← Back to scans

Who will be Trump's next Attorney General? — Todd Blanche

KXNEXTAG-29-TBLA · Politics · 2026-04-05
22%
Multi-Step
17%
Market Price
+5.0%
Edge
52%
Confidence
Final Rationale
The Devil's Advocate's Challenge 1 and 2 are decisive: I ACCEPT them. The market at 19% with high volume (161K daily contracts) is extremely strong evidence that acting AG status does NOT satisfy the resolution criteria — if it did, the market would be near 90% since Blanche is already serving. My independent forecast's 60% weight on 'acting counts' was an unsupported guess contradicted by market behavior. I PARTIALLY ACCEPT Challenge 3: the market dropping when Blanche became acting AG is a meaningful negative signal, though it could also reflect general uncertainty rather than a specific belief that acting status hurts permanent nomination chances. I ACCEPT Challenge 5: Trump's first-term pattern of cycling through acting officials (multiple acting DHS secretaries, acting DNIs never permanently nominated) suggests the base rate for Trump specifically is lower than the general 40-50%. With confirmation required, the key question becomes whether Trump will nominate Blanche permanently AND get Senate confirmation. Blanche has deep personal trust with Trump (positive), but there's no public indication Trump intends to nominate him permanently, Ed Martin and MAGA faction dynamics create alternative candidates, and 1021 days provides enormous time for turnover. I place my estimate at 22%, slightly above the market's 19%, reflecting a small residual belief that Blanche's personal relationship with Trump and his current acting role give him a modest edge that the market may slightly undervalue.
What Would Change My Mind
Trump publicly announcing he intends to nominate Blanche as permanent AG would push this to 50%+. Conversely, reports that Trump is interviewing other AG candidates or that Blanche is being moved to a different role would push this below 10%. Senate Republicans signaling strong opposition to Blanche's confirmation would also push downward significantly.
1. Planning Agent Sonnet
binary general article_search kalshi_data
Sub-questions
IDQuestionWeight
sq1 Who will be Trump's next Attorney General? — Todd Blanche 100%
Reasoning Approach
Fallback: general forecasting approach
2. Research Execution No LLM
ToolStatusTime
article_search OK 0.24s
kalshi_data OK 0.16s
3. Evidence Synthesis Sonnet · 8 items
#StrengthDirectionSourceClaimPriced In
1 STRONG ↑ UP article_search Trump fired Pam Bondi as Attorney General on April 2-3, 2026, and installed Todd Blanche as acting attorney general, not as a permanently confirmed AG. Yes
2 STRONG — NEUTRAL article_search Todd Blanche is serving as *acting* attorney general, not a Senate-confirmed AG — the question asks for the 'first new person to be Attorney General,' which may or may not include acting designations. Yes
3 MODERATE ↑ UP article_search Blanche was Trump's former personal defense attorney and has a deep personal history with Trump, suggesting strong presidential trust and potential for a permanent nomination. Yes
4 MODERATE ↓ DOWN article_search Blanche faces the same pressures that undid Bondi — Trump's desire to prosecute political enemies — suggesting his tenure as acting AG (or potential permanent AG) could be short-lived or face challenges. No
5 MODERATE ↓ DOWN article_search Blanche was involved in a rift with MAGA firebrand Ed Martin, reflecting internal DOJ tensions that could undermine his standing with Trump's base and with Trump himself. Yes
6 MODERATE ↑ UP article_search Blanche managed day-to-day DOJ operations as Deputy AG and stepped up publicly during Bondi's controversies, indicating institutional competence and visibility with Trump. Yes
7 MODERATE — NEUTRAL kalshi_data Kalshi market for Todd Blanche as Trump's next AG is priced at 19%, down 6% over both the last 7 and 30 days, suggesting the market sees significant probability but not a leading likelihood. Yes
8 MODERATE ↓ DOWN kalshi_data The 7-day and 30-day price change are both exactly -6%, suggesting the price drop occurred recently (likely around the time Blanche was named acting AG rather than permanent AG), and the market has stabilized at 19%. Yes
Information Gaps
  • No data on whether Trump intends to nominate Blanche permanently as AG or is already considering other candidates
  • No information on potential competing nominees for a permanent AG role (e.g., Ed Martin, other MAGA-aligned lawyers)
  • No clarity on whether the Kalshi market resolves YES for an acting AG designation or only for a Senate-confirmed appointment
  • No reporting on Senate confirmation prospects for Blanche if nominated
  • No information on how long Trump typically keeps acting officials before nominating someone permanent
  • No data on what the other candidates in the Kalshi AG market are priced at to understand the full probability distribution
Key Uncertainties
  • Whether the market resolves YES for acting AG status or requires Senate confirmation as a formal AG — this is the most critical ambiguity
  • Whether Trump will nominate Blanche permanently or use him as a placeholder while seeking a more aggressive MAGA-aligned AG
  • Blanche's ability to satisfy Trump's demands for prosecution of political enemies, given the pattern that undid Bondi
  • Whether internal MAGA faction opposition (e.g., Ed Martin supporters) could lead Trump to bypass Blanche for a permanent appointment
  • Timing — Blanche is acting AG now, but a permanent nominee could be announced quickly, changing the calculus
Market Context
Price: 0.19 · 7d: -0.06 · 30d: -0.06
Volume: HIGH — 161,894 average daily contracts indicates strong market interest · Depth: UNKNOWN — not provided in data
Reliability: MEDIUM-HIGH — high volume increases reliability, but only 3 days of data points limits trend analysis; the simultaneous 7d and 30d drop suggests a single discrete event caused the price change
4. Independent Forecaster Opus · No market price Did NOT see market price
Independent estimate: 55% (35% confidence)
sq1: Who will be Trump's next Attorney General? — Todd Blanche
55%
Base rate: When a president fires a cabinet member, the acting replacement becomes the permanent nominee roughly 40-50% of the time historically. However, this varies significantly by context. Key evidence updates: (1) Blanche is already serving as acting AG as of April 2-3, 2026 — this is a STRONG upward signal (+15-20%) because the incumbent acting official has a significant advantage in being named permanent. (2) Blanche has deep personal trust with Trump as his former defense attorney — this pushes UP by ~5-10% since Trump values personal loyalty highly in appointments. (3) However, the critical ambiguity is whether the market resolves for 'acting' AG or requires Senate confirmation. The question says 'first new person to be Attorney General' which could plausibly include acting status. If acting counts, probability is much higher (~75-80%). If Senate confirmation is required, probability drops significantly (~35-40%) because: Senate confirmation is uncertain, Trump might choose someone else for the permanent role, and Blanche could face opposition from MAGA hardliners who want someone more aggressive. (4) The pattern that undid Bondi — Trump wanting aggressive prosecution of political enemies — could also undermine Blanche, pushing DOWN by ~5%. (5) Ed Martin rift suggests internal faction tensions, pushing DOWN ~3%. Weighing the ambiguity about resolution criteria: I estimate ~60% chance acting AG counts for resolution, and ~40% chance it requires formal nomination/confirmation. If acting counts: P(yes) ≈ 0.78 (he's already acting AG, would only fail if replaced quickly before someone else is named). If confirmation required: P(yes) ≈ 0.35 (he might be nominated but faces confirmation uncertainty and Trump might pick someone else). Blended: 0.6 * 0.78 + 0.4 * 0.35 = 0.468 + 0.14 = 0.608. But I should also account for the possibility that even as acting AG, he gets replaced quickly by another acting AG before any permanent appointment, which pushes down slightly. Also, the question asks about the 'first new person to be Attorney General' after the market was created — if Blanche is already acting AG as of April 2-3, and today is April 5, he IS the first new person. This further increases the probability if acting counts. Final estimate: ~0.55, reflecting significant uncertainty about resolution criteria.
Show full reasoning trace
base rate: When a president fires a cabinet official, the acting replacement becomes permanent nominee ~40-50% of the time. Trump specifically has shown a pattern of both elevating acting officials and also cycling through them quickly.
evidence updates: Blanche is already acting AG (strong UP). Deep personal trust with Trump (moderate UP). Same pressures that undid Bondi could affect Blanche (moderate DOWN). MAGA faction tensions with Ed Martin (weak DOWN). The biggest uncertainty is the resolution criteria — acting vs. confirmed.
combination method: Single sub-question, weighted 100%. The estimate reflects a blend of scenarios: ~60% probability that acting AG status counts for resolution (in which case P(yes) ≈ 0.78) and ~40% probability that Senate confirmation is required (in which case P(yes) ≈ 0.35).
final: 0.55 probability that Todd Blanche will be the 'next Attorney General' per market resolution. The largest source of uncertainty is whether acting AG status satisfies the market criteria. If it does, Blanche almost certainly resolves YES since he's already serving. If it doesn't, there's substantial uncertainty about whether Trump will nominate him permanently and whether the Senate would confirm him.
5. Devil's Advocate Sonnet Market price revealed
Reasoning Flaw Missing Info Asymmetric Evidence
Challenges
  1. The forecaster's 60% probability that 'acting AG counts for resolution' is essentially a guess with no basis in the actual market rules. Prediction markets like Kalshi typically have precise resolution criteria, and the forecaster admits they don't know what these are. The market price of 19% is strong evidence that acting AG status does NOT satisfy the resolution criteria — if it did, the market would be pricing near 90%+ since Blanche is already acting AG. This is a reasoning flaw: the forecaster is assigning high probability to a resolution interpretation that is contradicted by market behavior.
  2. The forecaster's blended calculation gives 60% weight to a scenario (acting counts) where they assign P(yes)=0.78, but if acting status truly counted, the market would already be at ~80%+ given Blanche is already serving. The market at 19% with HIGH volume (161K daily contracts) is extremely strong evidence that acting status does NOT count for resolution. The forecaster should have used market price as a signal about resolution criteria rather than ignoring this information.
  3. If we accept the more likely interpretation that Senate confirmation is required (which the market price strongly implies), the forecaster's own estimate is only 0.35. The 7-day and 30-day price decline of -6% coincides with Bondi's firing and Blanche's installation as acting AG — the market moved DOWN when Blanche became acting AG, suggesting the market participants believe Blanche becoming acting AG actually REDUCES his chances of being the permanent confirmed AG.
  4. The forecaster identifies 'no data on whether Trump intends to nominate Blanche permanently' as an information gap but doesn't adequately weight this uncertainty downward. With 1021 days until resolution, there's enormous time for Trump to cycle through multiple AG candidates, and Trump's track record includes rapid turnover of acting officials.
  5. The base rate of 40-50% for acting officials becoming permanent nominees may be inflated for this context. Trump specifically has a pattern of using acting officials as placeholders (e.g., multiple acting DHS secretaries, acting DNIs) without nominating them permanently. Trump's first term saw unusually high cabinet turnover and frequent use of acting officials who were never nominated.
  6. The forecaster notes the market dropped when Blanche became acting AG but doesn't fully internalize the implication: market participants with skin in the game believe Blanche as acting AG is a negative signal for his permanent appointment, possibly because it signals Trump wants him in a temporary role while searching for someone more aligned with aggressive prosecution goals.
Suggested adjustment: -25pp
The core reasoning flaw is the 60% weight assigned to 'acting AG counts for resolution,' which is almost certainly wrong given the market's behavior. If the market required only acting status, it would be near 90% since Blanche already holds the position. Accepting the more likely interpretation (Senate confirmation required), the forecaster's own estimate is 0.35, and this should be further reduced because: (1) the market dropped when Blanche became acting AG, suggesting negative signal for permanent appointment, (2) 1021 days is enormous time for Trump to cycle candidates, and (3) Trump's specific pattern of using acting officials as placeholders without permanent nomination. A more defensible estimate would be in the 0.25-0.30 range.
Market comparison: Forecaster: 55%, Market: 19%. The 36% divergence is largely driven by the forecaster's unsupported assumption that acting AG status counts for resolution. Once this assumption is corrected (the market's high-volume pricing at 19% strongly suggests confirmation is required), the forecaster's own sub-estimate of 35% is much closer to the market. The remaining gap can be explained by the forecaster underweighting Trump's pattern of using acting officials as placeholders and the negative signal from the market's price drop coinciding with Blanche's appointment.
6. Final Forecast Opus
22% (52% confidence)
The Devil's Advocate's Challenge 1 and 2 are decisive: I ACCEPT them. The market at 19% with high volume (161K daily contracts) is extremely strong evidence that acting AG status does NOT satisfy the resolution criteria — if it did, the market would be near 90% since Blanche is already serving. My independent forecast's 60% weight on 'acting counts' was an unsupported guess contradicted by market behavior. I PARTIALLY ACCEPT Challenge 3: the market dropping when Blanche became acting AG is a meaningful negative signal, though it could also reflect general uncertainty rather than a specific belief that acting status hurts permanent nomination chances. I ACCEPT Challenge 5: Trump's first-term pattern of cycling through acting officials (multiple acting DHS secretaries, acting DNIs never permanently nominated) suggests the base rate for Trump specifically is lower than the general 40-50%. With confirmation required, the key question becomes whether Trump will nominate Blanche permanently AND get Senate confirmation. Blanche has deep personal trust with Trump (positive), but there's no public indication Trump intends to nominate him permanently, Ed Martin and MAGA faction dynamics create alternative candidates, and 1021 days provides enormous time for turnover. I place my estimate at 22%, slightly above the market's 19%, reflecting a small residual belief that Blanche's personal relationship with Trump and his current acting role give him a modest edge that the market may slightly undervalue.
Pipeline Timing
StepTime
Planning 28.9s
Research 0.24s
Synthesis 24.72s
Forecaster 23.03s
Critic 21.88s
Final 11.58s