WTI front-month, 2026): - **Current price (mid-September 2026):** WTI settled near $101 on Sept 17, 2026, extending a 3.2% drop from the previous session, as Saudi Arabia shifts some crude exports through the Strait of Hormuz to offset the closure of a key pipeline . Tr
code_execution OK 64.6s 0 ## Key Findings **Setup:** Barrier B = $115.01; sandbox clock date = 2026‑09‑19 → T ≈ 0.282 yr (~3.4 months) to Dec 31 2026. All models use zero/martingale drift (μ = −σ²/2) and the reflection principle; jump‑diffusion MC adds a Poisson(λ=0.10/yr) jump of +30% to price. - **Near-the-money spot ($7
3. Evidence Brief Sonnet 5 · 7446 chars
# Current state WTI front-month settle has NOT been confirmed to reach $115.01 in 2026 to date; the highest **confirmed settle** references in research are ~$111.54 (Apr 1, Trump speech spike) and $102.48 (Sep 10, Iran/Hormuz escalation), with spot easing to ~$100-107 by mid-September. Kalshi prices YES at 41.4% — consistent with "not yet resolved, meaningfully possible" rather than "already happened" (which would price near 100%). # Timeline of key events - **2026-03 (reported):** EIA boosts 2026 WTI forecast to $73.61 from $53.42 after Iran conflict escalation begins. [Rigzone] - **2026-04-01 (reported):** WTI jumps 11% intraday/session move to settle $111.54 after Trump speech on Iran. [claude_news] - **2026-04 (reported):** Intraday WTI briefly crosses $112-120 amid war escalation; some trackers cite 52-week high up to $117.63 (unclear if settle or intraday). [claude_news, conflicting] - **2026-08-24 (confirmed):** Oil prices fall as U.S. rolls out Iran-focused sanctions; CBA forecasts Brent $70-100 H2 2026. [CNBC] - **2026-08-31 (confirmed):** WTI hits $86.79 intraday, highest since Aug 21. [CNBC] - **2026-09-08 (confirmed):** Goldman Sachs warns Brent could top $120 if Gulf output stays depressed; options imply 25% prob Brent >$100 by March 2027 (up from 6%). [CBS, CNN] - **2026-09-10 (confirmed):** WTI settles at $102.48 (+6.7%), highest settle since May 19, as Iran war escalates. [CNBC] - **2026-09-14 (confirmed):** Diesel hits $6/gal; Saudi Arabia shutters East-West pipeline after Iraqi attack, tightening Hormuz-adjacent supply. [CNBC] - **2026-09-15/17 (confirmed):** WTI spot ~$107 (FRED, 9/15), then pulls back toward ~$101 (9/17) as Saudi Arabia reroutes exports. [FRED, claude_news] - **2026-09-16 (reported):** Oil falls on news damaged Saudi pipeline to restart "in days," though independent analysts doubt timeline. [CNBC] # Event Will WTI front-month settle price reach $115.01+ at any point between issuance and Dec 31, 2026? # Outcomes to forecast Yes / No (bucket: settle ≥ $115.01 at any point in window) # Kalshi market anchor **YES = 41.40%** (KXWTIMAX-26DEC31-T115). 7-day: -2.90%; 30-day: +4.50%. Avg daily volume 10,231 contracts. 90-day range: 22.70%-57.30% — high volatility reflecting the Iran war news flow. # Resolution source ICE product page returned no usable price data (nav/menu text only); EIA historical page returned only 1983-85 data (tool malfunction/wrong range). Cannot confirm current settle price or whether condition is already met from resolution_source tool directly — must rely on FRED/news proxies instead. # Sub-question answers 1. **Current settle & rally needed** — FRED spot ~$107 (9/15/26) sliding to ~$101 (9/17/26); news confirms recent settle $102.48 (9/10). Needed rally to $115.01 ≈ 8-14%. [FRED, CNBC] 2. **Already exceeded $115?** — Unconfirmed. Confirmed settles peaked ~$111.54 (4/1) and ~$102.48 (9/10); one 52-week tracker cites high of $117.63 vs another $112.95 — sources conflict and likely reflect intraday, not settle. Kalshi's 41.4% price implies market does not believe it's already resolved YES. [claude_news, Kalshi] 3. **Implied vol / touch probability** — Monte Carlo/reflection-barrier models: at spot $90, σ30-45%, ~3.4 months to expiry, touch probability ≈11-31%; at lower spot ($60-75) <10%. Given actual spot is now $100-107 (closer to barrier than modeled base case), true probability likely sits near or above Kalshi's 41.4%. [code_execution] 4. **Historical base rate** — Not directly computed; qualitatively, 2022 and 2026 episodes show oil can rally >15% in weeks during geopolitical shocks, but sustained levels above $115 have historically been rare/brief. 5. **Geopolitical drivers** — Active Iran-Israel/US war, Strait of Hormuz disruption, Houthi Red Sea risk, Saudi pipeline damage, tanker rates >$1M/day — all ongoing and escalating as of mid-Sept 2026. Goldman sees Brent >$120 if Gulf output stays impaired; White House reportedly discussing war persisting into 2029. [CNBC, CNN, CBS] 6. **Supply-demand fundamentals** — EIA's own 2026 base-case average forecasts ($73.61 → $84.65) are far below $115, and spot is trading well above EIA's ~$90 H2-2026 base case, indicating large geopolitical risk premium already priced in, not fundamentals-driven. [Rigzone, XTB, claude_news] 7. **Other markets** — Polymarket's WTI intraday-HIGH markets (Sept 2026 window only) price $110 at 11.5%, $120 at 4.7%, $130 at 1.4% — but these expire Oct 2026 and use intraday not settle definition, so not directly comparable. A cited Robinhood "how high will oil get by Dec 31 2026" market shows higher strikes ($120-135) priced 51-70% — internally inconsistent/likely stale or mis-scraped; treat as unreliable. [Polymarket, claude_news] # Key facts (high-confidence, factual) 1. [Kalshi] YES = 41.40%, up 4.5% over 30 days despite -2.9% over 7 days. 2. [FRED] WTI spot $107.02 (9/15/26), down to ~$101 (9/17/26). 3. [CNBC] Confirmed settle $102.48 on 9/10/26, highest since May 19. 4. [CNBC/CNN] Active Iran war, Hormuz/Red Sea disruption, Saudi pipeline damage ongoing as of 9/16/26. 5. [EIA/Rigzone] 2026 average WTI forecasts revised up but remain $73-85, well below $115. # Cross-market signals - Kalshi related: no directly related WTI strike markets returned (tool found 0 matches despite series existing — data gap). - Polymarket: intraday-HIGH WTI markets for Sept 2026 imply low near-term touch probability for $110-150, but window is short and definition differs (intraday vs settle). - Sportsbook implied: N/A. # Analyst opinions and speculation - Goldman Sachs: Brent could exceed $120 if Gulf output stays impaired (implies WTI could approach/exceed $115 in tandem). [CNN/CBS] - CBA: Brent likely $70-100 H2 2026, could fall further if Hormuz flows normalize. [CNBC] - Eurasia Group: little chance of conflict resolution; sees $85-105 range. [CBS] - Technical desk: H2 2026 range $70.39-$117.89 estimated, with $115.72 cited as a plausible technical target. [claude_news] # Directional lean per outcome - **Yes**: Active war, Hormuz/Red Sea disruption, Saudi pipeline outage, prior 11% single-day spikes, Goldman's $120 Brent scenario, high realized vol (30-45%) all support meaningful upside tail risk within remaining ~3.5 months. - **No**: Confirmed settles have topped out near $111.54 and $102.48, not $115+; EIA/analyst base cases ($73-105) sit well below threshold; recent price action is pulling back (Sept 17 drop) as Saudi reroutes exports; Kalshi pricing (41.4%) reflects genuine uncertainty, not near-certainty. # Gaps / unknowns - No confirmed authoritative ICE/EIA settle-price series for 2026 to verify whether $115.01 has already been touched — key resolution ambiguity. - Conflicting 52-week high figures ($112.95 vs $117.63) unresolved. - Whether "front-month" is consistently the same contract across data sources. - No option-market (OVX) implied vol data was actually retrieved despite being requested. # Calibration anchors - Kalshi current YES price: **41.40%** (primary anchor). - Barrier-touch models (spot~$90-107, σ30-45%, T~3.4mo): ~11%-40% depending on spot/vol assumptions — broadly consistent with Kalshi price, perhaps slightly below given current spot proximity to barrier. - 2026 has already seen two settle spikes >$100 in <6 months (Apr, Sep), demonstrating regime of elevated tail risk supporting a probability meaningfully above historical base rates (~15-20% in calm regimes).
4. Forecasters 5 draws · Fable 5.1 + GPT-5.6 Sol
claude-fable-5-1
45% conf
Yes 44%
No 56%
Kalshi prices YES at 41.4%, and the brief confirms the condition is not verified as met (highest confirmed settles ~$111.54 in April and $102.48 on Sep 10), though one tracker's $117.63 52-week high leaves a small chance it already resolved. With spot ~$101-107 in mid-September, roughly 3.5 months remaining, and realized vol of 30-45% in an active Iran/Hormuz war regime, a driftless barrier-touch model gives roughly 45-55% for touching $115 (settle-only slightly lower), consistent with or a bit above the market. Offsetting factors are the recent pullback as Saudi reroutes exports, analyst base cases ($70-105) well below the strike, and oil's tendency to mean-revert from geopolitical spikes. I land marginally above the Kalshi anchor at 44%.
claude-fable-5-1
47% conf
Yes 44%
No 56%
Kalshi prices YES at 41.4%, and the brief provides no confirmation that a settle ≥$115.01 has occurred (confirmed peaks ~$111.54 on Apr 1 and $102.48 on Sep 10), though one 52-week tracker cites $117.63, leaving a small chance the condition is already met. With spot ~$101-107 and realized vol of 30-45% in an active Iran/Hormuz war regime, a zero-drift barrier-touch model over ~3.5 months yields roughly 40-60% touch probability, while mean reversion of the risk premium (Saudi rerouting, sanctions, EIA/CBA base cases well below $115) pulls the true figure lower. The two >$100 settle spikes already in 2026 and Goldman's $120 Brent scenario justify staying near or slightly above the Kalshi anchor rather than below it.
claude-fable-5-1
45% conf
Yes 41%
No 59%
Kalshi prices YES at 41.4%, and the brief's evidence broadly supports that level: WTI spot is ~$101-107 (FRED 9/15-9/17) with a confirmed $102.48 settle on 9/10, requiring only an 8-14% rally over ~3.5 months in a regime with realized vol of 30-45% and an active Iran/Hormuz war that already produced a $111.54 settle in April. A simple barrier-touch model at spot ~$101, σ 30-40%, T≈0.29y gives roughly 40-55% touch probability, though mean reversion from a large geopolitical premium (EIA/CBA/Eurasia base cases $70-105), Saudi rerouting, and the recent pullback argue for the lower end. Confirmed settles have so far topped out at $111.54, and the conflicting $117.63 52-week high is likely intraday, so I treat the event as unresolved. I stay essentially at the Kalshi anchor.
gpt-5.6-sol
68% conf
Yes 43%
No 57%
The 41.4% Kalshi YES price is the primary anchor, and no authoritative source confirms that the threshold has already been met. Recent confirmed settles around $102.48 and spot prices around $101-$107 leave an achievable but substantial 8%-14% rally, while the earlier $111.54 settle demonstrates proximity to the barrier. Active Iran/Hormuz disruption, Saudi infrastructure damage, and prior sharp daily moves modestly raise the upside-touch probability, but forecasts centered below $115 and recent supply rerouting favor No. I therefore move only slightly above the market consensus to 43%.
gpt-5.6-sol
66% conf
Yes 42%
No 58%
Kalshi’s 41.4% YES price is the primary anchor, and the evidence supports only a slight upward adjustment. Recent prices around $101–107 require an achievable 8–14% rally, while active Iran/Hormuz disruptions, Saudi infrastructure damage, and prior rapid spikes create meaningful upside risk. However, confirmed settles remain below the threshold, base-case forecasts are substantially lower, and supply rerouting or pipeline restoration could unwind the geopolitical premium. Conflicting reports of a $117.63 high likely concern intraday pricing, and the lack of authoritative settlement data adds resolution uncertainty rather than establishing that YES has occurred.
6. Final plain mean of 5 draws
43% (54% confidence)
Yes: 43% No: 57%
Mean of 5 draws (0.44, 0.44, 0.41, 0.43, 0.42). Kalshi prices YES at 41.4%, and the brief confirms the condition is not verified as met (highest confirmed settles ~$111.54 in April and $102.48 on Sep 10), though one tracker's $117.63 52-week high leaves a small chance it already resolved. With spot ~$101-107 in mid-September, roughly 3.5 months remaining, and realized vol of 30-45% in an active Iran/Hormuz war regime, a driftless barrier-touch model gives roughly 45-55% for touching $115 (settle-only slightly lower), consistent with or a bit above the market. Offsetting factors are the recent pullback as Saudi reroutes exports, analyst base cases ($70-105) well below the strike, and oil's tendency to mean-revert from geopolitical spikes. I land marginally above the Kalshi anchor at 44%.
Pipeline Timing
Total pipeline time: 168.4s
Per-tool research timings shown in the Research section above.