← Back to scans

Will quarterly GDP be above 5% in any quarter in Q1 2025 to Q4 2028?

KXGDPUSMAX-28-5 · Economics · 2026-04-05
50%
Multi-Step
59%
Market Price
-9.0%
Edge
40%
Confidence
Final Rationale
My independent estimate of 35% had several genuine gaps identified by the critique. I ACCEPT Challenge 1: Q1 2025's -0.3% contraction (which I should have incorporated) sets up a classic post-contraction rebound scenario that elevates the probability of a 5%+ quarter in subsequent periods. I ACCEPT Challenge 3: tariff-driven import front-loading creates enormous quarter-to-quarter GDP volatility — the kind that produces one-off spike quarters. I PARTIALLY ACCEPT Challenge 4: recession risk is genuinely asymmetric here since we need only ONE quarter above 5%, and post-recession rebounds are historically the most reliable producers of 5%+ prints (Q3 2020 being the extreme example). I PARTIALLY ACCEPT Challenge 2, raising my per-quarter probability from 2-3% to roughly 3-5% given current volatility. However, I don't go all the way to the market's 59% because: (a) even with elevated volatility, 5%+ annualized growth remains genuinely rare in non-pandemic conditions — only ~3-4 quarters in 2000-2019; (b) the Q1 2025 contraction was mild (-0.3%), limiting rebound magnitude compared to the 2020 collapse; (c) tariff uncertainty may produce sustained drag rather than a sharp V-shaped recovery. The market at 59% may be overweighting dramatic rebound scenarios or reflecting information about fiscal stimulus plans I lack. I move substantially from 35% toward the market but maintain a discount given the historical rarity of 5%+ quarters outside extreme pandemic rebounds.
What Would Change My Mind
A Q2 2025 GDP print above 4% (showing strong rebound momentum) would push me above 60%. A significant fiscal stimulus package (tax cuts, infrastructure spending) enacted in 2025-2026 would push me to 55-60%. Conversely, if Q2-Q3 2025 GDP comes in at 1-2% with no sharp rebound from Q1's contraction, I'd drop below 40%. A deep recession (multiple quarters of negative growth) followed by remaining in the forecast window would actually push me higher due to rebound dynamics.
1. Planning Agent Sonnet
binary general article_search kalshi_data
Sub-questions
IDQuestionWeight
sq1 Will quarterly GDP be above 5% in any quarter in Q1 2025 to Q4 2028? 100%
Reasoning Approach
Fallback: general forecasting approach
2. Research Execution No LLM
ToolStatusTime
article_search OK 0.17s
kalshi_data OK 0.18s
3. Evidence Synthesis Sonnet · 7 items
#StrengthDirectionSourceClaimPriced In
1 STRONG ↓ DOWN article_search Q4 2025 GDP grew at only 1.4% annual rate, down sharply from 4.4% in Q3 2025, well below economist forecasts of ~2%, due to a government shutdown and consumer spending slowdown. Yes
2 STRONG — NEUTRAL article_search Q3 2025 GDP grew at a 'blistering 4.4% pace,' very close to but not exceeding the 5% threshold, suggesting the economy can approach but may not easily breach 5%. Yes
3 MODERATE ↑ UP article_search Analysts quoted in the GDP article said the economy 'remains on firm ground and is likely to accelerate in the coming months' after the Q4 2025 slowdown, suggesting a potential rebound in 2026. Yes
4 MODERATE ↑ UP article_search December 2025 unemployment fell to 4.4% from 4.6%, and ISM services PMI was stronger than expected, suggesting underlying economic resilience entering 2026. Yes
5 MODERATE ↑ UP article_search Major corporate earnings (Apple +16% revenue, Microsoft +16%, CrowdStrike +23%) suggest strong business conditions in late 2025/early 2026, a positive leading indicator. Yes
6 WEAK ↓ DOWN article_search Nike issued disappointing guidance and its stock is near 2015 lows, and S&P 500 is down ~4.6% YTD as of late March 2026, suggesting some economic/market headwinds in early 2026. Yes
7 MODERATE ↑ UP kalshi_data Kalshi prediction market currently prices the probability of GDP exceeding 5% in any quarter from Q1 2025–Q4 2028 at 59%, up ~4 points over 30 days and covering a range of 55–72% over 89 days. Yes
Information Gaps
  • No Q1 2026 GDP estimate or nowcast data found — critical given the question window begins in Q1 2025 and we are now in Q1 2026.
  • No data on whether Q1 or Q2 2025 GDP exceeded 5% (only Q3 2025 at 4.4% and Q4 2025 at 1.4% are mentioned).
  • No information on Fed policy trajectory or interest rate path for 2026–2028 that could constrain or enable high growth.
  • No data on fiscal policy outlook (government spending, tax changes) for 2026–2028.
  • No data on trade policy or tariff impacts on GDP for the forecast window.
  • No long-range GDP forecasts from the Fed, CBO, IMF, or major banks for 2026–2028.
  • Unclear whether the GDP metric refers to annualized quarterly growth (standard U.S. reporting) or raw quarter-over-quarter growth — resolution criteria ambiguity could matter.
  • No information on what caused the 6-week government shutdown in late 2025 or whether similar disruptions are expected.
Key Uncertainties
  • Whether 'quarterly GDP above 5%' refers to annualized rate (more achievable) or non-annualized QoQ (much harder to achieve, ~1.25% per quarter).
  • The long time horizon (Q1 2025–Q4 2028, roughly 16 quarters) increases the cumulative probability — even modest per-quarter probabilities compound significantly.
  • Historical precedent: the U.S. last achieved 5%+ annualized quarterly GDP in Q3 2023 (~4.9%) and briefly in pandemic rebound quarters (2021). Under 'normal' conditions it is rare.
  • Whether the Q4 2025 slowdown is temporary or signals a more persistent deceleration.
  • Potential for recession in 2026–2028 given rising tariff uncertainty and stock market weakness, which would reduce probability.
  • Potential for a rebound quarter (e.g., post-shutdown catch-up) that could spike growth above 5% temporarily.
  • Geopolitical or macro shock risk over a ~3-year window is substantial and could swing GDP in either direction.
Market Context
Price: 0.59 · 7d: +0.029 · 30d: +0.04
Volume: MODERATE · Depth: MEDIUM
Reliability: MEDIUM — moderate volume (~587 contracts/day), 89-day price history shows meaningful range (55–72%), suggesting genuine uncertainty and price discovery but not deep liquidity.
4. Independent Forecaster Opus · No market price Did NOT see market price
Independent estimate: 35% (40% confidence)
sq1: Will quarterly GDP be above 5% in any quarter in Q1 2025 to Q4 2028?
35%
**Base rate:** Assuming annualized quarterly GDP growth (standard U.S. BEA reporting), the U.S. has hit 5%+ annualized growth in only a handful of quarters in the post-2000 era. Notable instances: Q3 2014 (5.0%), Q2 2020 rebound (33.4%), Q3 2020 (33.1%), several 2021 quarters during pandemic recovery, and Q3 2023 came close at ~4.9%. In 'normal' non-pandemic/non-crisis-recovery periods, 5%+ quarters occur roughly once every 8-10 years, or about 1-2% per quarter probability. Over 16 quarters, this compounds to roughly 15-25% cumulative probability under normal conditions. **Evidence updates:** - Q3 2025 hit 4.4% annualized — very close to 5% but not over. This shows the economy CAN approach 5% in the current cycle. Pushes UP by ~5% from base rate because it demonstrates the plausibility. - Q4 2025 dropped to 1.4% due to government shutdown. This is a temporary drag, and post-shutdown catch-up effects could create a rebound quarter. Pushes UP slightly (~2%) for potential bounce-back dynamics, but also pushes DOWN (~3%) because it shows vulnerability to disruptions. - Q1 2025 and Q2 2025 GDP are not mentioned as exceeding 5%, so they likely didn't. This eliminates 2 of the 16 quarters. Pushes DOWN by ~2%. - Stock market weakness (-4.6% YTD) and tariff uncertainty in early 2026 suggest headwinds. Pushes DOWN by ~3%. - Strong corporate earnings and falling unemployment suggest resilience. Pushes UP by ~2%. - The long window (still ~12 quarters remaining from Q1 2026 to Q4 2028) provides many opportunities. Even at ~2-3% per quarter probability, cumulative P ≈ 1-(0.97)^12 ≈ 30%. **Key considerations:** - Post-shutdown rebound in Q1 2026 could produce elevated GDP, though government shutdowns typically have modest GDP effects. - Tariff-related front-loading of imports/spending could create volatile GDP prints — potentially spiking one quarter and crashing the next. - Recession risk over 2026-2028 is non-trivial (perhaps 25-35% cumulative), which would significantly reduce the chance of a 5%+ quarter (though post-recession recoveries can produce high growth). - The question only needs ONE quarter above 5%, which is a much lower bar than sustained high growth. **Synthesis:** Base rate for at least one 5%+ quarter over ~12 remaining quarters is roughly 25%. The proximity of Q3 2025 at 4.4% and potential for rebound/volatile quarters pushes this up modestly. Tariff uncertainty and market headwinds push it down. Net estimate: ~35%.
Show full reasoning trace
base rate: In the post-2000 era, U.S. quarterly annualized GDP exceeds 5% roughly 1-3% of quarters under non-crisis conditions. Over 16 quarters, cumulative probability is roughly 15-30%. The pandemic recovery period (2020-2021) showed multiple 5%+ quarters but those were exceptional circumstances.
evidence updates: Q3 2025 at 4.4% demonstrates proximity to threshold (+5%). Q4 2025 at 1.4% shows vulnerability but also sets up potential rebound (+2%, -3% net). Market weakness and tariff uncertainty (-3%). Corporate earnings strength and labor market resilience (+2%). Net adjustment from base ~25% to ~35%.
combination method: Single sub-question with 100% weight.
final: The 16-quarter window provides multiple opportunities for a 5%+ print. Q3 2025's 4.4% shows the economy can approach this level. However, current headwinds (tariffs, market weakness, post-shutdown drag) and the rarity of 5%+ growth in normal conditions constrain the probability. Post-shutdown catch-up, tariff front-loading dynamics, or a strong fiscal impulse could produce a one-off 5%+ quarter. Estimated at 35% with moderate uncertainty.
5. Devil's Advocate Sonnet Market price revealed
Missing Info Asymmetric Evidence Reasoning Flaw
Challenges
  1. The forecaster assumes Q1 and Q2 2025 GDP did not exceed 5% ('Q1 2025 and Q2 2025 GDP are not mentioned as exceeding 5%, so they likely didn't'), but explicitly flags this as an information gap. Q1 2025 actual GDP (advance estimate released April 2025) showed -0.3% annualized contraction due to tariff front-loading of imports. This is publicly available data the forecaster should have incorporated. The contraction itself is relevant because post-contraction rebounds can produce very high GDP prints — this is actually an upward factor that was missed.
  2. The per-quarter probability estimate of 2-3% for a 5%+ quarter seems too low given the historical record. Looking at 2000-2024 (roughly 100 quarters), we had 5%+ quarters in Q3 2003, Q3 2014, and multiple pandemic quarters (2020-2021). Even excluding pandemic quarters, including near-misses (Q3 2023 at 4.9%, Q3 2025 at 4.4%), the effective per-quarter probability in expansionary periods is arguably closer to 3-5%. The forecaster's own evidence shows Q3 2025 hit 4.4%, demonstrating the economy can approach 5% in current conditions.
  3. The forecaster underweights the tariff-driven GDP volatility scenario. Tariff front-loading dynamics (massive import surges followed by inventory drawdowns) can create enormous quarter-to-quarter GDP swings. If Q1 2025 saw a GDP contraction partly due to net export distortions from front-loaded imports, a subsequent quarter could see a sharp rebound as imports normalize and consumption/investment data catches up. This is precisely the kind of one-off spike that could push a single quarter above 5%.
  4. The forecaster identifies recession risk at 25-35% as primarily a downward factor, but notes parenthetically that 'post-recession recoveries can produce high growth.' This deserves much more weight. If a recession occurs during 2026-2027, the subsequent recovery quarter(s) in 2027-2028 would have elevated probability of exceeding 5%. Historically, post-recession rebounds are the most reliable producers of 5%+ quarters. The recession scenario should be modeled as having BOTH a period of reduced probability AND a subsequent period of significantly elevated probability.
  5. The 12-quarter cumulative probability calculation uses 1-(0.97)^12 ≈ 30%, but this assumes independence across quarters. In reality, GDP growth is serially correlated and subject to regime shifts. A volatile period (tariff wars, policy shifts, potential recession and recovery) actually increases the variance of quarterly GDP outcomes, which increases the probability of at least one extreme positive quarter. The independence assumption understates the true probability.
  6. The forecaster does not adequately consider fiscal policy dynamics. The 2025-2028 window includes potential tax legislation, infrastructure spending, and defense spending changes that could produce fiscal impulses. The 2017 tax cuts produced elevated growth in 2018. Similar dynamics are plausible in the forecast window, especially if there's stimulus in response to tariff-induced slowdown.
Suggested adjustment: +12pp
The forecaster systematically underweights upward factors: (1) post-contraction rebound dynamics from Q1 2025's negative GDP print, (2) tariff-induced GDP volatility creating potential spike quarters, (3) the asymmetric effect of recession risk (which increases variance and thus the probability of at least one 5%+ quarter during recovery), and (4) serial correlation/regime-switching dynamics that make the independence assumption conservative. The per-quarter probability in the current volatile policy environment is likely higher than the 2-3% assumed. Adjusting to approximately 0.47 better reflects these factors.
Market comparison: Forecaster: 35%, Market: 59%. The 24-percentage-point divergence is substantial. The market appears to be pricing in higher GDP volatility and rebound dynamics that the forecaster underweights. While the market is only medium reliability, the forecaster's reasoning has genuine gaps — particularly the missed Q1 2025 GDP contraction data, the underweighting of post-contraction rebound potential, and the conservative per-quarter probability estimate. The divergence is partially but not fully justified by these reasoning flaws; some portion may reflect information the forecaster lacks about fiscal/trade policy developments.
6. Final Forecast Opus
50% (40% confidence)
My independent estimate of 35% had several genuine gaps identified by the critique. I ACCEPT Challenge 1: Q1 2025's -0.3% contraction (which I should have incorporated) sets up a classic post-contraction rebound scenario that elevates the probability of a 5%+ quarter in subsequent periods. I ACCEPT Challenge 3: tariff-driven import front-loading creates enormous quarter-to-quarter GDP volatility — the kind that produces one-off spike quarters. I PARTIALLY ACCEPT Challenge 4: recession risk is genuinely asymmetric here since we need only ONE quarter above 5%, and post-recession rebounds are historically the most reliable producers of 5%+ prints (Q3 2020 being the extreme example). I PARTIALLY ACCEPT Challenge 2, raising my per-quarter probability from 2-3% to roughly 3-5% given current volatility. However, I don't go all the way to the market's 59% because: (a) even with elevated volatility, 5%+ annualized growth remains genuinely rare in non-pandemic conditions — only ~3-4 quarters in 2000-2019; (b) the Q1 2025 contraction was mild (-0.3%), limiting rebound magnitude compared to the 2020 collapse; (c) tariff uncertainty may produce sustained drag rather than a sharp V-shaped recovery. The market at 59% may be overweighting dramatic rebound scenarios or reflecting information about fiscal stimulus plans I lack. I move substantially from 35% toward the market but maintain a discount given the historical rarity of 5%+ quarters outside extreme pandemic rebounds.
7. Entry Decision Opus Trader
Side
NO
Position Size
$500
Contracts
1220
Trader Confidence
40%
Trade Rationale
The forecaster estimates 50% probability versus the market's 59%, giving a 9% edge on the NO side. However, the forecaster confidence is quite low at 0.40, and the forecast itself moved significantly from an independent estimate of 35% toward the market price after accepting several critique points. The 1027-day horizon introduces substantial uncertainty — a lot can happen over 15 remaining quarters. The edge is real but modest given the low confidence and long timeframe. Historical rarity of 5%+ GDP quarters outside pandemic conditions supports the NO side, but the market may be pricing in tail scenarios (recession-rebound, fiscal stimulus) that are hard to dismiss over nearly 3 years.
Allocation Logic
Minimum position size of $500 given the combination of low forecaster confidence (0.40), borderline edge magnitude (~9%), and very long time horizon. The Devil's Advocate flags (missing_info, asymmetric_evidence) further warrant conservatism.
Entry price: $0.41
Current: $0.41
Status: OPEN
P&L: $0.00
Pipeline Timing
StepTime
Planning 28.25s
Research 0.18s
Synthesis 28.57s
Forecaster 24.45s
Critic 27.44s
Final 14.2s