Show full JSON
{
"forecast": {
"combination_logic": "weighted_average",
"evidence_brief": "1. [sq1 | code_execution | MODERATE cred 40 | NEUTRAL | VERY_RECENT] Model estimates roughly 43% probability of the Dem margin hitting the 7.0-point threshold.\n2. [sq1 | question_description | STRONG cred 85 | NEUTRAL | DATED] Current Silver Bulletin generic ballot average sits at D+6.3, up slightly from D+6.1, below cycle high of D+7.\n3. [sq1 | question_description | MODERATE cred 75 | NEUTRAL | DATED] High-influence polls split: NBC/Cygnal/TIPP around D+5, YouGov/Morning Consult D+3, while Focaldata/Quinnipiac/Emerson show D+7 to D+11.\n4. [sq3 | article_search | MODERATE cred 70 | UP | RECENT] By July 2026, Democrats increasingly bullish citing a favorable national environment and Trump favorability at just 34%.\n5. [sq3 | article_search | MODERATE cred 68 | UP | RECENT] Widespread disapproval of Trump\u0027s handling of the economy and the Iran war reported in July 2026 coverage.\n6. [sq2 | fred_data | STRONG cred 92 | UP | RECENT] Consumer sentiment (UMCSENT) at 44.8, down 15.9 points year-over-year, indicating deteriorating economic mood.\n7. [sq2 | fred_data | STRONG cred 92 | UP | RECENT] CPI up sharply year-over-year (+11.1 index points), suggesting elevated inflation pressure.\n8. [sq2 | fred_data | STRONG cred 92 | DOWN | RECENT] Unemployment rate at 4.2%, up only 0.1 points year-over-year, remaining relatively stable and low.\n9. [sq4 | article_search | MODERATE cred 90 | NEUTRAL | DATED] Supreme Court allowed Alabama to use a GOP-favorable House map for the midterms in a 6-3 decision.\n10. [sq4 | article_search | WEAK cred 45 | NEUTRAL | RECENT] No major political shock producing a durable Democratic surge identified in research through July 2026.\n11. [sq2 | article_search | MODERATE cred 65 | UP | RECENT] Iowa coverage cites Trump record-low approval and rising gas prices as headwinds fueling voter discontent.\n12. [sq1 | question_description | MODERATE cred 80 | DOWN | DATED] Cycle high has been D+7, meaning the threshold has not yet been reached at any point in the cycle.\n\n## Cross-Market Signals\n\n### Polymarket\n- \"Will the Fed decrease interest rates by 25 bps after the September 2026 meeting?\" \u2192 Yes: 0.03, Volume: $1.2M\n\nInformation gaps:\n - No current (post-July 2026) Silver Bulletin average reading\n - No base rate for midterm generic-ballot volatility toward Sept\n - No specific polling data quantifying recent trend direction\n - Missing week-by-week trajectory since spring 2026\n\nKey uncertainties:\n - Whether high-D polls pull the average above 7.0\n - Economic deterioration effect on Dem margin timing\n - Impact of Iran war and Trump approval on ballot\n - Possibility of a galvanizing shock before September",
"forecast_prompt": "You are an elite superforecaster using Tetlock-style Fermi decomposition. Estimate each sub-question INDEPENDENTLY, then provide a holistic estimate. The pipeline will mathematically recombine the sub-question estimates \u2014 your job is to give the most accurate per-component probabilities.\n\n## Question\nWill Democrats\u0027 lead in the generic congressional ballot fail to reach 7.0 points before September 1, 2026?\n\n## Description / Resolution Criteria\n## Description\nAccording to the resolution source, \"Democrats\u2019 margin on the generic congressional ballot is currently sitting at D +6.3. That\u2019s up ever so slightly from D +6.1 over the past couple weeks, but still lower than the cycle high of D +7.\n\nMost of the highest-influence polls in our average fall into two buckets. Some polls, such as those from NBC News, Cygnal, and TIPP have the national environment around D +5. YouGov and Morning Consult are even more modest at D +3. On the other hand, polls from Focaldata, J.L. Partners, Quinnipiac, and Emerson show things anywhere from D +7 to D +11. \"\n\n`{\"format\": \"bot_tournament_question\", \"info\": {\"hash_id\": \"baf1495893af2b61\", \"sheet_id\": \"121\"}}`\n\n## Resolution Criteria\nThis question resolves as **No** if, before September 1, 2026, the *Are Democrats or Republicans winning the race for Congress?* tracker at the [Silver Bulletin](https://www.natesilver.net/p/generic-ballot-average-2026-nate-silver-bulletin-congress-polls) shows the Dem. advantage in net support as greater than or equal to 7.0%.\n\n## Sub-question decomposition\n- (w=0.35) Will the Democrats\u0027 generic ballot margin in the Silver Bulletin average stay below 7.0 points through the end of 2025? \u2014 The current margin (D+6.3) is near but below the threshold; near-term stability matters because it establishes the basel\n- (w=0.30) Will macroeconomic conditions (inflation, unemployment) fail to deteriorate enough to sharply boost Democratic generic ballot support before September 2026? \u2014 Economic conditions strongly influence the generic ballot; a worsening economy under a Republican administration would t\n- (w=0.20) Will the trend in the generic ballot average remain flat or declining (rather than steadily rising toward 7+) over the coming months? \u2014 The margin has moved slowly (D+6.1 to D+6.3); momentum/trajectory determines whether it crosses 7.0 during the long wind\n- (w=0.15) Will there be no major political shock (major scandal, crisis, or galvanizing event) that produces a durable Democratic surge before September 2026? \u2014 Midterm environments can shift abruptly with events; the absence of a large pro-Democratic shock keeps the margin from b\n\nCombination rule: **weighted_average**\n\n## Synthesized evidence\n1. [sq1 | code_execution | MODERATE cred 40 | NEUTRAL | VERY_RECENT] Model estimates roughly 43% probability of the Dem margin hitting the 7.0-point threshold.\n2. [sq1 | question_description | STRONG cred 85 | NEUTRAL | DATED] Current Silver Bulletin generic ballot average sits at D+6.3, up slightly from D+6.1, below cycle high of D+7.\n3. [sq1 | question_description | MODERATE cred 75 | NEUTRAL | DATED] High-influence polls split: NBC/Cygnal/TIPP around D+5, YouGov/Morning Consult D+3, while Focaldata/Quinnipiac/Emerson show D+7 to D+11.\n4. [sq3 | article_search | MODERATE cred 70 | UP | RECENT] By July 2026, Democrats increasingly bullish citing a favorable national environment and Trump favorability at just 34%.\n5. [sq3 | article_search | MODERATE cred 68 | UP | RECENT] Widespread disapproval of Trump\u0027s handling of the economy and the Iran war reported in July 2026 coverage.\n6. [sq2 | fred_data | STRONG cred 92 | UP | RECENT] Consumer sentiment (UMCSENT) at 44.8, down 15.9 points year-over-year, indicating deteriorating economic mood.\n7. [sq2 | fred_data | STRONG cred 92 | UP | RECENT] CPI up sharply year-over-year (+11.1 index points), suggesting elevated inflation pressure.\n8. [sq2 | fred_data | STRONG cred 92 | DOWN | RECENT] Unemployment rate at 4.2%, up only 0.1 points year-over-year, remaining relatively stable and low.\n9. [sq4 | article_search | MODERATE cred 90 | NEUTRAL | DATED] Supreme Court allowed Alabama to use a GOP-favorable House map for the midterms in a 6-3 decision.\n10. [sq4 | article_search | WEAK cred 45 | NEUTRAL | RECENT] No major political shock producing a durable Democratic surge identified in research through July 2026.\n11. [sq2 | article_search | MODERATE cred 65 | UP | RECENT] Iowa coverage cites Trump record-low approval and rising gas prices as headwinds fueling voter discontent.\n12. [sq1 | question_description | MODERATE cred 80 | DOWN | DATED] Cycle high has been D+7, meaning the threshold has not yet been reached at any point in the cycle.\n\n## Cross-Market Signals\n\n### Polymarket\n- \"Will the Fed decrease interest rates by 25 bps after the September 2026 meeting?\" \u2192 Yes: 0.03, Volume: $1.2M\n\nInformation gaps:\n - No current (post-July 2026) Silver Bulletin average reading\n - No base rate for midterm generic-ballot volatility toward Sept\n - No specific polling data quantifying recent trend direction\n - Missing week-by-week trajectory since spring 2026\n\nKey uncertainties:\n - Whether high-D polls pull the average above 7.0\n - Economic deterioration effect on Dem margin timing\n - Impact of Iran war and Trump approval on ballot\n - Possibility of a galvanizing shock before September\n\n## Required pre-forecast walkthrough\n\nBefore giving probabilities, walk through these explicitly:\n (a) The time left until the question resolves.\n (b) The status quo outcome \u2014 what happens if nothing changes from today.\n (c) A brief scenario that results in NO.\n (d) A brief scenario that results in YES.\n\n## Calibration guidance\n\n- **Estimate each sub-question in isolation.** Do not let your answer to one sub-question anchor your answer to another. This is the core of Fermi decomposition \u2014 independence forces more careful reasoning per factor.\n- **Anchor on the status quo.** Require strong specific evidence to move far from it.\n- 0.05 / 0.95 require strong, multi-source evidence. Avoid \u003e0.97 or \u003c0.03 unless the outcome is already settled or near-tautological \u2014 overconfident misses are punished heavily by the log score.\n- **Anchor on prediction markets.** If liquid market prices (Polymarket / Kalshi) or a community forecast appear in the evidence, treat them as a strong, well-calibrated prior. Your final estimate should rarely sit more than ~15 percentage points from a liquid market on the SAME question \u2014 move further only with specific evidence the market lacks.\n- **Treat research as fallible, not ground truth.** A single-source or \"very recent\" claim \u2014 especially one the evidence flags as unverified, possibly AI-generated, or low-credibility \u2014 must not drive you to near-certainty. When a load-bearing fact is unverified, keep at least 10-15% on the chance it is wrong.\n- **Also provide a holistic estimate** \u2014 your overall gut feeling about the main question, BEFORE you see the mathematical combination. This serves as a sanity check: if the Fermi result and holistic estimate diverge wildly, something is wrong.\n\n## Output\n\nReturn ONLY valid JSON, no markdown fences:\n\n{\n \"rationale\": \"\u003caddress (a) (b) (c) (d) above \u2014 5-8 sentences total\u003e\",\n \"sub_question_estimates\": {\n \"sq1\": \u003cfloat in [0.01, 0.99]\u003e,\n \"sq2\": \u003cfloat in [0.01, 0.99]\u003e,\n \"sq3\": \u003cfloat in [0.01, 0.99]\u003e,\n \"sq4\": \u003cfloat in [0.01, 0.99]\u003e\n },\n \"holistic_p_yes\": \u003cfloat in [0.01, 0.99] \u2014 your overall estimate ignoring the decomposition\u003e,\n \"what_would_change_my_mind\": \"\u003c1-2 sentences: what new info would push you above 70% or below 30%\u003e\"\n}\n",
"holistic_p_yes": 0.36,
"models": [
"opus"
],
"p_yes": 0.4335,
"rationale": "(a) The question runs from the late-2025 baseline (D+6.3) through Sept 1, 2026 \u2014 roughly 9 months, a long window for a 0.7-point move. (b) Status quo: the margin has been sticky in the low-6s, only 0.7 below the 7.0 threshold and just below the cycle high of D+7, so even minor Democratic tailwinds could push it over at some point. (c) NO scenario: deteriorating consumer sentiment, elevated inflation, Trump approval near 34%, and July-2026 Democratic bullishness lift the average past 7.0 at least once, which is all that\u0027s required. (d) YES scenario: high-D pollsters (Focaldata/Quinnipiac/Emerson) stay outliers while NBC/Cygnal/YouGov/Morning Consult (D+3 to D+5) hold the average down, keeping it below 7.0 through the summer. Given the strongly favorable Democratic environment and deteriorating economy in the evidence, crossing 7.0 at some point over 9 months looks somewhat more likely than not, so the \u0027fails to reach\u0027 (YES) outcome sits below 50%.",
"sub_question_estimates": {
"sq1": 0.58,
"sq2": 0.35,
"sq3": 0.4,
"sq4": 0.63
},
"what_would_change_my_mind": "A post-July 2026 Silver Bulletin reading showing the margin still stuck below 7.0 (pushing above 70%), or a confirmed reading already at/above 7.0 or clear evidence of a sustained upward trend crossing the threshold (pushing below 30%)."
},
"plan": {
"combination_logic": "weighted_average",
"domain": "politics",
"n_sub_qs": 4,
"n_tools": 4,
"reasoning_approach": "",
"sub_questions": [
{
"id": "sq1",
"question": "Will the Democrats\u0027 generic ballot margin in the Silver Bulletin average stay below 7.0 points through the end of 2025?",
"rationale": "The current margin (D+6.3) is near but below the threshold; near-term stability matters because it establishes the baseline heading into 2026 and the cycle high has been D+7.",
"weight": 0.35
},
{
"id": "sq2",
"question": "Will macroeconomic conditions (inflation, unemployment) fail to deteriorate enough to sharply boost Democratic generic ballot support before September 2026?",
"rationale": "Economic conditions strongly influence the generic ballot; a worsening economy under a Republican administration would tend to widen the Democratic advantage past 7 points.",
"weight": 0.3
},
{
"id": "sq3",
"question": "Will the trend in the generic ballot average remain flat or declining (rather than steadily rising toward 7+) over the coming months?",
"rationale": "The margin has moved slowly (D+6.1 to D+6.3); momentum/trajectory determines whether it crosses 7.0 during the long window to September 2026.",
"weight": 0.2
},
{
"id": "sq4",
"question": "Will there be no major political shock (major scandal, crisis, or galvanizing event) that produces a durable Democratic surge before September 2026?",
"rationale": "Midterm environments can shift abruptly with events; the absence of a large pro-Democratic shock keeps the margin from breaching 7.0.",
"weight": 0.15
}
],
"tool_requests": [
{
"parameters": {
"brief": "Find the latest Silver Bulletin generic congressional ballot average value and recent trend (D+ margin) for the 2026 cycle, including recent weeks\u0027 movement and the cycle high.",
"max_searches": 3,
"question_title": "Will Democrats\u0027 lead in the generic congressional ballot fail to reach 7.0 points before September 1, 2026?"
},
"target_sub_questions": [
"sq1",
"sq3"
],
"tool_name": "claude_news"
},
{
"parameters": {
"lookback_days": 60,
"queries": [
"generic congressional ballot 2026 Democrats lead polling average",
"2026 midterm generic ballot trend Democrats Republicans",
"Silver Bulletin generic ballot average Democrats advantage"
]
},
"target_sub_questions": [
"sq1",
"sq3",
"sq4"
],
"tool_name": "article_search"
},
{
"parameters": {
"lookback_months": 18,
"series_ids": [
"UNRATE",
"CPIAUCSL",
"UMCSENT"
]
},
"target_sub_questions": [
"sq2"
],
"tool_name": "fred_data"
},
{
"parameters": {
"code": "import numpy as np\n# Current margin 6.3, threshold 7.0. Simulate random-walk of generic ballot to Sep 2026.\n# ~10 months of weekly observations from close (~40 weeks); estimate prob of ever hitting \u003e=7.0.\nnp.random.seed(0)\ncurrent=6.3\nthreshold=7.0\nweeks=44\n# weekly volatility of a polling average is small; historical std of moves ~0.1-0.2/week\nsigma=0.15\ndrift=0.0\ntrials=100000\never_hit=0\nfor _ in range(trials):\n x=current\n hit=False\n for w in range(weeks):\n x+=np.random.normal(drift,sigma)\n if x\u003e=threshold:\n hit=True\n break\n if hit:\n ever_hit+=1\nprint(f\u0027Prob of hitting threshold: {ever_hit/trials:.4f}\u0027)"
},
"target_sub_questions": [
"sq1",
"sq2",
"sq3",
"sq4"
],
"tool_name": "code_execution"
}
]
},
"question": {
"close_time": "2026-07-24T06:00:00Z",
"description": "## Description\nAccording to the resolution source, \"Democrats\u2019 margin on the generic congressional ballot is currently sitting at D +6.3. That\u2019s up ever so slightly from D +6.1 over the past couple weeks, but still lower than the cycle high of D +7.\n\nMost of the highest-influence polls in our average fall into two buckets. Some polls, such as those from NBC News, Cygnal, and TIPP have the national environment around D +5. YouGov and Morning Consult are even more modest at D +3. On the other hand, polls from Focaldata, J.L. Partners, Quinnipiac, and Emerson show things anywhere from D +7 to D +11. \"\n\n`{\"format\": \"bot_tournament_question\", \"info\": {\"hash_id\": \"baf1495893af2b61\", \"sheet_id\": \"121\"}}`\n\n## Resolution Criteria\nThis question resolves as **No** if, before September 1, 2026, the *Are Democrats or Republicans winning the race for Congress?* tracker at the [Silver Bulletin](https://www.natesilver.net/p/generic-ballot-average-2026-nate-silver-bulletin-congress-polls) shows the Dem. advantage in net support as greater than or equal to 7.0%.",
"question_type": "binary",
"title": "Will Democrats\u0027 lead in the generic congressional ballot fail to reach 7.0 points before September 1, 2026?"
},
"research": {
"cross_market_brief": "## Cross-Market Signals\n\n### Polymarket\n- \"Will the Fed decrease interest rates by 25 bps after the September 2026 meeting?\" \u2192 Yes: 0.03, Volume: $1.2M",
"errors": [],
"has_cross_market": true,
"n_errors": 0,
"n_tools": 4,
"tools": [
{
"elapsed_s": 26.46,
"error": null,
"success": true,
"summary": "10 citations",
"tool_name": "claude_news"
},
{
"elapsed_s": 1.3,
"error": null,
"success": true,
"summary": "20 articles",
"tool_name": "article_search"
},
{
"elapsed_s": 3.86,
"error": null,
"success": true,
"summary": "3 series",
"tool_name": "fred_data"
},
{
"elapsed_s": 7.11,
"error": null,
"success": true,
"summary": "code",
"tool_name": "code_execution"
}
]
},
"synthesis": {
"evidence": [
{
"claim": "Model estimates roughly 43% probability of the Dem margin hitting the 7.0-point threshold.",
"credibility": 40,
"direction": "NEUTRAL",
"priced_in": false,
"recency": "VERY_RECENT",
"source": "code_execution",
"strength": "MODERATE",
"sub_question_id": "sq1"
},
{
"claim": "Current Silver Bulletin generic ballot average sits at D+6.3, up slightly from D+6.1, below cycle high of D+7.",
"credibility": 85,
"direction": "NEUTRAL",
"priced_in": true,
"recency": "DATED",
"source": "question_description",
"strength": "STRONG",
"sub_question_id": "sq1"
},
{
"claim": "High-influence polls split: NBC/Cygnal/TIPP around D+5, YouGov/Morning Consult D+3, while Focaldata/Quinnipiac/Emerson show D+7 to D+11.",
"credibility": 75,
"direction": "NEUTRAL",
"priced_in": true,
"recency": "DATED",
"source": "question_description",
"strength": "MODERATE",
"sub_question_id": "sq1"
},
{
"claim": "By July 2026, Democrats increasingly bullish citing a favorable national environment and Trump favorability at just 34%.",
"credibility": 70,
"direction": "UP",
"priced_in": false,
"recency": "RECENT",
"source": "article_search",
"strength": "MODERATE",
"sub_question_id": "sq3"
},
{
"claim": "Widespread disapproval of Trump\u0027s handling of the economy and the Iran war reported in July 2026 coverage.",
"credibility": 68,
"direction": "UP",
"priced_in": false,
"recency": "RECENT",
"source": "article_search",
"strength": "MODERATE",
"sub_question_id": "sq3"
},
{
"claim": "Consumer sentiment (UMCSENT) at 44.8, down 15.9 points year-over-year, indicating deteriorating economic mood.",
"credibility": 92,
"direction": "UP",
"priced_in": false,
"recency": "RECENT",
"source": "fred_data",
"strength": "STRONG",
"sub_question_id": "sq2"
},
{
"claim": "CPI up sharply year-over-year (+11.1 index points), suggesting elevated inflation pressure.",
"credibility": 92,
"direction": "UP",
"priced_in": false,
"recency": "RECENT",
"source": "fred_data",
"strength": "STRONG",
"sub_question_id": "sq2"
},
{
"claim": "Unemployment rate at 4.2%, up only 0.1 points year-over-year, remaining relatively stable and low.",
"credibility": 92,
"direction": "DOWN",
"priced_in": false,
"recency": "RECENT",
"source": "fred_data",
"strength": "STRONG",
"sub_question_id": "sq2"
},
{
"claim": "Supreme Court allowed Alabama to use a GOP-favorable House map for the midterms in a 6-3 decision.",
"credibility": 90,
"direction": "NEUTRAL",
"priced_in": true,
"recency": "DATED",
"source": "article_search",
"strength": "MODERATE",
"sub_question_id": "sq4"
},
{
"claim": "No major political shock producing a durable Democratic surge identified in research through July 2026.",
"credibility": 45,
"direction": "NEUTRAL",
"priced_in": false,
"recency": "RECENT",
"source": "article_search",
"strength": "WEAK",
"sub_question_id": "sq4"
},
{
"claim": "Iowa coverage cites Trump record-low approval and rising gas prices as headwinds fueling voter discontent.",
"credibility": 65,
"direction": "UP",
"priced_in": false,
"recency": "RECENT",
"source": "article_search",
"strength": "MODERATE",
"sub_question_id": "sq2"
},
{
"claim": "Cycle high has been D+7, meaning the threshold has not yet been reached at any point in the cycle.",
"credibility": 80,
"direction": "DOWN",
"priced_in": true,
"recency": "DATED",
"source": "question_description",
"strength": "MODERATE",
"sub_question_id": "sq1"
}
],
"information_gaps": [
"No current (post-July 2026) Silver Bulletin average reading",
"No base rate for midterm generic-ballot volatility toward Sept",
"No specific polling data quantifying recent trend direction",
"Missing week-by-week trajectory since spring 2026"
],
"key_uncertainties": [
"Whether high-D polls pull the average above 7.0",
"Economic deterioration effect on Dem margin timing",
"Impact of Iran war and Trump approval on ballot",
"Possibility of a galvanizing shock before September"
],
"n_evidence": 12
},
"timings": {
"forecast": 40.44,
"plan": 30.33,
"research": 26.46,
"synthesis": 20.8
}
}